Luigi Mangione has an issue with another health insurance company — and it's not UnitedHealthcare
They say prosecutors sent Aetna an "unlawful," back-channel subpoena seeking his confidential insurance account number and the time period for his coverage — and that in response, Aetna mistakenly sent prosecutors Mangione's entire, 120-page insurance record.
This "trove of protected medical information" includes "different diagnoses as well as specific medical complaints made by Mr. Mangione," his lawyers complained in a court filing Thursday night.
New York prosecutors should never have had access to these private records, his lawyers contend. And they should never have looked at them once receiving them, they also argue.
Aetna emailed the records to the Manhattan District Attorney's Office on June 12, in four files, with a cover letter advising "confidential." Each file was separately labeled "in large-type bold letters 'Request for Protected Health Information," the lawyers wrote.
"It would be impossible for anyone to view a single page of these records and not immediately see that they were private, confidential medical records within the scope of HIPAA," the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, the lawyers wrote.
The sheer volume of Aetna's response should have alerted prosecutors that "the unlawful subpoena they served on Aetna resulted in far more material than they requested," the lawyers wrote.
But instead of immediately sending the materials to the judge and the defense — where they should have been directly sent, as required by law — the DA's office says it downloaded them into an internal "discovery file," the lawyers wrote.
The lawyers say prosecutors "sat on this information" for 12 days, until June 24, when they sent the judge and defense team an email forwarding the four files. Prosecutors have told Mangione's lawyers that in the interim, they had reviewed the records, but not "in their entirety," according to the defense filing.
The defense filing, signed by defense lawyers Karen Friedman Agnifilo, Marc Agnifilo, and Jacob Kaplan, asks New York Supreme Court Justice Gregory Carro to order prosecutors to turn over all of their communications with Aetna.
It also asks the judge to hold "a full evidentiary hearing," with sworn testimony, to determine possible remedies, including the recusal of lead prosecutor Joel Seidemann, the suppression of evidence, and the dismissal of Mangione's indictment.
The subpoena, issued directly to Aetna and signed by Seidemann, bypassed the judge and defense team and should never have requested even the limited, HIPAA-protected information of Mangione's account number and period of coverage, his lawyers argue.
"If they're seeking information that is privileged, like medical records, the DA can't just subpoena that stuff directly," veteran homicide public defender Sam Roberts told Business Insider on Friday.
Prosecutors must first file a motion or application to the judge and defense team, alerting them to the subpoena, and then wait for the judge to review the subpoenaed materials privately, said Roberts, a senior staff attorney on the homicide defense task force of the Legal Aid Society.
"It sounds like they jumped the gun here," Roberts said. "They got this information without first giving notice to the defense, and they got the information directly from Aetna when they should have sent it to the court first without opening it."
Mangione's lawyers allege in their filing that the May 14 subpoena initially commanded Aetna to send someone to appear in court on May 23 with "the account number and period of time during which the following individual received coverage: Luigi Mangione."
The subpoena was not made public or viewed by BI.
May 23 was "a completely made-up date," on which no court proceeding was scheduled, Mangione's lawyers wrote.
Along with the subpoena, Seidemann sent a cover letter with his phone number and email, advising that "in lieu of appearing personally with the requested documents," Aetna could mail or deliver the records to the court, the lawyers wrote.
Prosecutors "were plainly lying to get the materials as soon as possible," they wrote, in order to bring their case to trial first, before he could be tried by federal prosecutors.
In addition to the state-level case, which alleges murder as an act of terrorism, Mangione is facing related, death-penalty-eligible murder charges in federal court. Prosecutors in central Pennsylvania say they, too, will try him for forgery and firearm charges related to his arrest there on December 9, after a five-day national manhunt.
Mangione's lawyers previously complained that in April, Manhattan prosecutors improperly listened to an 11-minute attorney-client phone call, something the DA's office has denied.
Both state and federal jurisdictions are vying to be first to put Mangione on trial.
Had Mangione's lawyers not been bypassed, they would have objected to the Aetna subpoena, including on the grounds that "the information sought is not relevant," they wrote.
A spokesperson for the DA's office told BI on Friday that they will respond to the defense allegations in court papers.
"Aetna received a subpoena for certain medical records, and we provided them appropriately," said Phil Blando, executive director for communications for Aetna's parent company, CVS Health.
Asked if the district attorney subpoena requested details beyond Mangione's account number and coverage period, Blando told BI in an email, "You have our statement."
Mangione, a 27-year-old software developer, remains in a federal jail in Brooklyn in the December 4 murder of Thompson.
The 50-year-old father of two from Minnesota was shot in the back at close range outside a Midtown hotel where he was about to address the UnitedHealthcare shareholders meeting.
Mangione is linked to the killing by his so-called "manifesto" and by DNA, ballistics, video, and fingerprint evidence, according to state and federal prosecutors.
He is next due in state court on September 16, and in federal court on December 5; both courts are in Manhattan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
18 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Chris Kluwe, fired as football coach, sues Huntington Beach Union High School District
High school football practices started all across Southern California on Monday. One person not on the gridiron this year at Edison High is former NFL punter Chris Kluwe. Kluwe, who had been a freshman football coach for the Chargers for six years, was fired on Feb. 27. 'This is the time they're just getting into camp and learning everything, and I'm not there anymore,' he said. On Monday, Kluwe sued the Huntington Beach Union High School District, alleging his 1st and 14th Amendment rights were violated when he was terminated earlier this year for what the district claimed was an incendiary social media post. The complaint, filed in the Southern Division of the U.S. District Court Central District, also lists HBUHSD Supt. Carolee Ogata, Board of Trustees President Susan Henry, Asst. Supt. Daniel Bryan, then-Edison Principal Daniel Morris, Edison Assist. Principal Edward Begany and author Chris Epting, a former Los Angeles Times columnist, as defendants. The ACLU Foundation of Southern California is listed as co-counsel for Kluwe for his claims of retaliatory discharge, violations of his civil rights and deprivation of property and liberty without due process against HBUHSD. 'Rather than responsibly investigating what unmistakably involved 1st Amendment-protected speech about a hotly-debated political issue in the community, the school district played a politically-motivated game of 'gotcha,'' the complaint reads. 'The school district's sham decision-making process did not even include notifying Kluwe of an issue with his post, disclosing the school district policy he allegedly violated and asking for his side of the story. With any level of investigation, the school district would have discovered that a group of politically-motivated MAGA loyalists had launched a campaign to 'cancel' Kluwe — i.e., to get him fired because his liberal politics and calls for him to run for City Council disgusted them.' The school district declined to comment because the issue is a confidential personnel matter, HBUSHD spokeswoman Noel Anderson said in an email Monday. Epting is named in the suit, as Kluwe claimed he posted an cropped social media image that placed him in a false light and implied that he was violent. 'I'm comfortable that my 1st Amendment right allows me to offer my opinion on his posts while sharing exactly what he said publicly,' Epting said Monday. Kluwe was arrested at the Feb. 18 Huntington Beach City Council meeting after engaging in an act of peaceful civil disobedience. His comments at the meeting served to slam a plaque featuring the MAGA acrostic, which was approved to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Central Library. Five days later, he made a since-deleted post on social media platform Bluesky encouraging people to stop complaining to the library, and start complaining to the City Council. 'Stop [expletive] with the library,' the post read. 'That's what the City Council is doing. The library is great, as are the people who work there. Go [expletive] with the City Council. Find where they work, and blow *those* places up.' Kluwe said he met with the Edison athletic director and vice principal of supervision on Feb. 27, and was told he was being let go. The district issued a press release on March 3, referencing the post and stating that it 'does not condone or tolerate language that promotes or suggests violence in any form.' Kluwe said Monday the social media post, which had been paired with a video and was later deleted, was taken out of context and did not promote actual violence, rather the 'blowing up' of phone lines with complaints. 'I was making the comments as a private citizen, and as far as I'm aware, the 1st Amendment is still intact,' said Kluwe, 43. 'That means, as a private citizen, you can speak out on matters of public import … That's why we have the 1st Amendment, right, to make sure that if someone is let go for their speech, then we have to figure out, was that protected speech or not?' Kluwe, who has announced that he is planning a state Assembly District 72 run next year, is represented by attorneys from Irvine-based Crowell & Moring LLP as well as Anne Brafford of Huntington Beach. The complaint demands a jury trial. During his time in professional football, Kluwe threatened to sue the Minnesota Vikings after he alleged they released him because he was an LGBTQ+ activist. A settlement was eventually reached, with the team agreeing to donate to groups that support gay rights, implement sensitivity training and set up a national symposium on LGBTQ+ tolerance. 'It's not really a stable society if you can get fired from your job for something you're saying on your free time that really isn't damaging or harmful,' Kluwe said Monday. 'It's just you being a person. And so I think it's indicative of more of a broader problem in American society, that we've kind of weaponized the idea of going after someone's speech … I think it's unfortunate that we've reached a point in our society where it seems like the go-to is for people to instantly try to get someone fired, when they say something that person doesn't agree with.'
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
Federal prosecutors are fighting Luigi Mangione's demand for death penalty details
In a court filing Friday night, Luigi Mangione posed what his lawyers say is an urgent question: Why is the federal government seeking the death penalty? Responding on Monday, federal prosecutors not only opposed tipping their hand, but successfully asked the judge for a month to explain why. "The government intends to oppose the defendant's motion and respectfully requests a period of thirty days to file its response," prosecutors wrote in a tersely-worded letter to the judge, who set an August 27 reply deadline. Mangione is accused of murder in the December assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. In April, Attorney General Pam Bondi directed New York prosecutors to seek the death penalty. Mangione's demand now is for prosecutors to immediately provide details of the so-called aggravating factors they intend to prove in seeking the death penalty at trial. The government has alleged five aggravating factors, meaning five reasons Thompson's murder deserves the ultimate punishment. They include "substantial planning and premeditation," the "grave risk of death to additional persons," "victim impact," "the selection of site for an act of violence," and "future dangerousness," according to prosecutors' bare-bones April 24 "Notice of Intent to Seek the Death Penalty." "The allegations in the Notice of Intent filed in this case are generalized and unbounded, leaving the defense blind as to what acts, events, harms — in short, what facts — the government intends to prove," the defense said in Friday's filing. The filing is signed by . It asks the judge to give prosecutors 90 days — until October 24 — "to provide an informational outline of the essential facts underlying its alleged aggravating factors." It will take the defense considerable time to respond, particularly to the prosecution's claim of "grave risk of death to additional persons," Moskowitz wrote. "The Notice does not identify what other people were put in grave risk of death," he wrote. "Indeed, given that the shooting of Mr. Thompson was done at close range and early in the morning, when the street was nearly empty, it is hard to imagine, without further specificity, how the government intends to prove this aggravating factor." The need for speed is "acute," Moskowitz added, "since the court has expressed its intention to try this case in 2026." US District Judge Margaret M. Garnett quickly granted prosecutors' request for a 30-day reply deadline. At a pretrial conference in April, she said she intends to set a firm, 2026 trial date at Mangione's next scheduled conference, on December 5.
Fox News
9 hours ago
- Fox News
Luigi Mangione's lawyers slam ‘vague' allegations, demand feds show their hand in ‘barebones' CEO murder case
Attorneys for Luigi Mangione are accusing the federal government of providing "barebones, vague allegations" in their death penalty case against the accused UnitedHealthcare CEO killer. In a new court filing, the defense is asking a federal judge to require the prosecution to hand over information surrounding allegations intended to be proven at the sentencing phase of Mangione's death penalty trial. The defense claims prosecutors' information about various factors – such as the alleged threat to individuals other than the victim and the impact on the victim's loved ones – "contain only barebones, vague allegations, lacking any information about the facts upon which the government intends to rely," according to the document. Mangione's legal team is arguing that the lack of details prevents them from preparing to defend their client against the allegations during the trial's sentencing phase and is in violation of the Federal Death Penalty Act. The document suggests an "informational outline" should be provided to the defense by Oct. 24 – 90 days from its filing. "The need for sufficient time to conduct such an investigation is particularly acute in this case, because the government announced its intention to seek the death penalty even before the defense had an opportunity to conduct a mitigation investigation and make a detailed factual mitigation presentation to the Department of Justice," the document reads. Mangione is accused of gunning down UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson outside the Hilton Hotel in Midtown Manhattan on Dec. 4, 2024 before fleeing to Pennsylvania. Federal prosecutors allege Mangione used a homemade ghost gun to shoot Thompson twice in the back, with authorities believing the killing was ideologically motivated due to the words "deny," "delay" and "depose" written on the ammunition found at the crime scene. The Manhattan District Attorney's office previously referred to the shooting as an act intended to "violently broadcast a social and political message to the public at large." The prosecution also points to journal entries and a note addressed to the FBI by Mangione, in which he allegedly rails against the U.S. healthcare system, adding that "these parasites simply had it coming." Mangione faces several federal charges, including alleged murder through use of a firearm and stalking. Additionally, he is facing state charges in a case that is expected to proceed ahead of his federal trial. Mangione has pleaded not guilty to all charges. The Department of Justice and Mangione's legal team did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
