Torfaen Council to vote on Crown Estate control in Wales
The Crown Estate is currently managed by the UK Government.
YesCymru views the motion as an opportunity for a united Welsh stance on national sovereignty.
YesCymru director Rob Hughes said: "Should we achieve unanimous support across all local authorities and the Senedd on Tuesday, the message from Wales will be loud and clear.
"We call once again on the UK Government to do the right thing and transfer control of the Crown Estate to Wales."
The motion in Torfaen has been introduced by Labour councillor for Fairwater Ward, Jayne Watkins.
Mr Hughes has praised the cross-party collaboration that has pushed the campaign to this point.
"When Wales works together, Wales works well," he said.
"This campaign proves that radical, positive change is possible when people from all walks of life unite for the common good.
"The future of Wales is ours to shape, and together, our potential is limitless."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
31 minutes ago
- Metro
Is the issue of violence against women being used as as a political tool?
Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments. Jon (MetroTalk, Thu) discusses the protests in Epping against the use of a hotel to house asylum seekers. He says they are based on concerns for the safety of women and girls and criticises government minister Jess Phillips for not voicing the same concerns. However, many of those claiming to protest in the name of women's safety – or supporting those who do – have defended Andrew Tate, who has been criticised for his misogynistic views. This raises serious doubts about their true motives. It appears that the issue of violence against women and girls (VAWG) is being co-opted as a political tool — a convenient cover for broader protests targeting asylum seekers and refugees. This tactic mirrors strategies seen in other parts of Europe. It's likely that the next step will be claiming to protect LGBTQ people from asylum seekers, despite the fact that many of these same individuals support policies that harm the LGBTQ community in the UK. Ultimately, it seems they are willing to exploit any marginalised group to advance their political agenda against asylum seekers and refugees. Alfiaz, London Some people seem to be seeing asylum seekers everywhere. No wonder they keep screaming, 'We're being invaded.' First, former Reform MP Rupert Lowe mistook charity rowers off Great Yarmouth for 'illegal immigrants'. Then residents in a Welsh village thought Scouts from Scotland must be migrants because of their accents. You can access completely fee-free mortgage advice with London & Country (L&C) Mortgages, a partner of Metro. Customers benefit from: – Award winning service from the UK's leading mortgage broker – Expert advisors on hand 7 days a week – Access to 1000s of mortgage deals from across the market Unlike many mortgage brokers, L&C won't charge you a fee for their advice. Find out how much you could borrow online Mortgage service provided by London & Country Mortgages (L&C), which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (registered number: 143002). The FCA does not regulate most Buy to Let mortgages. Your home or property may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage. Now caravan park operator Haven has had to issue a statement saying its facilities aren't being used to house asylum seekers. Apparently, it was sparked by social media posts claiming that 'coaches of men' had been turning up to some caravan parks. The UK is more than 94,000 square miles. At the end of March, there were nearly 110,000 asylum seekers – so barely one per square mile. The overall 68million UK population means there are more than 700 of us per square mile. It's unlikely you are going to see an asylum seeker today. Even if you do, please be nice – not racist. Peter Packham, Chair, Leeds for Europe How dare James Murray-Smith (MetroTalk, Thu) describe a tax on selling your home being considered by chancellor Rachel Reeves as a tax on 'unearned' wealth. Maybe he inherited his property unearned but the rest of us worked hard, often forgoing things, in order to get on the so-called property ladder. So no, it is not 'unearned', which implies undeserving. As to it being 'unavailable to those who do not own their own homes', so what? Is it the seller or home-owners' fault others don't own their homes? It's thinking like this that makes me despair! So much for getting to own your own home as so many of our young are struggling to do. Agatha, Surrey Some estate agents have warned that house-sellers will simply pass the cost of this tax on to buyers. They're wrong. The price of a house isn't controlled by what the owner wants – it is controlled by what the market is willing to pay. Otherwise, owners would sell for however much money they fancied. This tax – which is only being considered for homes above £500,000 – would mean people selling their houses will just end up with less money. Which is fine – they'll still have at least £450,000, which is enough for a deposit and plenty to spare. JWA Caley, St Pancras Rupert Fast's letter (MetroTalk, Thu) should be read by Labour chancellor Rachel Reeves. Britain is indeed, as he says, 'living beyond its means'. This fact has lead to UK gilt yields – the price the market demands for government loans – hitting the highs last seen during Liz Truss's tenure. More Trending This, therefore, supports Mr Fast and means that Britain has to pay more to service growing debt. That of course means Jo and Joe Public paying through taxes. Fares, food, broadband and council taxes have all risen more than inflation. The government must reduce spending and reduce debt. Fast. Graham Reid, Stockport MORE: How to win £3,000,000 house in West Sussex MORE: 'Ozempic vagina' is here and women are paying £2,000 to reverse it MORE: Inside the rise of 'Reta' – the controversial new weight loss jab 3 times stronger than Ozempic
Times
31 minutes ago
- Times
Rising food prices mean hefty obesity costs
Stung by the price of olive oil? Burnt by the cost of your coffee? You are not alone. The cost of food and drink is increasing fast, faster than prices in general. This is a bigger problem, politically, socially and economically, than any politician has yet noticed. The government in particular should be paying attention to food bills, and taking action. The Office for National Statistics this week put the annual inflation rate at 3.8 per cent, but also showed that food and drink prices are rising at 4.9 per cent. The average household spends a bit more than £5,000 annually on food, so those numbers add up to about £250 a year. ONS tracking of public opinion shows that the cost of living remains the number one concern for the public, with more than 90 per cent of people citing rising food bills as a reason — well above the share who cite energy bills as an inflationary worry. Being reminded that things are getting more expensive — meaning that you feel poorer — every time you fill your shopping basket is not a happy experience. Food prices rising faster than the cost of other purchases has been a dismally common feature of the UK economy since 2022, for several reasons: war in Ukraine; too much rain; not enough rain; higher energy costs; not enough migrant workers to pick fruit and veg; higher taxes. The public's daily dismay at food prices, I'd bet, is a bigger reason for Britain feeling generally dissatisfied than noisier issues like immigration or crime. Yet it gets curiously little political attention, given how much it matters to voters' lives and outlook. Labour's spin team should give more thought to finding someone else to blame for rising food bills, not least because the problem is going to get worse. The Bank of England reckons food inflation will hit 5.5 per cent by the end of the year, while the British Retail Consortium says 6 per cent. Get ready for a winter of headlines about the painful cost of your Christmas lunch. Looking further ahead, the problem is even worse, reaching beyond simple political unease into questions of fairness, public health and economic performance. Rising food prices affect some groups more than others, with the poorest facing both the greatest financial pain but also the worst long-term consequences. The worst of these is rising obesity levels. Perhaps that will surprise some readers. How do rising food prices make poor people fat? Surely if it's getting harder to buy food, people will eat less of it and get thinner? In fact, a wealth of evidence shows that when low-income households face rising food prices, they trade quality for quantity, buying more cheap foods that are high in calories but low in nutrients. Social scientists grandly call this the 'food insecurity obesity paradox' but it's arguably just the human version of a common animal instinct to put on fat when times are tough and a hard winter is coming. • From peanuts to pomegranates — the 19 foods that will keep you young Almost a third of UK adults are obese, with rates highest among the poorest. There are many links between obesity and poverty but raw economics is a significant factor. According to the Food Foundation, a campaigning charity founded by former Tory MP Laura Sandys, recent years of inflation have made it almost impossible for poorer people to eat healthily. The foundation reckons that the poorest households would need to spend almost half of their disposable income on food to afford a healthy diet high in fruit and veg with limited sugars and fats. For poor parents, a healthy grocery shop could cost 70 per cent of disposable income. Healthier foods are just more expensive per calorie than stuff that's full of sugar and fat. Government calculations show that cauliflower and broccoli might cost almost 2p per calorie; for cheap biscuits it's less than half as much. Obesity means more sickness — diabetes and heart disease, in particular — and shorter lives. It means misery for individuals and mounting costs to taxpayers. My back-of-an-envelope calculations suggest that just a one percentage point increase in the obesity rate (roughly 550,000 more people getting too fat) costs the state more than £3 billion over ten years in higher NHS and care costs. We must make good food cheaper for poorer people, but that's far easier said than done. Continuing education to overcome ignorance about nutrition helps but new ideas are needed. What about Nutrition Impact Bonds? Building on NHS 'social prescribing' models, public and private investors could pay upfront for subsidised or even free healthy food for poorer households, then be paid back from the savings the state makes from lower obesity spending. The causes of higher food prices are big, complicated and long-term. Likewise the public health challenge of obesity and poor diets. It follows that fixing them will be a long-term project, the sort of job that no government, especially an unpopular one worrying about its next election, rushes to tackle. • Eating home-cooked food 'helps you lose twice as much weight' But Labour should lift food prices and obesity up its agenda, because they interact with the government's emerging economic focus. Ministers are planning an autumn drive on productivity, correctly identifying Britain's basic economic effectiveness — how much stuff do we generate from each hour of work we do? — as a national priority. Helping business to finance and deploy technology and training to make workers more effective is a key part of productivity, but so too is ensuring the availability of a healthy workforce. And our fatter, sicker population is emerging as a drag on productivity, as more and more people go off sick or leave work outright. Last month a paper by Nesta, a think tank, and Frontier Economics put the cost of productivity lost to obesity at £31 billion a year. The study shows that obesity doesn't just drag on the economy by taking people out of the workforce through sickness. Boldly, it says that obese people just aren't as effective at work as healthy colleagues and cost the economy almost £10 billion a year, it estimates. The government rightly wants to increase productivity but the fact is that Britain is simply too fat and ill to be fully productive. And in large part that's because of bad and increasingly expensive diets. Sadly, the cost of food is even higher than you think. James Kirkup is a senior fellow of the Social Market Foundation
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Farming Today 20/08/2025 Funding for rural councils, spinach, bioethanol
County councils say major changes to the way the government calculates funding for local authorities will penalise rural areas. The government says the new system will mean fairer funding and more stability which will help deliver better public services. However the County Councils Network says rural council tax payers will 'shoulder the burden' of redistributing hundreds of millions of pounds to urban areas and warn some councils will face deep cuts to their services. Growing spinach in the soaring heat - a seasonal look at producing salad. The Vivergo bioethanol plant on the Humber near Hull has now stopped production and started laying off staff after the government said it wouldn't provide support for the plant. The future of the business had been in doubt since tariffs were removed on bioethanol imports from the US in the recent trade agreement with Donald Trump. The company, owned by Associated British Foods, bought in locally grown wheat, around a million tonnes a year, and distilled it into bioethanol which is added to petrol to reduce emissions, and also produced large quantities of cattle feed. It's one of two plants in the UK. We speak to a renewable energy expert Dr Michael Short from the University of Surrey. Presenter = Caz Graham Producer = Rebecca Rooney
