The Dublin-born cardinal at the heart of Vatican affairs
CARDINAL Kevin Farrell (aged 77) is a key figure in the papal succession owing to his 2019 appointment as camerlengo of the Apostolic Chamber. The responsibilities of the camerlengo—or chamberlain—include confirming the pope's death, overseeing certain rites connected to the papal funeral, preparing for the conclave, and administering the affairs of the Holy See during the sede vacante, the period between pontificates.
Born Kevin Joseph Farrell in Drimnagh, Dublin, into a staunch nationalist family, he was raised speaking Irish. His parents instilled the language from an early age, and today Cardinal Farrell speaks Irish, English, Italian and Spanish fluently.
When the Dublin-born cardinal met with Pope Francis, the pair often switched seamlessly into Spanish—a shared tongue from Farrell's early missionary work in Mexico and the Pope's upbringing in Argentina.
It was Cardinal Farrell who made the official announcement of Pope Francis's death—delivered in Italian—shortly after the pontiff passed away in April 2025.
Ordained in 1978 for the Legionaries of Christ, Farrell initially served in Mexico before transferring to the Archdiocese of Washington in 1984. There, he held various roles including director of the Spanish Catholic Centre and secretary for financial affairs.
In 2001, he was appointed an auxiliary bishop of Washington, later serving as moderator of the curia and vicar general.
Farrell was appointed Bishop of Dallas in 2007, where he served for nearly a decade. In 2016, Pope Francis named him the first prefect of the newly created Dicastery for the Laity, Family and Life. He was elevated to the College of Cardinals later that year. He has since taken on further roles, including President of the Supreme Court of Vatican City in 2024.
In his role as camerlengo, Farrell is now overseeing the Church's administrative affairs during the current sede vacante.
Farrell has at times faced criticism for what have been seen as conservative decisions—among them, his 2018 refusal to approve former Irish president Mary McAleese as a speaker at a Vatican event on women's leadership. The incident drew international attention and prompted organisers to relocate the event outside Vatican grounds.
Farrell's older brother, Bishop Brian Farrell, also rose to prominence within the Vatican. Born in 1944, Brian was ordained in 1969 and entered the Holy See's Secretariat of State in 1981. He became head of the English-language desk in 1999, and in 2002 was appointed secretary of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity—a role he held until retiring in February 2024. He also served as vice-president of the Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews.
In Ireland, Brian Farrell was known for his opposition to the 1985 legislation that allowed the sale of condoms without a prescription, reflecting his conservative stance on social issues at the time.
Together, the Farrell brothers—raised in a modest Dublin household—have become two of the most senior Irish clerics ever to serve in the Vatican. The cardinals from Britain and Ireland
Cardinal Kevin Farrell is the only Irish-born prelate in the College of Cardinals.
Uniquely in history, there are currently four English-born cardinals:
Vincent Nichols
Born in Liverpool in 1945, Cardinal Nichols has served as the Archbishop of Westminster since 2009 and was elevated to the cardinalate in 2014. He currently serves as the President of the Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales.
Arthur Roche
Born in Yorkshire in 1950, Cardinal Roche is the Prefect of the Dicastery for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments. He was made a cardinal in 2022 and is considered a significant figure in the Vatican, particularly for his role in overseeing liturgical matters.
Timothy Radcliffe
Born in London in 1945, Cardinal Radcliffe is a Dominican friar and former Master of the Order of Preachers. He was elevated to the cardinalate in 2024 and is known for his theological writings and contributions to interfaith dialogue.
Michael Fitzgerald
Born in Walsall of Irish ancestry in 1937, Cardinal Fitzgerald is a member of the Missionaries of Africa and a leading expert on inter-religious relations, particularly Christian-Muslim dialogue. He was made a cardinal in 2019 but, at 87, is no longer eligible to vote in a papal conclave. Nonetheless, he remains the highest-ranking British citizen in the Roman Curia.
Although trying to choose who will be next pope is almost impossible, it would be safe to say that of the five cardinals born in these islands, only Farrell and Roche are seen as possible candidates for the papacy. But they would both be regarded as very much outside bets.
Photograph: Camerlengo Cardinal Kevin Joseph Farrell with Pope Francis in Lisbon in 2023 (Photo by Vatican Media via)
See More: Cardinal Kevin Farrell, Papal Succession, Pope Francis, Vatican
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
26 minutes ago
- The Journal
Irish citizens among activists detained in Egypt after arriving for march to Gaza border
EGYPTIAN AUTHORITIES HAVE detained more than 200 people who arrived in the country ahead of a planned peaceful march to the Rafah crossing on the border with Palestine, according to the march's spokesperson. Asked if there were Irish citizens among those detained, the Department of Foreign Affairs told The Journal it 'has been contacted by a small number of Irish citizens and is providing consular assistance'. Demonstrators from around the world have been arriving in Cairo this week, with dozens of Irish people among them. 'Over 200 participants were detained at Cairo airport or questioned at hotels across Cairo,' the march's spokesperson Saif Abukeshek told the AFP news agency, adding that those detained included nationals from the United States, Australia, the Netherlands, France, Spain, Morocco and Algeria. People Before Profit TD also plans to join the march and told RTÉ Radio this morning that the demonstrators have no intention of trying to enter Gaza. He described the demonstrators as people 'trying to do everything we can to highlight the absolute horror faced by the people of Gaza'. 'The aid must be allowed to enter and Israel must stop using starvation as a weapon of war. The blockade must be lifted and the genocide halted,' Murphy said in a statement yesterday. Meanwhile, a convoy that left Tunisia on Monday is making its way to Egypt to join the march, crossing through the divided and war-torn Libya. Following Israeli war minister's orders, Egyptian authorities directed its security services to block the International March to Break Gaza Siege from entering the country! Thousands taking part in the March, which has been launched from Tunisia, are planning to walk through… — Global March To Gaza (@globalmarchgaza) June 12, 2025 According to the Global March to Gaza website , participants plan to gather in Cairo tomorrow before travelling by bus the following day to Al Arish, where they will begin their 48km march to the besieged Palestinian territory to the north of Egypt's Sinai region. Advertisement 'Over the course of 2–3 days, we'll walk in solidarity toward Rafah,' the website says. The demonstrators have said they do not plan to try and enter Gaza and will camp at the border for three days before returning to Cairo on 19 June. Israel had asked Egyptian authorities to prevent people from making the march. 'I expect the Egyptian authorities to prevent the arrival of jihadist protesters at the Egypt-Israel border and not to allow them to carry out provocations or attempt to enter Gaza,' Defence Minister Israel Katz said in a statement. Katz added that such actions 'would endanger the safety of (Israeli) soldiers and will not be allowed'. Egypt said on Wednesday that it supports efforts to put 'pressure on Israel' to lift its blockade of Gaza, but added that any foreign delegations seeking to visit the border area must receive prior approval through official channels. Speaking this morning, Paul Murphy said the march aims to pressure Israel into lifting its blockade on Gaza, but also put 'pressure on our own governments'. 'I mean, these are peaceful Palestine solidarity protests. We have clear guidelines on what we're doing. 'We're not trying to forcibly break through into Gaza or anything like that. It is a peaceful demonstration. 'Unfortunately, this morning, we're hearing reports of people being detained at the airport, and I think at least two Irish citizens have been detained by Egyptian authorities.' With reporting from AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
The Journal
39 minutes ago
- The Journal
US anti-deportation protests continue and spread beyond 'test case' Los Angeles
PROTESTS AGAINST AGGRESSIVE immigration raids have continued in the United States after President Donald Trump ordered the deployment of National Guard troops and US marines in Los Angeles this week, against the wishes of the state's Democratic governor. More than 1,000 people massed yesterday in America's second-biggest city for a sixth day of demostrations, as peaceful protesters marched through the streets. A second night of curfew was in place as city leaders try to get a handle on the after-dark vandalism and looting that scarred a few city blocks in the city. 'I would say for the most part everything is hunky dory right here at Ground Zero,' protester Lynn Sturgis, 66, a retired school teacher, told the AFP news agency. 'Our city is not at all on fire, it's not burning down, as our terrible leader is trying to tell you.' The mostly peaceful protests are the result of a sudden escalation by the Trump administration to arrest and deport undocumented immigrants. Police kettle protesters under arrest on in LA Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Pockets of violence have included the burning of self-driving taxis and the hurling of stones at police. Arrests by masked and armed men, who have refused to identify themselves during raids, continued yesterday. A pastor in the LA suburb of Downey said five armed men driving out-of-state cars grabbed a Spanish-speaking man in the church's carpark. When she challenged the men and asked for their badge numbers and names, they refused. 'They did point their rifle at me and said, 'You need to get back,'' Lopez told broadcaster KTLA. 'The first, perhaps, of many' Police and National Guard members have fired rubber bullets at protesters, and reporters , while Los Angeles residents have been demanding the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) to get out of the city. The deployment of US military personnel on the streets of a major American city has been met with shock and concern by many. This week, Mayor Karen Bass said LA residents are living in fear and that the city had become the site of an 'experiment' conducted by the Trump administration. 'Our city is actually a test case for what happens when the federal government moves in and takes the authority away from the state or away from local government,' she said on Tuesday. LA police officers on Wednesday Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo 'By having the military, it de-escalates,' Trump said about the decision to send 700 marines to LA. Advertisement 'They're stopping an invasion,' he told graduates in an address at West Point military academy. 'This is the first, perhaps, of many,' Trump said yesterday of the National Guard and Marine deployments. 'Democracy is under assault' Trump won the election last year partly on promises to combat what he claims is an 'invasion' by undocumented migrants. 'We're going to have a safe country,' he told reporters on his way into a performance of 'Les Miserables' in Washington. 'We're not going to have what would have happened in Los Angeles. Remember, if I wasn't there… Los Angeles would have been burning to the ground.' Around 1,000 of the 4,700 troops Trump deployed are actively guarding facilities and working alongside ICE agents, said Scott Sherman, Deputy Commanding General Army North, who is leading operations. The Pentagon has said the deployment will last for 60 days and cost taxpayers $134 million. Governor Newsom, a Democrat widely viewed as eying a 2028 presidential run, has charged that Trump is seeking to escalate the confrontation for political gain. He warned on Tuesday that the unprecedented militarization would creep beyond his state's borders, claiming 'democracy is under assault right before our eyes.' Los Angeles Metro police ride on a vehicle during a protest on Wednesday Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Lawyers for California are expected in court today to seek an order blocking troops from accompanying immigration officers as they arrest migrants. Trump administration lawyers called the application a 'crass political stunt.' Not just LA Despite Trump's threats to deploy the National Guard to other Democratic-run states, protesters appear to be undeterred. In Spokane, Washington, a night curfew was declared after police arrested more than 30 protesters and fired pepper balls to disperse crowds, police chief Kevin Hall told a news conference. Demonstrations were reported in St Louis, Raleigh, Manhattan, Indianapolis and Denver. In San Antonio, hundreds marched and chanted near city hall, reports said, where Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott has deployed the state's National Guard. A nationwide 'No Kings' movement is expected on Saturday, when Trump will attend a highly unusual military parade in the US capital. The parade, featuring warplanes and tanks, has been organized to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the founding of the US Army but also happens to be the day of Trump's 79th birthday. With reporting from AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
Government fined €550,000 by privacy regulator and warned over facial scans for Public Services Card
The Government department has also been ordered to stop the practice and cease using its biometric database by April of next year, unless it finds a correct legal basis under which to do it. The Department, the regulator said, holds biometric data on at least 70pc of the population here. It has been engaged in the 'ongoing collection, storage and processing of highly sensitive personal data, including biometric data consisting of facial templates, on a large scale', according to the DPC. The Public Services Card has been a privacy battleground between the Government and the regulator for years. While ministers and civil servants insist that it's necessary to bring more efficiency into public services, with facial scans being required to protect against fraud, critics have consistently labelled it an attempt to introduce a national identity card through the back door. In 2017, the then Social Protection Minister, Regina Doherty, infamously described it as being 'not compulsory but mandatory'. In 2021, the Irish privacy regulator began an investigation into what the Department was doing with regard to biometric facial templates and its usage of associated facial matching technologies as part of the registration process for the Public Services Card. The registration process, known as 'SAFE 2 registration', typically involves the submission of a digital photo of someone to make sure they're not already registered or claiming benefits under another identity. Under European GDPR law, biometric data is categorised as 'special category data' to which higher protections and safeguards must be applied. 'SAFE 2 registration is mandatory for anyone who wishes to apply for a Public Services Card,' said the DPC. ADVERTISEMENT 'Persons who do not submit to such processing cannot access DSP services, including welfare payments.' However the Department said it believes there is a legal basis to operate the process, but that the legal provision is 'not in it view, clear and precise enough to satisfy the requirements of the GDPR'. it said that it 'will carefully consider the DPC decision report, in conjunction with colleagues in the Attoreny General's Office with a view to determining an appropriate response within the nine-month timeframe'. It said that depending on the outcome, it may appeal any enforcement notice or work to rectify the issues as perceived by the DPC. The Department said that the DPC 'did not find any evidence of inadequate technical and organisational security measures. "There are no examples of any person suffering damage or loss as a result of SAFE registration.' It insisted that the process has led to a reduction in identity fraud and offered 'security and customer service benefits'. There are no immediate implications for users of the card or MyGov ID, according to the Department, and during the nine-month period the process will continue. The regulator had looked at whether the Department of Social Protection had a 'lawful basis' for collecting and retaining biometric data 'for the purposes of conducting facial matching' as part of this SAFE 2 registration. It also examined the Department had complied with transparency obligations and had carried out an adequate Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) as part of SAFE 2 registration. It found the Department liable on all counts, by 'failing to identify a valid lawful basis for the collection of biometric data in connection with SAFE 2 registration' and, thus, incorrectly 'retaining biometric data collected' as part of the process. The watchdog said that it also 'failed to put in place suitably transparent information' to citizens and failed to include certain details in the DPIA it carried out. 'In light of the infringements identified above, the DPC has reprimanded the DSP, issued administrative fines totalling €550,000 and issued an order to the DSP requiring it to cease processing of biometric data in connection with SAFE 2 registration within nine months of this decision if the DSP cannot identify a valid lawful basis,' said the privacy regulator. However, the regulator did not suggest there was any security risk to the sensitive facial scans stored. 'The DPC did not find any evidence of inadequate technical and organisational security measures deployed by the DSP in connection with SAFE 2 registration in the context of this inquiry,' said Graham Doyle, deputy commissioner of the DPC. 'It is important to note that none of the findings of infringement identified, nor the corrective powers exercised by the DPC, pertain to the rollout of SAFE 2 registration by the DSP as a matter of principle. "This inquiry was concerned with assessing whether the legislative framework presently in place for SAFE 2 registration complies with the requirements of data protection law and whether the DSP operates SAFE 2 registration in a data protection-compliant manner, and the findings announced today identify a number of deficiencies in this regard.'
