logo
What parts of a wedding budget are tariffs affecting? We explain

What parts of a wedding budget are tariffs affecting? We explain

Yahoo2 days ago

Corrections & clarifications: An earlier version of this story misidentified the year covered by a survey. It has been corrected in the story.
As a florist, Allison Krivachek is doing her best to navigate tariff increases to imported flowers to keep costs for her brides and grooms down.
As a bride-to-be, Krivachek is also trying to make choices to keep her July wedding budget from increasing.
Brides, grooms and wedding vendors are in similar boats as prices for imported goods and tariffs add more costs to an already expensive life event. Many different aspects of the wedding day will be affected by tariffs, including alcohol, flowers, the wedding dress and goods such as centerpiece decorations if they are imported, according to The Knot, a wedding website.
As much as 80% of cut flowers are imported from other countries and 90% of wedding gowns sold in the U.S. are imported, according to The Knot, which could hike up wedding costs.
In a survey of 741 engaged brides and grooms users of The Knot, shared exclusively with USA TODAY, 73% of couples said keeping costs within their budget were the top concern, while 46% said economic factors such as inflation were a major concern. Thirty-four percent were concerned about the rising costs of goods that could impact weddings though price changes specifically due to tariffs were less of a concern with 15% of couples mentioning it.
More than half of engaged couples (58%) said they hadn't seen tariffs impact their weddings yet, but 36% said they were making changes to their plans due to economic stress. Of those couples, 22% are adjusting their budgets while 68% said they were increasing their budgets.
Rather than cutting back, many couples responded to the concerns of looming tariffs by taking the proactive steps like booking early and consulting pros.
About 1 in 3 couples are purchasing items earlier to lock in pricing.
Many are opting for U.S.-made or local products to offset import costs.
28% of couples are slightly reducing guest count by an average 25 people, or 12 couples, not wanting to sacrifice the guest experience (average 112 guests).
Vendors are good about helping couples figure out ways to make changes to suit their budget or plan for increases, said Lauren Kay, executive editor of The Knot.
"They want to help you have the best wedding ever and they want to help you pull that off, whether that's avoiding a tariff or making a trade off so your budget isn't terribly impacted," Kay told USA TODAY.
Couples do not seem to be panicking, Kay said, as they deal with another moment in wedding planning.
"It's not so much of a concern about the tariffs, itself, but just thinking about how we are going to plan our weddings and stay within budget with all of the economic factors that we're facing today," she said.
The average U.S. wedding in 2024 costs $33,000, down slightly from $35,000 for 2023, according to The Knot's Real Weddings 2025 Study.
Some vendors, like Krivachek, are already starting to see those increases.
"When they first came out, it was like, oh my gosh, this is going to be really devastating. We were seeing anywhere from 10% to 25%, and when you're talking about a wedding in flowers, when it's $5,000 plus, that 10% to 25%... really adds up quickly," said Krivachek, referring to the average floral budget for weddings.
Some suppliers have also used the tariff news to unfairly raise prices as much as double, Krivachek said.
A lot of florists and couples have been panicking on how to offset tariff increases and checking contract language, which may allow vendors to raise prices due to market fluctuations, she said.
Krivachek said she and other wedding vendors learned during the COVID-19 pandemic that they had to include a clause in their contracts to allow for unexpected market pricing fluctuations. She added she's communicated with consumers about other options, rather than pass tariff-related prices to prospective brides and grooms.
"They can either up their budget to keep everything the same or we can sub with local varieties, which I've been loving and it's really been a positive thing for local growers," Krivachek said.
She has told some brides, especially those with winter weddings, that if their heart is set on a particular type of flower that cannot be grown domestically in the winter, they will have to increase their budget.
Krivachek is also getting married in July. Her floral budget is the largest portion of her budget at a hefty $36,000, partially because she feels like she needs to make a statement as a florist.
She's made some adjustments to keep her budget the same, including using a lot of landscaping plants and bushes.
"I'm excited about that because I want to make that a trend where you use these flowers and bushes that you get to take home and plant and remember your wedding and have it be sustainable," she said.
She has also reduced the number of imported cut flowers she is getting to stay within her budget.
She has not seen any tariff-related increases on other parts of her wedding budget, she said.
Uncomfortable Conversations: Being a bridesmaid is expensive. Can or should you say no?
A lot of the components to design and make a gown come from various countries, so between the materials and the execution of the product being made and transported, tariffs impact the price, said Nayri Kalayjian, owner of Lovella Bridal in Los Angeles.
"Price increases are everywhere, so the wedding industry is no different, no matter where the gown is being manufactured," she said.
Some designers are doing a straight price increase while others have added a percentage for the tariffs, she said. Kalayjian said she's seen some tariff surcharges anywhere from 10% to 35%.
But typically bridal boutiques see price increases multiple times a year, regardless of tariffs, Kalayjian said.
Kalayjian said she often tells brides if they see a dress they absolutely love, don't wait too long or it could be discontinued or increase in price.
Bridal gowns are also taking longer to make since they are all custom-ordered, she said. The turnaround time is typically six to eight months.
However, Kalayjian also said there are dresses at every price point for every budget, even with price increases. Brides can often get sample dresses at steep discounts, she said.
(This story has been updated to correct an error.)
Betty Lin-Fisher is a consumer reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at blinfisher@USATODAY.com or follow her on X, Facebook or Instagram @blinfisher and @blinfisher.bsky.social on Bluesky. Sign up for our free The Daily Money newsletter, which will include consumer news on Fridays, here.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: How are tariffs impacting weddings? We explain.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal appeals court to hear arguments in Trump's long-shot effort to fight hush money conviction
Federal appeals court to hear arguments in Trump's long-shot effort to fight hush money conviction

CNN

time16 minutes ago

  • CNN

Federal appeals court to hear arguments in Trump's long-shot effort to fight hush money conviction

Five months after President Donald Trump was sentenced without penalty in the New York hush money case, his attorneys will square off again with prosecutors Wednesday in one of the first major tests of the Supreme Court's landmark presidential immunity decision. Trump is relying heavily on the high court's divisive 6-3 immunity ruling from July in a long-shot bid to get his conviction reviewed – and ultimately overturned – by federal courts. After being convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records, Trump in January became the first felon to ascend to the presidency in US history. Even after Trump was reelected and federal courts became flooded with litigation tied to his second term, the appeals in the hush money case have chugged forward in multiple courts. A three-judge panel of the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals – all named to the bench by Democratic presidents – will hear arguments Wednesday in one of those cases. Trump will be represented on Wednesday by Jeffrey Wall, a private lawyer and Supreme Court litigator who served as acting solicitor general during Trump's first administration. Many of the lawyers who served on Trump's defense team in the hush money case have since taken top jobs within the Justice Department. The case stems from the 2023 indictment announced by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, who accused Trump of falsely categorizing payments he said were made to quash unflattering stories during the 2016 election. Trump was accused of falsifying a payment to his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to cover up a $130,000 payment Cohen made to adult-film star Stormy Daniels to keep her from speaking out before the 2016 election about an alleged affair with Trump. (Trump has denied the affair.) Trump was ultimately convicted last year and was sentenced without penalty in January, days before he took office. The president is now attempting to move that case to federal court, where he is betting he'll have an easier shot at arguing that the Supreme Court's immunity decision in July will help him overturn the conviction. Trump's earlier attempts to move the case to federal court have been unsuccessful. US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, nominated by President Bill Clinton, denied the request in September – keeping Trump's case in New York courts instead. The 2nd Circuit will now hear arguments on Trump's appeal of that decision on Wednesday. 'He's lost already several times in the state courts,' said David Shapiro, a former prosecutor and now a lecturer at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. And Trump's long-running battle with New York Judge Juan Merchan, Shapiro said, has 'just simmered up through the system' in New York courts in a way that may have convinced Trump that federal courts will be more receptive. Trump, who frequently complained about Merchan, has said he wants his case heard in an 'unbiased federal forum.' Trump's argument hangs largely on a technical but hotly debated section of the Supreme Court's immunity decision last year. Broadly, that decision granted former presidents 'at least presumptive' immunity for official acts and 'absolute immunity' when presidents were exercising their constitutional powers. State prosecutors say the hush money payments were a private matter – not official acts of the president – and so they are not covered by immunity. But the Supreme Court's decision also barred prosecutors from attempting to show a jury evidence concerning a president's official acts, even if they are pursuing alleged crimes involving that president's private conduct. Without that prohibition, the Supreme Court reasoned, a prosecutor could 'eviscerate the immunity' the court recognized by allowing a jury to second-guess a president's official acts. Trump is arguing that is exactly what Bragg did when he called White House officials such as former communications director Hope Hicks and former executive assistant Madeleine Westerhout to testify at his trial. Hicks had testified that Trump felt it would 'have been bad to have that story come out before the election,' which prosecutors later described as the 'nail' in the coffin of the president's defense. Trump's attorneys are also pointing to social media posts the president sent in 2018 denying the Daniels hush money scheme as official statements that should not have been used in the trial. State prosecutors 'introduced into evidence and asked the jury to scrutinize President Trump's official presidential acts,' Trump's attorneys told the appeals court in a filing last month. 'One month after trial, the Supreme Court unequivocally recognized an immunity prohibiting the use of such acts as evidence at any trial of a former president.' A White House spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. If Trump's case is ultimately reviewed by federal courts, that would not change his state law conviction into a federal conviction. Trump would not be able to pardon himself just because a federal court reviews the case. Bragg's office countered that it's too late for federal courts to intervene. Federal officials facing prosecution in state courts may move their cases to federal court in many circumstances under a 19th century law designed to ensure states don't attempt to prosecute them for conduct performed 'under color' of a US office or agency. A federal government worker, for instance, might seek to have a case moved to federal court if they are sued after getting into a car accident while driving on the job. But in this case, Bragg's office argued, Trump has already been convicted and sentenced. That means, prosecutors said, there's really nothing left for federal courts to do. 'Because final judgment has been entered and the state criminal action has concluded, there is nothing to remove to federal district court,' prosecutors told the 2nd Circuit in January. Even if that's not true, they said, seeking testimony from a White House adviser about purely private acts doesn't conflict with the Supreme Court's ruling in last year's immunity case. Bragg's office has pointed to a Supreme Court ruling as well: the 5-4 decision in January that allowed Trump to be sentenced in the hush money case. The president raised many of the same concerns about evidence when he attempted to halt that sentencing before the inauguration. A majority of the Supreme Court balked at that argument in a single sentence that, effectively, said Trump could raise those concerns when he appeals his conviction. That appeal remains pending in state court. 'The alleged evidentiary violations at President-elect Trump's state-court trial,' the Supreme Court wrote, 'can be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal.'

Global Markets Mostly Higher; U.S. Futures Down Ahead of Inflation Data
Global Markets Mostly Higher; U.S. Futures Down Ahead of Inflation Data

Wall Street Journal

time33 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Global Markets Mostly Higher; U.S. Futures Down Ahead of Inflation Data

Global markets were mostly higher and U.S. stock futures were lower after U.S and China officials hit the reset button following two days of trade talks, and ahead of the U.S. CPI inflation report due later Wednesday. Little detail from the talks was released, but representatives from the countries said the framework agreed would essentially restore a pact they agreed to in Switzerland last month, a deal that saw both sides lower tariffs.

Propane Trade Shows Signs of Revival as US and China Mend Ties
Propane Trade Shows Signs of Revival as US and China Mend Ties

Bloomberg

time35 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Propane Trade Shows Signs of Revival as US and China Mend Ties

Chinese plastics makers are showing tentative signs of reviving US propane purchases as the two economies seek to mend ties. Propane dehydrogenation plants, which turn the gas into building blocks for plastics, bought at least four US cargoes this month, an increase from May, according to traders with knowledge of the matter, who asked not to be identified. Aiding the trade, US propane was also becoming cheaper relative to alternatives, they said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store