logo
Pakistan's politico-military tango: Relationship fractured by deep State

Pakistan's politico-military tango: Relationship fractured by deep State

Hindustan Times12-05-2025

The idea of Pakistan as an Islamic democracy that offered space for other religions and cultures to coexist within an Islamic State vanished with the death of its founder and first Governor General, Muhammad Ali Jinnah. What has emerged since is a State that has demonstrated a fractured and unstable politico-military relationship that has seriously impeded Pakistan's evolution from a colony to a modern State.
There are three main themes that highlight the politico-military dynamics that exist in Pakistan. The first is an absence of consistent political acumen and the widespread corruption within Pakistan's political parties since its creation, which has offered space for the military to step in and offer notions of stability and power to its people. Pakistan's political instability relative to India is exemplified by the fact that it has had 24 prime ministers compared to India's 14.
The second theme that merits attention is the political rise of the Pakistan army and its gradual domination of the violent political landscape. From Prime Minister (PM) Liaquat Ali Khan's assassination at a political rally in 1951, to the recent attempt to assassinate Imran Khan in November 2022, the Pakistan army has — in one or the other form — been linked to these attempts as part of a continuous struggle for supremacy over the political and civilian establishment.
The methodology followed by the Pakistan army over the years to dominate the political landscape has followed two models. The first model is the military dictator model in which the Pakistan army chiefs have brazenly seized political power and proclaimed themselves as president to seemingly infuse stability in the country after engineered political crises. Generals Ayub Khan, Yahya Khan, Zia-ul-Haq, and Pervez Musharraf are examples of this model. In their regime, dummy PMs were installed, and these dictators ruled the country with an iron hand. An interesting trivia that indicates the longevity and domination of the Pakistan army is that since the creation of Pakistan, its army has just had 15 army chiefs with tenures ranging from two years to as long as 12 years (Zia). India, on the other hand, has had 31 army chiefs who have consistently stuck to the two-year/retirement at 62 years template that is mandated as per law.
The dominance of the Pakistan army has been periodically challenged by powerful politicians like Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, Nawaz Sharif, Benazir Bhutto, and Imran Khan, all of whom came to power on a consistent anti-India and Kashmir-centric plank. When coupled with the global pressure that linked the continuation of aid to the return of democratic processes, these politicians came to power with the backing of specific factions within the Pakistan army. However, what emerged that whenever these politicians attempted to flex political power and marginalise the military, they were removed from power — Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was hanged, Benazir was assassinated, Nawaz Sharif was exiled, and Imran Khan was imprisoned, all at the behest of powerful army chiefs.
The last theme that is not often discussed in India relates to the continuous tinkering with the Constitution that changes Pakistan's politico-military equations. Rubber stamp presidents have often been used by the Pakistan army to dissolve the National Assembly and conduct fresh elections, usually to install an elected government favourable to the army. In 1987, President Zia-Ul-Haq engineered the 8th Amendment which gave the president (himself) sweeping powers to dismiss the National Assembly. In 1997, the 13th Amendment was passed during a decade-long period of strong civilian rule, under PMs Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif. The Amendment nullified the 8th Amendment and clipped the wings of the President. The following decade saw a period of dominance of the Pakistan army with Musharraf proclaiming himself president in 2001 after three years as the army chief, a move that saw him undermine the Constitution to stay in office till 2008 when he resigned to avoid impeachment.
Soon after Musharraf's downfall, the 18th Amendment was put in place in 2010 to further limit presidential powers and improve federalism, a move that has not paid much dividend as far as limiting the powers of the army, though there have been previous army chiefs in the recent past such as General Qamar Bajwa who have attempted a more sophisticated way of retaining power in Pakistan — through a masquerade of submitting to civilian authority. Bajwa's successor, General Asim Munir is a radicalised general in the Zia mould who has plunged the politico-military dynamics in Pakistan to a new low. After the current crisis, only time will tell whether this relationship will see a change.
Arjun Subramaniam is a military historian and a strategic commentator. The views expressed are personal
Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Illegal Mexicans or legal Indians: Controversial poll resurfaces as LA burns, 'Be very careful what you wish for'
Illegal Mexicans or legal Indians: Controversial poll resurfaces as LA burns, 'Be very careful what you wish for'

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Illegal Mexicans or legal Indians: Controversial poll resurfaces as LA burns, 'Be very careful what you wish for'

In a recent social media poll, Americans said they would prefer illegal Mexicans over legal Indians. As Los Angeles burns amid anti-ICE protests, a controversial poll resurfaced on social media in which Americans chose illegal Mexicans over legal Indians. As many of the LA rioters are Mexicans and they waved Mexico flags in their protest, some social media users dug up the poll, conducted not long ago and showed that the result of choosing illegal Mexicans over legal Indians is in front of everyone. "Be very careful what you wish for, last year Americans have chosen illegal Mexican over legal Indians. While illegal Indians are being deported without any noise, Mexicans and others have burnt LA," one wrote. In one such poll conducted as recent as April 22, 84 per cent chose illegal Mexicans and 16 per cent legal Indians. "Illegal Mexicans are welcomed, Legal Indians are denied in most powerful country. Result infront of you," one wrote on X sharing the video of cars on fire in LA. — Netajinonsense1 (@Netajinonsense1) "Whole west make racism against Indian but the thing is that Indians respect law of the land work hard make progress, don't run for easy money," another wrote. In a similar poll conducted in December 2024, 82 per cent picked illegal Mexicans. Some social media users explained that the context of those polls was different as the polls were conducted mostly on H-1b rows. Legal Indians take up Americans' jobs and they can't be deported and that's why illegal Mexicans were picked in those polls, some said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo The LA riots started from protests against ICE raids in Los Angeles. About 35 Mexicans were reportedly detained in these raids, following which Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said migrants are not criminals."Mexicans living in the United States are good men and women, honest people who went to the United States to seek a better life for themselves and to support their families. They are not criminals! They are good men and women," the Mexican president said. Donald Trump deployed National Guard troops in Los Angeles, which started a Dem-Republicans tussle with Dem Governor Gavin Newsom resisting the deployment of the troops. While Newsom threatened to sue Trump and asked border czar Tom Homan to arrest him, Trump said he would have arrested Newsom had he been Tom. Trump defended the decision of sending the National Guards to LA and said if it was not done, Los Angeles would have been completely obliterated.

Donald Trump backs arrest threat against California Governor Newsom: ‘I would do it if I were Tom'
Donald Trump backs arrest threat against California Governor Newsom: ‘I would do it if I were Tom'

Mint

time2 hours ago

  • Mint

Donald Trump backs arrest threat against California Governor Newsom: ‘I would do it if I were Tom'

US President Donald Trump escalated his feud with California Governor Gavin Newsom on Monday (June 9), suggesting that Newsom should be arrested after publicly daring Border Czar, Tom Homan, to do so. Speaking briefly to reporters after landing at the White House, Trump responded to Newsom's defiant remarks made during a TV interview. 'I would do it if I were Tom,' Trump said, referring to Homan. 'I like Gavin Newsom… he's a nice guy, but he's grossly incompetent.' The remarks come days after Newsom challenged Homan on MSNBC, saying: 'He's a tough guy. Why doesn't he do that? He knows where to find me… So, Tom, arrest me. Let's go.' Newsom's comments were a direct response to Homan's warning that state officials who interfere with federal immigration operations could face felony charges. Tensions between California and federal authorities have intensified following a surge in immigration raids in Los Angeles. Homan, speaking earlier with NBC News, warned that local leaders obstructing immigration enforcement could be prosecuted. 'You cross that line, it's a felony,' Homan said. 'It's a felony to knowingly harbor and conceal an illegal alien. It's a felony to impede law enforcement doing their job.' He also made it clear that federal agents would not back down from operations in Los Angeles, regardless of resistance from state or city officials. In a Truth Social post, Trump doubled down on his criticism of Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, sarcastically suggesting they should be thanking him instead of pushing back against federal action. 'The very incompetent 'Governor,' Gavin Newscum, and 'Mayor,' Karen Bass, should be saying, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP, YOU ARE SO WONDERFUL. WE WOULD BE NOTHING WITHOUT YOU, SIR,'' Trump wrote. 'Instead, they choose to lie… by saying that we weren't needed, and that these are 'peaceful protests.' Just one look at the pictures and videos of the Violence and Destruction tells you all you have to know.' This latest clash underscores the deepening divide between federal and California state officials over immigration policy and public safety. Newsom and Bass have condemned the use of National Guard troops to quell protests against anti-ICE immigration raids, warning it could escalate tensions in an already volatile environment. Governor Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass have both criticised the deployment of over 2,000 National Guard troops authorised by Trump in response to the protests, warning it could escalate violence rather than restore order. In a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Newsom requested the federal troops be returned to state control, emphasising that 'State and local authorities are the most appropriate ones to evaluate the need for resources and safeguard life and property.' Protests escalated across Los Angeles and San Francisco over the weekend after President Donald Trump deployed National Guard troops without California Governor Gavin Newsom's request — a rare move that ignited political tensions and street chaos. Around 300 National Guard troops were sent to Los Angeles to protect federal buildings. Trump defended the move, saying, 'We're gonna have troops everywhere.' On Truth Social, he added, 'Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!' California leaders slammed the deployment. 'This is a serious breach of state sovereignty,' said Governor Newsom. LA Mayor Karen Bass accused Trump of pursuing 'another agenda — this isn't about public safety.' Protesters shut down the 101 Freeway, set Waymo cars on fire, and clashed with law enforcement. Police used tear gas and rubber bullets. 'We were not notified in advance of the raids,' said LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell, who confirmed arrests and violent flare-ups. Calling the unrest 'migrant riots,' Trump declared, 'Order will be restored, the Illegals will be expelled, and Los Angeles will be set free.' He directed federal agencies to coordinate a crackdown and urged more troops: 'Don't let these thugs get away with this.' Similar protests erupted in San Francisco, where 60 people were arrested and three officers injured. 'Violence — especially against SFPD officers — will never be tolerated,' the department said. With Marines placed on standby and cities reeling from the clashes, California faces an intensifying standoff between federal authority and state leaders.

Russia eyes reboot of RIC trilateral diplomacy as India-China tensions ease
Russia eyes reboot of RIC trilateral diplomacy as India-China tensions ease

First Post

time2 hours ago

  • First Post

Russia eyes reboot of RIC trilateral diplomacy as India-China tensions ease

Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that the stalled work of the Russia-India-China troika could be restarted as the tension between New Delhi and Beijing has eased 'significantly'. read more Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Monday said that the Russia-India-China (RIC) trilateral dialogue could resume, citing easing tensions between New Delhi and Beijing. Speaking at the 'Forum of the Future-2050' conference, Lavrov highlighted that the RIC platform—largely dormant since the 2020 Galwan Valley clash between Indian and Chinese troops could be the first step towards pan-Eurasian processes, including the formation of a multi-polar architecture. He said ongoing discussions with both Chinese and Indian counterparts are underway to restart the foreign ministers' meetings under the RIC framework. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I really hope that we will be able to restore the work of the Russia-India-China trio. We have not met at the level of foreign ministers for the last couple of years, but we are discussing this issue with my Chinese colleague and with the Indian head of the External Affairs department,' Lavrov was quoted as saying by Russia's state-run TASS news agency. Lavrov said that Russia and China can and should play a leading and proactive role in the pan-continental process, including in the formation of a multi-polar architecture, and added that the restoration of the RIC format could act as the first step towards this. 'I really hope that now that the tension has eased, in my opinion, has eased significantly on the border between India and China, and the situation is stabilising, there is a dialogue between New Delhi and Beijing, we will be able to resume the work of this Russia-India-China trio,' he added. 'This will also be a very important step forward in the movement of continental processes,' he added. The two-day forum inspired by Russian philosopher Alexander Dugin, often dubbed as President Vladimir Putin's 'guru', has attracted young participants. Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk's father Erol Musk is also attending the forum. With inputs from agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store