Gauteng widow in distress after Old Mutual rejects R1. 68 million claim following husband's death
Old Mutual's non-profit entity 'Masisizane' Fund has reached a milestone by disbursing R1 billion to over 400 SMEs and creating more than 13,000 jobs.
A Gauteng woman is locked in a bitter conflict with Old Mutual over a life insurance payout following the tragic death of her husband.
Annette Monica Mulder, 60, lost her husband, Rudolf Johan Frederick Mulder in January 2018.
Before his death, he had taken out a policy with Old Mutual in 2009 and according to his wife, at the time of his death, it was R1.68 million.
Mulder's anguish began when Old Mutual denied her claim, citing suicide as the cause of death.
"When my husband died, they refused to pay out the policy and claimed that my husband killed himself. The policy never excluded suicide, there was no clause mentioning suicide. Because it wasn't clear how my husband died, they decided to pick suicide to avoid making payment," she said.
According to Mulder, the life insurance contract specified just three exclusions: death while committing a crime, death in war, or death during a strike.
"Those were the three exclusions that were listed in the contract. If they decided to add suicide, it's something they added without notifying us. We were certainly not made aware of this,'' she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Jobs aren't coming so they created their own
At a time when youth unemployment continues to erode economic confidence, more than 30 young entrepreneurs have chosen a different path, creating businesses instead of waiting for jobs. Their achievements were celebrated on June 4 at a graduation ceremony hosted by the Chemical Industries Education and Training Authority (CHIETA) and the Johannesburg Business School (JBS), following the completion of two transformative, accredited qualifications in entrepreneurship and small business development. As these young entrepreneurs return to their communities, they carry more than certificates. They carry the tools and vision to spark grassroots economic renewal. The programmes, the Certificate in Entrepreneurial Development and the Certificate in Small Business Enrichment, are part of a strategic partnership between CHIETA and JBS at the University of Johannesburg, enabled by a R1 million discretionary grant from CHIETA. The funding supports sustainable entrepreneurship and leadership training aligned to national economic development goals. In her opening address, Professor Adri Drotskie, Acting Dean of JBS, emphasised the power of sector partnerships to create lasting impact: 'Our collaboration with CHIETA continues to build managerial capacity and entrepreneurial thinking. These graduates represent not only academic success but a growing movement of economic selfdetermination.' Delivering the keynote, Princess Kgakane, CHIETA Executive Manager for Grants, Projects and Regions, acknowledged the deeper significance of the moment: 'You've chosen growth over defeat. At a time when our expanded unemployment rate has reached 43.1%, your journey shows that with the right support, people don't just survive. They thrive.' CHIETA's investment forms part of a wider mission to drive inclusive skills development, particularly in the chemical sector and adjacent industries. The long-standing partnership with JBS has already yielded tangible results, empowering beneficiaries with practical business acumen, leadership confidence, and sector-relevant expertise.
IOL News
20 hours ago
- IOL News
Mango airline sale: SAA to receive nominal fee as new owners emerge
State-owned Mango appears to be a step closer to the skies again, four years after the low-cost airline was grounded in July 2021. Image: File The sale of grounded state-owned low-cost airline Mango is being finalised and its current owners, SA Airways (SA), are likely to receive a nominal fee of about R1 000. Business rescue practitioner Sipho Sono this week said there was no reason why SAA should not sign the sale of shares agreement because the sale was approved even though the matter had to go to court to force the decision. 'That decision has already been taken. We don't know why its taken SAA long to comment on the sale of shares agreement but at least now there is some movement,' he explained. Sono said SAA appointed lawyers advising the national carrier to review and conclude the agreement. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ 'So it looks like we are moving in the right direction. The value that goes to SAA is nominal, they are not getting anything. Their shares will be sold at next to nothing, let's say a R1,000,' he added. Sono expressed confidence that the rest is more the language of the agreement and nothing of substance will change. Mango's new owners are expected to lease aircraft, according to Sono. 'The investor will be buying the intellectual property, the brand, which is Mango, and the loyal customer base, which previously had a good experience with Mango. The planes and so forth would be leased independently so there are no planes to be sold,' he said. Sono said Mango has to be sold and it has to be privatised as it may no longer be owned by SAA. 'It will be sold to a private investor whose details we have not officially released. We will only do so once all the relevant agreements have been signed,' he further stated. Sono said the investor has also reviewed the agreement and once it is signed the investor will be announced but timelines for the restart of Mango have not been finalised. 'We are busy with trying to conclude a transaction that will then allow the investor to finalise its own business plan. The timelines and the dates will be announced in the future,' he said. At the start of the business rescue process, there were 55,000 unflown customers, which is about R180 million in value. Sono said some of the customers have been refunded by their banks, where if a passenger bought a ticket with their credit card they are allowed to claim back from the bank within 30 days or so. In addition, there are a number of customers who may have opted for bank refunds and some of them may have been refunded by Mango's pervious travel partners. Sono said customers are no different from other creditors but they have been prioritised to receive the full value of their unflown tickets. 'Customers are getting good value, assuming we finalise the transaction and Mango restarts soon enough,' he said. However, if the sale is not concluded, customers will be treated the same way as other creditors and will be paid a dividend, which is a fraction of what they paid for their tickets.
The South African
20 hours ago
- The South African
BUSINESS INSIGHTS: Unpacking tenant eviction in South Africa
As a landlord, one of the most frequent questions we hear revolves around the 'what ifs.' What if my tenant stops paying rent? What if they break the lease? What if they damage the property through negligence? For most landlords, tenant evictions are a last resort, however, it is important to arm yourself with the necessary tools in cases where you have no option but to seek legal recourse. The reality is that when good tenants go south, landlords can quickly find themselves entangled in protracted legal battles. In a notable case from Stellenbosch, a tenant recently amassed nearly R1 million in unpaid rent to two landlords. Despite court orders mandating repayment and the auctioning of his possessions, the landlords have yet to recover the owed funds. This situation underscores concerns that South Africa's tenant-friendly laws may inadvertently expose landlords to significant financial risks when tenants exploit legal protections. The Rental Housing Act of 1999 governs the relationship between landlords and tenants in South Africa, outlining the rights and responsibilities of both parties. Under this Act, tenants can only be evicted for valid reasons recognised by the law, which constitute a breach of a lease agreement. These include: Rental arrears. Persistent late or incomplete rent payments may lead to eviction, though some landlords allow a grace period to settle the balance. Engaging in illegal activities on the property. Tenants involved in criminal activities like theft, drug dealing, or sex work can be evicted with proper evidence. Property damage. Tenants must maintain the property reasonably; negligence or failure to report structural issues may result in eviction. Lease agreement expiration. If a tenant stays beyond the lease's end, and you have given notice according to the lease agreement and legislation, they become an illegal occupier and must vacate. As grounds for a legal eviction are based on a breach of the lease agreement, it's important to note that the 2022 Rental Housing Amendment Act requires that all lease agreements be in writing, which is the responsibility of the landlord. Any lease agreements that have been verbally agreed upon are not binding and therefore will not hold up in court. Under the Act, evictions cannot be based on discriminatory reasons, such as race, gender, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation. Furthermore, tenants cannot be evicted for requesting repairs and withholding rent until these repairs are made, forming a tenant's association or refusing to pay an unauthorised rental increase. If a landlord fails to follow proper eviction procedures, as outlined below, the eviction can be deemed unlawful and challenged by the tenant in court, even if the reasons for the eviction are valid. The Prevention of Illegal Eviction and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act No. 19 of 1998 (PIE Act) outlines the proper procedures for evicting illegal occupants as follows: Step 1. When a tenant violates the terms of the lease agreement, the landlord's initial step should be to send a formal letter to inform the tenant of the breach. The letter should include a specific timeframe, typically set at 20 business days, for the tenant to rectify the breach. Step 2. If the tenant does not vacate the property upon lease termination, the landlord must inform the tenant of their intention to seek an eviction order through the court. Following this notification, the landlord can initiate the eviction process by filing an application at the Magistrate's Court that holds jurisdiction over the property. Step 3. A written notice of the eviction hearing must be personally delivered to the unlawful occupier(s) of the property, by the sheriff at least 14 days before the court date. The notice must clearly specify the date and time of the hearing, detail the reasons for the eviction, and acknowledge the unlawful occupier's right to present a defence. Step 4. All parties are required to attend the eviction hearing in court. If the unlawful occupier(s) does not appear, the court may either postpone the hearing or proceed in their absence, potentially resulting in the court granting an eviction order. Step 5. If the landlord is successful, the court issues a warrant of eviction to the sheriff, authorising them to remove the tenant's possessions from the property. In terms of costs, even in the case of an unopposed eviction, your legal costs can range between R25 -R35,000, excluding the mandatory sheriff fees. This is why it's essential to thoroughly review a prospective tenant's rental application before signing a lease. This includes assessing their credit score, contacting references, and, in cases of uncertainty, conducting a background check. Sometimes the red flags aren't so apparent so it's crucial to perform due diligence. Have you experienced challenges with tenant evictions or have tips for fellow landlords? Share your thoughts, questions, or experiences in the comments below. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
