Moana Pasifika owners deny public funding has gone into team
Te Puni Kōkiri (TPK) has launched an independent review into allegations of inappropriate use of public funding allocated for Whānau Ora commissioning services.
The independent review relates to allegations of funding misuse by two agencies, Te Pou Matakana Limited - otherwise known as the Whānau Ora Commissioning Agency - and Pasifika Futures Limited, and would focus on whether the agencies met their contractual obligations when using the public money.
The review followed Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka seeking urgent advice on "electioneering concerns" relating to an advertisement encouraging Māori to sign-up to the Māori electoral roll paid for by Te Pou Matakana Limited released this week, and suggestions Moana Pasifika had also received Whānau Ora funds.
Pasifika Medical Association Group (PMA) - which bought the franchise last year - is set to lose contracts with Whānau Ora through its entity Pasifika Futures.
Dr Kiki Maoate, chair of the PMA, said in a statement "we strongly reject any claim that public funds have been used in an inappropriate manner".
When PMA took ownership of Moana Pasifika in July last year Maoate said the Moana Pasifika Charitable Trust was established to hold both the professional rugby team and the Moana Pasifika Community Sports Programme.
"Moana Pasifika has always been more than a rugby team. From the outset, it was established as a movement - a platform for social good and long-term transformation for Pacific people," he said in a statement.
"Any public or Whānau Ora funding has been directed solely to the Moana Pasifika Community Sports Programme. No public funding has been used to support the professional rugby team."
He added "the professional rugby team operates independently of public funding. The team is funded through commercial rugby revenue streams".
He said that funding came from the likes of New Zealand Rugby, World Rugby, SKY TV broadcast revenue and PMA revenue.
"PMA generates its own income and is not reliant solely on government funding. It has built significant equity over 28 years, including savings and a property portfolio. This financial strength has enabled it to support the franchise without drawing on public money," Maoate said.
Maoate said since becoming part of PMA Moana Pasifika has increased its focus on community impact evolving from a professional sports team into a wider platform for sport, connection and social purpose.
"We welcome scrutiny - but it must be informed, balanced and grounded in fact. We stand by the integrity of our decisions, the strength of our governance and the value of our work across Aotearoa."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Should Māori born overseas automatically be NZ citizens? Father fights for children classed as illegal overstayers
John Bryers Ruddock pictured with his children, who are 8, 9 and 12. Photo: John Bryers Ruddock / Supplied The descendant of a Treaty signatory, All Black and " the voice of New Zealand" is fighting for Māori to have automatic New Zealand citizenship. John Bryers Ruddock (Ngāpuhi), recently returned to Aotearoa to live with his three children - ages 8, 9 and 10. But, he was born in Australia and all three of his children were born in Hawaii. As a result, he was now navigating an expensive process to get his tamariki recognised as New Zealand citizens. Despite their whakapapa including a number of famous New Zealanders - their great grandfather was All Black Ron Bryers, their grandmother was celebrated singer Rhonda Bryers, known as "the voice of New Zealand" and their great great grandfather was an original signatory to Te Tiriti, the children were technically overstayers and unable to attend school. Bryers Ruddock told Checkpoint , he had asked for a Waitangi Tribunal hearing to discuss the issue and wanted to see some kind of intervention. He said having his children being labelled as overstayers was not something as a father he wanted to put them through. "It's red tape after red tape," he said. "It's been a costly process so far, I have to finalise the court orders, so still dealing with that, I've spent over $17,000 so far." Bryers Ruddock said he wanted the tribunal to look at his case and change the policy around citizenship for people of Māori descent who were born overseas. "I just feel, you know, my mum was an ambassador for this country and culture... it's something I want to do for our people." Bryers Ruddock said he had sent in an application for the children to get citizenship under Section 61 of the Immigration Act, which allowed Immigration NZ to issue visas in special circumstances, and was waiting for a sponsor to help him get either a student visa or residency. The treaty claim had been lodged by Hastings law firm Manaia Legal, he said. John Bryers Raddock and his three children recently moved to Wellington. Photo: John Bryers Ruddock / Supplied Minister of Internal Affairs, Brooke van Velden, said in a statement provided to Checkpoint, she was not looking to change the citizen act and said the requirements of citizenship applied to all applicants equally. "The outcomes depend on the information provided for each case not the ethnicity of the applicant." The minister had the discretion to grant citizenship to people who didn't meet requirements bur had exceptional circumstances. Van Velden's office said it had not yet received an application about Bryers Ruddock's children and they needed to go through the application process with internal affairs first. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
UN letter: PM firm with ministers on who should be sending responses
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says he has made it "pretty clear" to his ministers how they should handle correspondence with the United Nations, as the coalition's letter-writing saga drags on. Appearing at his post-Cabinet media conference on Monday, Luxon was pressed on RNZ's revelations that Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith had been consulted before David Seymour issued a forthright reply to the UN in July. "I'm not going to get into that," Luxon told RNZ. "We've canvassed that before." Luxon reiterated his "very clear position" that Winston Peters, as foreign minister, was responsible for coordinating all responses to the UN. Asked what it said about his Cabinet that multiple ministers appeared to misunderstand that process, Luxon was blunt. "It's pretty clear to them now," he said. "I've made it pretty clear." Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii However, new correspondence - as reported by RNZ on Saturday - show Seymour's staff stated that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade's preferred approach was actually for a joint reply from "relevant ministers" Seymour, Goldsmith and Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka. The controversy stems from a June letter from UN special rapporteur on Indigenous Peoples Albert K Barume, who flagged concerns that Seymour's Regulatory Standards Bill excluded Māori traditions and failed to uphold Treaty of Waitangi principles. Seymour, writing as regulations minister, fired back a response in early July, describing the critique as "presumptive, condescending and wholly misplaced" and "an affront to New Zealand's sovereignty". That letter was later withdrawn and both Luxon and Peters publicly rebuked Seymour for bypassing proper process. Peters eventually sent a government-wide response in August , striking a softer tone and expressing regret for the "breakdown in protocol". On Saturday, RNZ revealed new documents, obtained under the Official Information Act, which showed Seymour had run his draft past Goldsmith beforehand and been told his colleague was "happy for us to send it". Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Should Māori born overseas automatically be NZ citizens?
Should all Māori born overseas automatically be New Zealand citizens? Currently, that is not how things work, and a father of three is fighting to change that. John Bryers Ruddock, who is Ngāpuhi, recently returned to Aotearoa with his three children. Currently his children are illegal overstayers here, meaning they can't even go to school. He is now navigating an expensive and bureaucratic process to get his tamariki Māori recognised as New Zealand citizens, complicated by the fact they were born in Hawaii, and John, a New Zealand citizen was born in Australia. John Bryers Ruddock spoke to Lisa Owen. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
