logo
Ibtisam Azem: 'The reality that Palestinians live in goes beyond any dystopia'

Ibtisam Azem: 'The reality that Palestinians live in goes beyond any dystopia'

Hindustan Times06-05-2025
What was the genesis of the novel's central theme? Author Ibtisam Azem (Courtesy the subject)
The main theme is the disappearance of Palestinians from all of historic Palestine and the way Israeli society, like any settler colonial society, will deal with and react to the disappearance of this 'enemy.' However, as a Palestinian writer, I did not want my novel to be consumed solely with how to deconstruct the founding myths of a colonial society. I also wanted to centre the Palestinian narrative through Alaa's journal and his grandmother's stories. The novel is engaged with the choices that characters make and it tries to explore the psychology of colonialism. It also holds a mirror to historical events in which the majority of Palestinians, more than 750,000, were ethnically cleansed during the Nakba in 1948. And the destruction of more than 500 Palestinian villages and the depopulating of most of the coastal cities. The novel deals with the effects of all of this on the lives of people. The other side of the mirror was merely a warning over similar and possible future scenarios. Anyone who looks deeply into Israeli policies since the Nakba, will see that it is ongoing. 'A silent Nakba' is what I call the confiscation of land, successive wars and massacres and so on.
I also wanted to centre the destruction of Palestinian cities, particularly coastal cities, because more than 11 of them were depopulated. Jaffa was the most important and its population had reached almost 100,000 Palestinians. But after the Nakba its population was reduced to 4000. Jaffa is also a character in the novel, as opposed to Tel Aviv, the colonial city. Before the Nakba, Jaffa was one of the most important Palestinian cities. It was the centre of economy, culture and trade with a history that goes back thousands of years. The grandmother's character in the book is inspired by stories I heard from my own maternal grandmother who was forced out of Jaffa during the Nakba. But this is not an autobiographical novel. I did not grow up in Jaffa. I grew up in a small town 30 kilometers north of Jaffa called al-Taibe, to which my grandmother and mother, when she was a year old, were displaced. So, I did not grow up in Jaffa, but Jaffa grew inside me because of my grandmother's stories and our visits to the city and the centrality of displacement to our lives. 248pp, ₹1747; Syracuse University Press
What was the idea behind contrasting narratives as depicted through the friendship between the central characters of the young Palestinian man Alaa and his Jewish neighbour and journalist Ariel? How does it reflect the tensions between collective identity and personal memory in the context of the Palestine-Israeli conflict?
There are many Palestinian and Israeli characters in the novel that have different intellectual and poetical leanings. With Ariel, I wanted a liberal character to highlight the double standards of that group that might be against the occupation of 1967 areas, but don't question the founding myth of Israel as an empty land. Ariel represents the silent majority that allows and accepts crimes to be committed in its name. Their friendship is lacking as it is missing the most important part: equality. Alaa and Ariel exist in a historical and geographic context and their relationship both as individuals and members of collectives, is governed by colonial power. coloniser and colonized.
Was it challenging to authentically inhabit the character and themes explored particularly through Ariel's character, shown as a liberal Zionist critical of his country's military occupation and yet loyal to the Israeli national project?
There are always challenges in creative writing. Writing about a character whose politics I don't agree with is a challenge and requires setting aside the writer's ego and personal opinions in order to make sure the character is multidimensional and not superficial. But I should say that writing about a character one loves is also challenging. There is the possible trap of mythologizing. It is important in writing to reveal the complexity of inner worlds without necessarily passing judgment but letting the reader decide how they want to deal with the characters.
It is true that I live in New York, but I was raised and studied over there and my family still lives there. I have also known Israeli society very well. Before studying in Germany and the US, I studied at the Hebrew university in Jerusalem. Although our schools were Palestinian, the curriculum was controlled by Israel and most of the Hebrew literature we studied was Zionist. What we studied was governed by the perspective of the Israeli government. So, my knowledge of the world and society in which Israeli characters live was based on both personal experience and my studies and not based on theory or detached knowledge. So, writing Ariel as a character was a challenge like any other.
Ariel's behaviour reveals the inability or unwillingness of the coloniser to deal with his colonial past. If he were to do so, he would question many of the constants of Israeli society, including what it means to exist on stolen land. The coloniser claims that he wants to look at the future and accuses the colonized of being consumed with the past. But reality is quite the opposite. The colonized is engaged with the past because he wants to change the present and does not want the past to be repeated again. He wants to create a better world. I hope that a day will come when the Nakba is just 'a memory,' but we are very far from that. The coloniser refuses to dismantle the founding myth and thus refuses to build the future that is different from the past he created
The memories of Alaa's grandmother are central to the novel. What is the significance of such intergenerational story telling in preserving Palestinian identity?
Memory, as Alaa says in the novel, is the last lifeline. It is also a form of resistance against the coloniser's constant attempts to control collective memory and change history. The novel tries, on various levels, to centre and revive oral history and zoom in on the stories of survivors and accentuate them. Oral memory and history have always been a resource for colonized societies to resist cultural erasure and extinction. The novel chronicles survivor narratives so that they go on beyond individuals to be a counter and alternative history to official history.
The grandmother in the novel is a thread linking the past, that lives on despite visceral attempts to marginalize it, and a present and a future for coming generations to that resist amnesia. The dominant narrative in the West which adopts the official Israeli narrative, deals with the genocidal war as if it started on October 7th. But this is part of a long series of continuous wars against Palestine and Palestinians. The majority of the people who live in Gaza are refugees or descendants of refugees from the first Nakba in 1948.
The novel was written and published in 2014. How do you see the relevance and reception of the novel post the October 7, 2023 attacks and their aftermath?
The reality that Palestinians live in, particularly in Gaza, goes beyond any dystopia. Since the beginning of this genocidal war, I have lost the sense of time. I think we will need a very long time to read carefully what is written and what will be written. I'm focusing now on using any platform to talk about and shed light on the injustice that is befalling my people. I hope that literature and culture and art in general give more space to understand the lives of Palestinians from their perspective.
What are some other speculative fiction titles by Palestinians that you would recommend?
The landscape of Palestinian literature is quite extensive and rich and goes beyond what is written in Arabic. There's Palestinian literature written in other languages as well and it's difficult to keep up. What comes to mind is Emile Habiby's The Secret Life of Saeed: The Pessoptimist and Palestine + 100, an anthology published by Comma press in the UK and edited by Basma Ghalayini.
Tell us about your collaboration with the English translator of the novel. How did Sinan Antoon go about preserving the cultural nuances, the speculative aspects, and emotional depth of the original Arabic text?
Literary translation is its own individual creative process. Sometimes there is author cooperation if need be. In this case, there wasn't. Sinan Antoon is a novelist, poet, and translator who has translated the works of the Palestinian poet Mahmoud Darwish and the Iraqi poet Saadi Yusuf, in addition to his own works. He knew the text and its complexities intimately and he knew the target language and culture.
I read the drafts of the translation and loved it, but the translation was his work. Sinan happens to be my partner and my first reader, and he was aware of the various stages of writing the novel. I should say that unfortunately literary translation from the global South doesn't always get the attention it deserves from publishers and it always takes much longer to recognize. Small independent publishers and university presses carry the burden.
What did being longlisted for the International Booker Prize mean in terms of the larger discussions on displacement, identity and memory in the Israel Palestine context?
Being longlisted for the International Booker Prize impacted the novel's reception and made sure it reached a wider readership. Prizes play an important role in promoting literary works. I am grateful. I wish for the reader to approach the novel as a literary work and judge it on its artistic merits.
Majid Maqbool is an independent journalist based in Kashmir.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel-Hamas war: IDF kills Nasser Musa, ‘key' terrorist in Hamas Rafah Brigade, in Khan Yunis strike
Israel-Hamas war: IDF kills Nasser Musa, ‘key' terrorist in Hamas Rafah Brigade, in Khan Yunis strike

Mint

timea minute ago

  • Mint

Israel-Hamas war: IDF kills Nasser Musa, ‘key' terrorist in Hamas Rafah Brigade, in Khan Yunis strike

Amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas war, the Israel Defence Forces on Friday said thar they have struck and killed Nasser Musa, a key operative in Hamas's Rafah Brigade, in the Khan Yunis area on 9 August, reported The Jerusalem Post. In a joint statement, the IDF and Shin Bet stated that the IDF led by the Southern Command, struck 'key' operative in Hamas's Rafah Brigade. According to the statement, Musa served as head of Hamas's military control department and was responsible for the readiness and training of operatives in the brigade. Taking to X, IDF wrote, "ELIMINATED: Nasser Musa, Head of Hamas' Military Control Department in the Rafah Brigade, was struck and eliminated by the IDF & ISA in Khan Yunis." "Musa was responsible for the Rafah Brigade's operational readiness & attacks during the war, and was a close associate of the brigade's commander, Mohammad Sabaneh who was eliminated in May 2025," they added. These brigade use to plan and carry out terror activity against IDF forces and Israeli civilians during the war. Musa was a close associate of Muhammed Shabana, the Rafah Brigade commander who was killed in May 2025, the statement added. He held multiple roles in the Rafah Brigade which include military intelligence officer and head of the observation network, the report added. The IDF also stated that with the killing of Musa, the Hamas's ability to carry out terror activity against IDF troops has declined. The IDF on Thursday said that they attacked several underground routes of the Hezbollah terrorist organisation in South Lebanon. "The presence of the infrastructure that was attacked was a violation of the understandings between Israel and Lebanon," ANI quoted the IDF as saying. The Upper Galilee Regional Council reported that a series of attacks began in the Lebanese sector, with an emphasis on the eastern sector, as part of what it called "enforcement efforts."

How to win at foreign policy
How to win at foreign policy

Hindustan Times

time3 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

How to win at foreign policy

WHEN DONALD TRUMP meets Vladimir Putin in Alaska it will be the seventh time the two have talked in person. This time is different, though. Since their last sit-down, Mr Putin has launched an unprovoked war, lost perhaps a million Russian soldiers (dead and wounded) and inflicted ceaseless misery on Ukrainians in pursuit of an imperial dream. Undaunted, Mr Trump hopes to get in a room with a wily dictator, feel him out and forge a deal. It is the biggest test yet of his uniquely personal style of diplomacy. It is also a reminder of how unpredictable American foreign policy has become. Will Mr Trump be firm, making clear that America and its allies will do what it takes to guarantee Ukraine's sovereignty? Or will he be in such a rush to reopen business with Russia that he rewards its aggression and leaves Ukraine vulnerable to future attacks? As everyone clamours for the president's ear, no one knows what he will do. At the beginning of Mr Trump's second term his supporters had a theory about how he would wield American power. Rather than relying on deep relationships and expertise, he would rely on his gut. As a master negotiator with a knack for sensing what others want and fear, he would cut through the waffle and apply pressure ruthlessly. Everyone wants access to American markets. By threatening to shut them out, he would force recalcitrant foreigners to end wars and reset the terms of trade to America's advantage. Career diplomats and experts would be replaced by rainmakers. Yes, his transactional approach might foster a bit of corruption. But if it brought peace in Ukraine or Gaza, who cared? Alas, there are drawbacks to this approach. Using tariffs as a weapon hurts America, too. More fundamentally, junking universal principles for might-makes-right repels friends without necessarily cowing foes. And the substitution of presidential whim for any coherent theory of international relations makes geopolitics less predictable and more dangerous. Mr Trump is not a globalist, obviously. Nor is he an isolationist, or a believer in regional spheres of influence. He simply does what he wants, which changes frequently. One way to make sense of Trumpism is that he divides his efforts at dealmaking into three categories: high, medium and low stakes. In the first category are America's relations with unfriendly great powers, principally China and Russia. Israel is here, too, because of its importance in American domestic politics. Iran makes an appearance, because of the way it threatens its neighbours. All these relationships are complex, difficult and matter a lot to Mr Trump. If he scores a win here—if he ends the war in Ukraine, or brings peace between Israel and the Palestinians, or finds a formula for co-operating with China without endangering national security—then the pay-off is potentially staggering. In the medium-stakes category Mr Trump puts Brazil, South Africa and, oddly, giant India. These are important countries that both America and China want in their camp. In most cases, their values are far closer to America's than to China's. Ties with them ought to be win-win. But they are unwilling to be bossed around, and take offence when Mr Trump insults or tries to bully them. The small stakes, for Mr Trump, are in small or poor countries. A superpower can wield great influence over such places, sometimes to good ends. Mr Trump helped cement a peace deal between Azerbaijan and Armenia, for example, and brokered a truce between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda. These are welcome achievements. Azerbaijan and Armenia had been fighting for 35 years. Mr Trump mediated a reopening of trade and transport links. The fruits may include a weakening of Russian influence in the area. The Congo-Rwanda deal is much shakier—Rwandan-backed rebels have violated it repeatedly—but not nothing. And there may be an upside for America, in the form of mineral deals. When it comes to medium-size stakes, Mr Trump's method works less well. He has started needless feuds with the leaders of Brazil (because it is prosecuting a Trumpy ex-president for allegedly attempting a coup), with South Africa (because he believes, wrongly, that it is persecuting whites) and with India (infuriating its prime minister with painful tariffs and undiplomatic boasting). The result? India will draw closer to Russia again, and be less inclined to act as a counterweight against China. Brazil and South Africa see China as a more reliable partner than America. Mr Trump has won headlines that play well with his most ardent supporters. But America has lost out. And when it comes to the highest stakes, the president is floundering. He has tried to coerce China with tariffs, but it is fighting back. This week Mr Trump blinked and extended another deadline. He also undermined his own national-security policy by lifting a ban on exports of Nvidia chips to China, while insisting that Uncle Sam gets a 15% cut. On Ukraine, he has been wildly inconsistent, one day blaming it for having been invaded and threatening to cut military aid, then accusing Mr Putin of bad faith and threatening stiffer sanctions on Russia. On Israel, he has consistently given Binyamin Netanyahu everything he wants and extracted nothing in return. If Mr Trump's bombing of Iran's nuclear sites made Israel safer, well and good. But he has failed to use his leverage to restrain Israel's unending war in Gaza. The world is flattery Other countries are learning how to play Mr Trump. A crypto deal and a nomination for a Nobel peace prize worked for Pakistan. A plane helped Qatar. The corruption is turning out to be as bad as almost anyone feared; the great deals have yet to materialise. Those who say Mr Trump is looking out for his own interests, not America's, have plenty of ammunition. All this is only a preliminary judgment. If Mr Trump stands up to Mr Putin this week, perhaps he can make his greatest-ever deal, ending Europe's worst war since 1945. Sadly, the odds are against it. For subscribers only: to see how we design each week's cover, sign up to our weekly Cover Story newsletter.

Best chapters of India-Israel partnership still lie ahead, says Netanyahu
Best chapters of India-Israel partnership still lie ahead, says Netanyahu

Business Standard

time3 hours ago

  • Business Standard

Best chapters of India-Israel partnership still lie ahead, says Netanyahu

Israeli President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Friday extended warm wishes on India's Independence Day calling for strengthening the flourishing ties and emphasising that the best chapters on bilateral ties still lie ahead. Sending his heartfelt greetings to President Droupadi Murmu and all the people of India, Herzog took to X to say: Your friendship with Israel in these difficult days strengthens us deeply. May the bond between our nations continue to flourish and may we soon see the safe return of all our hostages. Congratulating India and dear friend Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Independence Day, Netanyahu said Israel and India are two proud democracies, bound by history, innovation, and friendship. Our nations have achieved much together and the best chapters of our partnership still lie ahead, Netanyahu wrote in a message on X. Amir Ohana, who in 2023 became the first Speaker of the Israeli Knesset (Parliament) to visit India, also took to X posting a message in Hindi congratulating his counterpart, Om Birla, and Indians on the occasion. Earlier on Friday, India's Ambassador to Israel, JP Singh, hoisted the tricolor to celebrate India's 79th Independence Day in the presence of about 350 people from the Indian community. In his address, Singh emphasised on efforts to deepen our strategic relationship as one team India. Israel is home to about 40,000 Indians. I can see the warmth Israelis have for Indians. In particular, they are very appreciative of our workforce and our caregivers, Singh pointed out, in an apparent reference to the massive Indian workforce employed by Israel to deal with an acute shortage of workers in various sectors. He also thanked the Indian Jewish community for being a powerful bridge between the two nations. People from the Indian community and Jews of Indian origin turned up from all over Israel to celebrate Independence Day. Several people turned up at the Cricket club in the southern city of Beersheba, braving a heat wave, to celebrate India's Independence Day. We have lived in Israel since our childhood but have not forgotten our Indian roots. We still hold the cultural values alive and never forget that it was the only country where Jews never faced anti-semitism. We are proud of our Indian origin, chairman of Beersheba Cricket Club Naor Gudker told PTI.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store