logo
Bridging powers, managing tensions

Bridging powers, managing tensions

The Sun3 days ago
AMID intensifying great power rivalry and regional flashpoints, such as the recent Thailand-Cambodia border skirmish, Malaysia is asserting itself as a credible and proactive middle power.
Its chairmanship of Asean this year has reaffirmed its long-standing foreign policy strategy of selective alignment, a pragmatic approach that allows Malaysia to build bridges between rival powers while championing Asean's relevance in an increasingly polarised global order.
Through a principled and agile diplomatic strategy, Malaysia has positioned itself not only as a stabilising regional force but also as a convener of inclusive dialogue and multilateral cooperation.
The recent escalation of the Thailand-Cambodia border dispute, long marked by intermittent tensions, underscored the fragility of peace along Southeast Asia's strategic frontiers.
On July 24, this simmering conflict erupted into a four-day confrontation in the Emerald Triangle, with both sides exchanging artillery and rocket fire. Thailand's deployment of F-16 and Gripen fighter jets marked a significant escalation.
In its role as the Asean Chair, Malaysia swiftly emerged as a key diplomatic actor. Due to the precarious nature of the conflict, Kuala Lumpur hosted emergency talks on July 28 between Thai and Cambodian leaders, with Malaysia mediating the negotiations.
The presence of both American and Chinese ambassadors to Malaysia lent additional legitimacy to the process. A ceasefire was
agreed and implemented, restoring calm along the border.
Malaysia's successful diplomatic intervention earned praise from the US, the EU and regional Asean leaders. It reinforced Malaysia's growing credibility as a constructive and neutral middle power – one capable of managing high-stakes diplomacy while upholding Asean centrality.
The inclusion of US and China in the ceasefire negotiations further underscored Malaysia's ability to balance competing interests without aligning too closely with any single power.
Malaysia's leadership was further demonstrated during the 58th Asean Foreign Ministers' Meeting (AMM-58), held from July 8 to 11 in Kuala Lumpur.
Against a backdrop of geopolitical uncertainty, the meeting advanced key regional discussions on the South China Sea, the internal crisis in Myanmar and global economic disruptions, such as escalating tariffs imposed by the US.
A series of Asean-led platforms were convened in parallel, including the Asean Plus Three meeting, Asean Post-Ministerial Conferences and Asean Regional Forum.
What set this year's AMM-58 apart was the level of engagement from major global powers. Malaysia succeeded in bringing together foreign ministers from the US, China and Russia, an increasingly rare diplomatic convergence in today's fragmented geopolitical climate.
Notably, US Secretary of State and Acting National Security Adviser Marco Rubio chose to prioritise the AMM-58 over scheduled visits to Japan and South Korea, a move that reflects not only Asean's growing relevance but also Malaysia's ability to shape the regional strategic environment.
Hosting one of the most consequential Asean meetings in recent years required more than logistical coordination; it reflected the presence
of a deeply rooted and adaptable foreign
policy strategy.
Malaysia's selective alignment strategy enables it to maintain constructive ties with all major powers. As a middle power, this approach enhances Malaysia's credibility, allowing it to engage across geopolitical divides with strategic flexibility.
The strength of selective alignment lies in its strategic ambidexterity. Malaysia is not bound by binary choices and can build cooperative ties with diverse partners even amid global uncertainty.
This approach proved effective during the Cold War, when Malaysia maintained strong economic and defence relations with Western powers while simultaneously engaging the Soviet Union and becoming the first Asean member to establish diplomatic ties with China in 1974.
Today, that same policy posture enables Malaysia to navigate complex dynamics involving Washington, Beijing and Moscow. Its long-standing defence relationships with the UK, Australia and New Zealand – sustained through the Five Power Defence Arrangements and indirectly connected to the US via the Bilateral Training and Consultative Group – coexist alongside active bilateral ties with China and Russia. This enduring balance reflects Malaysia's foresight in managing volatility without appearing aligned with any one bloc.
Malaysia's current diplomatic practice also reflects calculated and astute statecraft. It pairs bilateral engagement with active participation in multilateral platforms, using Asean mechanisms to address contentious issues in a constructive manner.
By combining dialogues with regional frameworks, Malaysia helps to minimise the risk of coercion and reinforces Asean's role as a credible convener in regional affairs.
As the Chair, Malaysia is effectively leveraging this strategy to connect middle and smaller powers with global powers. It is helping to elevate Asean's profile, not as a passive player or a contested geographical space for great power rivalry, but as a proactive platform for dialogue, cooperation and building shared prosperity.
That said, selective alignment is not without
its challenges. It requires constant recalibration, diplomatic agility and coherent domestic policy support.
Additionally, Asean's consensus-driven model can limit the bloc's ability to respond swiftly to emerging crises. Malaysia must, therefore, continue investing in Asean's institutional capacity and enhance its diplomatic and crisis-response capabilities to sustain its effectiveness
as a regional power broker.
In sum, Malaysia's selective alignment in foreign policy strategy offers a compelling model for middle power diplomacy in the Indo-Pacific.
By mediating conflicts, managing tensions and building inclusive coalitions, Malaysia is strengthening its international standing and reinforcing Asean's strategic relevance while safeguarding its own national interests.
As its Asean chairmanship continues, Malaysia's role as a bridging power is set to grow, offering the region a steady hand amid a volatile and divided global landscape.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thai army to lead Asean observers keen on assessing alleged ceasefire violations at Thai-Cambodian border
Thai army to lead Asean observers keen on assessing alleged ceasefire violations at Thai-Cambodian border

The Star

time22 minutes ago

  • The Star

Thai army to lead Asean observers keen on assessing alleged ceasefire violations at Thai-Cambodian border

BANGKOK: The Royal Thai Army (RTA) will lead the Asean Interim Observation Team (IOT) to visit the Thai-Cambodian border from Monday (Aug 18) to Wednesday (Aug 20). The mission aims to monitor alleged breaches of international law and ceasefire conditions by Cambodian troops, government spokesman Jirayu Houngsub (pic) said on Sunday (Aug 17). Asean and Ottawa Convention envoys visit Si Sa Ket Jirayu noted that the visits follow two successful trips organised earlier by the Thai government for international governments and organisations. On Saturday, Asean envoys and representatives from countries that ratified the Ottawa Convention visited Si Sa Ket province. The Ottawa Convention, formally known as the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction, bans the use of landmines. During the visit, envoys witnessed evidence of anti-personnel mines allegedly laid by Cambodian troops and spoke directly with affected residents. Jirayu said the Thai government believed the envoys would report their findings to their respective governments and raise the issue with the international community. ICRC representatives assess humanitarian impact The RTA, in coordination with the Foreign Ministry and Interior Ministry, also facilitated a visit by representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). They assessed the humanitarian impact of cross-border attacks on civilians in Surin, Si Sa Ket, and Ubon Ratchathani provinces. ICRC representatives interviewed local residents in Phanom Dong Rak and Kab Choeng districts of Surin, Kantharalak district in Si Sa Ket, and Nam Yuen district in Ubon Ratchathani. Jirayu said the visit demonstrated Thailand's commitment to working with the ICRC to strengthen humanitarian protection mechanisms. ICRC to submit findings to both countries The ICRC gathered facts on the ground, interviewed affected civilians, and will compile a confidential report on the humanitarian impact of the conflict. The organisation will not make its findings public but will submit the report directly to both Thailand and Cambodia. - The Nation/ANN

From tariff talks to conflict resolutions: Negotiators wanted?
From tariff talks to conflict resolutions: Negotiators wanted?

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

From tariff talks to conflict resolutions: Negotiators wanted?

IN today's fragmented and divisive world, demands for skilled negotiators, those steeped in diplomacy and dialogue as statecraft, should be at a premium. After all, a perfect storm is brewing: global politics are becoming increasingly fraught, and common global issues are being weaponised. Open conflicts are flaring up in places like Europe and the Middle East, while other regions, such as East Asia, face renewed risks of unintended conflict due to miscalculations over long-standing disputes. Even South-East Asia, long marked by the absence of open conflict between Asean member states, was recently reminded of the dangers of complacency and the need to continuously nurture a culture of peace. Cross-border issues, such as the climate crisis, demand a cooperative global response, yet nations are unable to look past their immediate interests. A proverbial diplomatic traffic jam confronts us as countries scramble to reach 'a deal' to stave off tariff wars. With true statesmanship, these fraught conditions would be an ideal opportunity for diplomats and negotiators to thrive, demonstrating their unique skills in managing international relations, bridging differences and forging consensus tactfully and respectfully. Unfortunately, the opposite seems to be happening. Diplomacy is facing headwinds as countries increasingly turn inward, seemingly oblivious to the fact that national goals cannot be achieved in a vacuum. Instead, they require a keen awareness of external dynamics and how they affect a country's objectives. Furthermore, multilateral institutions are facing a critical test of their relevance and credibility. They are often seen as disconnected from shifting power dynamics. Complex issues are often oversimplified for headlines, and the popular focus on making 'deals' instead of 'agreements' highlights a short-term, transactional mindset. Do professional negotiators and diplomats matter? The work of a professional negotiator is not one-size-fits-all. Every situation is unique. The setting can vary, from bilateral to multilateral negotiations. Multilateral settings might involve a few countries, often within a region, or many countries, as seen in the United Nations system. Bridge-building efforts can also take place within countries, where the term 'dialogue' is often preferred over 'negotiation'. It is important to recognise that the resolution of internal conflicts, particularly in South-East Asia, has benefited immensely from the tactful, nuanced and calibrated skills of the region's diplomats, who are always conscious of hidden tripwires that could halt fragile dialogues. The subject matter can also vary widely, including political, security, economic, trade, finance and global cross-border issues. To add to the complexity, these subjects are often intertwined, defying clear distinctions between them and between the local, national, regional and global levels. A country's role can also differ, ranging from being a party to a dispute, a facilitator or mediator, to a strictly third-party observer focused on minimising risks and maximising opportunities. In all these different circumstances, the professional negotiator offers important, often unquantifiable, skills. First, a deep understanding of national interests is crucial. Professional negotiators have the ability to clearly identify and, if necessary, recalibrate their country's national interests on international issues. They focus on long-term interests rather than short-term, fleeting ones. Their institutional memory allows them to be alert to even the subtlest shifts that could inadvertently cause irreparable harm. Negotiators also have the capacity to take a comprehensive, unified approach. They are able to develop a whole-of-government, or even whole-of-society, approach in formulating a country's negotiating position, rather than a fragmented, 'siloed' one. This approach creates a sense of common national ownership and participation, making the country's position more resistant to the probes of other negotiating parties and ensuring the effective implementation of any agreements reached. They also possess full knowledge of their country's 'red lines' to adeptly manage changing negotiation dynamics. The real work of negotiation begins after initial positions are presented, it is more than just reading a prepared statement. Second, professional negotiators are trained to develop an acute knowledge and 'feel' of the other side's position, of their interests and objectives as well as their 'red lines'. They understand the other side's constraints and how they align or diverge from their own. This awareness is not a sign of weakness, it is crucial to ensure the most efficient (not to overpromise or over-concede for the sake of reaching agreements) and effective ('national' interest becoming synonymous with 'common' interest) attainment of the set objectives. In today's complex environment, experienced negotiators also discern wider stakeholders and their interests, even if they are not directly involved. This ensures that outcomes are supported and not contested, and that these dynamics work in their country's favour. Nothing happens in a vacuum. Third, professional negotiators have a strong appreciation for detailed preparation. They leave nothing to chance. Every step of a negotiation, no matter how small, is prepared for and, if necessary, negotiated over. The agenda, format, working methods and even seating arrangements matter and can significantly affect outcomes. Unfortunately, such attention to detail, the minutiae of a negotiation process, is sometime mistakenly viewed as archaic and overly bureaucratic. The truth is, they help draw the proverbial line in the sand, to test resolve before attention turn to the issues of substance. Finally, the experienced negotiator possesses a range of unquantifiable qualities. These include the ability to 'read the room' and sense underlying dynamics, points of convergence and the other side's readiness to compromise. They have a keen appreciation for timing, knowing when to reveal a national position or submit fresh proposals. A genuine capacity for empathy allows them to build trust and a comfort level with the other side without being co-opted. They also know how to agree to disagree respectfully, avoiding excessive celebration of gains that could burn bridges for future negotiations. An almost infinite reservoir of patience and resilience is critical in a battle of will and wit. Negotiators must not be too eager for results or fall into the trap of unilaterally set deadlines. Ultimately, since all agreements are expressed in words, experienced negotiators are wordsmiths, equipped with a command of language. They must also be seen as trustworthy, reliable and principled individuals whose words can be relied upon. In our fragmented world, the efficacy and importance of diplomacy as a means to manage relations between states should be beyond doubt. The skills of the diplomat-negotiator should be in high demand, and a surge in diplomacy is needed. — The Jakarta Post/ANN Marty Natalegawa is a former Indonesian foreign minister and founder/convenor of the Amity Circle, which focuses on the promotion of diplomacy, negotiation and dialogue.

Lavrov discusses Alaska summit with Turkey, Hungary after US-Russia
Lavrov discusses Alaska summit with Turkey, Hungary after US-Russia

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

Lavrov discusses Alaska summit with Turkey, Hungary after US-Russia

MOSCOW: Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov held separate calls with his Turkish and Hungarian counterparts on Saturday. The discussions followed the inconclusive US-Russia summit in Alaska, where no agreement was reached on ending the Ukraine war. The Russian foreign ministry confirmed the call with Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan was initiated by Ankara. Both ministers reviewed the outcomes of the August 15 meeting between Presidents Putin and Trump. Turkey has positioned itself as a mediator, maintaining open channels with Russia, Ukraine, and NATO allies. Lavrov also spoke with Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto about the Ukraine crisis in light of the Alaska summit. Hungary has faced criticism for its continued energy ties with Russia and opposition to EU sanctions. Prime Minister Viktor Orban called the world 'safer' post-summit, while EU leaders stressed Ukraine's sovereignty over its territory. - Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store