Monarch butterflies' mass die-off in 2024 caused by pesticide exposure
Researchers discovered hundreds of butterflies that had died or were dying in January 2024 near an overwintering site, where insects spend winter months. The butterflies were found twitching or dead in piles, which are common signs of neurotoxic pesticide poisoning, researchers wrote.
Testing of 10 of the insects revealed an average of seven pesticides in each, and at levels that researchers suspect were lethal. Proving that pesticides kill butterflies in the wild is a challenge because it is difficult to find and test them soon after they die. Though the sample size is limited, the authors wrote, the findings provide 'meaningful insight' into the die-off and broader population decline.
'The incident gave us a rare opportunity to directly document pesticide exposure and its impacts on monarchs in the real world,' said Staci Cibotti, the study's lead author, and an entomologist and pesticide program specialist with the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation.
She added: 'Even though laboratory studies and population models have shown that pesticides are harmful to monarchs, it can be difficult to capture the impacts of pesticides in the field on wild populations. This study helps to fill that gap.'
As much as 90% of the monarch butterfly population in some US regions has been wiped out in recent decades, and evidence has pointed to pesticides, climate crisis and habitat loss as the drivers.
The butterflies were found adjacent to the Pacific Grove Monarch Sanctuary, one of about 400 wintering sites along California's coast that are crucial points in the monarchs' migratory and reproductive cycles. Xerces counted about 6,600 butterflies overwintering at Pacific Grove in November 2023.
Though an investigation by a state agricultural official did not determine a source of the die-off, pesticide residues on crops, lawns and ornamental flowers are a poisoning risk for monarch larvae, and for adults eating nectar. Pesticide run off in shallow water sources near where high numbers of butterflies collectively drink present a risk for the type of mass die-off at Pacific Grove.
All the butterflies showed high levels of the same three pyrethroids, a pesticide class widely used in California on agricultural and residential land. The residential applications are not reported, and Cibotti said the presence of the same types of pyrethroids in all the samples points to a nearby residential exposure as the source.
Some of the pyrethroid levels found in the monarchs are known to be lethal, and researchers suspect the combined levels of multiple pesticides also probably contributed. Combinations of pesticides can have a synergistic effect that makes them even more toxic.
The solution, Cibotti said, is less pesticides.
'These clustering events occur during especially sensitive phases of the migratory cycle, so reducing pesticide exposure during these times is essential not only to prevent immediate losses, but also to improve the population's chances of rebounding the following spring and support its long-term recovery,' Cibotti said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Venus Williams reflects on harrowing health battle a year on from surgery: 'I was told I could bleed to death'
Venus Williams has opened up on the depths of her recent health struggles, a year on from having surgery to remove fibroids from her uterus. The 45-year-old Williams, who recently confirmed her engagement to her actor boyfriend Andrea Preti, took a 16-month break from tennis due to the issue, returning to the court back in July. Now, for the first time, Williams has revealed just how much her condition was impacting her life away from tennis in a moving Instagram post 12 months on from her operation in New York. 'On this day 1 year ago I was having surgery, an open myomectomy to remove fibroids and a large focal adenomyoma that was imbedded in the muscle of my uterus,' Williams wrote on Instagram. 'What a difference a year makes! I played my first tournament in over 16 months and I am now preparing for the US Open. This post is in celebration of the last day of fibroid awareness month. There can be happy endings!' Williams won her first singles game since March 2024 at the Citi Open in Washington D.C. in July, the latest landmark step on her road to recovery. The 45-year-old took a 16-month break from tennis, before returning to the court back in July She told reporters at the tournament that the difference in her health is 'night and day' from the summer of 2024. But Williams told her 2 million followers on Instagram that she was now opening up her journey to recovery to reassure other women with the same condition. 'I was told I was inoperable,' she wrote. 'I was told I could bleed to death on the table. 'I was told to get a surrogate and forget the hope to carry my own children. I was misdiagnosed. 'I went untreated for years and years and years. It's so important to advocate for your health! I suffered from severe anemia, debilitating pain, excessive bleeding and abnormally frequent menstrual cycles for many years. It affected my tennis and the trajectory of my career.' 'I told my story so other women don't have to go through this and so they can get better sooner. I play tennis now because I can play healthier than ever, it is a dream come true!' It promises to be an emotional return to Queens for Williams later in August at the competition she first won in 2000. Williams confirmed her engagement to her Italian boyfriend Preti on her return to the game in DC, telling the crowd after her win: 'My fiancé is here and he really encouraged me to keep playing. 'There were so many times where I just wanted to coast and kind of chill. Do you know how hard it is to play tennis? You guys don't know how much work goes into this, like it's 9 to 5 except you're running the whole time. 'Lifting weights and just like dying and then you repeat it the next day. So he encouraged me to get through this and it's wonderful to be here. He's never seen me play.' The couple were first linked last summer when they were on vacation on the Amalfi coast. Speculation over their engagement had been rife for months - Williams was seen practicing with a huge ring back in February.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Andrew Garfield leaves fans confused by his 'freaky' face on new film set as he fuels plastic surgery rumors
Andrew Garfield has fans doing a double take after his latest appearance on the set of Artificial in San Francisco. The 41-year-old Spider-Man star looked noticeably different while filming the AI drama alongside Ike Barinholtz and Monica Barbaro. Garfield takes on the role of tech visionary Sam Altman, with Barinholtz as Elon Musk and Barbaro playing former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati. But it wasn't the star-studded cast or romance rumors with Barbaro that stirred chatter—it was Garfield's altered look that had fans buzzing. Many are now speculating if the actor underwent cosmetic procedures to achieve his new appearance. 'They did something real freaky to his face,' one critic wrote, as another added, 'Did he get bad botox?' But it wasn't the star-studded cast or romance rumors with costar Monica Barbaro that stirred chatter—it was Garfield's altered look that had fans buzzing Yet another chimed in, 'Did someone edit his face?' while another posted, 'I came to the comments to check if I was just crazy. What happened!?' 'Why does he look yassified,' one wrote. 'His whole eye area looks diff,' said another, while one fan admitted, 'I've never been so unattracted to Andrew Garfield before.' One summed it up: 'People are saying it's because he shaved but no. He looks very pale like he has makeup on? and then a facelift maybe? But that's insane if he did that.' The critic then made a robot reference, saying, 'It's giving uncanny valley and I feel bad judging but there is SOMETHING not right. We've all taken bad photos so I'm praying that's all it is' One simply said, 'He looks artificial.' Of course, some fans thought the actor looked incredible, with one writing, 'Andrew Garfield still looks 24 when he's actually 42 is an enigma to me.' The viral uproar comes after Garfield and Babar confirmed their romance as they joined the likes of Lily Collins and Poppy Delevingne at day seven of Wimbledon in July. The lovebirds, who reportedly seen smooching at Glastonbury the week before, put on a very cosy display while watching the centre court action, with the actor leaning in for a cheeky kiss. After sparking romance rumours in February, actor Andrew reportedly went public with his romance with the Top Gun: Maverick star Monica at Glastonbury. Speaking to The Sun , an onlooker at the festival said that Andrew and Monica are the 'real deal' and were seen holding hands, kissing and hugging. The pair are said to have stayed in the luxury teepee tents for the festival and spent their time moving between the VIP area and the main farm. 'On Friday she was posing for some pictures in the VIP area and he stood quite a distance away but looked really proud,' the source said. 'By Saturday they were holding hands and kissing and cuddling. They both seemed really happy and were singing along to Gracie Abrams during her set.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
A professor had a $2.4m grant to study Black maternal health. Then Trump was elected
Jaime Slaughter-Acey was in a state of shock and anger when she learned that her National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded study on birth outcomes in Black families was cancelled this spring. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill associate professor in epidemiology said that she felt like 'the rug was pulled out from under us' when the university called her to share the news. The termination notice said that the study no longer met the agency's priorities and didn't promise to increase life expectancy. 'It was heartbreaking,' Slaughter-Acey told the Guardian, 'and honestly, infuriating given the high rates of maternal and infant mortality in this country.' The cancellation came as the Trump administration terminated 1,902 NIH grants totalling more than $4.4bn between his January inauguration and the end of July, according to Grant Witness data. NIH followed guidance from the so-called 'department of government efficiency' (Doge) and Trump's executive orders to cut costs. Additionally, in April, the Trump administration let go of a majority of the staff at the federal Division of Reproductive Health, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) office that collects data on maternal experiences. It also surveils pregnancy-related deaths in an effort to reduce infant mortality and improve health outcomes for mothers and their children. Slaughter-Acey's several-year study funded by a more than $2.4m NIH grant aimed to look at how social and biological factors affect outcomes for more than 500 Black women in Detroit. The grant termination froze the team's more than $581,000 remaining funding. Through blood samples and surveys of Black mothers and grandmothers, Slaughter-Acey and her team aimed to understand if social environments accelerated how bodies physiologically age, otherwise known as biological ageing, which may lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes for Black women. She said that the research is 'designed to tell us how social environment and the pathways that social environment affects us physiologically, to then increase this risk that Black moms and Black babies have with respect to pregnancy'. While most studies that look at racism only focus on one point in time, Slaughter-Acey said that hers was 'the first study to comprehensively examine how exposure to structural, cultural and intergenerational racism throughout a Black woman's life impacts her epigenome and her child's birth outcomes.' It was also innovative because Black women are underrepresented in epigenomic studies, a field where researchers look at how environment and behavior impacts a person's genes, said Slaughter-Acey, due to medical mistrust and experiences of racism in the healthcare system. The NIH-grant cancellation in late March followed the release of data from the CDC revealing that Black women were the only race or ethnic group who didn't experience a decline in deaths from pregnancy related causes in 2023. Out of every 100,000 live births, 50.3 Black mothers died, compared with 14.5 deaths for white people, 12.4 for Latinos and 10.7 for Asians. The NIH didn't respond to a request for comment. Slaughter-Acey fears that the grant-cancellation signals that research and efforts to close the maternal death gap are at risk of coming to a standstill under the Trump administration. Other NIH grants that have been terminated include one that looked at prenatal exposure to public drinking water contaminants and a study that analyzed why women of color die of cervical cancer at a disproportionate rate. On Thursday, the Trump administration froze UCLA research grants from federal agencies including NIH and the National Science Foundation totaling nearly $200m, accusing the university of antisemitism and discrimination in admissions. 'It's part of a larger pattern of political interference in science that puts the health of all people at risk, especially vulnerable populations,' Slaughter-Acey said. The study 'is about understanding the root causes of poor maternal and infant health in this country – something that affects all of us, regardless of race or background. When science is silenced, communities suffer'. Still, Slaughter-Acey and her team are hopeful that the study will continue for years to come as they search for alternative funding sources, including donations. On Slaughter-Acey's LinkedIn page, she called upon her followers to donate to the University of North Carolina Department of Epidemiology, and to include a note that they support Slaughter-Acey's work, or the name of the study, 'LIFE-2'. 'The voices of these 500 plus moms and babies should not die or be silenced with the termination of this grant,' she told the Guardian. The pull in funding 'is an example of erasure of black mothers and infants'. There has been some temporary relief. This June, Slaughter-Acey's team received short-term funding from Michigan State University to continue their study over the next few months. Now nearly 600 moms are enrolled in the study, but without additional funding, it will probably pause again at the end of the year. The nearly 600 women who have joined the study were recruited from local delivery hospitals in Detroit, Michigan, in the day or two following childbirth. Slaughter-Acey chose Detroit since she completed her post-doc at the University of Michigan, where she researched the influence of social environments on Black maternal health. Participants for her study, which began in 2021, completed a post-delivery survey where they answered questions about social determinants of health including housing and food insecurity throughout their life. Along with collecting their blood through a finger prick, researchers also collect the babies' and mothers' birth certificates from the state health department as well as the mothers' blood that was collected at birth and stored in a biobank. About 20% of the babies' grandmothers are also participating in the study by answering questions about the social environment during their pregnancies and their daughters' early childhoods. The multilevel data collection allows the researchers to create 'this robust and triangulated dataset that includes social determinants of health, like information about food and housing insecurity', Slaughter-Acey said. 'It's capturing a more holistic view than what's been captured previously for moms in terms of maternal and infant health.' After the moms are discharged from the hospital, the researchers also follow up with a majority of the women eight to 10 weeks after they give birth to ask about their adjustment to motherhood, whether they've received support for breastfeeding, a postpartum healthcare visit, or if they've experienced discrimination from their healthcare providers. At the time of the funding termination, the research team was in the process of creating a 12-month postpartum checkup with the mothers to help define maternal thriving. 'When we are talking about maternal morbidity and mortality, we're defining maternal health by the absence of disease, by mom not dying, by mom not having a severe morbidity,' Slaughter-Acey said. 'But the field in general does not have a good understanding or even definition of, 'what does maternal thriving look like?' And we need to get past this conversation of maternal survival, and move to thriving.' More than two years of funding remained in the NIH grant, during which her team had planned to recruit more mothers and to conduct data analysis. They also aimed to create a website for participants to read about the study's findings. But the data that the team has analyzed thus far has revealed that mothers with a lot of adverse childhood experiences were more likely to have conflict with the father of the child. The finding, Slaughter-Acey said, 'underscores the importance of understanding how the social environment influences relationship dynamics and maybe perinatal outcomes. We know that social support is key during pregnancy'. The team also found that one in five study participants experienced housing insecurity during their pregnancy, a factor that she said greatly affects perinatal health and is rarely documented in hospital records. They also created a tool to measure racial microagressions from healthcare providers and in the mothers' everyday life, since many in the cohort said that they experienced harmful interactions that Slaughter-Acey said may explain why they felt unsupported. For Slaughter-Acey, the study findings 'highlight how structural inequities – across housing, healthcare, and personal history – intersect to shape maternal and infant outcomes. And they underscore why we need research that listens to and reflects the full complexity of Black women's experiences.' NIH research funding will probably continue to take a hit under the Trump administration. A new Trump administration policy requiring that multiyear grants be paid upfront lowers the odds that a research proposal will be accepted. As a result, university labs may close.
