Wedding kiss restrictions branded ‘bizarre' at Covid inquiry
The Scottish Covid-19 Inquiry's worship and life events impact hearings began on Tuesday, with evidence from faith leaders from different denominations including the Catholic Church, Free Church of Scotland, as well as from the Humanist Society Scotland and the Jewish Council of Scotland.
Fraser Sutherland, of the Humanist Society Scotland, said as recently as 2024, weddings were going ahead which had been postponed during the pandemic, and branded some restrictions 'bizarre'.
Mr Sutherland said: 'Some couples decided they didn't want to get married, some people's relationships ended.
'We did also see a significant increase in small weddings. There were quite a lot of people who were relieved they didn't have to have a big wedding. I think a lot of couples feel pressure from family and friends to have a big ceremony. I think quite a lot of people felt they had a licence to do what they wanted.'
He added: 'The restrictions for masks for couples was removed there were numerous conversations with the Government about removing masks for declaration. There was a bizarre circumstance where there was no kissing allowed.
'In humanist tradition most of those couples would be already living together.'
All the faith leaders said that they were dedicated to sticking to the restrictions – however, Mr Sutherland said that some venues were desperate to generate income and would allow people to break the rules.
Mr Sutherland said: 'There was a lot of push-back particularly as pandemic pressed on, from couples, from wedding venues, who were keen to get as many people in as possible.
'We had a lot of difficult situations where couples were being told one thing by venues, our celebrant turns up and there's 50 people when there should be 20. We had couples saying 'everyone here is exempt, around mask wearing'.'
Rev Donald MacDonald of the Free Church of Scotland, based on Tiree, Skye, said: 'On Skye we tend to get a number of elopement weddings every year – they came to an end when lockdown was announced. All these arrangements in place for a year to 18 months had to be cancelled.
'Others delayed planning of their weddings. We did schedule a meeting with government representatives to try to argue for permission of having weddings – within our tradition a number of folk moving in together is not an option before marriage.'
Guests socially distance at a wedding during the pandemic (Peter Byrne/PA)
Ephraim Borowski, of the Jewish Council of Scotland, said: 'It might have been useful to have a hotline, or some kind of exception granting mechanism, completely general, which would give us a definite answer, I think that would have helped.'
He added: 'I wasn't aware of any time anyone said about the 1919 Spanish flu pandemic so as far as we knew nothing had been learned from that. That puts this inquiry into perspective, because presumably the point is to learn for the future. Is anyone actually going to remember?'
Rt Rev Brian McGee, of the Bishops' Conference of Scotland, said that NHS workers were deprived of pastoral care in hospitals, along with sick or dying people, due to restrictions.
He said that mass could only be celebrated in a church, and that faith leaders were not told about a decision to close places of worship in the second lockdown, until it happened.
Mr McGee said: 'We've talked about ceremonies but when people were in hospital, they were looked after by NHS staff who were in fear for their own lives.
'When people are sick and they're nervous they would want the comfort of a visit, some pastoral care and prayers being said for them.
'I know the difficulty for that and infection control but could there have been more consideration given.
'When a chaplain goes in they're there for anyone looking for help including the staff. There could have been pastoral care available for staff.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
6 hours ago
- Spectator
The remarkable life of Peter Kemp, warrior and Spectator writer
Today is the 110th anniversary of the birth of a former Spectator correspondent who took part in and survived more wars than any other English writer in modern history. Yet he is practically forgotten today because he fought all his life for unfashionable conservative causes. Peter Kemp, the son of a judge in the Indian Raj, was born in Bombay on 19 August 1915. Educated at Wellington, and destined for the law like his father, he went up to Trinity College, Cambridge, the alma mater of the notorious Communist sympathising Soviet spies Kim Philby, Guy Burgess and Anthony Blunt. Kemp gravitated to the polar opposite of his leftist contemporaries and became a right-wing Tory. As such, he abandoned his studies and determined to fight for the Nationalist side in the Spanish civil war when it broke out in the summer of 1936. Pretending to be a journalist, he obtained a press pass as a correspondent for the Sunday Dispatch newspaper, and entered the war-torn country from Portugal. Disliking the Falange, the Spanish fascist party, Kemp preferred to enlist in the cavalry of the Carlists, a monarchist faction noted for their staunch Catholicism and bravery in battle. But however romantic, these horse soldiers weren't of much use in modern warfare, and Kemp was thirsting for action, so he transferred to the Spanish Legion – the Iberian version of the French Foreign Legion – a brutal and tough outfit whose motto was 'Viva la Muerte!' (Long live death!) The Legion gave Kemp invaluable experience in the savage realities of modern warfare. Fighting alongside the Moors who were the mainstays of General Franco's army in the battles for control of Madrid's university city, Kemp was kept awake all night by the screams of a captured Republican militiaman being tortured to death by his Moorish comrades in a neighbouring lecture hall. Another time, Kemp unsuccessfully pleaded for the life of a fellow Briton, a member of the International Brigades from Belfast, but was ordered to command the firing squad at his execution instead. Wounded on several occasions, and promoted to command a whole bandera (battalion) aged only 24 – an unusual honour for a foreigner – the Spanish war ended for Kemp when his jaw was shattered and his hands were crippled by an exploding mortar bomb. The outbreak of the second world war saved Kemp from the humdrum boredom of peace, and he lost no time in signing up for a special force, the precursor of the Special Operations Executive (SOE), specialising in cross-Channel raids on isolated Nazi outposts in France. On one such raid, Operation Dryad, Kemp took a group of Germans prisoner who were garrisoning a lighthouse off Alderney. His next SOE assignment was to parachute into Axis-occupied Albania in support of partisans supposedly struggling to liberate their homeland. But these guerilla bands were divided between nationalists and communists and Kemp's anti-communist convictions were reinforced when he realised they preferred to fight their rival compatriots rather than the Nazi and fascist enemy. Kemp collided once more against his lifelong communist foes on his next mission when he was dropped into Poland to help the anti-communist home army in the 1944 Warsaw uprising against the Nazis. After the rising was crushed – partly because Stalin refused to let the Red Army intervene – Kemp surrendered to the Russian 'allies' but found himself in Moscow, imprisoned and interrogated by the notorious NKVD, Stalin's murderous secret police. He was finally freed after several months and ended the war in Indochina helping France against the VietMinh communist revolutionaries. By now, Kemp was a hardened Cold Warrior, and as that global ideological struggle began, he found himself again and again battling his old Red enemies. He was in Budapest in 1956 when Russian tanks put down the anti-communist revolution there and he helped smuggle young Hungarian rebels to safety in Austria; and he was present in the Congo in 1960 as that vast country gained independence from Belgium while dissolving in chaotic civil strife. It was in Africa that Kemp became a special correspondent for The Spectator. In the 1970s, The Spectator's editor, Alexander Chancellor, was persuaded, despite his liberal tendencies, to employ the old warrior (who had passed his pensionable age) as a special correspondent in Rhodesia to report on the bitter bush war between the minority white regime of Ian Smith and Robert Mugabe's black guerilla army. As might be expected, Kemp's sympathies lay with the embattled Smith regime, but he continued to file insightful pieces sporadically until the Lancaster House agreement ended the conflict in 1979. In 1957 Kemp had discovered his gift for writing when he published Mine Were of Trouble – a vivid memoir of his time in Spain and the first in an autobiographical trilogy covering his eventful life. He remained utterly unashamed of having chosen the 'wrong' side in Spain and was proud of fighting for Franco. He continued to believe that it was the Basques themselves rather than the Nazi Condor Legion aircraft who had destroyed the ancient Basque capital of Guernica. Intrigued by an article by Kemp in a History magazine frankly titled 'Why I fought for Franco' I sought an interview with him in the 1980s. Given his amazing military record I was expecting a fire breathing volcano but was surprised and impressed by his gentleness of manner. For someone who had spent so long in situations of extreme violence, he exuded a calming sense of peace. Even in old age, Peter Kemp couldn't resist a final campaign and his last battle, when he was already in his 70s, was on the side of the anti-communist Contras in Nicaragua. He died in October 1993 – an unfashionable hero to the last.
Spectator
7 hours ago
- Spectator
Childfree zealots are anti-humanity
Few things in life are more French than a dispute animée about holidays. While the Spanish enjoy an easy relationship with mañana and the Italians savour il dolce far niente (sweet idleness), the French will incite a riot over any threat to their leisure time faster than you can say faire une pause. It's therefore little surprise to witness the ardourof government officials in condemning childfree resorts, a rare but growing feature of French holidaymaking. Saint-Delis in Normandy is but one hotel offering an 'ever more exclusive and peaceful experience' with 'absolute relaxation' for only €334 a night. The existence of such facilities has prompted Laurence Rossignol, a former families minister, to propose that adult-only venues should be banned. The Socialist party senator claimed that they 'institutionalise and legitimise intolerance', adding for good measure that 'to not like children is to not like humanity itself'. With rates of childlessness only climbing worldwide, it's a debate that will only become more pertinent. France's fertility rate is a mere 1.66 births per woman, according to the World Bank, with birthrates at their lowest ebb since the second world war. In Britain (1.56 births per woman), the Office for National Statistics recently revealed that a slender majority of women turned 30 without having had their first child in 2020, for the first time in history. Such is the scale of the childlessness that even the bien pensants are spooked. Last year French president Emmanuel Macron called for 'demographic rearmament', offering six months parental leave for both parents, free fertility checks for 25-year-olds, and more funding for reproductive technology. The vogue for childfree hospitality indicates this is as much a cultural problem as a financial or even technological one. Earlier this year France's high commissioner for childhood, Sarah El Haïry, felt obliged to publicly rebuke anti-child attitudes, arguing that the country must resist the notion 'that children aren't welcome on a restaurant terrace'. To some degree the reaction is overwrought. One travel company group reckons that only 3 per cent of France's hotels and resorts qualify as childfree, and many of those visiting will be parents who have dropped Josephine and Gabriel off at the in-laws for a weekend of amour – or at least a few nights of unbroken sleep. Having the odd pub that bars patrons still in primary school is likewise no great crisis if there's a more family-friendly alternative nearby, nor should there be any objection to the curfews imposed in many British venues, ordering children home for bedtime. Even if we're allowing kids to vote, there's no need to have them hogging the barstools. But there is a darker side to these reasonable requests. While the decision not to have children is a legitimate exercise of personal agency, the emboldened childfree movement – who dislike the more exposing 'childless' description – are increasingly arguing that other people's children should be neither seen nor heard. I've visited cafes – a trade heavily reliant on mothers of young children – who will post signs declaring that dogs are allowed, but children merely tolerated. See also the growth in childfree weddings: as if a marriage without children isn't basically a tax avoidance scheme. Public transport is another battleground, with a viral TikTok clip from April 2023 showing a man throw a hissy fit over a baby crying on a plane stuck in a holding pattern. This June an American sports pundit called for parents to 'brain rot the baby on TikTok' if it starts crying in the sky, and only a few days ago the Standard reported that a fight broke out on a Ryanair flight in response to infant tears. This is all to say that childfree zealots are as prone to temper tantrums as the toddlers they despise. Much of this comes downstream of intellectual attempts to paint child-rearing as a quirky personal interest, rather than the only reason any of us are alive. No doubt all parents enjoy a slither of solipsism in replicating their genes. But this is rather undercut by the self-sacrifice of raising the pickles, as many childless people cite when justifying their decision not to have any. Still, the childless are happy to draw from the welfare state when they reach their autumn years, funded, naturally, by other people's children. All of that is anyway besides the point. At the risk of sounding like a heartbleeder, what matters is that children are people like any other. They can be loud, annoying and inconsiderate, much like adults. Both deserve a place in public, even if it upsets those with dual incomes and no kids.
The Independent
4 days ago
- The Independent
Kate Forbes not banned from Summerhall building, venue says
An arts venue has said it has not banned Scotland's Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes from the building after a row over her speaking at an event. Ms Forbes was interviewed on stage at the Summerhall in Edinburgh as part of a Fringe show on August 7 organised by The Herald newspaper. The Deputy First Minister is a devout Christian and a member of the socially conservative Free Church of Scotland, and she was criticised during her SNP leadership battle for her stance on gay marriage, abortion and trans rights. In an email to artists on the day of the event, Summerhall said Herald Unspun was programmed before the line-up of interviewees was confirmed. It described the booking as an 'oversight' and said it 'should have considered the likelihood of her being booked to attend, and the understandable upset it would cause'. The venue said it will be writing 'robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies that prevent this from happening again'. It said Herald Unspun was not curated by Summerhall and at this stage would not comment on future curated events and the possibility of Ms Forbes appearing. However in a statement on Friday it said Ms Forbes is not banned from the building. It said: 'The Fringe event passed without incident. 'Forbes is not banned from the Summerhall building which encompasses a cafe, pub, arts venues, galleries and independent traders' offices and studios.' It said speakers including First Minister John Swinney, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar and Ms Forbes 'all entered and exited the building the same way for the events over each day'. It added: 'The events, the Herald Unspun events, were a paid hire and programmed by The Herald newspaper.' Ms Forbes has said she 'fervently' believes in freedom of speech. She said: 'Any effort to cancel people, especially politicians, undermines democracy. 'Many people attended the Herald event and it is important that we could freely discuss and debate matters in a respectful manner. 'I respect and acknowledge the fact that, in a liberal democracy, there are people who will agree with me and others who will disagree with me. 'That is all the more reason to create events where the audience and journalists can question politicians openly, as the Herald did.' In an email sent to artists on August 7 and addressed to 'Dear companies', Summerhall said: 'At this point, our main concern is that cancelling the event could pose significant additional risk to the safety and wellbeing of LGBTQ+ artists, staff and audiences by attracting those who share Kate Forbes's views outside of these walls to Summerhall, and as such the interview will take place as scheduled, with all proceeds from the event donated to a local LGBTQ+ charity, the amount and the recipient will be published as soon as possible. 'While the event is happening, staff will be on hand to help anyone who may wish to make use of a designated relaxed space. 'We do not believe LGBTQ+ rights, nor their existence, is up for debate. We recognise that the LGBTQ+ community make up a significant proportion of our artists, audiences and staff, and we have work to do to repair the damage from this oversight. 'At this stage, we can guarantee that we will be writing robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies that prevent this from happening again.'
