ACLU sues Nevada school district over graduation regalia policy
'For the fourth year in a row, we are again hearing stories about CCSD schools enforcing unconstitutional restrictions on students' decorating their caps and gowns at their high school graduation,' the ACLU said in a news release.
'Our clients and their families deserve the right to express themselves and celebrate their graduation,' the union added.
The law states that students are 'entitled to wear traditional tribal regalia or recognized objects of religious or cultural significance as an adornment at a school graduation ceremony.' However, school boards and school officials can ban a specific item if it's 'likely to cause a substantial disruption of, or material interference with, [a graduation] ceremony.'
The lawsuit, filed on Thursday, said the graduating student wanted to wear the following items:
A stole with the written message 'Black Girl Magic' to represent herself
A black and red stole to represent her time with the ACLU of Nevada's Emerging Leaders program
A pin signifying her membership in the National Honor Society
The stoles and cords provided by her school signify her achievements at a local career and technical academy
A cap decorated with small paper flowers, gems and crystals
The ACLU gave all the students in its Nevada Emerging Leaders program a graduation stole and pin to wear at graduation, and states in the suit that not being able to wear these violates the Nevada law and the First Amendment.
The suit contends that CCSD has not provided proper guidance to schools, causing individual schools to create their own guidelines.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sydney Sweeney Jeans Ad Deepfake Drags US Senator Into AI Scandal
Amy Klobuchar, who serves as the U.S. senator from Minnesota, has come out to set the record straight regarding a recent video. The video featured her badmouthing Anyone But You star Sydney Sweeney. Responding to the backlash that followed, Klobuchar noted that the clip was, in fact, a work of AI. She also petitioned for the introduction of new legislation to counter such 'deepfakes.' US Senator calls out AI after deepfake of her saying Sydney Sweeney has 'perfect t—–' goes viral An artificially generated video of Senator Amy Klobuchar shaming Sydney Sweeney at a recent Senate Judiciary subcommittee went viral. It was about the latter's American Eagle jeans ad. Post this, the veteran politician released an official statement addressing the issue. (via New York Post) Talking to the New York Times, Klobuchar noted, 'The A.I. deepfake featured me using the phrase 'perfect t—–s' and lamenting that Democrats were 'too fat to wear jeans or too ugly to go outside.' Though I could immediately tell that someone used footage from the hearing to make a deepfake, there was no getting around the fact that it looked and sounded very real.' The video of Amy Klobuchar included a deepfake version of the Minnesota Democrat. It showed her calling out Sydney Sweeney for her controversial ad collaboration with American Eagle over new line of jeans. 'If Republicans are gonna have beautiful girls with perfect t—–s in their ads, we want ads for Democrats too, you know,' the digitalized version of Klobuchar stated. 'We want ugly, fat b—–s wearing pink wigs and long-ass fake nails being loud and twerking on top of a cop car at a Waffle House because they didn't get extra ketchup, you know,' the clip continued. It concluded by taking a dig at the Democratic Party with a dialogue. It was, 'Just because we're the party of ugly people doesn't mean we can't be featured in ads, OK.' Further, it said, 'And I know most of us are too fat to wear jeans or too ugly to go outside, but we want representation.' In the aftermath of the incident, Klobuchar proposed an act that would 'give people the right to demand that social media companies remove deepfakes of their voice and likeness.' She said that they can do this while making exceptions for speech protected by the First Amendment. Originally reported by Apoorv Rastogi on Mandatory. The post Sydney Sweeney Jeans Ad Deepfake Drags US Senator Into AI Scandal appeared first on Reality Tea.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Man living next to Hispanic-owned business puts up sign urging Trump to deport his neighbors
A North Carolina man who says he's upset about the business next door to his home has put up a sign in his yard asking President Donald Trump to deport people in his neighborhood. 'BUILD THE WALL/DEPORT THEM ALL/TRUMP START WITH MY NEIGHBORHOOD FIRST' reads the sign that Douglas Dietrich placed at his home in Grifton, Pitt County. The news was first reported by WITN. Dietrich lives next door to the automotive, aircraft and boat repair business Monkeys Garage, owned by Enrique Garfias. According to WITN, Garfias told them that he was a 'legal citizen of the United States' and that he found the sign offensive, since it was targeted at him. Garfias said he thinks there is racism behind Dietrich's sign. He added that Dietrich has problems 'not just with Hispanic people' but that he targets Hispanic people more, because 'he thinks he can do it to us.' 'There is so much hate already. I don't hate him,' Garfias said. 'He thinks he's right. People out there are gonna see what he's doing is not right.' Calls to Garfias' business and other phone numbers were not answered. A call by NBC News on Thursday to a number believed to belong to Dietrich disconnected before anyone spoke. When called again, the person who responded said 'Stop f---ing calling me' and hung up. Dietrich told WITN that part of the reason he was upset was because Monkeys Garage was able to operate in a residential neighborhood. He said that years ago he wanted to operate a business on the property where Monkeys Garage is, but was told by previous town officials he couldn't do so because it's in a residential neighborhood. The dispute has led to conflicting comments on social media as community members have weighed in. Dietrich said the social media attention leads him to want to keep the sign in place. There were questions raised over whether Dietrich's sign was in compliance with local regulations in Grifton and its extraterritorial jurisdiction, which is where Dietrich lives. 'Everyone has the right to freedom of speech,' Dylan Haman, town manager of Grifton, told NBC News. 'Whether anyone agrees with what the sign says or not that's up to the public and whether or not they think it's a neighborly thing to do is another question.' While the town of less than 3,000 has to respect Dietrich's right to freedom of speech, the town does have zoning rules about permit requirements, where signs can be located, their size and height, etc., Haman said. 'He can say anything from, 'I love Jesus' to political. We don't get into that because that's a First Amendment issue,' he said. A permit application for the sign was submitted Wednesday, Haman said. A determination on whether the sign complies with the local sign ordinance might come at the end of the week, the town manager said, adding that and 'there are some regulations about what's allowed in residential districts' that have to be considered too. Haman said there had not been considerations yet on whether the sign could lead to people targeting Garfias and his business or some kind of violence. 'We are not pro or against any political party ... We are just a town trying to provide service,' Haman said, who noted that the town board is elected in unaffiliated elections. 'We just encourage everybody to be more neighborly.' This article was originally published on Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
State reps push for safeguard against Trump deploying military to Michigan cities
Earlier this month, President Donald Trump announced a 'crime emergency' in Washington D.C. He then militarized the D.C. police department and deployed hundreds of National Guard soldiers, sparking protests, public safety concerns and legal challenges. As Trump threatens similar actions in other Democratic-led cities, some Michigan lawmakers are pushing for legislative safeguards to prevent a similar situation from happening here. 'The federalization and deployment of National Guard troops into L.A. and Washington D.C. represents an unprecedented abuse of executive power,' Michigan House Rep. Laurie Pohutsky, D-Livonia, said at a news conference on Thursday, Aug. 21. 'As elected leaders, we cannot allow these actions to go unchecked.' State Rep. Tyrone Carter, D-Detroit, and Kyle Zawacki, the Legislative Director for the ACLU of Michigan, joined Pohutsky at the news conference to introduce House Bill 4796. The bill sets out to 'reaffirm state sovereignty' by requiring permission from Michigan's governor before the military can be deployed in the state. While the bill does not expand or limit any existing powers, said Pohutsky, it does enable state courts to litigate the issue, rather than relying on federal courts to determine the legality of the President's actions. 'This bill […] reiterates federal law into state law, giving our state and our courts one more avenue to push back on the President's unlawful and, arguably, unconstitutional actions, should he attempt to deploy troops in Michigan,' said Pohutsky. Rep. Carter, a former lieutenant with the Wayne County Sheriff's Office, warned that the deployment of troops to American cities 'will not bring public safety.' 'Good policing is about protecting the civilians we serve, not treating them like enemies on the battlefield — that's the role of the military,' said Carter. When asked if she thought it was a realistic concern that troops would be sent to Michigan cities, Pohutsky cited reporting from the Washington Post and The Guardian that the Trump administration has already signaled its 'plans to expand these actions' across the country. 'I think that it's important to supply that safeguard whether it's an acute threat to Michigan or not,' Pohutsky said. She also said she worries that similar policies to the ones in Washington could be 'weaponized' in cities like Ann Arbor that have been vocal about their opposition to many of the current presidential administration's actions. In addition, Pohutsky said she has 'very serious concerns' for Detroit, a city that Trump has repeatedly criticized in public comments, and whose population is 74% Black. 'Based on the cities that [Trump] has targeted and the areas that he is choosing to have occupied, I absolutely think that race is playing a role,' Pohutsky said. 'Which again creates some concern about areas of our state that may be unjustly targeted using these policies.' Throughout the news conference, all three speakers described the President's deployment of troops as 'authoritarian,' with Zawacki warning that it was another step down a dangerous path, and Pohutsky calling on her father's experience as a soldier in WWII to warn constituents to pay attention to history. 'We keep saying 'unprecedented,' and in a way it is because it's unprecedented here. But worldwide, it is not unprecedented,' said Pohutsky. 'It's very, very frightening.' Violent crime rates in both Washington D.C. and Detroit are currently the lowest they've been in decades. In 2024, the city of Detroit reported a 19% decline in homicides. Earlier this week, however, Detroit Mayor Duggan sparked controversy over an interview with CNN in which he partially credited the Trump administration for helping Detroit's violent crime reduction. Pohutsky acknowledged the limits of the legislation, saying that preventing the Trump administration from 'engaging unlawfully is not reality.' However, she ended by emphasizing her goal is to give state courts the power to litigate and fight back against such actions. The bill must be approved with a majority vote in both the Michigan House and Senate and then signed by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer before it can become law. Pohutsky said that while she doesn't expect the bill to move out of the House or for the Speaker of the House, Rep. Matt Hall, R–Richland Township, to put the bill up for a vote, she does see it as an important first step towards raising awareness on the issue and a 'long term goal' to pass the legislation in the future. Aurora Sousanis is a politics intern at the Detroit Free Press. You can contact her at asousanis@ This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Legislation aims to stop Trump deploying military to Michigan cities
