logo
Tax Season 2025: A Cheat Sheet for Retirees and Retirement Accounts - Your Money Briefing

Tax Season 2025: A Cheat Sheet for Retirees and Retirement Accounts - Your Money Briefing

This transcript was prepared by a transcription service. This version may not be in its final form and may be updated.
Ariana Aspuru: Here's Your Money Briefing for Tuesday, March 4th. I'm Ariana Aspuru for The Wall Street Journal. Congress has set up a variety of tax-friendly accounts to encourage saving for retirement. While they offer plenty of benefits, it's important to be aware of the potential pitfalls.
Laura Saunders: If the money comes out of a traditional account, you'll owe tax on it in general. Also, if you're under 59 and a half, you probably will owe a 10% penalty, but not always, so it's important to check on that and strategize.
Ariana Aspuru: We'll talk to Wall Street Journal reporter Laura Saunders about her latest guide to taxes for retirees or retirement account holders after the break. Tax season for retirees and people holding retirement accounts means paying attention to when and how you contribute and withdraw money from them. Wall Street Journal reporter Laura Saunders joins me. Laura, before we dive into the tax benefits and pitfalls that filers need to be aware of this year, let's do a little refresher on the main types of retirement savings accounts. What are they?
Laura Saunders: The main types are two branches of the same tree. One is 401(k)s and 403(b)s and plans like that. Those are employer sponsored plans and they might have an employer match, so that's always a good thing to get. Now, separately, there are IRAs, and IRAs are individually owned and you put money in if you're eligible and you take money out. But there are overlapping rules like in both cases you probably don't have access to a lot of the money unless you're 59 and a half or older.
Ariana Aspuru: And what influences why someone would choose 401(k) over an IRA?
Laura Saunders: It's often eligibility. Now, if your employer offers a match with the 401(k) and you have access to the 401(k) and the match, that would be a slam dunk. On the other hand, if you're an 18-year-old kid and you've got your first summer job as a lifeguard and maybe you have a great-grandparent who wants to match your savings, you would put it into an IRA. With traditional accounts, the money goes in pre-tax, so you get a really nice sometimes very fat tax deduction for putting that money in and the money grows tax-free. But on the other end, when it comes out, it's all ordinary income. It will be taxed at the same rate as your wages, and you have to start taking it out when you're 73. Now with Roth IRAs and 401(k)s, the money goes in after tax dollars. You pay tax on the front end, and that's a little more painful because you don't get the nice. On the other hand, it grows tax-free and then it can come out tax-free.
Ariana Aspuru: If you have money saved in a traditional IRA count and want to transfer it to a Roth one, what's the most tax-efficient way to do that?
Laura Saunders: It's not especially tax-efficient because you have to pay tax on the conversion. You take it out, you roll it into a Roth IRA and you pay tax at ordinary income rates. And if you're already paying tax on your earnings and things like that, it might push you into higher tax bracket. If you have a pause or a break like you are going back to school or you just got out of school and you started to earn, but your income is lower this year because you only worked for part of the year, or if you've just retired and your income is low, the lower your income at the time you convert, the lower your tax will likely be.
Ariana Aspuru: When do you have to start withdrawing money from your retirement accounts?
Laura Saunders: If you have traditional accounts, right now the law is 73, you pull out about 4% the first year, but it rises after that. If you are lucky enough to have a lot of income, it might raise taxes on other investment income, things like that. It's a thing to keep your eye on. It might be a reason to convert to Roth accounts.
Ariana Aspuru: When you hear the words required minimum distributions, that's what we're talking about.
Laura Saunders: That's what we're talking about. The IRA has a table for it and you look it up and every year you see what it is. And the value is the value on the last day of the year. That's how you figure out the withdrawal for the next year.
Ariana Aspuru: What's the penalty for withdrawing early if you have to or you choose to?
Laura Saunders: If the money comes out of a traditional account, you'll owe tax on it in general. Also, if you're under 59 and a half, you probably will owe a 10% penalty, but not always. So it's important to check on that and strategize. With Roths, it's somewhat different and I would say look up the rules, but the most important thing to know, and especially for young people, is that if you pull out Roth contributions at any time, you don't owe tax or penalty on them. The only downside is that you can't put them back, but let's have an example of this. Maybe there's a young person who's managed to put money into a Roth every year, and by age 30 she has built up 50, $60,000 in her Roth IRA of contributions. Now they're also earnings, but they're not as much as the contributions. If she wants to take that money out, say to go back to school or the down payment on a house, that can just come out with no problem. So a Roth IRA can make a great emergency savings account for true emergencies or long-term investments and things like that.
Ariana Aspuru: In your cheat sheet for navigating taxes with retirement accounts, you mentioned how someone who inherits an IRA can gain access to the money in the account. What does that process entail?
Laura Saunders: Generally, you have 10 years to take the money out. It cannot exist longer than 10 years if the person who left it to you died after 2019. If it's a Roth IRA, you don't have to take annual distributions. If it's a traditional IRA, you probably have to take some money out every year. And the thing to know there is that you may want to take out more than you're told to take out. If you're stuck taking out over half the money in the 10th year, it might push you into a higher tax bracket. So keep an eye on your taxes when you're taking these withdrawals.
Ariana Aspuru: Donating money straight from your retirement account to charity can also be a highly efficient tax move. Why is that?
Laura Saunders: For savers who have gotten a lot of money into traditional accounts, you can make your charitable contributions directly from the traditional IRA. It will count against your RMD and it will reduce your income. You won't get a tax deduction for it, but that might be better. It will reduce your AGI and it can reduce other taxes as well. If you switch your contributions from a cash account to these so-called qualified charitable distributions, these are called QCDs, it could benefit you. You could even get a charitable tax break while you're taking the so-called standard deduction.
Ariana Aspuru: That's WSJ Reporter Laura Saunders, and that's it for Your Money Briefing. This episode was produced by Zoe Kuhlkin with supervising producer Melony Roy. I'm Ariana Aspuru for The Wall Street Journal. Thanks for listening.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans rediscover the one weird trick that actually cuts spending
Republicans rediscover the one weird trick that actually cuts spending

Washington Post

time18 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Republicans rediscover the one weird trick that actually cuts spending

Dominic Pino is the Thomas L. Rhodes journalism fellow at National Review Institute and host of the American Institute for Economic Research podcast 'Econception.' Well, this is awkward. After the relationship between President Donald Trump and businessman Elon Musk very publicly soured, Congress is considering action on the primary product of that relationship: spending cuts suggested by the U.S. DOGE Service.

Mayor Lurie made ‘painful' cuts in his S.F. budget proposal. The hurt is far from over
Mayor Lurie made ‘painful' cuts in his S.F. budget proposal. The hurt is far from over

San Francisco Chronicle​

time32 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Mayor Lurie made ‘painful' cuts in his S.F. budget proposal. The hurt is far from over

San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie said he made 'painful decisions' when assembling his recent budget proposal that would slash nonprofit contracts and shrink the City Hall workforce. But the hurt is far from over. Lurie recently told the Chronicle that he is still eyeing a more ambitious overhaul next year as he tries to erase a deficit that's projected to reach as much as $700 million in the 2028 fiscal year. Complicating Lurie's plans to rein in city spending is the fact that the Trump administration has already moved to claw back federal funds from San Francisco and could try to take more money away. And a Tuesday report from the city controller's office warned that proposed Medicaid cuts advanced by Congressional Republicans could further hurt city revenue — as could a potential recession. Lurie's city spending plan would eliminate about $185 million in grants and contracts over two years and cut about 100 filled jobs from the government payroll. The proposal would help Lurie close a massive budget shortfall, but unions and nonprofits quickly decried what they view as an unwarranted assault on community groups that provide crucial services to residents and businesses. Despite the early resistance, however, Lurie's inaugural budget blueprint does not represent a massive reorganization of the San Francisco bureaucracy, nor does it compare to the layoffs the city last experienced during the Great Recession. Next year could be a different story. In an interview with the Chronicle last week, Lurie indicated that he sees the current budget negotiations as a prelude to his plans for 2026. This year, his budget proposal was all about 'right-sizing,' he said. For next year, he has a different word in mind: 'restructuring.' 'This was a really focused budget on delivering core services (and) right-sizing our government,' Lurie said. 'And it does not mean the work is over. It was never going to be that way. … We have a lot of work to do ahead of us.' It's not yet clear what Lurie's promised restructuring will look like. The mayor's budget plan this year already proposed combining two city departments beset by scandals into one agency. And a February executive directive that Lurie issued on permitting reform said the city should explore how it might merge 'key permitting functions' into one department. Just how difficult Lurie's budget calculus will be in the coming year depends heavily on what happens at the national level. San Francisco's nearly $16 billion budget relies on more than $2 billion in operating revenue from the federal government, the vast majority of which comes in the form of Medicaid reimbursements. Funding changes under consideration in Congress could hurt the city, but it's how much it might lose. The controller's Tuesday report said the proposed federal budget bill 'represents the biggest set of cuts to Medicaid since inception and could result in thousands of San Francisco residents disenrolling from the Medi-Cal program and reduced funding for the Department of Public Health.' Lurie has proposed setting up a $400 million reserve that the city could tap into to offset any major funding cuts from President Trump or Congress. The controller found that the reserve amount was 'commensurate to risk.' Another unknown is the extent to which any national economic downturn could harm San Francisco's budget, and Lurie's ability to bring city spending in line with revenue. The controller's report noted that, while unemployment in the city is stable and office attendance has risen, technology and hospitality companies continue to lay people off. Trump's tariffs and immigration crackdowns could further strain the economy. Regardless of what happens nationally, Lurie has said he is already trying to end 'the era of soaring city budgets' and wants city officials to 'start living within our means.' His proposed cuts represent a reckoning for nonprofits after years of flush city budgets that saw millions flow to third parties in exchange for providing crucial social services. Now, many of those organizations are reeling from deep cuts that could force layoffs and the shuttering of programs. Some San Francisco legal aid organizations are facing deep cuts that they say could lead to more homelessness and less access to legal services for the needy. One legal aid organization's director is going on a hunger strike to protest the cuts. The Latino Task Force, Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco, the Chinatown Community Development Center and dozens of others are facing cuts that will impact services. The People's Budget, a coalition of city advocacy groups that every year proposes changes to the mayor's budget, has a 'walkthrough' of all the groups they have heard from that are losing funding. Anya Worley-Ziegmann, lead coordinator for the San Francisco People's Budget Coalition that advocates for nonprofits facing cuts, said in a statement that Lurie's budget proposal threatens 'essential services for food security, workforce development, legal aid, and children and families facing homelessness.' 'We cannot balance the budget on the backs of working class and marginalized communities while at the same time claiming to be a city that cares for all its residents,' Worley-Ziegmann said. Lurie also is being slammed by fiscal conservatives who believe he should have made deeper cuts to the city's 33,000-person workforce and take on the city's 'nonprofit industrial complex,' a moniker critics have given to the large contractors that do work on behalf of the city. A previous Chronicle analysis found that San Francisco has an unusually high amount of public sector workers per capita, especially among public health and library employees. Marie Hurabiell, founder of the neighborhood advocacy group Connected SF, praised Lurie for taking on the city's nonprofits and contractors as well as his effort to 'right-size' the budget after years of what she said was 'overspending' related to the pandemic. But she said those changes will only get San Francisco to the level of spending it had before COVID, and there are many more cuts to be made to downsize the government so it better reflects the city's relatively small population. One way to do that is by doubling down on accountability, she said. 'For years there's been a lot of money flowing and our services have not been great,' she said. '(Lurie) is probably trying to be very thoughtful and methodical (about future cuts), but I'm hoping he will be more impactful.' The existing job cuts in Lurie's proposed budget also drew some criticism from the executive committee of the San Francisco Democratic Party, which is controlled by moderates who generally share Lurie's politics. Committee members said in a statement that Lurie's budget overall 'demonstrates bold leadership during a time of unprecedented fiscal challenge.' But party leaders said they were 'very concerned about the proposed reduction of city jobs currently held by San Francisco employees.' 'Cutting these roles not only disrupts lives and livelihoods but also risks weakening the long-term capacity of government to meet the needs of its residents,' the statement read. Party chair Nancy Tung said the committee doesn't have a position on where budget cuts should come from if those 100 jobs were preserved. But she said the committee hoped Lurie and supervisors would be able to find a way to prevent any city employees from being laid off. She also acknowledged that the city's financial condition had put Lurie in a tough spot and praised him for issuing a hiring slowdown on his first day in office. 'I don't envy where the mayor is in terms of having to do this,' Tung said. 'I also know that this is very hard for him, too. He is trying to do it as humanely as possible.' Tom Li contributed reporting.

Elon Musk Regrets Some of His Posts on Donald Trump
Elon Musk Regrets Some of His Posts on Donald Trump

Bloomberg

time34 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Elon Musk Regrets Some of His Posts on Donald Trump

Good morning. Regrets—Elon Musk has a few. Downtown LA is under curfew. And we've got great news for you K-pop fans out there. Listen to the day's top stories. Sorry. Elon Musk, who had a very public falling out with Donald Trump last week, regrets some of the social media posts he made, saying ' they went too far.' The dispute—which was triggered by Musk's opposition to the tax-cut bill Trump is pushing through Congress—posed a threat to the billionaire's wealth when the president raised the prospect of cutting off his government contracts. Tesla investors can relax a bit; the company's shares rose in premarket trading.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store