3 House Republicans from South Florida with Cuban roots carefully navigate Trump's immigration policies
In an hour of remarks, Diaz-Balart did not bring up immigration on his own.
Diaz-Balart is one of three House Republicans in South Florida with roots in Cuba. Together, they are treading carefully in discussing President Donald Trump's immigration offensive, which includes directly targeting some Cubans and Venezuelans, key parts of the GOP's base in Florida.
Democrats are targeting at least one of these lawmakers, zeroing in on U.S. Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar's district as a possible House seat they could flip next year.
Miami Democrats set up a billboard on a heavily traveled expressway showing the three House members and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a former Florida senator who is also of Cuban descent, with the label "traitors."
Vehicles on the Palmetto Expressway drive past a digital billboard reading "Traitors, to immigrants, to Miami-Dade, to the American dream," alongside pictures of Florida politicians with roots in Cuba, including from left, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and U.S. Reps. Maria Elvira Salazar, Carlos Gimenez, and Mario Diaz-Balart, Friday, April 25, 2025, in Medley, Fla.
Rebecca Blackwell / AP
Diaz-Balart, Salazar and Rep. Carlos Gimenez have defended Trump despite the president's efforts to eliminate protections that allow hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans, Cubans, and other migrants to live and work legally in the United States.
Last November, Trump became the first Republican presidential candidate since 1988 to win Miami-Dade County, the metropolitan area with the highest share of immigrants in the country. While Republicans believe the rightward shift among Latinos indicates support for stricter border restrictions and mass deportations, Democrats think such measures may backfire on these lawmakers if these restrictions hit too close to home.
In his recent visit with Republican women, and after not mentioning immigration, one of the few questions Diaz-Balart fielded was about temporary protections to Venezuelans, which Trump is trying to end. Diaz-Balart justified Trump's actions, saying the president was doing "exactly what he said he was going to do."
"We have a lot of friends who are in this situation, and they have no way to adjust," said Milena Mitraud, a lawyer who asked the question.
Here's a closer look at the three lawmakers
Maria Elvira Salazar
Salazar, 63, has been perhaps the most vocal of the three, saying Trump must not eliminate some of the immigration protections that are popular among Miami residents, specifically advocating for Cubans and some Venezuelans. A federal judge recently intervened to block the Trump administration from ending temporary legal protections for hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans. After the judge's ruling, Salazar gave Trump — not the judge — credit for "doing the right thing."
Salazar has blamed Democratic President Joe Biden for creating a system under which Cubans were no longer being allowed to apply for legal residency a year after arriving in the U.S. under the Cuban Adjustment Act. She said she has put pressure on the new administration to stop arresting those Cubans who were allowed under that system and said she intervened and secured the release of a nursing student.
She made the argument that she is pushing for immigration changes — anathema to much of the Republican base nationally — in a video she posted to X only in Spanish.
"We are the only ones in Congress who are helping you," she said. "We're trying to make that piece of trash paper the Biden administration gave them so that they can receive parole and then benefit from the Cuban Adjustment Act."
The former broadcaster recently agreed with a Univision anchor that she was "the only Republican" trying to work on immigration changes. She talked about a "new dawn" in saying that Trump would be as effective on immigration as Republican President Ronald Reagan was in countering the Soviet threat.
"Things are changing," she said. "President Trump has said that those illegals who are criminals should leave, and I agree. They should be kicked out. But the lady who has been here cleaning for 10, 15, 20 years, or the one who is picking tomatoes, or the one who is picking oranges, or the one who is peeling potatoes in a New York restaurant, we must give them dignity."
Salazar, in an opinion column for the Miami Herald on Friday, defended her record on immigration in response to a letter by a Cuban American health care businessman published in the newspaper. The former GOP political donor accused Salazar, Diaz-Balart, Gimenez and Rubio of "complicity and cowardice" in the face of Trump's "cruelty toward immigrants."
"I don't belong in any letter calling out inaction. I've been on the battlefield in Congress, willing to take the political risk and lead the charge," she wrote.
Mario Diaz-Balart
Diaz-Balart, 63, joined Salazar and Gimenez releasing a joint statement after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced she was revoking deportation protections for Venezuelans. The lawmakers said they stood in solidarity with Venezuelans, who may be persecuted or oppressed if deported to their native country.
"The Venezuelan people have endured repression, corruption, and human rights abuses for far too long in Venezuela, and it is still not safe for many to return," the joint statement said.
But the dean of the Florida congressional delegation has mostly defended Trump's actions, blamed Biden for allowing record-high numbers of immigrants into the U.S. and claimed many migrants who arrived during the Biden administration are criminals. Studies show immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than native-born Americans, but some immigrants in the U.S. illegally have been convicted in recent murder cases that gained notoriety during the campaign.
When meeting with Republican women in Miami this month, Diaz-Balart told them he is working with the administration to create a "process" to screen people who come from countries where it is more likely they would have a legitimate case of asylum. He said that while working on that, they have asked to allow those who are already here and are not a threat to the public to remain in the country. But he was still critical of those who are arriving illegally.
Carlos Gimenez
Gimenez, 71, a former mayor of Miami-Dade County, has defended Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration while expressing solidarity with those Venezuelans who receive temporary legal protections.
But the Cuban-born congressman has gone a step further in proposing cutting off remittances and halting all travel to and from Cuba. That would impact many of those who have arrived more recently who have relatives living on the island.
In a letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Gimenez said there could be limited exceptions authorized by the State Department.
"The murderous dictatorship in Cuba is on life-support," he said in the letter. "The regime cannot even keep the lights on. And America must stand with the Cuban people to topple this pathetic gang once and for all."
In a statement, Gimenez's spokesman Roberto Lugones said the lawmaker believes these actions eliminate Cuba's revenue streams while "supporting the brave Cuban people in their quest for freedom." Regarding immigration protections, Gimenez wants cases to be decided on an individual basis.
"Congressman Gimenez supports a case-by-case solution for exiles with legitimate political asylum claims who are stuck in immigration limbo due to Joe Biden's incoherent and reckless open-border policies," the statement said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
Trump nominates new Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner
President Donald Trump on Monday nominated E.J. Antoni to be the new commissioner for the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the agency that collects and publishes data about jobs and inflation, after firing the previous commissioner, whom he accused without evidence of rigging jobs data. 'I am pleased to announce that I am nominating Highly Respected Economist, Dr. E.J. Antoni, as the next Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. Antoni's nomination comes after Trump fired Dr. Erika McEntarfer earlier this month after the BLS' monthly jobs report showed disappointing numbers for July and sharply revised down employment growth in May and June. Trump accused McEntarfer, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden to the role of commissioner in 2023 and confirmed by a bipartisan Senate vote, of manipulating the data for 'political purposes.' 'Last weeks Job's Report was RIGGED,' Trump wrote on his social media site Truth Social last week. 'Those big adjustments were made to cover up, and level out, the FAKE political numbers that were CONCOCTED in order to make a great Republican Success look less stellar!!!' McEntarfer's firing was met with backlash from many economists who argued that the move could damage the bureau's credibility. William Beach, a former Trump-nominated BLS commissioner, condemned the decision to fire McEntarfer. 'I don't think there's any grounds at all for this, for this firing, and it really hurts the statistical system,' Beach said on CNN earlier this month before Antoni was appointed. 'Suppose that they get a new commissioner … And they do a bad number. Well, everybody's going to think, 'well, it's not as bad as it probably really is,' because they're going to suspect political influence. So, this is damaging.' The BLS is a nonpartisan agency whose data underpins key decisions across the public and private sectors. Its reports influence everything from Social Security payments to corporate hiring and layoff plans, shaping how policymakers and businesses gauge the health of the US economy. Concerns over the bureau's data accuracy had surfaced even before McEntarfer's firing, with some economists warning that Trump administration budget cuts, layoffs and hiring freezes could undermine its reliability. Earlier this year, the BLS posted a notice saying it had suspended data collection entirely in three cities. Last month, the agency said it had further cut back on the data it was collecting from the rest of the country by roughly 15%. In July, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell was asked about the cuts. 'The government data is really the gold standard in data,' he said. 'We need it to be good and to be able to rely on it.'
CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
‘What gives you the right?': Tapper pushes back on Abbott over calls to remove Dem lawmaker
CNN's Jake Tapper presses GOP Texas Gov. Greg Abbott over why he took the unusual step of calling for Democratic leader state Rep. Gene Wu to be removed from office amid the ongoing redistricting fight.
CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
Trump has federalized DC's police force. Now what?
Donald TrumpFacebookTweetLink Follow The Metropolitan Police along with federal agencies tasked with helping curb crime in the nation's capital are scrambling to figure out roles and strategy following President Donald Trump's decision to declare a crime emergency and federalize DC's police force, multiple sources told CNN. 'We're going to restore the city back to the gleaming capital that everybody wants it to be,' Trump said at the White House on Monday. 'It's going to be something very special.' But little communication seems to have been done before Trump's news conference – the Washington, DC, mayor and police chief hadn't been told about the takeover until they watched Trump say it live. It's led to confusion over who now leads the MPD, how their policing strategy will change and in what ways federal agents – many who aren't trained for community policing – are going to interact with local officers. During a separate news conference, Mayor Muriel Bowser said she was trying to set up a meeting with Attorney General Pam Bondi, who Trump said would be overseeing the implementation of his order. She also maintained that Chief of Police Pamela Smith would still run the department and report to Bowser up through the deputy mayor. 'Nothing about our organizational chart has changed,' Bowser said. 'And nothing in the executive order would indicate otherwise.' This is the first time a president has used Section 740 of the Home Rule Act to federalize the DC metro police, said Dr. Heidi Bonner, chair of the Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology at East Carolina University. 'It's definitely difficult to say what that means,' she said, including it being 'an open question' as to who's in charge. 'Is the chief of police still in charge of the department once it's become federalized?' Bonner asked. 'And of course, all this is mixed up in the unique nature of DC as a district and not a state. There are different authorities – the president acts as the governor for all intents and purposes when it comes from the National Guard.' Bowser seemed resigned to the fact that Trump's decision would go into effect given the city's status. Prominent Democrats called Bowser and her office Monday to offer support but indicated there was little they could do to stop the takeover. 'I don't want to minimize what was said and I don't want to minimize the intrusion on our autonomy,' Bowser said. The mayor also called the move 'unsettling and unprecedented' and advocated for DC statehood to prevent such unilateral action from the president. Police Chief Smith said she was scheduled to meet with federal liaisons following the news conference for the first time regarding Trump's announcement in order to start to 'create an operational plan.' Trump activated 800 soldiers from the DC National Guard, with up to 200 members being assigned to supporting law enforcement, according to the Defense Department. 'Duties for those personnel include administrative and logistical roles, as well as providing a physical presence in support of law enforcement,' the DOD said. The unilateral move contrasts heavily with how Trump blamed others, including Bowser and then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for not deploying the National Guard on January 6, 2021, before Trump-supporters broke into the US Capitol. Over the weekend, Trump had already moved officers from several federal agencies to begin assisting MPD in policing certain areas in DC, including as many as 130 FBI agents to patrol with DC police as part of the increased federal presence, according to two people familiar with the deployment. It's not typical for FBI agents to patrol with local police, and agents are often not trained for community policing and operate under different policies – including for use of deadly force – that could create issues on the ground, two federal law enforcement sources told CNN. Because of this, pairing federal agents with officers to patrol DC could present a situation where each member of the team must respond differently to a potential threat based on the respective agency's policy. In the FBI, the plan to deploy agents to patrol the streets of Washington has been met with concern over strained resources and the safety of agents who are not trained in routine police patrols, according to multiple sources. Taking agents away from their daily investigations to patrol DC would risk not adequately addressing other serious crimes like terrorism, foreign counterintelligence threats, cyber intrusions and the nation's fentanyl epidemic, sources said. 'This isn't hard: If we're doing (policing) we're not covering down on those other threats,' said one source. Federal agents are also typically only minimally trained in conducting vehicle stops, which remains one of the most dangerous aspects of a police officer's job. Unlike routine police encounters with suspects, which may only involve one or two officers, when agencies like the FBI conduct an arrest, they typically plan out the operation methodically in advance and execute it with a complement of agents that far outnumbers the suspect. During the two sparring news conferences Monday, Trump remained adamant that crime in Washington is out of control despite data suggesting that it has decreased in recent years, and Bowser said firmly that DC is 'not experiencing a spike in crime but a decrease in crime.' Regardless of the current crime rates, Bonner noted that Trump's order has a 30-day limit and said any long-term impact on crime is doubtful. 'You can't have a long-term effect on crime with fast actions like this because it doesn't get to the root causes,' Bonner said. 'At the end of 30 days, it will be interesting to see what it has done in terms of reducing the crime rate further, or whatever the goals of this operation are, and what they might try to do moving forward to affect some long term fixes.' 'Because, again, you're not going to affect crime in the long term without addressing the symptoms of crimes,' Bonner said.
