
The ‘dual-edged sword' of AI chatbots
Driving the day
— As large language models become increasingly popular, the security community and foreign adversaries are constantly looking for ways to skirt safety guardrails — but for very different reasons.
HAPPY MONDAY, and welcome to MORNING CYBERSECURITY! In between the DMV's sporadic rain this weekend, I managed to get a pretty gnarly sunburn at a winery. I'll be spending the rest of the summer working to fix the unflattering tan lines.
Follow POLITICO's cybersecurity team on X at @RosiePerper, @johnnysaks130, @delizanickel and @magmill95, or reach out via email or text for tips. You can also follow @POLITICOPro on X.
Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories.
Today's Agenda
The House meets for morning hour debate and 2 p.m. to consider legislation under suspension of the rules: H.R. 1770 (119), the 'Consumer Safety Technology Act"; H.R. 1766 (119), the 'NTIA Policy and Cybersecurity Coordination Act"; and more. 12 p.m.
Artificial Intelligence
SKIRTING GUARDRAILS — As the popularity of generative artificial intelligence systems like large language models rises, the security community is working to discover weaknesses in order to boost their safety and accuracy.
But as research continues identifying ways bad actors can override a model's built-in guardrails — also known as 'jailbreaking' — to improve safeguards, foreign adversaries are taking advantage of vulnerabilities in LLMs to pump out misinformation.
'It's extremely easy to jailbreak a model,' Chris Thompson, global head of IBM's X-Force Red Adversary Simulation team, told your host. 'There's lots of techniques for jailbreaking models that work, regardless of system prompts and the guardrails in place.'
— Jailbreaking: Popular LLMs like Google's Gemini, OpenAI's ChatGPT and Meta's Llama have guardrails in place to stop them from answering certain questions, like how to build a bomb. But hackers can jailbreak LLMs by asking questions in a way that bypasses those protections.
Last month, a team from Intel, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Boise State University published research that found AI chatbots like Gemini and ChatGPT can be tricked into teaching users how to conduct a ransomware attack on an ATM.
The research team used an attack method called 'InfoFlood,' which pumps the LLM with dense language, including academic jargon and fake citations, to disguise the malicious queries while still getting the questions answered. According to Advait Yadav, one of the researchers, it was a simple yet successful idea.
'It was a very simple test,' Yadav told your host. 'We asked, what if we buried … a really harmful statement with very dense, linguistic language, and the success rate was really high.'
Spokespeople for Google and OpenAI noted to your host that the report focuses on older LLM models. A spokesperson for OpenAI told MC in a statement that the firm takes steps 'to reduce the risk of malicious use, and we're continually improving safeguards to make our models more robust against exploits like jailbreaks.'
— Disinfo mission: And as university researchers find ways to sneak past these guardrails, foreign adversaries are, too.
Rival powers like Russia have long exploited AI bots to push their agenda by spreading false information. In May 2024, OpenAI detailed how operations from Russia are using its software to push out false and misleading information about a variety of topics — including the war in Ukraine.
'These models are built to be conversational and responsive, and these qualities are what make them easy for adversaries to exploit with little effort,' said McKenzie Sadeghi, AI and foreign influence editor at the misinformation tracker NewsGuard.
NewsGuard's monthly audits of leading AI models have repeatedly found that chatbots will generate false claims around state narratives from Russia, China and Iran with little resistance.
'When foreign adversaries succeed in manipulating these systems, they're reshaping the informational landscape that citizens, policymakers and journalists rely on to make decisions,' she added.
— Boosting safeguards: As actors linked to foreign adversaries utilize the chatbots, the security community says they are working to keep up.
'The goal of jailbreaks is to inform modelmakers on vulnerabilities and how they can be improved,' Yadav told your host, adding that the research team plans to send a courtesy disclosure package to the model-making companies in the study.
For Google's Gemini App, the firm runs red-teaming exercises to train models to defend against attacks, according to Elijah Lawal, the global communications manager for the Gemini App.
'This isn't just malicious threat actors using it,' Thompson told your host. 'There's also the security research community that is leveraging this work to do their jobs better and faster as well. So it's kind of a dual-edged sword.'
On The Hill
FIRST IN MC: QUESTIONS, CONCERNS — Rep. Raja Kristhnamoorthi (D-Ill.), ranking member of the House Select Committee on China, wants answers on how the State Department is working to prevent the use of AI-enabled impersonations of officials, following reports that Secretary of State Marco Rubio was the recent subject of an AI hoax.
Krishnamoorthi will send a letter to Rubio today, first obtained by Maggie, asking questions around the agency's approach to countering AI-enabled impersonations, such as deepfake videos and voice recordings. This comes after The Washington Post reported last week that an imposter used these types of scams to pose as Rubio and contact foreign diplomats and U.S. lawmakers.
Given his role on the China Committee, Krishnamoorthi is particularly interested in understanding how the State Department is studying and addressing the potential negative impact of deepfakes on the U.S.-China relationship, and whether the agency has a process for evaluating the authenticity of communications from Chinese and other foreign officials.
'While I currently have no information indicating this incident involved a foreign state, and hoaxers are equally capable of creating deceptive deepfakes like this given the proliferation of AI technologies, this incident presents an opportunity to highlight such risks and seek information about the department's efforts to counter them,' Rajnamoorthi wrote in the letter being sent today.
When asked about the impersonations, Rubio reportedly told reporters in Malaysia last week that he uses official channels to communicate with foreign officials, in part due to the risk of imposters claiming to be him. The State Department put out a statement last week following the Post's report, noting that the agency is investigating the incident.
China corner
SUSPECTED BREACH — Suspected Chinese hackers have gained access to email accounts of advisers and attorneys at Wiley Rein, a top law firm in Washington, in an intelligence-gathering operation.
CNN reported on Friday that the hackers linked to the breach 'have been known to target information related to trade, Taiwan and US government agencies involved in setting tariffs and reviewing foreign investment,' according to the firm.
— Zoom out: This breach comes amid the Trump administration's trade war against China, which Wiley Rein helps its powerful clients navigate.
The International Scene
COME TOGETHER — Norway is joining the international initiative to boost Ukraine's cybersecurity defenses.
Ukraine's Digital Transformation Ministry announced on Friday that Norway is also joining the Tallinn Mechanism and will provide Ukraine with 25 million Norwegian krone, or $2.5 million, to support the country's cyber defenses by the end of 2025.
'The Tallinn Mechanism is a key instrument of international support that helps Ukraine resist these attacks while building long-term digital resilience,' Norway's Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide said in a statement.
— Zoom out: Norway is the 12th country to join the Tallinn Mechanism — which includes Estonia, the United Kingdom, Germany, Canada and the U.S. The group was established in 2023 to coordinate private sector and government aid to Ukraine.
Quick Bytes
LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION — Bodyguards using fitness app Strava inadvertently made locations of Swedish leaders, writes Lynsey Chutel for The New York Times.
'HORRIFIC BEHAVIOR' — In a series of posts on X, the AI chatbot Grok apologized for 'horrific behavior' following a series of posts that included expressing support for Adolf Hitler, Anthony Ha reports for TechCrunch.
Also Happening Today
The Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association holds the TechNet Emergency 2025 conference. 9 a.m.
Chat soon.
Stay in touch with the whole team: Rosie Perper (rperper@politico.com); John Sakellariadis (jsakellariadis@politico.com); Maggie Miller (mmiller@politico.com), and Dana Nickel (dnickel@politico.com).

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
Consumers win in Big Tech antitrust cases
Can you imagine your life without Google? Google Search, Google Chrome, Google Maps, Google Wallet, Google Drive, the Google Pixel phone—you could probably live your entire digital life within the Google ecosystem. Many, including the Justice Department, say that's a problem. The department recently won antitrust cases against Google's search engine and ad placement businesses. This may all feel abstract and perhaps invisible to most consumers. Google, Microsoft, Apple —they constitute the digital water we're all swimming in, and their monopoly raises prices, stifles innovation, and shapes our lives often to our detriment. The landmark antitrust case against Google marks a big victory against this status quo. Here's why it's so important. Monopolies create higher advertising costs Imagine promoting your business in a small town. You might buy an ad in the newspaper, put up a billboard, and run a spot on the local radio. Because these outlets are independent, you have lower prices and more advertising options. Now, imagine that the newspaper, billboard, and radio station are all owned by the same company. That shifts the dynamic: Because there is no competition for your ad dollars, prices are higher. That's essentially what the Google Ad business achieved, especially considering how critical digital advertising has become to businesses. People aren't watching commercials anymore. They're browsing the web during a commercial break. Google's monopoly on digital ads allows it to raise prices, making it harder for smaller businesses to compete and thrive. Google's monopoly created a less user-friendly internet Historically, about 90% of search traffic comes from Google, giving it a lot of power. For instance, Google uses an algorithm that examines web pages to score how relevant it is for search phrases, like 'pizza shop Minneapolis' or 'leaking fridge how to fix.' Because Google search is so dominant, people and companies who build and run websites do so with Google's algorithm in mind. That means the user experience takes a back seat to Google's preferences. If you've been to any recipe website lately, you know what I'm talking about. In a recent episode of the podcast Stay Tuned with Preet Bharara, former FTC chair Lina Khan noted that a monopoly is when a company can offer worse products and/or raise costs without suffering any substantial consequences in the market. 'You can understand this in some ways as a firm becoming too big to care,' Khan said. Many say the internet has become increasingly awful to use. The first page of search results are often dreck, in my opinion, written for Google's robots, not for humans. It's getting harder to find the information you're looking for, so a lot of people append their searches with tags for Reddit and YouTube, e.g. 'Hiking itinerary New Zealand Reddit' or 'best salmon dip recipe YouTube,' to cut through the SEO slop. Google's search monopoly could be a chokepoint for information Because of its dominance, Google can evolve in the direction of its own interests, rather than the interests of the user individually or collectively. It's not wild to imagine that Google can throttle searches for sensitive topics. During COVID, a 2020 Senate Commerce Committee hearing called Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and then-Twitter's then-CEO Jack Dorsey to question them about censoring conservative voices. Back in 2017, the World Socialist Web Site alleged that Google restrict ed access to 13 progressive and anti-war websites. For users, the question is not whether Google's algorithmic policies line up with your political views but whether Google can put its thumb on the scale regarding your access to information, based on what's advantageous for Google . It definitely can, and it definitely has. Monopolies stifle innovation Google can throw its weight around to thwart competition. In 2023, internet users noticed that YouTube (which Google owns) ran five seconds slower on the Mozilla Firefox browser than on Google Chrome. Ostensibly, Google tuned YouTube to purposely run slower on a competitor's browser to encourage users to switch to Chrome. Google, like many large companies, tends to acquire burgeoning competition rather than innovate in-house. Google has acquired hundreds of companies, from data analytics firms to rival search engines, from virtual reality developers to mapping products. When a company can buy out all the competition, consumers lose out on new ideas and better products, because the company has no incentive to pursue them. The ruling The ruling found that Google's default status with makers of smartphones, tablets, and laptops locked out rivals like Bing and DuckDuckGo, and that the integration of Google's adtech tools created a feedback loop that entrenched its monopoly. Google's ad business is facing its own antitrust lawsuit and may be broken up. The Department of Justice argues that Google's dominance in search (and its vast collection of user data) positions Google to achieve a similar feedback loop in AI -powered search and assistants—which could create a new monopoly. The DOJ has proposed forcing Google to sell Chrome and license some of its core search technologies to competitors, as well as ending default search agreements and allowing more visibility into how search results are ranked. The DOJ proposed Google give advance notice of AI-related acquisitions. Both sides have given their closing arguments and now await the judge's ruling, which is expected by August. This case is a blow against Big Tech in general, which has monopolized almost the entire digital world. I can only hope the FTC ' s antitrust case against Meta plays out in a similar fashion, and facilitates a return to a freer, more innovative digital world.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump unveils investments to power AI boom
US President Donald Trump went to Pennsylvania on Tuesday to announce $92 billion in energy and infrastructure deals intended to meet big tech's soaring demand for electricity to fuel the AI boom. Trump made the announcement at the inaugural Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit at Carnegie Mellon University, with much of the talk about beating China in the global AI race. "Today's commitments are ensuring that the future is going to be designed, built and made right here in Pennsylvania and right here in Pittsburgh, and I have to say, right here in the United States of America," Trump said at the event. The tech world has fully embraced generative AI as the next wave of technology, but fears are growing that its massive electricity needs cannot be met by current infrastructure, particularly in the United States. Generative AI requires enormous computing power, mainly to run the energy-hungry processors from Nvidia, the California-based company that has become the world's most valuable company by market capitalization. Officials expect that by 2028, tech companies will need as much as five gigawatts of power for AI -- enough electricity to power roughly five million homes. Top executives from Palantir, Anthropic, Exxon and Chevron attended the event. The funding will cover new data centers, power generation, grid infrastructure, AI training, and apprenticeship programs. - Race to beat China - Among investments, Google committed $25 billion to build AI-ready data centers in Pennsylvania and surrounding regions. "We support President Trump's clear and urgent direction that our nation invest in AI... so that America can continue to lead in AI," said Ruth Porat, Google's president and chief investment officer. The search engine giant also announced a partnership with Brookfield Asset Management to modernize two hydropower facilities in Pennsylvania, representing 670 MW of capacity on the regional grid. Investment group Blackstone pledged more than $25 billion to fund new data centers and energy infrastructure. US Senator David McCormick, from Pennsylvania, said the investments "are of enormous consequence to Pennsylvania, but they are also crucial to the future of the nation." His comments reflect the growing sentiment in Washington that the United States must not lose ground to China in the race to develop AI. "We are way ahead of China and the plants are starting up, the construction is starting up," Trump said. The US president launched the "Stargate" project in January, aimed at investing up to $500 billion in US AI infrastructure -- primarily in response to growing competition with China. Japanese tech investor SoftBank, ChatGPT-maker OpenAI, and Oracle are investing $100 billion in the initial phase. Trump has also reversed many policies adopted by the previous Biden administration that imposed checks on developing powerful AI algorithms and limits on exports of advanced technology to certain allied countries. He is expected to outline his own blueprint for AI advancement later this month. arp/ksb

Wall Street Journal
2 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
TNB Tech Minute: Trump Touts Billions in Investments to Create AI Hub in Pennsylvania - Tech News Briefing
Full Transcript This transcript was prepared by a transcription service. This version may not be in its final form and may be updated. Julie Chang: Here's your afternoon TNB Tech Minute for Tuesday, July 15th. I'm Julie Chang for The Wall Street Journal. President Trump touted billions of dollars in investments from some of the world's biggest companies to create an artificial intelligence hub in Pennsylvania. Trump made the announcement during an AI and energy summit at Carnegie Mellon University earlier today. Google said it would put $25 billion into data centers and related infrastructure in the state and the surrounding region over the next two years. Private equity firm Blackstone promised another $25 billion and AI startup CoreWeave announced a $6 billion investment. Plus, Apple has struck a deal with MP Materials to buy $500 million worth of rare earth magnets. The move helps the iPhone maker expand its US supply chain. MP will supply Apple with magnets it produces in a Texas facility and use recycled materials processed at a site MP will build in California. Such magnets are used in iPhones as well as audio equipment and microphones inside various Apple products. MP said shipments are expected to begin in 2027. Finally, Tesla's VP of Sales, Service, and Delivery in North America has left the company. That's according to people familiar with the matter. Troy Jones had been with the electric car maker for 15 years. It's the latest high-level departure at Tesla. Less than a month ago top aid to CEO Elon Musk and top AI executive Omead Afshar left the company. Tesla has been facing declining sales and shrinking margins amid increased competition and pressure on its brand stemming from Musk's stint in politics. And that wraps up your TNB Tech minute for today. Join us again tomorrow morning for your next quick tech update.