
Map Shows Democrat States Rolling Back Health Care Benefits for Immigrants
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Multiple Democratic-led states, including California, Illinois and Minnesota, have moved to roll back or freeze health care coverage for undocumented immigrants. Others may follow suit.
Why It Matters
The rollback of state-funded health care access for undocumented immigrants could signal a significant policy shift with national implications. The developments come amid larger debates over immigration and health care policy at a time when state and federal budgets face significant pressures.
What To Know
These policy reversals have been attributed by the states' Democratic leaders to mounting budget deficits and rising program costs. While coverage for many undocumented residents had been expanded in recent years, governors announced measures to reduce benefits, freeze new enrollments or end programs entirely.
Such changes could affect tens of thousands of individuals and counter notions of universal health care, backed by many Democrats, while prompting broader reassessment of similar programs in other states, including Colorado, New York and Washington.
Some Democratic-run states are rolling back health care, or considering rolling it back, for undocumented immigrants because of tightened budgets.
Some Democratic-run states are rolling back health care, or considering rolling it back, for undocumented immigrants because of tightened budgets.
Flourish
California: Enrollment Freeze and Possible Benefit Reductions
California Governor Gavin Newsom has announced plans to freeze new enrollments in Medi-Cal, the state's Medicaid program, for undocumented adults. Existing recipients would remain covered but could face reduced benefits in the future.
Starting in 2027, the state plans to introduce a $100 monthly premium for adults without satisfactory immigration status, attributed to higher-than-expected spending and a multi-billion-dollar budget shortfall.
The pause in California is for undocumented adults who haven't already enrolled in Medi-Cal, not people already enrolled. It does not apply to those under age 19, as even those who turn 19 and are on Medi-Cal and remain income eligible will keep their coverage.
In May, Newsom said: "We are not cutting or rolling back those that are already enrolled in our Medi-Cal system, we're just capping it....No state has done more than the state of California, no state will continue to more than the state of California by a long shot. That's a point of pride and that's a point of privilege to be governor that's been part of that effort."
Under Newsom, California became the first state to offer full-scope Medi-Cal to all low-income adults, regardless of immigration status—expanding access in phases to young adults in 2020, older adults in 2022 and all remaining adults in 2024.
"Governor Newsom championed these expansions and remains committed to protecting the immigrant communities who contribute to the fabric and economy of California," Elana Ross, deputy communications director for Newsom's office, told Newsweek on Friday. "He refuses to turn his back on hard-working Californians, especially when it comes to their basic health care needs.
"But because of the $16 billion Trump Slump and higher-than-expected health care utilization, the state must take difficult but necessary steps to ensure fiscal stability and preserve the long-term viability of Medi-Cal for all Californians."
Proposed adjustments in California's 2025-26 budget would include a $100 monthly premium for certain adults, effective January 1, 2027, and applies to Medi-Cal enrollees age 19 and older with "unsatisfactory immigration status—in line with the average subsidized covered California premium, which is about $135 per month in 2025.
The estimated general fund savings would be $2.1 billion by 2028-29.
California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks at East Los Angeles College on February 26, 2025, in Monterey Park, California.
California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks at East Los Angeles College on February 26, 2025, in Monterey Park, California.The enrollment freeze for full-scope Medi-Cal for undocumented adults, effective no sooner than January 1, 2026, applies only to new adult applicants over 19.
Nobody under such a freeze would be kicked off their health care. There would be no impact on limited-scope coverage (emergency, pregnancy services, etc.) and children would remain unaffected.
The state, which has previously frozen a publicly sponsored coverage program during difficult budget years, has estimated general-fund savings to be $3.3 billion by 2028-29.
Illinois: Full Program Termination
Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker has proposed ending the Health Benefits for Immigrant Adults program as of July 1. The program, launched in 2021, provided state-funded health coverage to more than 30,000 low-income undocumented adults.
The decision is a response to higher-than-anticipated costs, aligning with broader deficit reduction efforts. Those previously enrolled will be left without similar coverage options.
Newsweek reached out to Pritzker's office for comment.
Minnesota: Removal From MinnesotaCare
Pritzker specifically related his in-state efforts to what is happening in neighboring states like Minnesota, where Governor Tim Walz said he would sign a bill removing undocumented adults from MinnesotaCare, a state-funded program, by year's end.
While coverage for undocumented adults will end, eligibility will continue for undocumented children. The bill reversed a major health policy expansion from 2023.
Newsweek reached out to Walz's office for comment.
Broader National Trend and Political Debate
Congressional Republicans in Colorado, one of seven states offering health care regardless of immigration status, are urging Democratic Governor Jared Polis to rescind Medicaid eligibility for undocumented immigrants.
A letter co-signed by Representatives Lauren Boebert, Jeff Crank and Gabe Evans referenced recent rollbacks in California and Minnesota, and cited concerns over rising costs and effects on the state's Medicaid program.
The letter, in part, says that each new dollar invested in care for illegal immigrants is a dollar that could go to supporting long-term care for seniors or keeping rural hospitals open.
"Congressman Gabe Evans believes Governor Polis should prioritize taxpayer-funded health care for citizens who need it most: single mothers, children and people with disabilities," a spokesperson for Evans told Newsweek on Friday. "Additionally, every dollar that Colorado hands out for free health care for illegal immigrants is money that can't be spent on seniors and rural hospitals."
Newsweek reached out to Polis' office for comment.
What Happens Next
Debate in other states, such as New York and Washington, suggests that similar policy shifts could spread. Democratic governors pointed to financial constraints and anticipated federal funding cuts as primary reasons for reversing course.
Pressures from federal proposals, such as a Trump-endorsed bill to reduce Medicaid support for states offering coverage to undocumented immigrants, are shaping state policies.
States like New York and Washington are reviewing their own policies, signaling that further changes may be forthcoming as budget negotiations and federal actions continue.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
42 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Clarence Page: Did you miss a national holiday, Mr. President?
Juneteenth came and went Thursday, but curiously something seemed to be missing from the annual celebration: a cordial salute from the president of the United States. Well, sure, you might say at this point in our political history: After all, he's Donald Trump. What do we expect? The only times when the master of Mar-a-Lago brings up a delicate topic like America's troubled racial history is when he can use it to bludgeon Democrats and other liberals. But it wasn't long ago that Trump regularly made a point to mark Juneteenth, the holiday that honors the freeing of enslaved Americans by his Republican predecessor Abraham Lincoln. As The New York Times reported, Trump invoked Juneteenth in each of his first four years as president, before it was a federal holiday. It commemorates June 19, 1865, the day Union soldiers brought the news of freedom to enslaved Black people in Texas, letting them know they had been legally freed by Lincoln's signing of the Emancipation Proclamation two years earlier. Better late than never. Much better. When asked on Thursday about Trump's intentions to mark the holiday in the traditional presidential manner, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt answered evasively, 'I'm not tracking his signature on a proclamation today.' That was strange, because by Leavitt's own admission, Trump had in the past week issued proclamations commemorating Father's Day, Flag Day and National Flag Week, and the 250th anniversary of the Battle of Bunker Hill — none of which are among the 11 annual federal holidays. Why does Trump feel differently about the holiday now? Without mentioning Juneteenth by name, Trump bellyached on Truth Social: 'Too many non-working holidays in America. It is costing our Country $BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to keep all of these businesses closed. The workers don't want it either!' Ah, yes, workers and their well-known aversion to paid holidays. He continued: 'Soon we'll end up having a holiday for every once working day of the year. It must change if we are going to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' That sounds ominous. Is Trump planning to claw back paid holidays from hardworking government employees? It occurred to me, as a descendant of freed enslaved people, that perhaps Trump simply wants to downgrade our day of jubilee. True, back in his first term, Trump lavishly boasted: 'I made Juneteenth very famous. It's actually an important event, it's an important time. But nobody had heard of it. Very few people have heard of it.' (That would be news to the millions of 'nobodies' who spent years eating soul food and pounds of traditional 'red cake' to celebrate the day.) Trump even spoke favorably about Juneteenth as a federal holiday, but he didn't get around to making it official before he left office. It was then-President Joe Biden who completed that task in 2021. Which may explain Trump's newfound hostility to the holiday. Whereas Biden sought to mend the nation's racial divisions after the George Floyd protests, Trump built his revanchist second presidency on the demonization of diversity. Consider that until recently, the following message could be read on the Army's official website: 'Juneteenth is an integral part of Army life. It is a time to reflect on the crucial role the Army played in the Emancipation Proclamation and ending segregation in the U.S.' It called on readers to 'honor those who fought and sacrificed to ensure the Constitution fulfilled its promise to all Americans.' As an Army veteran, that sentiment makes me feel proud. However, if you Google those words today, and click on the link in the search results, you reach an error page. The Army scrubbed the message. Why? Perhaps for the same reason Trump's secretary of defense ordered Arlington National Cemetery to delete webpage memorials of Black and Latino people and women who defended our country. And the same reason he restored Confederate names to military bases and dismissed several Black generals. It's hard to think of a holiday better suited to uplift our mulligan stew of a nation than Juneteenth, when our armed forces finally broke the shackles of a profoundly unjust institution, beginning a process of liberation and reconciliation that we carry on. Sadly, such historical good news is being suppressed too often in today's classrooms and by political opportunists who would rather build unity in their own ranks by turning us against each other like so many political interest groups. Some, including our president it seems, would rather hide our troubled past than try to use it to learn how to work together and truly make America great. Say, tell me again: What was the U.S. Civil War about?


Axios
42 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: DNC touts record fundraising under Ken Martin
The Democratic National Committee is touting a record $40 million raised in the first four months of Ken Martin 's chairmanship — more than any other chair in that time frame. Why it matters: The news comes amid growing infighting and frustration from committee members, and after the New York Times reported the DNC's fundraising from major donors has dangerously dropped off. "Powered by our grassroots community, the DNC has just set a new record for most money raised in the first four months under a new Chair — ever," Martin said in a statement, first provided to Axios. Zoom in: The nearly $40 million raised from February through May surpasses the $37 million raised under Jamie Harrison's leadership in those same months in 2021, according to the DNC. It is also almost twice as much as was raised in the months after the 2016 election, the first time Donald Trump was elected president. Grassroots fundraising has been a big factor, with record grassroots fundraising for February and March. What he's saying: " This is only the start, but it's a record-setting start that allows Democrats to meaningfully invest in every part of the country," Martin said in the statement. "Our grassroots donors are sending a message to Donald Trump and rubber-stamp Republicans who are trying to steal health care from working people in exchange for billionaire tax handouts," he continued. Zoom out: The DNC has struggled to show a united front after former DNC Vice Chair David Hogg stirred up controversy with an effort to back younger primary challengers to Democratic incumbents.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Move to unseat Mike Lee gains steam after Utah senator's tweets mock Minnesota political shootings
The movement to unseat Republican Representative Mike Lee of Utah is gaining traction as he faces backlash for his posts about the shootings of two Minnesota politicians last week. Last week, Democratic state Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband were fatally shot in their Minnesota home. State Senator John Hoffman and his wife were also shot in their home, but survived. Two days later, officials arrested and charged Vance Boelter with two counts of second-degree murder and attempted murder in connection with the shootings. After the shootings, Lee wrote on X: 'This is what happens when Marxists don't get their way.' In another post, he posted a photo of Boelter with the caption 'Nightmare on Waltz Street.' The caption appeared to be a reference to Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, a Democrat. Lee has since deleted the posts. Now, federal and state lawmakers alike are slamming Lee for sharing the posts in the wake of the deadly shooting. Utah State Senator Nate Blouin, a Democrat, told The Bulwark he's getting messages from constituents asking him to hold Lee accountable. Fellow Democratic lawmakers in Utah say they've been similarly flooded with emails from constituents who want to donate to support efforts to unseat Lee, according to The Bulwark. But Blouin told The Bulwark he doesn't think a Democrat like him could win Utah 'at a statewide level.' However, he would support rallying behind an independent challenger, he added. 'We're not going to win with a Democrat right now in Utah at a statewide level. It is not going to happen. I love the optimism, but it is not a reality,' Blouin told the outlet. 'We've got a lot of work to do on the ground level to convince people that Democrats aren't, you know, demons and eating babies trying to make everyone have an abortion.' A senior staffer for Minnesota Senator Tina Smith also wrote a scathing email to Lee, The Salt Lake Tribune reports. The staffer, who knew Hortman, said they were speaking 'through enormous grief.' 'It is important for your office to know how much additional pain you've caused on an unspeakably horrific weekend,' the email read. 'I am not sure what compelled you or your boss to say any of those things, which, in addition to being unconscionable, also may very well be untrue.' 'You exploited the murder of a lifetime public servant and her husband to post some sick burns about Democrats,' the message continued. 'Did you see this as an excellent opportunity to get likes and retweet[s]? Have you absolutely no conscience? No decency?' Smith told CNN on Monday she also confronted Lee in person. She recalled telling Lee: 'You need to take responsibility and accountability for what you are saying and doing out there in the social media world.' Gabi Finlayson, founder of a Democratic consulting firm in Utah, told The Bulwark that Lee's posts 'really broke something open in Utah.' 'There certainly is a lot more urgency,' Finlayson said. 'The idea that we truly have to get him out of office is no longer a theoretical thing or just a liberal idea. It is a moral imperative.' The Independent has contacted Lee's office for comment.