Eco-anxiety is a serious concern for young people
Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text.
Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here
Dana Taylor:
Hello. I'm Dana Taylor, and this is a special episode of USA TODAY's The Excerpt.
Devastating rains in Texas, Hill County, on the morning of July 4th created deadly floods that have now claimed over 100 lives and counting. The catastrophic rains took place in a region that's known as Flash Flood Alley, causing the Guadalupe River to rise from less than a foot on July 3rd to more than 34 feet by the morning of July 4th. Experts say that warming temperatures over land, and especially in the gulf, are stoking extreme rainfall events across the United States, largely due to climate change. The fear these super storms are unleashing in young people has a name, eco-anxiety. How can we maintain our mental health in the midst of our worsening climate? Here to help us explore the topic is Caroline Hickman, a psychologist who has specialized in treating eco-anxiety for decades. She also sits on the board of the Climate Psychology Alliance, a global coalition of mental health experts whose focus is anxiety related to global warming. Thanks for joining me, Caroline.
Caroline Hickman:
Thank you for inviting me.
Dana Taylor:
Let's start by taking a step back here. Can you please define for us what eco-anxiety is?
Caroline Hickman:
So eco-anxiety is also eco-distress, depression, despair, frustration. It's a whole range of emotional responses that people have in response to what's happening globally in the world, in terms of climate but also biodiversity loss, ecological stress. It's a mentally healthy response when we look outside and see things getting worse on the planet. The first response is often anxiety and fear. We have a fight-flight response. Where can we run to? What can we do about this? But the anxiety and the distress doesn't stop there. It moves then quickly to, and what are people doing to take care of us? People in power, what's happening around us? Because you can feel like you're just this very vulnerable individual that doesn't have enormous power to do anything about this global crisis. So the anxiety is twofold. One, it's in relation to the climate, and then two, it's in relation to other people's responses.
Dana Taylor:
The condition of eco-anxiety has been around for decades now, but at least one study indicates that it's getting worse. You are on the front lines of this battle. What are you seeing and hearing from young people on this?
Caroline Hickman:
It can only increase. When we talk about it getting worse, we have to be clear about what we mean by that, but it will only increase as the pressure of climate change increases, and we are going in the wrong direction when it comes to stopping and mitigating and changing the impact of climate change on the planet. So it makes complete sense that alongside that, the mental health impact will also continue to increase. I just want to be careful when we talk about things getting worse, because it changes constantly in relation to what's happening on the planet. It does not mean that young people are becoming more fragile or themselves developing more mental illness. They will have more severe psychological responses to this, but that's because it's in relation to the planet getting worse.
So we're seeing more increased weather events, climatic events, increased flooding, increased wildfires, increased storms, and they're increasing in severity as well as frequency, so what will go along with that is the increased psychological impact of that on young people. And again, I would come back to if they feel that people are not taking that seriously, then they will be left feeling more and more worried and upset.
Dana Taylor:
Are there other differences you can point to in comparison with, say, a decade ago?
Caroline Hickman:
Yes, absolutely. We saw a significant increase in eco-anxiety or eco-distress during and following COVID. During COVID, no matter how you might feel about that, we saw governments react and respond to this swiftly around the world, and it was variable around the world, but we did see swift action. During that time, I saw young people's anxiety and distress increase considerably in relation to climate change, because they were left thinking, "If we can react like this to COVID, why can we not react like this to climate change when actually climate change is going to pose a greater threat in the long term, particularly to the futures of children and young people?" So I saw an increase during that, and then every year when you see the return of forest fires, the return of heat domes, the return of flooding, and we see the pictures, the images online, in the news, even if you're not directly impacted yourself, with the communication increase around the world about this, we see young people getting more and more worried and upset and angry about this.
I want to clarify that we are talking about both direct impact of climate change but also indirect impact of climate change. So you can be impacted by being involved in floods or fires or heat, but also indirectly impacted by witnessing other people struggling with it around the world. Now, I wouldn't put the blame on media or social media communicating about this. People want to know what's going on, but it's incredibly distressing watching other people fight for their lives or run away from these threats. And what that does is it sets up a helplessness in the individual, because you want to think, "Well, what can I do to help?" So you anticipate what might happen to you, but you also have an empathy and a concern and a care for what's happening to other people.
Young people in particular are very connected globally. They're online, they're talking to each other, they're witnessing what's going on, and they relate to what's happening to young people elsewhere in the world, say in Africa or Bangladesh, India, and they don't feel disconnected from that just because they live in Europe or the United States.
I've seen an increase in referrals for young people for therapeutic support. I've seen an increase in young people joining community action groups and speaking out about this. I've seen an increase in young people spearheading legal cases around the world, pushing governments to take action on climate change. So we're seeing young people find different ways to make their voices heard, but it was already bad five years ago. 10 years ago, I think there was a lot of belief that we would still take action and there was still more time to take action, and increasingly over that 10 years, what we've seen is a loss of faith in young people that people will take action, and that results in a form of moral injury. The very people that should be taking action, leaders, world leaders, are not only failing to take action, but they're lying about it and they're saying that they're doing what needs to be done whilst frequently doing the opposite. So young people increasingly are not just feeling frightened of climate change, but they're losing faith in governments and leadership around this.
Dana Taylor:
I know your work has evolved over the years from global in-person therapy pre-pandemic to a lot of remote work with different groups. Where are you seeing the biggest mental health impacts today?
Caroline Hickman:
Well, that's a fascinating question. The United States is particularly hard hit I think. It's a country that is very much on the frontline of climate change, but is such an enormous country with such variability across the country, so I'm seeing more and more and more referrals from people living in the United States. Europe, people living across Europe, Europe is facing some of the worst impacts of climate change, but in many ways, the young people are actually freer to speak out. I think it's impossible to really measure any one particular country, but I'm just noticing an increase in referrals, particularly from the United States and across Europe.
One of the things to be clear about is that children and young people in the United States or Europe that may not be facing the direct physical impact of, say, children and young people in Bangladesh or Nigeria or the Philippines, for example, who are facing terrible floods, the children and young people in the US and Europe are not protected from this cognitively or emotionally.
So if I give you a couple of figures, it'll illustrate that. In the 2021 research that we published, which with 10,000 children and young people in 10 different countries, including the US, the global average told us 74% told us the future was frightening, 56% told us that humanity was doomed. 48% told us they were dismissed or ignored when they tried to talk about climate change. So you can see that young people are not being protected from the impact of climate change, even if they're not personally directly impacted. So we're not able to protect our children, even if they're not personally threatened by wildfires or floods. We can't protect them from the cognitive and the emotional impact because they will feel it, they will think about it, they will know about it, and they need us to respond to that.
Dana Taylor:
And finally, what's your advice to the adults in the room on the issue, whether they be parents, teachers, or others? How can they appropriately respond to young people who are in an existential crisis regarding climate change?
Caroline Hickman:
So first of all, acknowledge that this is a relational distress, and what children and young people want is to be seen and heard and understood, and that is the number one thing to reduce the distress. Don't minimize their distress. Don't tell them to go back to school, don't tell them to stop worrying about it. Of course, go back to school, but at the same time, acknowledge the distress that this is causing and say to them, "We are not expecting you to fix this for the rest of us, but we need to work together to think about this, and you're not on your own with this." So take their distress seriously. Even if you don't fully understand it, take it seriously because it's how they feel.
We wouldn't dream of telling our children and young people to not be worried and upset or scared if they're facing the issue of somebody in their family having a health problem or dying. We wouldn't dream of dismissing their upset. In fact, we would find ways to talk with them, even very young children. It's no different to that. So parents, you have got the skills to deal with this, but what you have to do sometimes is deal with your own feelings of guilt and grief and upset in order to be able to listen to your children, have courage, and then sit down and talk with them and say to them, "Okay, we will find a way through this."
And there are ways to deal with the relational distress alongside taking practical action in the world. Find practical projects that you can get involved in, community projects, projects at school, mental health projects supporting young people. There's many around. Sign up to them and join them, and then you've got a sense of community. You're not on your own. But always, always, always say to young people, "Even if I don't fully understand, help me understand. I want to understand it through your eyes, even if that's different." And that in itself helps children immediately, because then they don't feel they're being silly.
What hurts the most is if you feel you're the only person in your family that is upset by this. Children shouldn't be left feeling that way. I'm going to quote a ten-year-old. This was a number of years ago, and I thought I understood but he said to me, "Caroline, you don't fully understand." He said, "You grew up thinking polar bears would be there forever." He said, "I am growing up knowing they will go extinct." So we have to use our imagination and our curiosity and our respect for children and young people, that it is a different world that they are inheriting from us, and we might feel bad about that but there is a lot we can do about that, and number one is tell them the truth and be honest with them about what's going on, and then find ways to take action together.
Dana Taylor:
Listeners can find a link to more resources in the show notes. Thank you so much for being on The Excerpt, Caroline.
Caroline Hickman:
Thank you.
Dana Taylor:
Thanks to our senior producers, Shannon Rae Green and Kaely Monahan for their production assistance. Our executive producer is Laura Beatty. Let us know what you think of this episode by sending a note to podcasts@USAToday.com. Thanks for listening. I'm Dana Taylor. Taylor Wilson will be back tomorrow morning with another episode of USA TODAY's The Excerpt.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Grand Canyon fire adds to 7.5 million acres of burned national parkland, analysis shows
In four decades, fires that burned at least partly inside U.S. national parks blazed across more than 7.5 million acres of land, a new USA TODAY analysis of federal data reveals. The 683 fires recorded from 1984 to 2024 impacted 43 national parks, more than two-thirds of the nation's parks. Just this week, fires in the Black Canyon of Gunnison National Park and Grand Canyon National Park are burning thousands of acres with low containment. The Dragon Bravo fire, sparked by a lightning strike July 4, has already burned roughly 100 structures and become the largest fire, by far, to hit the Grand Canyon National Park since 1984. On July 13, the wildfire razed the historic 1937 Grand Canyon Lodge. As of July 31, the Dragon Bravo Fire is now at 94,228 acres and is 9% contained. The South Rim fire in Colorado at Gunnison National Park was spread across 4,232 acres with 41% containment. Which national parks have suffered the most fire damage? In total, the national park fires reviewed by USA TODAY have burned 7.5 million acres, or more than 500 times the size of Manhattan. The largest blaze, the Dixie fire in 2021, burned nearly 1 million acres in Northern California, including 73,240 acres within Lassen Volcanic National Park − roughly two-thirds of the park's total land area. Other notable fires are the North Fork and Clover Mist blazes that tore through Yellowstone National Park in 1988. After decades of fire suppression, Yellowstone managers started to experiment in 1972 by letting lightning-caused fires burn. Then fires in summer 1988 charred more than one-third of the park and were fully controlled only when rain and snow fell months later. That led the federal government to review its national policy on fire management. A landmark report reaffirmed the importance of natural fires but recommended improvements. The National Park Service rewrote its fire management guidelines to require contingency plans, monitoring procedures and stricter decision-making protocols before allowing fires to burn. Among all fires − not just the ones affecting national parks − there has been a statistically significant increase in the number of fires and the acres burned each year. From 2020 to 2024, the number of annual fires has increased 68% compared with the 1990s, the first complete decade recorded in the fire data. The annual acres burned has more than doubled in the same time period. 1988 remains the year with the most fires and acreage burned intersecting national parks, the USA TODAY analysis found. The title for the park with the most fires from the past four decades goes to the Everglades National Park in Florida, with nearly double the number of Grand Canyon fires. Beyond beloved parks, climate change is fueling wildfire conditions. It's also making them deadlier and costlier. Methodology of the fire analysis USA TODAY reporters analyzed data recorded by MTSB (Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity), a multi-agency program that maps large fire perimeters and burn severity across all lands in the United States. The data, compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, tracks fires of 1,000 acres or more in the western United States and 500 acres or greater in the eastern states. The data also includes Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Fire boundaries from 1984 through 2024 were merged with National Park Service maps to look for instances in which fires overlapped − even partially − park boundaries. Fires that burned within park boundaries also burned beyond them in many instances. SOURCES U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Department of Agriculture


USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Watch horses appear unfazed by massive dust devil near Utah ranch
A group of horses in Utah looked unfazed in a viral video showing a massive dust devil swirling behind them. Video footage from the event shows the horses at the ranch in Eagle Mountain completely unbothered by the large, dusty vortex as it swirled over paddock areas. Meanwhile, onlookers were in awe of the natural phenomenon. 'Pretty sure that's one of the biggest one of those I've seen while I've been here,' Rebekka Fullmer, who filmed the video and lives in Eagle Mountain, can be heard saying. The city is located near Provo, Utah. Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle. Watch horses be unfazed by dust devil What is a dust devil? Dust devils are a common wind phenomenon around the world, according to the National Weather Service. These dust-filled vortices, which typically form under clear skies and in light winds, are created by strong surface heating between two different surface types, such as asphalt and dirt, or even irrigated fields and dirt roads. Dust devils usually last for only a few minutes before dissipating. However, in desert areas, they can reach up to several thousand feet and last more than an hour, according to the NWS. "Even though they are generally smaller than tornadoes, dust devils can still be destructive as they lift dust and other debris into the air," NWS officials said. "Small structures can be damaged, and even destroyed, if in the path of a strong dust devil." Saman Shafiq is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at sshafiq@ and follow her on X and Instagram @saman_shafiq7.

USA Today
6 hours ago
- USA Today
What is Lyme disease? Justin Timberlake shares 'debilitating' diagnosis
Justin Timberlake announced on Thursday, July 31, that has been diagnosed with Lyme disease. Timberlake, who shared the news on Instagram, said the disease has been "relentlessly debilitating." "If you've experienced this disease or know someone who has — then you're aware: living with this can be relentlessly debilitating, both mentally and physically," he wrote. "When I first got the diagnosis, I was shocked for sure. But, at least I could understand why I would be onstage and in a massive amount of nerve pain or, just feeling crazy fatigue or sickness." What is Lyme disease, and what are the common symptoms? Here's what you need to know. What is Lyme disease? According to the Mayo Clinic, Lyme disease is caused by Borrelia bacteria. The most common cause of Lyme disease is when a person is bitten by a tick carrying the bacteria. These ticks can be found across most of the United States, but are most common in the Northeast, mid-Atlantic and upper Midwest regions of the country, according to the Mayo Clinic. Ticks that carry the disease are found in grassy, brushy or wooded areas. What are the symptoms of Lyme disease? Dr. John Aucott, the director of the Johns Hopkins Lyme Disease Clinical Research Center, said in a 2024 interview with USA TODAY that in the acute phase, some patients may experience a round red rash (Erythema Migrans or the "Bulls-Eye Rash") at the site of the tick bite, or signs of infection like fever, chills, malaise and fatigue. "The rash is the distinguishing characteristic, but the rest of the symptoms don't distinguish Lyme disease from other infections," he said. What happens if you never get treated for Lyme disease? If you do not receive treatment for Lyme disease, the infection could still be present in your body. 'If you have Lyme disease that was never treated, the infection is still present in about half the people who demonstrate the classic form of long-standing Lyme disease, which is Lyme arthritis. That is actually how it was discovered – by an outbreak of arthritis in the shoulder in a town called Lyme, Connecticut,' he said. Contributing: Brendan Morrow, USA TODAY Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach him at and follow him on X @fern_cerv_.