logo
Administration returns improperly deported Guatemalan

Administration returns improperly deported Guatemalan

Yahooa day ago

The Trump administration has returned a Guatemalan man who was improperly deported to Mexico, obeying a federal judge's order that he be brought back to the United States to receive due process.
The man, identified in court papers only as O.C.G., is bound for an immigration detention facility in Arizona, his attorney Trina Realmuto confirmed, while he awaits further immigration proceedings ordered by U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy, a Massachusetts-based appointee of President Joe Biden.
The administration signaled last week that it was working to arrange O.C.G.'s return. The New York Times first reported that O.C.G. was back in the United States.
Although O.C.G. is a Guatemalan national, an immigration judge in February blocked his deportation there over O.C.G.'s fear of persecution in his native country. The Trump administration then abruptly deported him to Mexico.
But in a class action lawsuit, O.C.G. said immigration officials never asked whether he had any similar fear of persecution in Mexico, a country where he says he has been raped and targeted for being gay. As a result, O.C.G. accepted an offer from Mexico to be deported to Guatemala, where he says he has been living in hiding ever since.
Initially, the Trump administration contested O.C.G.'s account, relying on a sworn statement from an Immigration and Customs Enforcement official to insist that O.C.G. was given a chance to express fear of deportation to Mexico and said he had no concerns. But officials later retracted that account, saying it was based on an erroneous note in an ICE database.
Murphy quickly ordered the Department of Homeland Security to facilitate O.C.G.'s return to the United States. Though it is reminiscent of similar cases in which judges have ordered the return of wrongly deported immigrants — like Kilmar Abrego Garcia — O.C.G.'s return was less cumbersome to arrange because he was not incarcerated in Guatemala.
Department of Homeland Security officials used the development to lob new attacks at Murphy, who they have criticized for issuing a sweeping ruling blocking so-called 'third country' deportations to places other than an immigrant's native country, without a chance to assert fear of torture or persecution.
"America's asylum system was never intended to be used as a de facto amnesty program or a catch-all, get-out-of-deportation-free card,' DHS spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement, calling Mexico a 'safe third option' for O.C.G. 'Yet, this federal activist judge ordered us to bring him back, so he can have an opportunity to prove why he should be granted asylum to a country that he has had no past connection to. The Trump administration is committed to returning our asylum system to its original intent."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal judge again blocks deportation of anti-Israel Columbia protester
Federal judge again blocks deportation of anti-Israel Columbia protester

Fox News

time8 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Federal judge again blocks deportation of anti-Israel Columbia protester

A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from detaining a Columbia University student and lawful permanent resident whom federal agents have targeted for deportation after she took part in an anti-Israel demonstration earlier this year. U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald's preliminary injunction on Thursday blocks Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from taking 21-year-old Yunseo Chung into custody. Chung is originally from South Korea and has lived in the U.S. since she was seven years old. ICE had attempted to arrest her in March but were unsuccessful and the court has now barred ICE from detaining her without prior approval. If the government tries to detain Chung for any reason other than her potential deportation, it must give 72 hours' notice to Chung's lawyers and the court and allow the court time to determine if the detention attempt is a pretext for First Amendment retaliation. The ruling also states that she remains free while her legal case proceeds. Ramzi Kassem, co-director of CLEAR, a legal nonprofit at City University of New York that is representing Chung, praised the ruling. "This is a win not just for Yunseo and for the legions of people who stand up for Palestinians and oppose the daily atrocities in Gaza that our government underwrites, but also for freedom of speech and the rule of law in our country," Kassem said in a statement, per the Washington Post. It comes after the same judge in March ordered immigration officials to cease their efforts to arrest Chung. The Trump administration has alleged that her participation in a protest poses a potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequence for the United States. Chung's attorneys say that the government's pursuit of the Columbia student is an "unjustifiable assault on [the] First Amendment." Chung sued the government earlier this year. The lawsuit states that Chung was a participant in the anti-Israel protests, not a leader, and was "one of a large group of college students" expressing "shared concerns" over the war in Gaza. Chung, according to the lawsuit, "visited" the Gaza Solidarity Encampment, a number of tents organized in the center of campus, but does not state whether she stayed there. The lawsuit also makes it clear that she did not make public statements or engage in high-profile activities while at the protests. Chung's lawsuit states that she was never arrested or disciplined in relation to events at the encampment. However, she was later arrested during a 2025 protest at Barnard College. The lawsuit claims that it is common in New York City for police to arrest many protesters and that charges are usually dropped or dismissed. The lawsuit states that on March 8, an ICE official signed an administrative arrest warrant for Chung and federal law enforcement went to Chung's parents' house the next day seeking to arrest her. An ICE official allegedly told Chung's attorneys on March 10 that her green card had been "revoked," according to the lawsuit. The government has the authority to rescind permanent resident status if it believes that a person has violated U.S. immigration law. Chung's attorneys say in the lawsuit that law enforcement searched Chung's dorm room on March 13 in accordance with a warrant. She was valedictorian of her high school senior class and has a near-perfect GPA heading into her senior year, according to court documents. Chung is double-majoring in English and women's and gender studies at Columbia, the Washington Post reported. The Trump administration has also sought to deport former Columbia student Mahmoud Khalil, whom it accuses of playing a major role in anti-Israel protests at Columbia University.

GOP backing for wind and solar is cratering, new poll shows
GOP backing for wind and solar is cratering, new poll shows

Axios

time9 minutes ago

  • Axios

GOP backing for wind and solar is cratering, new poll shows

New polling shows steep declines in Republicans' support for solar and especially wind power — data that lands as GOP lawmakers weigh bills to curtail incentives. Why it matters: The Pew Research Center survey reveals Democrats' challenge in trying to exact a political price for scuttling IRA credits. If this poll is right, it doesn't look like ending the credits would create jeopardy with the GOP base — especially if these trend lines continue. But roughly 9 in 10 Democrats polled support more wind and solar, making renewables popular on an overall basis. That matters in swing districts. The big picture: The poll of 5,085 U.S. adults — conducted from April 28 to May 4 — shows steep erosion in just five years among Republicans (see above). Support for wind, which President Trump especially dislikes, is under 50%. "Republicans' views on the nation's energy priorities are now the reverse of what they were in 2020," Pew said. A few other data points from the wide-ranging poll... Nuclear support is growing across the aisle. Sixty-nine percent of GOP and GOP-leaning respondents want to see more nuclear power, up from 51% in 2016. Among Dems and Dem-leaners, it's at 52%, up from 38% in 2016. Pew highlights a wider GOP shift. Today 67% of Republicans surveyed say producing fossil fuels should be a more important priority than wind and solar. In 2020, 65% said renewables should be the higher priority. There's a sharp divide on regulations, too. Seventy-seven percent of Republicans say it's possible to cut back environmental rules while still protecting air and water. Just 32% of Democrats have the same view. What we're watching: George Mason University's Ed Maibach tells me that Pew's renewables results track with a soon-to-drop survey from the school's Center for Climate Change Communication and Yale researchers. "The erosion of support for clean energy among Republicans is almost certainly driven primarily by Donald Trump's, his administration's, Fox News' and other MAGA pundits' relentless bad-mouthing of clean energy," he said via email. "Relentless message repetition is the key to public communication effectiveness, even [when] the messages are factually wrong," said Maibach, the group's director and founder. The other side: Republicans who are paring back hundreds of billions of dollars in IRA credits and grants for renewables, EVs and much more call them part of a "green new scam." Senate environmental committee Republicans, in releasing their portion of the budget plan yesterday that scuttles many grants, said it "promotes fiscal responsibility by rescinding taxpayer dollars spent through the wasteful and bloated IRA." Of note: Responses from the entire sample of 5,085 adults has a margin of error of plus or minus 1.6%.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store