Bon Natural Life Limited Announces Receipt of Nasdaq Delisting Notifications
On May 1, 2025, the Company received an additional Notification Letter notifying the Company that the Staff has determined to delist the Company's securities pursuant to their discretionary authority under Listing Rule 5101. The Staff's determination was based on public interest concerns in relation to the Company's March 2025 best efforts offering.
The Company has filed a notice of appeal and requested a hearing before a Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel to review the Staff's determination. The appeal will stay delisting of the Company's securities pending the Panel's decision.
The Company will evaluate available options to regain compliance with the aforementioned Listing Rules. However, there are no assurances that the Company will be able to regain or maintain compliance or that any such appeal to the Panel will be successful, as applicable.
About Bon Natural Life Limited
BON is a Cayman Islands company engaged in the business of natural, health, and personal care industries. For more information, please visit http://www.bnlus.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this announcement are 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Investors can identify these forward-looking statements by words or phrases such as 'may,' 'will,' 'expect,' 'anticipate,' 'aim,' 'estimate,' 'intend,' 'plan,' 'believe,' 'potential,' 'continue,' 'is/are likely to' or other similar expressions. Although the Company believes that the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot assure you that such expectations will turn out to be correct, and the Company cautions investors that actual results may differ materially from the anticipated results. These forward-looking statements are based only on our current beliefs, expectations and assumptions regarding the future of our business, future plans and strategies, projections, anticipated events and trends, the economy, activities of regulators and future regulations and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of our control. Therefore, you should not rely on any of these forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among others: the completion of the offering, the satisfaction of customary closing conditions related to the offering, the intended use of proceeds from the offering, BON's limited operating history and historical losses; BON's ability to raise additional funding; competition from third parties that are developing or have products for similar uses; BON's ability to obtain, maintain and protect its intellectual property; and BON's expectations regarding its growth, strategy, progress towards its goals. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are based on current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that the Company believes may affect its financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent occurring events or circumstances, or changes in its expectations, except as may be required by law. Although the Company believes that the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot assure you that such expectations will turn out to be correct, and the Company cautions investors that actual results may differ materially from the anticipated results and encourages investors to review other factors that may affect its future results in the Company's registration statement and in its other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Investor Relations Contact:
Cindy Liu | IR
Email: bonnatural@appchem.cnSign in to access your portfolio
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Thinking of Buying Tesla Stock? Here Are 2 Red Flags to Watch
Key Points Tesla's heavy reliance on Elon Musk adds significant leadership risk. Increasing competition from established automakers and Chinese EV makers is pressuring Tesla's dominance. Investors need to be comfortable with Tesla's high valuation. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) has long been the front runner in the electric vehicle (EV) revolution in the U.S. Its innovation, brand strength, and rapid growth have made it a favorite among investors. Yet, despite its impressive track record, there are two big risks that investors should carefully consider before buying Tesla stock today. 1. The Elon Musk factor Elon Musk's leadership is often cited as Tesla's greatest strength -- and, paradoxically, one of its most significant vulnerabilities. Musk's vision and hands-on approach have driven Tesla's technological breakthroughs and ambitious expansion. However, this heavy reliance on a single individual introduces what investors refer to as "key man risk." If Musk were to step back from daily operations or shift his focus to other projects, Tesla might face challenges in maintaining its momentum. Though Tesla's management team has grown stronger, few executives command the same vision, drive, and public attention as Musk. Recently, Musk's increasing involvement in political activities has raised concerns about potential distractions or reputational risks for Tesla. While the company has remained operationally strong, these developments underscore the uncertainty around its future leadership continuity. While Tesla's success lies not only with Musk but also with his team, which has executed well on his vision -- no one can build a trillion-dollar company alone -- there is still no clear successor (or a viable management team) . The silver lining here is that the Tesla board has become more serious about finding one in recent months, largely due to the CEO's active involvement in politics. For investors, this means that Tesla's fortunes remain closely tied to Musk's presence and decisions -- a factor that adds a layer of risk to the investment. 2. Intensifying competition Tesla might have been an early mover in the EV industry, but its dominance is no longer guaranteed. The industry landscape is rapidly evolving, with legacy automakers and new entrants accelerating their electric ambitions. Companies like Ford and General Motors are aggressively expanding their EV lineups. For instance, Ford plans to introduce a $30,000 midsize truck by 2027. That price is significantly lower than the average for an EV, and Ford is investing $5 billion in its EV production to make it happen. GM, on the other hand, is working hard on next-generation battery technologies to improve range, charging performance, and cost. Meanwhile, Chinese manufacturers such as BYD are growing their international footprints, particularly in Europe, where Tesla experienced a nearly 27% sales declinein July 2025. BYD's battery technology, government support, and competitive pricing make it a formidable challenger. In addition, a host of EV start-ups are innovating in battery tech, autonomous driving, and new business models, further intensifying competition. While Tesla is not sitting still -- it is working on becoming the lowest-cost producer by cutting prices to grow sales volume and achieve economies of scale -- there is no guarantee that it can maintain its market share over time. In short, it's no longer the only player in town. What does this mean for investors? Tesla's story remains compelling: It's a pioneer with a powerful brand, innovative products, and potential optionality with some of its long shot bets (robotaxi, humanoid robots, etc). But the key man risk surrounding Musk and the escalating competitive landscape are real concerns that investors can't ignore. If Tesla continues to innovate more rapidly than its rivals, the company could sustain its growth trajectory. However, any leadership changes or slips in market position could hurt the business and its share price. While these two risks don't necessarily call for the sale of the stock, they do mean that investors should think carefully before buying the stock today. Tesla stock trades at a significant premium valuation to other carmakers. For perspective, Tesla has a price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 12.9, compared to GM's 0.3. Unless you're comfortable with the risks and the high valuation, buying the stock today may not be a prudent decision. Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $467,985!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $44,015!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $668,155!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Lawrence Nga has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends BYD Company and General Motors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Thinking of Buying Tesla Stock? Here Are 2 Red Flags to Watch was originally published by The Motley Fool
Business Insider
5 minutes ago
- Business Insider
3 Economic Reports That Could Affect Your Portfolio This Week, August 18-22, 2025
Stocks ended the week on a soft note, still managing to lock in back-to-back weekly gains. The S&P 500 (SPX) rose 0.94% for the week, and the Nasdaq-100 (NDX) inched up 0.43%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) was the standout, delivering a weekly gain of 1.74%. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. After a red Monday, all three major indexes reached all-time highs on Tuesday. This followed in-line CPI data, which bolstered bets that the Fed would deliver its first rate cut of 2025 in September – traders have priced in nearly a 100% chance of a 25-bps easing. Stocks extended gains on Wednesday: the S&P 500 and Nasdaq hit new ATHs again amid remarks from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urging a 50-bps cut based on downward revisions in payroll data. Wall Street analysts began forecasting up to three cuts this year, citing a softer labor market, limited tariff pass-through to consumers, and the appointment of Trump's temporary Fed board pick. But those forecasts were questioned Thursday when PPI, which tracks wholesale price trends, came in hotter than expected, denting sentiment and clouding the Fed outlook. Other economic reports pulled markets in opposing directions: July's industrial production was lackluster – although not recession-bellwether weak – while retail sales beat forecasts, underscoring resilient consumer demand despite high borrowing costs. Meanwhile, the UoM consumer sentiment unexpectedly slipped and inflation expectations rose, muddying the outlook for Fed cuts in September. With mixed inflation and consumer data re-injecting uncertainty into the Fed policy outlook, all eyes now turn to Jackson Hole for the annual confab. Jerome Powell's speech on August 22 is the marquee event, expected to instantly influence markets. A dovish tone could broaden the rally, boosting small caps, rate-sensitive areas, and tech. A hawkish stance – highlighting inflation risks or caution – could trigger sharp corrections and volatility, especially in growth and rate-sensitive sectors. Three Economic Reports Here are three key economic reports that could affect your portfolio this week, in addition to the widely anticipated speech by Jerome Powell at the Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium. For a full listing of additional economic reports, check out the TipRanks Economic Calendar. » August Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Survey – Thursday, 8/21 – This report measures manufacturing conditions in the survey area (Philadelphia, New Jersey, and Delaware) and is considered an accurate leading indicator for two nationwide reports: the Manufacturing PMI and ISM Manufacturing Index. » August S&P Global Manufacturing PMI and Services PMI (preliminary readings) – Friday, 8/22 – PMI indices are leading economic indicators used by economists and analysts to gain timely insights into changing conditions, as the direction and rate of change in PMIs usually precede shifts in the broader economy. » July Existing Home Sales – Friday, 8/22 – This report tracks sales volumes and prices of existing single-family homes, condos, and co-ops nationwide. Existing homes account for over 90% of total U.S. home sales, making this a key measure of housing market health and its influence on overall economic activity.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Great week for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:HAIN) institutional investors after losing 72% over the previous year
Key Insights Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Hain Celestial Group's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership Recent purchases by insiders AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. A look at the shareholders of The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:HAIN) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 80% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. After a year of 72% losses, last week's 13% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hain Celestial Group. See our latest analysis for Hain Celestial Group What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hain Celestial Group? Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. Hain Celestial Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Hain Celestial Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hain Celestial Group. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 7.4% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.2% of common stock, and PGGM holds about 4.6% of the company stock. Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 52% of the ownership is controlled by the top 14 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future. Insider Ownership Of Hain Celestial Group While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$2.8m worth of stock in the US$167m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board, though we generally prefer to see bigger insider holdings. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling. General Public Ownership The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in Hain Celestial Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. Next Steps: It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hain Celestial Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Hain Celestial Group you should know about. If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
