The US Marine Corps is trying to figure out how to sort out friendly and enemy drones in battle
The Marine Corps is learning to fight with uncrewed aerial systems, and there's a lot to figure out. One Marine Corps leader said the potential for confusion on cluttered future battlefields "haunts" his dreams.
"Knowing what's good guys versus bad guys, knowing what to kill and not to kill," that sort of thing "haunts my dreams," Col. Sean Hoewing, the director of the Marine Corps' Capabilities Development Directorate's Aviation Combat Element, said last week at the big annual Modern Day Marine expo in Washington, DC.
The push to develop counter-UAS capabilities coincides with the service's efforts to develop its offensive capabilities.
The service has established a new Attack Drone Team and aims to replicate it across the Corps, using competition to mimic the stressors of combat. It's also set up UAS advisory councils to accelerate feedback from troops on the ground to senior leaders in the Pentagon who can field requests to industry partners.
Drones are quickly becoming a top priority, especially as the world watches what how drone warfare unfolds in Ukraine.
In future fights, Marines will need to be able to identify not only friendly or enemy UAS systems with lethal payloads but also systems like logistics resupply drones and maybe even casualty evacuation drones, which could create new concerns around the identification of medical UAS systems for wounded enemy combatants, which are protected by the Geneva Conventions.
Friendly and enemy identification of drones has become increasingly important in Ukraine, where one Ukrainian drone operator previously told Business Insider that it is not uncommon for troops to end up jamming everything nearby in a "cluttered battlespace."
Combat footage from the front lines in Ukraine has highlighted the confusion that can quickly arise from drones. In the chaos of battle, it can be difficult to figure out which quadcopter is friendly and which may soon be dropping grenades overhead.
Col. Scott Cuomo, the commander of the service's Weapons Training Battalion and the new Attack Drone Team, envisions a not-so-distant future for Marines in which UAS identification demands will force troops to drill down on strict airspace deconfliction procedures.
"Someone's going to do the fires coordination, just like we've always done," Cuomo said, referring to the practices of ensuring strikes from aircraft, artillery, or other weapons can occur without harming friendly forces. "So there's a lot of just building on what we've done in the past," he said.
What might that approach include in practice? When a Marine sends out a UAS with a payload on it, "you're going to tell someone that you're going to do that," Cuomo said, referring to detailed fires coordination between infantry units and their command centers.
Friend-or-foe identification is far from the only challenge of battlefield drone operations. Both Ukraine and Russia have been forced to grapple with tremendous drone losses, not only to one-way attacks but also to electronic warfare.
A reluctance to squander too many UAS systems may add more complexity to UAS identification concerns. "We can't necessarily take the approach that it's okay if we lose 40% of our stuff," Hoewing added. "That's not going to work for the Marine Corps."
Loss of equipment is anathema to Marines, who treat equipment accountability as an immovable tenet. That may contradict the lessons from Ukraine though, where cheap drones are considered expendable and used as individual rounds of ammunition.
There is a lot to sort out, but the only way Marines will be able to iron out the pains of such complicated UAS oversight will be more sets and reps, Cuomo said. "Just give it to the Marines, and then figure out the training."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
France to produce drones in Ukraine, minister says
French automotive and defense companies will produce drones on Ukrainian soil, French Defense Minister Sebastien Lecornu announced on June 6, Le Monde reported. "We are going to embark on a completely unprecedented partnership where a large French car company – I won't name it because it's up to them to announce it – will join forces with a French defense SME (small to medium-sized enterprise) to equip production lines in Ukraine to be able to produce drones," Lecornu said, as quoted by the newspaper. Lecornu did not specify the types of drones to be produced. He said that, apart from Ukraine, the drones will be also provided "to our own armies… to have ongoing tactical and operational training that reflects the reality." Lecornu also said there is "no need" to send French citizens to work on the production line, since it will be set up in Ukraine, where Ukrainians "are better than us at designing drones and especially at developing the strategies that accompany them." Since the start of the full-scale invasion, Ukraine has been developing and deploying technological innovations and cutting-edge unmanned systems. Both Ukraine and Russia have increasingly relied on drone warfare, using aerial, naval, and ground-based drones for reconnaissance and combat missions. In late March, presidential advisor Alexander Kamyshin said in an interview with Radio Khartia that Ukrainian manufacturers had the capacity to produce over 5 million FPV drones per year. Read also: Ukraine war latest: Russia hits Ukraine with large-scale attack days after Operation Spiderweb; Ukraine targets Russian air bases in 'preemptive strike' We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Grand Forks Mayor Brandon Bochenski: HIVE 'far ahead of schedule'
Jun. 7—GRAND FORKS — The Grand Forks HIVE building is expected to generate nearly $400,000 in revenue this year before additional contributions from the Grand Forks Jobs Development Authority, less than the $515,000 in expected expenditures for the year. And while originally not a fan of the purchase, Grand Forks Mayor Brandon Bochenski said the transformation of the former Grand Forks Herald building into a tech accelerator and unmanned aircraft system industry hub has made the facility a worthwhile investment. A $1.1 million grant from the U.S. Economic Development Administration was "the hinge" for Bochenski, he said, allowing the building to move forward as a UAS-specific tech accelerator. "All of that came to fruition, so I think we've gotten the most out of the building," said Bochenski, who was not mayor when the city negotiated for the building's purchase. A profit wasn't expected, said Bochenski, who believes the amount of business growth the facility drives outweighs the cost of investment. "When you're growing something like this that's unique that nobody else across the country has, it's going to take time to get there," Bochenski said. "But I would say we're far ahead of schedule." The building has been owned by the Jobs Development Authority since 2019, when the organization purchased it from Forum Communications for $2.75 million. The gap between what the building earns and what it costs to run has shrunk since the city finished the first phase of renovations in 2023. The JDA has contributed between $260,000 to $391,000 a year for the operations since the building became the HIVE, an acronym for Hybrid Innovation Venture Engine. Earlier this spring, the JDA — comprised of members of the Grand Forks City Council and the mayor — voted to open a request for qualifications for a company to take over the management of the tech accelerator and building. Part of the qualification advertisement is to determine how much third-party management would cost — since there isn't a good analogous example from which to pull from — and potentially bring programming to the facility that the JDA is unable to. "Because the UAS industry is changing so rapidly, to keep up, we do think it's a good time to look at a third-party management company for the HIVE," city human resources manager Haley Rosaasen, who helps with operational management of the HIVE, told the JDA on April 7. "After taking a look at other accelerators, seeing how we're performing, we are trending in the right direction financially." The city first announced it would purchase the building six years ago, in April 2019. The original idea was to use it for city offices and house other offices for political entities, but that changed when Bochenski took office in 2020. After the JDA received the $1.1 million grant from the United States Economic Development Administration, it began to renovate the building into a tech accelerator to support technology and unmanned aircraft system start-up companies. While originally geared toward helping start-ups, the HIVE's mission has evolved to focus more on scale-ups rather than true start-ups. The JDA has spent $4.1 million on renovating the structure, which was built after the Flood of 1997 in 1998. The JDA, while comprised of city leadership and related to the city, is a distinct financial and legal entity, separate from the municipal corporation that is the city of Grand Forks. Its funds come from economic development dollars from sales tax earnings and rental income from other JDA-owned buildings . The funds to buy and renovate the HIVE building came from JDA cash reserves and the $1.1 million grant from the EDA. The first phase of renovations was completed in spring 2023 , and the second is now wrapping up. The renovations allowed the JDA to rent out some portions of the building traditionally and other portions as a coworking space model with memberships. The Herald moved from the HIVE to a south-side office building in 2023. The entirety of the structure is 32,000 square feet, with around 12,350 square feet of leaseable space. Most of that space is under lease, with only around 2,800 square feet — or about 23% — currently available. The building is estimated to generate around $148,000 a year in rent from its tenants, including: * Grand Forks Region Economic Development Corporation: 2,900 square feet at $3,153.92 monthly. * Meadowlark Aircraft: the company rents two spaces in the building billed separately. One 910 square foot space for $1,562.17 monthly and another 1,270 square foot space for $2,180.17 monthly. * Praxis Strategy Group: 1,150 square feet for $1,974.17 monthly. * Thread: 2,068 square feet for $1,947 monthly. * GrandSky: 705 square feet for $1,175 monthly. * XTI Aerospace: 525 square feet for $875 monthly. In total, those rental figures equal approximately $154,000. The variance between the $148,000 annual estimate and the potential $154,000 — the sum of all contracts over the year — is due to the way the JDA budgets and the nature of how rental contracts work at the HIVE. Companies can leave or join midway through the year since leases are generally month-to-month. The HIVE also has a fair amount of flex and meeting space. The "bullpen" is 1,950 square feet of flexible office space. Those who use it pay memberships to the HIVE, but don't necessarily have formal leases with the JDA. The HIVE offers three tiers of membership. Tier 1 includes use of the flexible office spaces in the bullpen, use of building services, and participation in member events. Tier 2 includes all tier one features and exclusive use of an office. Tier 3 is mainly reserved for those with formal leases and includes all features of Tier 1, minus use of the bullpen, and serves akin to a common area maintenance fee common in many commercial leases elsewhere. There are 22 companies overall that have memberships (including the six with leases) according to revenue records, and the JDA is estimating $180,600 in membership revenue in 2025. With an additional $53,000 expected in naming rights and sponsorships — $3,000 from general donors, $4,000 from a partnership with O'Leary Ventures and $46,000 in future, yet unrealized, opportunities — the total expected revenue in 2025 is $396,968, before the JDA's contribution. The roughly $118,000 that the JDA will contribute to the building is 4.7% of the budgeted $2.5 million in local sales tax revenue dedicated to economic development in 2025, or 0.35% of the total expected $33.5 million in sales tax collections for 2025. What the future has for the facility will likely be informed by the outcome of the management proposal, for which the city is now advertising. The building's operations require around one and a quarter staff to operate, much less than the typical six to seven for facilities like this, according to Bochenski. Under the proposed timeline, proposals were due to the JDA by May 9 with review occurring throughout the month. After that, it likely will come to the Growth Fund Committee and the JDA sometime in the middle of summer. "We're unsure of who would quite apply for it," Rosaasen said. "... We are looking for somebody who has UAS knowledge, so it's going to be a tight market."
New York Times
2 days ago
- New York Times
How to Take Incredible Underwater Photos Like a Pro Photographer
When you're diving, the water around you filters light — but not evenly. As you descend, red wavelengths disappear first, followed by orange and yellow. Soon, all you have left are greens and blues. Most recreational dives are shallow enough that you'll still be able to capture some oranges and yellows, but after 15 feet or so you have very little red. And that's the best-case scenario, on a sunny day when the water is clear; murky water, cold water, and overcast days all create unique lighting challenges. The result is that your images right out of the camera will typically be far less vibrant than the inspo you've likely seen on social media. If you've been dazzled by underwater photos with vibrant oranges and reds, what you've seen is either the results of a very shallow dive or the product of the photographer's bringing their own lights underwater. Avoid: Color filters Color filters that you mount in front of your camera's lens can serve as a bridge between bringing your own lights and getting enough from the sun. Typically these lights are red, orange, or magenta for underwater use, but they don't add red, orange, or magenta light — instead, they reduce green and blue light. The camera tries to compensate by letting in more light so that there's more red, orange, or magenta than there otherwise would have been. However, I'm not a fan of using these lights, for several reasons. First, doing so darkens the overall image and forces the camera to compensate by increasing the ISO sensitivity, shutter speed, and/or the aperture setting to let in more light; that process tends to reduce overall image quality. In addition, these filters work only at some depths and lighting conditions. So, although filters can help, editing is a better, more flexible fix for beginners. Use: Editing software Virtually all underwater photos you see online have been edited. Generally, they have been brightened, and the colors have been adjusted to make them look a little more natural. Editing is entirely optional, of course, and many of my favorite underwater photos that I've taken haven't been messed with much, if at all. But when you're 50 feet under the sea, the world is blue and green. Editing the images you capture to add reds, oranges, and yellows may make them less 'realistic,' but the result is often more pleasing and interesting to a viewer. Ultimately, there's no right or wrong answer as to how much editing is too much. If you're handy at photo editing, you can use Adobe Photoshop, Lightroom, or Premiere Pro — or any of the many free photo and video alternatives. These four versions of the same image demonstrate how underwater photos can look with different color adjustments. The first is direct from the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro. The second was edited in the DJI app. The third is the result from AquaColorFix, and the last is my own edit in Photoshop. The first photo is the most 'true to life' in that it's what you actually see when you're underwater. It isn't the most interesting photo, however. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter These four versions of the same image demonstrate how underwater photos can look with different color adjustments. The first is direct from the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro. The second was edited in the DJI app. The third is the result from AquaColorFix, and the last is my own edit in Photoshop. The first photo is the most 'true to life' in that it's what you actually see when you're underwater. It isn't the most interesting photo, however. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter These four versions of the same image demonstrate how underwater photos can look with different color adjustments. The first is direct from the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro. The second was edited in the DJI app. The third is the result from AquaColorFix, and the last is my own edit in Photoshop. The first photo is the most 'true to life' in that it's what you actually see when you're underwater. It isn't the most interesting photo, however. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter These four versions of the same image demonstrate how underwater photos can look with different color adjustments. The first is direct from the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro. The second was edited in the DJI app. The third is the result from AquaColorFix, and the last is my own edit in Photoshop. The first photo is the most 'true to life' in that it's what you actually see when you're underwater. It isn't the most interesting photo, however. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter These four versions of the same image demonstrate how underwater photos can look with different color adjustments. The first is direct from the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro. The second was edited in the DJI app. The third is the result from AquaColorFix, and the last is my own edit in Photoshop. The first photo is the most 'true to life' in that it's what you actually see when you're underwater. It isn't the most interesting photo, however. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter In addition, the apps created by action cam manufacturers — such as DJI's Mimo app (iOS, Android via APK only), Insta360's desktop and mobile app (iOS, Android), and GoPro's Quik app (iOS, Android) — have filters to improve the colors of underwater footage from their various cameras. CapCut, our pick for the best third-party video editing app, doesn't have a specific filter for underwater footage but does include the tools you need to fix the colors yourself. But if you don't want to mess with adjustment sliders yourself, consider AquaColorFix (iOS, Android). This automated color-correction app is simple to use and does a great job. It also has traditional image adjustments, as a standard photo editor does. The free version works only with photos and adds watermarks, while the paid version removes the watermarks and also works with video. At this writing, it costs $25 as a one-time purchase, $10 per year, or $3 per month. AquaColorFix makes the colors more visually interesting with just a few taps. There's no singular 'right' way to do photo editing; more elaborate photo editing software, such as Photoshop, will let you do more but at a higher cost in both money and time. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter Another solid option is the Dive+ app (iOS, Android) which has additional social and location-guide features. The free version has a watermark and a limit to how many images and videos you can color-correct per day. The paid version costs $24 per year or $4 per month at this writing. Avoid: LED lights It's possible to add red and orange back into images by bringing your own lighting. You can find rigs that add small LED lights and strobes to everything from action cameras to more elaborate camera setups. But you don't need lights for good underwater photography, and for most people they would be more trouble than they're worth. They add cost and complexity, and even the smallest rigs are bulkier than just the camera itself. Yes, they can absolutely help you get some epic shots, but they're effective only within a short distance from the camera — roughly 3 to 10 feet, give or take a few feet depending on the situation. You shouldn't consider adding lights to your camera before you are extremely comfortable and experienced with both diving and underwater photography.
