logo
San Diego's final budget draws criticism over cuts to Humane Society, libraries

San Diego's final budget draws criticism over cuts to Humane Society, libraries

Yahoo17-05-2025
SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — Organizations hit by cuts in San Diego's final proposed budget for 2026 are warning of consequences for the communities they serve.
The mayor says tough choices need to be made to close the city's roughly quarter-of-a-billion-dollar deficit, but some want him to reconsider his final budget plan.
'That's not really fair because it cuts off a lot of activities for kids and free time that parents need from the kids,' said library-goer Daniel Gomez.
Library-goers like Daniel Gomez are criticizing Mayor Todd Gloria's plans to reduce hours and programming at San Diego libraries.
A more than $8 million funding cut in the city's final budget proposal for next fiscal year is to blame.
As early as July, San Diegans could see all 37 locations closed Sundays and Mondays losing access to a range of resources.
'It leaves me to find places to get WiFi for free or a silent place or somewhere to get books so I really do not have an alternative,' Gomez said.
Others say having free public services makes a real financial difference for community members.
'One of my friends was being told she's going to have to pay a couple thousand dollars to fix her car and there was all these problems and between online and going to the library she figured out how to do it herself and it cost her like $70 in parts and she did it herself,' said library-goer Robert Lawson-Owens.
The CEO of the Library Foundation SD released a statement that reads in part, 'I am disappointed the City of San Diego is unable to find alternatives to across-the-board cuts…I continue to urge city leaders to commit to building sustainable revenue streams that will safeguard the San Diego public library.'
The city is restoring some of the San Diego Humane Society's funding after initially planning a $3.5 million cut for animal control.
'We want to make sure our animals and people are safe,' Dr. Gary Weitzman, president and CEO of SDHS.
Weitzman says they understand the city's situation and want to help.
'We're foregoing an increase that we by law have to do every year and that's to provide a living wage to our employees who are San Diego residents,' Weitzman said.
But Weitzman says if the final budget for next fiscal year passes as is, the nonprofit faces a roughly million-dollar funding gap.
'To do the work that we have to do, we have to have the city agree to leave our budget right now where it is with the agreement that we will give back $1 million of the cut that they have asked us for, we cannot go higher than that,' he said.
The budget process moves forward as the city council prepares to debate change before a final vote June 10.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Just 35 complaints of debanking cite political bias despite Trump order
Just 35 complaints of debanking cite political bias despite Trump order

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Just 35 complaints of debanking cite political bias despite Trump order

By Ross Kerber (Reuters) -Less than one percent of customers who filed detailed complaints about checking or savings account closures with the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau over the last 13 years accused banks of acting for political or religious reasons, even as the White House mounts a campaign to stamp out "systemic abuses" in the financial system that it says have wronged conservatives, a review of the agency's data shows. U.S. President Donald Trump earlier this month signed an executive order requiring banks not to discriminate against clients on political or religious grounds, a practice known as debanking, after citing what Trump called discrimination against conservatives. The White House said the order was targeting "systemic abuses by financial institutions that undermine free expression and economic opportunity." But few customers who have been denied access to banking products cite their political affiliation as a chief concern. Out of the 8,361 detailed complaints about closed bank accounts filed with the CFPB since the agency began taking them in 2012, only 35 include the terms 'politics,' 'religion,' 'conservative' or "Christian," a review by Reuters shows. "It's not a real issue. 'Debanking' is an excuse for political attacks," said Amanda Jackson, a director for Americans for Financial Reform, a coalition of progressive-leaning groups. The group and others say a bigger problem is making sure U.S. banks provide services to poorer consumers. Financial institutions have tried to balance fair access with steps to combat a wave of fraud, and say they have not cut customers over their political views. Rachel Cauley, communications director for the White House's Office of Management and Budget, whose leader Russell Vought is also CFPB's acting director, did not directly address questions about the small number of complaints. She repeated claims that members of the Trump family and others have been cut off from banking services on the basis of political or religious beliefs. The actions, Cauley said, amount to "an Orwellian censorship tactic that is antithetical to the American way of life. The Trump Administration believes access to the financial system is a fundamental right for all Americans." The CFPB data does not identify filers. While none of the 35 complaints provided proof that their accounts were closed for political or religious reasons, filers said they suspected that was the case. "I believe this is discriminatory actions based on race, religion and/or political views," according to a 2023 complaint filed against JPMorgan over account closures. A JPMorgan representative, Lauren Bianchi, said via email that "We do not close accounts for political or religious reasons, full stop." The bank supports a national prohibition on account closures for political or religious reasons, and for regulators to allow more transparency in those cases, she said. Brian Knight, senior counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom, which calls itself a Christian law firm and is supportive of Trump's executive order, said the small number of complaints citing politics or religion could reflect that banks are not required to disclose much detail to consumers they drop. "There's no information-sharing mechanisms" short of litigation to force banks to be more open about their thinking, Knight said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Air Force's top uniformed officer is retiring early in latest Trump military shake-up
Air Force's top uniformed officer is retiring early in latest Trump military shake-up

Washington Post

time26 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Air Force's top uniformed officer is retiring early in latest Trump military shake-up

WASHINGTON — The Air Force's top uniformed officer is set to retire early in the most recent shake-up of military leadership during President Donald Trump's second term. Gen. David Allvin will continue serving as the service's chief of staff until a replacement is confirmed by the Senate, the Air Force announced Monday. He expects to retire around Nov. 1, two years into his four-year term, it said in a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store