
Apple's first smart screen could still launch this year — but you'll have to wait for the robotic version
The good news is that the devices are a 'major priority' for Apple as 'part of its scramble to make AI-centric devices'. The bad news is that the company's ongoing issues with Siri development have caused problems that will likely delay the more interesting model with its robotic arm, and possibly see some features being stripped out of the basic version, too.
'The company wants to get this device to market as soon as possible, but there's been a snag,' Gurman writes, explaining that while the more basic J490 screen could still arrive by the end of this year, 'it remains up in the air' thanks to 'problems with Siri'.
After the J490 is out of the door, Apple will turn its attention to the J595 — a far more ambitious version, where a smart display can 'move around a person's desk on the end of a robotic arm'. This is expected 'a year or two later', meaning we're looking at a release at some point between the end of next year and 2028, depending on just how delayed J490 is.
Even with this delay, J595 may not be as ambitious as originally intended. While Gurman claims that the device will ship with its own 'unique AI personality', his sources have stated that Apple has 'pulled some bolder features' in order to ensure it reaches the market as fast as possible. These features, whatever they are, could 'reappear in subsequent models'.
So what will these devices be like when they finally emerge?
According to Gurman's original report, J490 will be an 'affordable iPad-like screen' with a price point that might attract consumers to install a few around their houses. Indeed, Apple has reportedly tested prototypes with magnets for wall mounting.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
It sounds a lot like Amazon's Echo Show smart screen, but naturally with a focus on the Apple ecosystem. Think streaming Apple TV Plus, making FaceTime calls and accessing planning apps such as Calendar and Notes via a new operating system called homeOS (based on tvOS that powers Apple TV).
J595, meanwhile, will be aimed at power users, priced at 'perhaps around $1,000'. The screen would be 'positioned atop a swivelling robotic arm', with a 'focus on home security monitoring, advanced videoconferencing and media playback with high-quality audio.'
As well as the aforementioned AI personality, the device would utilize Apple Intelligence to assess its surroundings, who's interacting with it and what they're doing.
Like the Echo Show and Google's Nest Hub, both devices will also allow users to control their smart home appliances easily. Still, Apple Intelligence will apparently 'offer home automation on steroids' while providing 'precise control of applications, devices and media'.
J595 is undoubtedly the more interesting-sounding product, but it wouldn't be the first robotic smart screen. It may be the first mainstream one, however: while Amazon released its $1,499 Astro robot in 2021, four years later, it's still only available in the United States via an invitation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Verge
19 minutes ago
- The Verge
Is this really an iPhone 17 Pro spotted in the wild?
Posted Jul 28, 2025 at 10:55 PM UTC Is this really an iPhone 17 Pro spotted in the wild? Now that Google has coughed up a look at the next Pixel, it's apparently time for more iPhone rumors. The account @Skyfops on X tweeted two pictures of a cap and sunglasses-wearing man with two phones, claiming he's holding a test development iPhone, complete with another man seemingly running interference to keep them hidden. Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates. Richard Lawler Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Richard Lawler Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Apple Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Apple Rumors Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All iPhone Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech


Bloomberg
42 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Samsung Inks $16.5B Deal with Tesla for AI Chips
Bloomberg's Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow discuss Tesla's plans to buy AI chips from Samsung in a new deal worth $16.5 billion. Plus, the US and EU reach a trade agreement that will see the European bloc face a 15% tariff on its exports, including cars and chips. And investors prepare for a busy week of tech earnings, as Microsoft, Meta, Apple, and Amazon all get ready to report results. (Source: Bloomberg)


Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
Where are all the designers?
In the last decade, the buzz around design has captured global attention. People everywhere are increasingly interested in design and seem to recognize how it impacts nearly every facet of our lives. Popular culture also places a high value on design, yet the corporate C-suite too often walks a different path. Leading companies such as Apple, IBM, Nike, and PepsiCo have historically understood the transformative power of design. Recognizing that design is not just about aesthetics, they've leaned on design as a business driver to differentiate their brand, create customer loyalty, and deliver market value. Apple is a perfect case study. Its rise from the early 2000s to become one of the world's most valuable companies is often credited to its focus on beautiful products and intuitive interfaces, from the iPod to the iPhone, making design part of everyday conversation. For a time, organizations across industries seemed to understand design as a strategic advantage. But today, in an era marked by what I've heard called a 'design-cession,' many companies seem to have lost track of this insight, marking design as a cost center to manage. Moreover, there's an alarming absence of designers at the highest levels of corporate decision making. Even in companies that claim to be 'design-led,' or in the management consultancies who have gobbled up small to mid-sized innovation and branding agencies, we rarely see designers in the boardroom. I keep wondering, why not? And how do we fix this? The problem The obvious question is: Why are designers so underrepresented in places where key strategic decisions are being made? After all, design is not just about products, packaging, or digital platforms; it's about creating innovative user experiences, improving services, and designing better ways of working within organizations—transforming the mundane into the extraordinary. In recent years, companies have grown increasingly risk-averse, unsure how to navigate an unpredictable future. The COVID-19 pandemic forced many businesses to take shortcuts to survive, particularly in areas deemed 'nonessential' like design. Even as conditions stabilized, this mindset lingered, often leaving design excellence deprioritized. The rise of AI has further complicated the role of design in business and culture. While many companies now lean on artificial intelligence for speed and efficiency, human designers have been further pushed from the equation, despite that AI lacks the creativity and empathy to understand human needs unless guided by human input. At the same time, a troubling gap exists between business and design education, with little overlap in training or collaboration. All this to say, despite general awareness, consumer passion, and decades of telltale research showcasing how the intangibles of brand and design drive corporate value, too many companies now see design as a cost to work around rather than a key contributor to innovation and profitability. As Uli Becker, a friend and mentor of mine and the former CEO of Reebok said to a room full of design leaders recently: 'If you all don't do your jobs well, I have nothing to sell.' The undervaluation of design is not only detrimental to business, but to our world as a whole. Good design relies on research to define problems, ideate solutions, prototype, and test. It serves as a valuable tool for addressing some of the world's most complex challenges, from climate change to inequality. I firmly believe that design matters. The solution As an MBA who has spent most of her career at the intersection of business and design, I often ask myself 'where are all the designers?' Despite consistent evidence showing that companies that embrace human-led design tend to outperform their competitors, why do business leaders still insist on seeing design as a 'soft skill' versus the competitive advantage it is? In 2015, the Design Management Institute published a study with Microsoft, revealing that design-led companies outperformed the S&P 500 by an astonishing 211% over a 10-year period. In 2019, McKinsey released a report showing that design-driven companies saw an increase in both revenue and shareholder returns at nearly twice the rate of their industry peers. From this data, one clear fact emerges: Design is not only a differentiator; it is a critical driver of financial performance. So how can the world's companies ensure they utilize the power of design? The answer is simple: Re/introduce designers into the boardroom. In the words of Beth Comstock, then SVP of GE, 'What business needs now is design. What design needs now is making it about business.' It's a two-way problem and a holistic solution. Here's what needs to give: Companies need to invest in design. This means committing to the ongoing leadership training of designers across all levels, and providing learning and development opportunities to bring more designers into senior leadership roles. Designers need to learn and design schools need to teach business fundamentals. If designers of all levels could speak the language of business—ROI, gross margin, net profit, market share, brand equity, etc.—then perhaps their voices will be louder and more confident, their contributions taken more seriously, and their paths to the C-suite made more obvious. Public and private sector investments should be made in secondary and university education to nurture the next generation, to understand the value of good design and why it matters to all of us. It would that ensure young people will be more properly equipped to help solve tomorrow's challenges. Meanwhile, business and design schools can partner to provide future leaders with hands-on experience. My alma mater, INSEAD (Singapore) did this with ArtCenter (Pasadena); while I may be biased, it was one of the best courses offered. Smart, future-focused companies understand the need for strategic design. It is neither a luxury nor a cost to cut. It is a core component of successful business strategy and contributor to the continuous improvement of human life. As we confront myriad present and future uncertainties, we need design to help us navigate complexity. Designers must have a seat at the decision-making table, but they must be equipped to speak the language of business to communicate clearly with those already there. Companies that embrace this paradigm and invest in design(ers) are the ones that will end up on top—just like they always have. This is a good outcome for us all, because in the end, design is an act of optimism. It creates something that looks forward and helps propel humanity towards tomorrow. And ultimately, isn't that what life is all about?