logo
FDA issues urgent recall for popular Friendly's ice cream flavor over risk of life-threatening allergic reactions

FDA issues urgent recall for popular Friendly's ice cream flavor over risk of life-threatening allergic reactions

Daily Mail​6 days ago
Ice cream sold in three states has been urgently recalled due to a risk of life-threatening allergic reactions.
Friendly's Ice Cream is voluntarily recalling 324 cartons of its Cookies & Cream ice cream because they may contain soy and wheat allergens not listed on the ingredient label.
The hidden ingredients pose a serious threat to the millions of Americans with soy and wheat allergies, with reactions ranging from mild symptoms like hives and swelling to anaphylaxis, a potentially deadly condition that can cause difficulty breathing.
The FDA said: 'People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to soy and/or wheat run the risk of a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume these products.'
The affected 48-fluid ounce cartons were distributed through one distributor and shipped to retail stores in Maryland, Virginia and Pennsylvania. It's unclear which specific stores carry the products.
Recalled products were packaged in Friendly's Vanilla Bean ice cream cartons with Friendly's Cookies & Cream lids. They had a 'best by' date of November 26, 2025.
The recall was initiated after the company discovered that a limited quantity of products were mistakenly packaged in a Friendly's Vanilla Bean ice cream carton that did not identify the allergens.
No other Friendly's products were affected, and no illnesses or adverse reactions have been reported.
About 5million Americans are allergic to soy or wheat.
Symptoms of an allergy include hives, wheezing, coughing, congestion, face and throat swelling and in severe cases, anaphylaxis.
This is a life-threatening allergic reaction that occurs very quickly after being exposed to an allergen.
Experts estimate 150 to 200 Americans die from allergen-induced anaphylaxis every year.
It triggers an extreme immune response, leading to dizziness, fainting, shortness of breath and vomiting.
If not treated quickly with epinephrine (adrenaline), which can be administered via injection like an EpiPen or nasal spray, a person can die.
The FDA has not given the recall a designation, though it could be classified as Class I, the most serious, due to the life-threatening risks.
A Class I recall describes 'a situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of, or exposure to, a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death,' according to the FDA.
The FDA urged customers who purchased the recalled products to return them to the place of purchase for a full refund if they wish.
Customers with questions can contact Friendly's at 800-587-2259.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Faith-based activist groups celebrate after Costco bails on selling abortion pill
Faith-based activist groups celebrate after Costco bails on selling abortion pill

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Faith-based activist groups celebrate after Costco bails on selling abortion pill

Costco has opted not to dispense abortion pills after receiving demands from activists on both sides of the issue — and faith-based groups are celebrating the move. Last year, New York City Comptroller Brad Lander urged the retail giant to get a certification to be able to dispense mifepristone — one drug in a two-drug regimen for medication abortions — at its pharmacies. The following month a religious coalition pleaded with Costco not to sell the termination pill. The FDA allows only certified prescribers to dispense mifepristone. Costco chose to forego pursuing this certification, the company said in a statement to Reuters emphasizing the decision was based on a lack of consumer demand. "Our position at this time not to sell mifepristone, which has not changed, is based on the lack of demand from our members and other patients, who we understand generally have the drug dispensed by their medical providers,' the company said. Bloomberg first reported Costco's decision. The Independent has reached out to Costco for more information about its decision. Representatives on both sides of the abortion debate have battled over Costco's position in the form of letters. Last July, Lander penned a letter to CEO Ron Vachris demanding the retailer 'immediately take the necessary steps to receive certification' to sell mifepristone, following in the steps of CVS and Walgreens. The comptroller also wrote letters to the leaders of Walmart, Kroger, Albertsons, and McKesson. 'By failing to become certified mifepristone dispensers, these pharmacy giants put both women's reproductive health care and investors' money at risk,' he said in a statement at the time. In August 2024, a coalition of religious activists wrote to Vachris, urging Costco to 'continue its current practice of not dispensing the abortion drug mifepristone.' The group argued that dispensing the drug will reduce demand for the diapers and formula that the store sells and worsen the 'the crisis of record low birth rates.' The letter also alleged the pill poses 'serious health risks.' The FDA first approved the drug in 2000 to end pregnancy through 10 weeks of gestation, but anti-abortion activists have recently challenged its safety and FDA approval. Last year, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled to preserve access to the crucial drug, as nearly two-thirds of all abortions in the U.S. — 63 percent — are medication abortions, according to the Guttmacher Institute. 'Costco's decision to refuse to dispense mifepristone is disappointing and short-sighted,' a spokesperson for Lander told The Independent in a statement. Failure to provide access to proven safe and FDA-approved medication under the guise of 'weak demand' risks isolating customers and undermines the company's credibility. Putting customer needs before political ideology must remain Costco's priority.' Faith-based activists have celebrated the decision. 'We applaud Costco for doing the right thing by its shareholders and resisting activist calls to sell abortion drugs,' Alliance Defending Freedom Legal Counsel Michael Ross said in a statement Thursday. 'They have nothing to gain and much to lose by becoming abortion dispensaries.' 'We have this momentum,' Tim Schwarzenberger, director of corporate engagement at Inspire Investing, the world's largest faith-based ETF provider, told Bloomberg. 'Now there is a chance to turn to some of the other retailers.' 'We are so grateful that Costco—a company that serves families, especially large ones—has decided to remain a wholesale store, not become an abortion facility,' Mary Szoch, director of the Center for Human Dignity at evangelical think-tank Family Research Council, said in a statement on X. 'What a win for America! Great job, @Costco!" CVS and Walgreens, which both dispense the drug, have stood by their decisions in the wake of Costco's announcement. 'We have a long history of supporting and advancing women's health and we remain focused on meeting their unique health needs. This includes providing access to safe, legal, and evidence-based reproductive health services,' CVS told The Independent in a statement, noting that the company fills prescriptions in states where it's legal. Walgreens declined to comment. Its website states: "The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on mifepristone access allows Walgreens to continue to dispense mifepristone under the FDA guidelines.' The abortion landscape has been complicated after the fall of Roe v. Wade in 2022. In January 2023, the FDA removed some restrictions around accessing mifepristone and added the pharmacy certification. Individuals living in states that have banned the procedure cannot access the drug at pharmacies; 12 states have total abortion bans, according to Guttmacher Institute. The 2022 Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe has opened the door for abortion opponents to argue fresh legal challenges. Earlier this year, anti-abortion activists pushed a report by right-wing think tank Ethics and Public Policy Center claiming serious complications from mifepristone use were 22 times higher than previously reported. Critics blasted the report as 'bogus.'

Air quality concerns linger in the wake of steel plant explosion in Pennsylvania
Air quality concerns linger in the wake of steel plant explosion in Pennsylvania

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

Air quality concerns linger in the wake of steel plant explosion in Pennsylvania

The Pennsylvania county where an explosion at a U.S. Steel plant south of Pittsburgh killed two people and injured more than 10 others announced Thursday that it is stepping up air quality monitoring in the area of the sprawling facility that has a troubled environmental record. The Allegheny County Health Department announced that mobile air units provided by the state and Carnegie Mellon University will be stationed in the Mon Valley where the plant is Thursday and Friday. The county said these measures are part of its ongoing investigation into Monday's explosion at Clairton Coke Works. The county said the measures go 'well beyond the normal and rigorous regulatory air quality monitoring' and will assess parts of the valley for different types of pollutants such as volatile organic compounds, PM2.5 pollutants and sulfur dioxide. After Monday's blast, the county health department initially told residents within 1 mile (1.6 kilometers) of the plant to remain indoors and close all windows and doors. The department lifted the advisory after its monitors didn't detect levels of soot or sulfur dioxide above federal standards. The Allegheny County Medical Examiner's Office also confirmed Thursday that the second person who died in the blast was Steven Menefee, 52, of Clairton. Earlier, the county medical examiner's office identified one of the dead as Timothy Quinn, 39. U.S. Steel CEO David Burritt said Tuesday the company is working closely with local, state and federal authorities. He would not speculate about the cause of the explosion. The massive plant along the Monongahela River in Clairton converts coal to coke, a key component in the steelmaking process. The facility is considered the largest coking operation in North America and is one of four major U.S. Steel plants in Pennsylvania. To make coke, coal is baked in special ovens for hours at high temperatures to remove impurities that could otherwise weaken steel. The process creates what is known as coke gas — a lethal mix of methane, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. The plant has a long history of environmental problems, especially fouling the air in communities nearby the sprawling plant. In 2018, a Christmas Eve fire damaged pollution-control equipment and led to repeated releases of sulfur dioxide, according to a subsequent lawsuit. The fire prompted Allegheny County to warn residents to limit outdoor activities. Residents said it was hard to breathe for weeks afterward and that the air felt acidic and smelled like rotten eggs. U.S. Steel settled a lawsuit last year with an agreement to spend $19.5 million in equipment upgrades and $5 million on local clean air efforts and programs. Dr. Deborah Gentile, the medical director of Community Partners in Asthma Care, studied asthma levels after the 2018 fire and found twice as many patients sought medical treatment. In 2019, U.S. Steel agreed to settle a lawsuit regarding air pollution from Clairton for $8.5 million. The concerns about air quality also come as the federal Environmental Protection Agency moves to postpone new hazardous air pollution standards for coke plants, like Clairton. Matthew Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project, a public health advocacy group in Pittsburgh, said the regulations were deemed to be almost insignificant to operational costs and would have helped protect the public with air quality monitoring. The regulation would have required — like is already required at refineries all over the United States — fence-line monitoring for hazardous air pollutants at the Clairton plant, Mehalik said. That information would have been 'incredibly useful' when the explosion happened on Monday, Mehalik said. ___

Report: Why Susie Wiles at the center of new MAGA conflict
Report: Why Susie Wiles at the center of new MAGA conflict

Daily Mail​

time12 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Report: Why Susie Wiles at the center of new MAGA conflict

White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles continues to silently flex her authority after convincing the president to rehire a vaccine regulator who was sacked at the urging of a prominent MAGA influencer. Laura Loomer, one of Donald Trump 's most fanatic loyalists, has made it her mission to go after officials in the administration who she believes are disloyal to the president. The right-wing activist appears to have the ear of the president but her influence, like most actors in Trump's world, is limited and inconsistent. On Monday, Dr. Vinay Prasad returned to his job at the FDA center that oversees vaccines and biotech therapies. Prasad, a longtime critic of the FDA, is viewed as a top ally to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr . Kennedy along with Prasad's boss, Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary, were also key to undoing the damage caused by Loomer as they pleaded for his return. 'After Vinay left, Marty and Bobby worked very, very, very hard through Susie Wiles, the president's chief of staff, to tell the president that Vinay was not anti-Trump,' claimed one of the anonymous senior administration officials to Politico. 'The MAHA movement is an expansion of the MAGA, sort of, you know, big tent,' the source added. Trump's decision to bring Prasad back into the fold showcased the limits of Loomer's influence within the White House. Moreover, the president's reversal gave a small win to Kennedy who is attempting to completely reform US regulation surrounding drugs and vaccines. According to Politico, Loomer has set her sights on bringing down Kennedy and his top aides because she believes he will use his time in the administration to launch a presidential bid in 2028. Loomer had accused Prasad of being disloyal to Trump by citing past social media posts he had made amid the 2020 pandemic when he claimed he was once a supporter of Bernie Sanders. Makary and Kennedy, with assistance from Wiles, persuaded the Oval Office to review their decision to axe Prasad by arguing that his prior statements were taken out of context. 'I think it really is something good about the president that he's willing to change his mind when persuaded,' one of the anonymous senior administration officials told Politico. In recent weeks, Loomer has gone after a number of MAGA Trump loyalists on social media, including Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lindsey Graham.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store