
‘Pastoral' Review: Sampling Beethoven at Bard
The experience of attending a performance at Bard SummerScape in the Hudson Valley is not confined to the theater. For someone traveling from New York City, as I did on Saturday, there's an entire preshow of escape into the country: the car or train ride along the blue stripe of the Hudson River, the calming effect of dense green forests.
This is partly the subject of 'Pastoral,' the latest work by the choreographer Pam Tanowitz. Partly, because the pastoral in art is not a return to nature but an idealized view of it, a substitute following a separation.
This 'Pastoral,' which ran Friday through Sunday afternoon, is very much in conversation with the past. The décor by the painter Sarah Crowner — green floral shapes as clean-edged as Matisse cutouts — invokes swathes of Western art history, as do the group tableaus in Tanowitz's choreography, as if taken from scenes in paintings by Nicolas Poussin. Caroline Shaw's score samples from and playfully remixes Beethoven's Symphony No. 6, the one called 'Pastoral.'
These elements — along with Reid Bartelme's gauzy costumes in a sherbet color palette and Davison Scandrett's subtly imaginative and color-sensitive lighting — combine in such fresh and delightfully unpredictable ways that it's distorting to discuss them separately. Nevertheless, let's start with the music.
Shaw switches among a live woodwind trio and several recordings of the Beethoven, both recent and more than a century old, wax cylinders with the scratchy sound of the distant past. The recordings fade in and out, sometimes eddying in stuck-record loops that toy with the tension and release of classical musical grammar. The live musicians behave like samplers, too: erasing bits of Beethoven, stretching, slowing, accelerating the tempo.
The woodwinds are all reeds, among the most pastoral of instruments, and on the low end of the section. The bassoonist Dana Jessen croaks like a frog and extends duck calls into song. Alongside these mimetic games, Shaw adds real field recordings of frogs and crickets but also of trains and traffic, the urban environment that creates the pastoral perspective. One of Shaw's wittiest touches is to bring out the similarity between a bouncing triplet figure in the Beethoven and a car horn.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GB News announces US expansion with nightly show focused on American politics
GB News is set to expand its reach across the Atlantic, launching a new live nightly show from Washington D.C. hosted by Bev Turner. The channel, which began broadcasting in 2021, will establish a new bureau in the US capital as part of its transatlantic expansion. The two-hour programme is slated to commence in September, broadcasting from a studio described as "close to the White House." GB News states the show aims to "bring British audiences closer than ever to the political news which unfolds each day in America." According to the channel, the programme will feature "headline-making exclusives, thought-provoking interviews with major figures, and in-depth analysis of the Trump presidency as well as stories from across the US." The move includes an extension of GB News' distribution across the US, with content to be made available free to American audiences. Turner said: 'With the gutsiest guests and the most iconic backdrops, I intend to keep viewers up late. Fronting the next stage of GB News's evolution is both a huge honour and an immense responsibility, and I cannot wait to represent the people's channel on a global stage. 'We will be disrupting the late-night TV space as the next day's papers land in the UK and America's prime-time analysis gears up. This affords us the chance to deliver a unique UK-USA hybrid of political, cultural and social issues from the start-line of global politics. 'We will fulfil the need for a British voice with an international perspective to help our viewers get a sense of who's really on their side. 'Tapping into Washington's heartbeat and delivering real-time perspective with editorial edge, the show will be alive, and a conversation that's punchy, intelligent and unmissable. What happens in DC reverberates in GB and we will capture every moment. 'Our highly engaged British audience understands how events in the US are directly impacting government policy and living standards here. 'We have a job to do: bridging the gap between British and American politics in the fearless style that typifies GB News. 'We will include the very best guests that Washington has to offer, alongside quintessentially British voices in an unparalleled assessment of events on both sides of the Atlantic. 'This isn't just a media experiment, this is a market intervention. And I look forward to leading it from the front.' Turner, 51, who began presenting her own show on GB News in 2022, previously hosted a talk show on LBC and has appeared on ITV's This Morning and Good Morning Britain. Michael Booker, GB News editorial director, said: 'This is a huge moment for GB News as we grow our presence and deliver more of the fearless journalism that defines us. 'The world's biggest political story is playing out in Washington, and its impact is being felt daily in towns and cities across Britain. 'More than ever before, what happens in the USA is having huge consequences, both socially and economically, for the people of Britain. 'We've seen time and again this year that a decision made on one day in Washington DC is felt the next day in Washington, Tyne and Wear. 'It's essential the people's channel is right there, reporting live, asking the tough questions, and telling it like it is. 'While others scale back on live free coverage, GB News is investing in our content. 'Our new Washington investment, our expanded programming and our brilliant on-the-ground team will ensure we're not just reporting on the story but that we're right at the heart of it.'
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Indiana Fever Star Aliyah Boston Has Clear Opinion on Candace Parker
Indiana Fever Star Aliyah Boston Has Clear Opinion on Candace Parker originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Indiana Fever star Aliyah Boston has made her feelings clear about WNBA legend Candace Parker, celebrating the former Los Angeles Sparks standout's recent jersey retirement with a heartfelt message. Advertisement During a special halftime ceremony, the Sparks honored Parker by raising her No. 3 jersey into the rafters at Arena. The event took place during the Sparks' game against the Chicago Sky. Boston joined fans and players across the league in celebrating Parker's achievements. Sharing her reaction on Instagram, Boston posted a video clip of Parker's speech during the ceremony. 'So deserving,' Boston wrote in her caption. Parker spent 13 seasons playing for the Sparks after being drafted first overall in 2008 out of the University of Tennessee. Over her career in Los Angeles, she became one of the biggest names in the WNBA, winning two MVP awards and leading the Sparks to a championship in 2016. Advertisement Parker later played for the Chicago Sky, where she helped win another championship in 2021. She finished her career with the Las Vegas Aces, adding yet another title to her name. Former Los Angeles Sparks Candace Parker acknowledges the crowd during her jersey retirement ceremony at Kamin-Oncea-Imagn Images Parker is the third player in Sparks history to have her jersey retired, joining Lisa Leslie and Penny Toler. During the ceremony, Sparks co-owner and Lakers legend Magic Johnson called Parker 'the best all-around player that has ever played in the WNBA,' while Lisa Leslie said Parker 'changed the game' and ensured the Sparks were 'in good hands.' Boston's tribute comes at a time when she and her Fever teammates, including star guard Caitlin Clark, are drawing significant attention and crowds wherever they play. Advertisement Boston herself has been vocal about the growing popularity of the league and the importance of supporting women's sports. 'Every game is a home game. I think you see that. People show up, they show out. I think it's great for this league,' Boston said following a recent Fever win against the Dallas Wings. Related: Aliyah Boston Shares Funny Reaction After Going Viral Over Angel Reese Altercation This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 30, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I Watched Terminator 2 When I Was Only 8. Should I Let My Own Children Watch R-Rated Films? Let's Talk
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Back in my day, we used to watch R-rated movies all the time. In fact, when I was only 8 years old, my dad took me to see Terminator 2: Judgment Day in the theater, and it still, to this day, has my favorite introduction to any movie ever. Well, being the idiot that I am, I showed my son and daughter, who are 8 and 9, respectively, this intro, and I stupidly said, 'You know, Grandpa took me to see this when I was only 8, and it's rated R,' to which my children obviously asked, 'Can we watch rated-R movies then?' I walked right into that one, didn't I? I told them no, of course, since I felt bad for even taking my then-six-year-old son to a PG-13 movie like Godzilla Minus One. But my children asked me why I could watch a rated-R movie at their age, and they couldn't, which really got me thinking: Should I let them watch R-rated movies? Well… Terminator 2 is rated R, sure, but I don't know if I would consider it a heavy R. What I mean is the rating is mostly because of the violence, as well as the profanity, as the movie has around 52 f-bombs in it. Yes, that's a lot, and the first time I saw the movie, I was shocked! I distinctly remember turning to my dad, who gave me an apologetic expression, and I exclaimed, 'They can say that?' How naive I was, as the word was uttered several more instances after that first time. But, here's the thing: after that initial f-bomb, it didn't have the same impact for me anymore. In fact, I kind of didn't even notice it after awhile. So when it comes to my own children, would it really be so bad if they heard a few f-bombs in a movie? I mean, kids at their school say the f-word all the time, and I only know this since I've heard other kids saying it when I've picked my own children up. So, really, if I let my kids watch an R-rated flick, it all depends on the movie. For instance, my son has asked if he can watch Deadpool, and I said absolutely not. Besides the profanity, there's also a lot of sexual innuendo in that movie, and the violence is a bit too extreme. My daughter asked if she could watch The Evil Dead, since it's in one of my favorite horror franchises, which, in my enthusiasm, I've told her about several times. But besides the gore, that movie also has that scene (and you know what scene I'm talking about). So even though I saw an R-rated film when I was only 8, I'm not sure if my own kids are 'ready' yet. But that brings me to my next question. I've settled on 13. Is that the best age to let kids watch rated-R movies? Honestly, I have no idea, but I figure that if I tell my kids a certain age that's not too far away, then they'll be more amenable to accepting that rather than me just saying, 'Wait until you're 17.' Because, honestly, I trust my children, and I don't think watching a rated-R movie is going to warp them or turn them into deviants. For example, I've been a diehard Mortal Kombat fan ever since the first game debuted back in 1992. In fact, everybody I knew back then was a big fan of Mortal Kombat, and we turned out just fine. Also, I swear I watched every Friday the 13th movie, unedited, by the time I was 13. My mom worked nights, so I used to wait up until my older sister fell asleep, and then sneak downstairs to watch them (in fact, I watched a lot of movies my sister told me not to watch). In that way, 13 feels like a good age to me. That's because I'm the kind of father who has been answering any questions my children have from as early as they could talk; my rationale being that if they're old enough to wonder, then they're old enough to know the truth. So, when they asked me where babies came from, I took them to the library and showed them an age-appropriate book. I didn't say, 'The stork,' or anything that I would have to walk back later. I respect their intelligence, and when my daughter started watching The Simpsons, I was a little apprehensive at first since there are sexual jokes. But at the same time, I know these jokes are coming since I've seen every episode multiple times, and I'm prepared to explain any bawdy humor that comes up whenever my daughter asks, 'What do they mean?' Which brings me to my next point. When my dad took me to see Terminator 2, we went into it blind. He told me that he had asked a coworker of his if it was 'appropriate' for his 8-year-old son, and his coworker said that it was. But what's appropriate for one parent may not be appropriate for another. For example, I don't curse in front of my children, but I know there are plenty of parents who do. So for them, Deadpool's dialogue may not be an issue. For me, it is, at least when it comes to my kids. As another example, a lot of the kids in my son's class have already watched Squid Game (my son's friend asked him if he wanted to play 'Russian Roulette,' to which my son, thankfully, didn't know what he was talking about). So whatever R-rated movie I let my children eventually watch when they turn 13, I'll of course have to watch it first. In other words, unlike my dad, I won't just take another person's word for what is appropriate for my kids. I feel this is my job as a parent anyway. I'm not throwing any shade, but my kids don't even have cell phones. I know, how is that even possible, right? When even kindergarten kids have smartphones these days, I feel like the odd parent out since I won't let my children have them. But even with parental settings on, there are just too many outside factors that I can't control that I don't feel comfortable with. This brings me to my last point… Being a parent is knowing that your children aren't going to do what you want them to do, probably 99% of the time. For example, my mom didn't want me watching Friday the 13th, or the Halloween movies (which I've also watched all the way through), but I watched them anyway. It's mostly because my mother and I never had that conversation of what I should or shouldn't watch. It was just implied. However, it doesn't matter the generation. If a kid wants to see something badly enough, they'll find a way to see it, and my kids are no exception. Like, my son had to be the one who narc'd on his sister when he told me that she watched an episode of Hazbin Hotel on my account. I have since pulled Prime Video from my television and now only watch it on my phone. That said, for my son to even narc on his sister in the first place just tells me that 1, she must have done something that pissed him off, so he wanted to get her in trouble; and 2, even he realized that she shouldn't have been watching a show like that. So, when it comes to an R-rated movie, I want to be there when they watch one all the way through. Firstly, I want it to be something that they want to watch so it shows that I trust their maturity level. And secondly, I want it to be there to explain things, if need be. For example, when I used to sneak downstairs and watch Jason kill horny teenagers, a part of me thought sex was bad and that the camp counselors DESERVED to die since they shouldn't have been having sex in the first place. But I don't want my kids to grow up thinking sex is 'bad,' or that violence is 'good,' which I grew up believing since I watched these films alone at such a young age. I want them to know the risks of sex and the consequences of violence, and I feel I can do that if we watch these films together. But what do you think? I'd love to hear your thoughts.