Australia sues ex-director of crypto exchange Blockchain Global over alleged duty breaches
May 28 (Reuters) - Australia's corporate regulator said on Wednesday that it has initiated civil penalty proceedings against Liang (Allan) Guo, a former director of the failed cryptocurrency exchange firm Blockchain Global, alleging multiple breaches of duties.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission's allegations in the federal court are in relation to Guo's involvement in Blockchain Global's operation of a cryptocurrency exchange platform, ACX Exchange, which collapsed around December 2019, when customers began being unable to withdraw funds or cryptocurrency from their accounts.
The allegations relate to Guo's dealings with ACX Exchange customer funds, statements made about those dealings and obligations to keep proper books and records.
The regulator had started an investigation into the firm in January 2024, following a receipt of a report from the firm's liquidators, which said that Blockchain Global owed around A$58 million ($37.3 million) to unsecured creditors as of October 2, 2023.
Guo was barred from leaving the country in February 2024, but left Australia on September 23, 2024, following the expiry of his travel restraint orders, the regulator said.
Blockchain Global had no published contact information and could not immediately be reached for comment.
The firm's liquidator, Andrew Yeo, did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment.
($1 = 1.5562 Australian dollars)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Disqualified driver accused of hitting and killing woman then fleeing the scene is named
A disqualified driver has been denied bail after allegedly fleeing the scene of a fatal hit-and-run on a busy Sydney roadway. Police allege a 20-year-old disqualified driver fatally struck a woman believed to be aged in her 60s on Macquarie Avenue, Penrith, about 5.30pm on Thursday. Nine News and the Daily Telegraph identified the driver as Lasaro Tavai. Emergency services were called to the scene by which time Tavai had allegedly fled without stopping. The female pedestrian succumbed to injuries at the scene. Police released two pieces of footage as part of their investigation. In the first video, filmed on dashcam, a ute appeared to make a right-hand turn onto a busy roadway before barreling towards the woman's position. In the following frame, an orange ute could be seen waiting at the intersection while indicating before making the turn. Following inquiries and an appeal for information, the 20-year-old man was arrested the following evening at a Taloma Street home in Penrith at 10.40pm on Friday. Officers attached to the Nepean Police Area Command established a crime scene where crash investigators conducted forensic examinations. Tavai was taken to St Marys Police Station where he was charged with a raft of offences including dangerous driving occasioning death-drive manner dangerous, negligent driving (occasioning death), fail to stop and assist after impact cause death. Police also charged Tavai with drive motor vehicle during disqualification period, and use unregistered registrable Class A motor vehicle on road. He was refused bail to appear at Parramatta Bail Court on Saturday. According to the Daily Telegraph, Tavai did not appear in court on Saturday where no bail application was made and was formally refused. His matter is reportedly listed for the same court on June 13.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Kids allegedly spotted carrying lethal weapons at a busy shopping centre just days after they were banned
A popular Melbourne shopping centre was sent into lockdown on Friday evening after a group of boys were seen allegedly carrying machetes days after a ban came into effect. The group of five-to-six boys were seen arguing inside Caroline Springs Shopping Centre in the west Melbourne suburb of Caroline Springs, at about 6.40pm. A Victoria Police spokesperson told Daily Mail Australia the boys were believed to have been armed with machetes and had fled by the time officers arrived at the scene. CCTV footage obtained by Nine News showed shoppers and retailers as they scrambled to avoid the armed mob who appeared to threaten one another. 'I feel so scared... I just quickly go and shut the cafe and tell my other staff "don't leave",' witness Pawan Kaur told Nine. Witness Hung Nguyen watched on in horror as a boy pulled what he believed to be a machete from his backpack before tensions spilled over. 'I can't believe it did happen,' he said. Shoppers affected by the lockdown plastered news of the incident across social media as the events unfolded. The popular Melbourne shopping centre was plunged into lockdown following reports of a group of boys carrying machetes 'Another machete attack while I was getting my noodle on,' one TikTok user wrote in a video filmed inside the shopping centre as the lockdown announcement played over the loudspeakers. While no injuries were reported, the incident called into question the effectiveness of a ban on the sale of machetes by the Victorian government. The ban followed a clash between suspected rival youth gangs alleged to have been carrying the weapons at Northland shopping centre in Preston on May 25. Footage from inside the popular mall depicted shoppers running for cover as a group of seven males, aged between 15 and 21, squared-off. The following day Premier Jacinta Allan announced her government would bring forward the machete ban until a permanent ban takes effect on September 1. 'In Victoria, community safety comes first. We must never let places we meet become places we fear,' Ms Allan said last Monday. 'I hate these knives, and I will keep introducing as many laws as it takes to get them off our streets, out of our shops and out of our lives.' Investigations into the Caroline Springs incident remain ongoing.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Teenager at elite Sydney private school wins HUGE payout after suing primary school over an accident at an athletics carnival that left him with lifelong injuries
A student at an elite Sydney private school has won a huge payout against his public primary school after life-changing injuries suffered at a Year 6 athletics carnival. On Friday, the now 17-year-old, a current student at Shore, secured a $275,000 judgment against Neutral Bay Primary School and, vicariously, the state of NSW. The lawsuit concerned a long-jump competition at the public school in 2019 when, at the age of 11, the boy landed on a hard surface in a sandpit and injured his back. The student, unnamed for privacy reasons, said he suffered a significant spinal injury during the long-jump, resulting in permanent back pain and impairment. He first brought the suit to the NSW District Court which, in October, dismissed his claim, finding the school had taken adequate steps to protect the students. In that instance, Judge Robert Newlinds SC found the teachers supervising the event reasonably believed the sandpit was safe and had been sufficiently sanded. Judge Newlinds ruled that while schools must take reasonable steps to keep students safe during sporting events, they cannot be expected to eliminate risks altogether. 'There will always be unfortunate consequences and injuries suffered by children at school or at play, even when there has been every reasonably precaution taken to prevent such actions,' he said. On appeal, acting Justice John Griffiths, with whom two other judges agreed, disagreed, claiming the risk of harm was foreseeable and easily avoidable. He held the school failed to ensure there was adequate sand to soften the area where the student landed and the two teachers failed to give adequate supervision. The primary judge relied on an image of a tape measure alongside the sandpit to infer there was at least was at least 20cm of sand combined with other soft-fall material. Justice Griffith disagreed with the inference, claiming the tape measure appeared to be kinked in the image and that the lower court relied too strongly on the single image. 'I am comfortably satisfied that there was a breach of duty on the part of the school in failing to take reasonable precautions to minimise the risk of injury from long jumping,' Justice Griffiths said. 'There was a breach of duty here because of the school's failure to take reasonable precautions which could have prevented [the student's] injuries. 'Those precautions were not onerous.' In determining damages, Justice Griffiths accepted the evidence of the student's doctor who claimed the injuries were 'likely to affect his future outcome'. Medical evidence held the boy suffered 'significant structural damage' to a spinal disc which, in turn, caused 'permanent structural damage' to his spine. Both courts accepted the injury interfered with his 'ability to enjoy life to date' and would 'continue to do so'. During the trial, the student suggested he might wish to follow his mother into IT or finance after school and that his back pain might make sitting all day 'quite hard'. He also raised the possibility of joining the military after school but said his experience in cadets at high school had been undermined by his injuries. Justice Griffiths decided to award a 'buffer' of $250,000 for future economic loss and an additional $25,000 for non-economic loss in the form of pain and suffering. He also rejected the school's claim the injury would have arisen regardless of the force or hardness of his landing in the pit since it arose from intra-abdominal pressure. 'It is possible [the student] may still have suffered the same injuries had there been an adequate amount of sand in his landing area,' he said. 'However, it is no "answer to the question whether something has been demonstrated as being more probable than not to say that there is another possibility open".' Ultimately, the Court of Appeal panel ruled the school had failed to protect the student from a reasonably foreseeable risk of injury. 'There are undoubted risks in school sports, but they form part of the curriculum in many primary schools and the community rightly recognises that such activities are beneficial for young children when properly supervised,' the panel ruled. 'I am comfortably satisfied that there was a breach of duty on the part of the school in failing to take reasonable precautions to minimise the risk of injury from long jumping.'
