Russian attacks kill five, including family, in east Ukraine
A couple and their 36-year-old son were killed in a village in the eastern Kharkiv region on late Wednesday, local officials said. Two more women were killed in the Donetsk region on Thursday (July 24, 2025).
Russia has stepped up drone and missile attacks on Ukraine more than three years into its invasion, even as the warring parties meet for ceasefire talks.
The Russian army has also been making advances on the ground. Families with children were ordered out of 10 settlements in Donetsk, including the town of Dobropillia, where 28,000 people lived before the war.
"I emphasise once again: staying in the Donetsk region is extremely dangerous," said regional governor Vadim Filashkin.
Donetsk regional officials issued blurred images of one of the bloodied women killed in Kostyantynivka, where a dozen other people were wounded. Russian forces are gradually encircling the industrial hub.
A strike later on Kharkiv city wounded 37 people, including a 10-year-old girl and a 17-year-old boy and girl, the governor said.
A separate Russian drone and missile barrage wounded seven people overnight, including a child, in the central Ukrainian region of Cherkasy, emergency services said.
And in the southern port city of Odesa, a Russian drone attack wounded four people and badly damaged a famous market. Ukraine's Prime Minister said some of the buildings targeted were UNESCO protected.
"Russia continues its terror and obstructs diplomacy, which is why it deserves full-scale sanctions responses, as well as our strikes on their logistics, their military bases, and their military production facilities," President Volodymyr Zelensky wrote on social media.
He said Russia had launched 103 drones -- mainly Iranian-designed Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles -- and four missiles.
In Russia, a Ukrainian drone strike killed two women and wounded several others in the southern city of Sochi, regional authorities said.
The Russian defence ministry said its air-defence systems had downed 39 Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles, mainly over southern regions of the country.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
6 minutes ago
- First Post
'Impossible to cover up': Iran threatens 'decisive' response after Trump vows to 'wipe out' nuclear programme
Iran has warned it will respond 'in a more decisive manner' if the US or Israel launches another strike on its nuclear sites. The warning, issued by FM Araghchi, came after Trump threatened to 'wipe out' Iran's nuclear programme if it restarts. read more Iran has issued a stern warning, vowing to respond 'in a more decisive manner' if the United States or Israel carries out another strike on its nuclear facilities in the near future. The warning came on Monday from Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, in response to US President Donald Trump's threat to 'wipe out' Iran's nuclear programme if it resumes atomic activity. 'If aggression is repeated, we will not hesitate to react in a more decisive manner and in a way that will be IMPOSSIBLE to cover up,' Araghchi said in a post on X. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Araghchi also stressed that diplomacy, not threats, is the only effective solution to concerns surrounding Iran's nuclear programme. 'If there are concerns about the possible diversion of our nuclear program into non-peaceful purposes, the 'military option' proved incapable, but a negotiated solution may work,' he added. The full extent of damage from the US strikes remains unclear. These strikes followed a surprise Israeli bombing campaign, which Israel claimed was aimed at halting Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions. The twin assaults have disrupted nuclear negotiations between Tehran and Washington that had only recently resumed in April. During a visit to Scotland on Monday, Trump defended the earlier airstrikes and issued fresh warnings. 'They can start again. If they do, we'll wipe it out faster than you can wave your finger at it,' he said. Iran had earlier retaliated with missile attacks on Israeli cities and a U.S. base in Qatar, though Trump previously downplayed the severity of those responses. Just a month ago, fierce clashes erupted between Iran and Israel, with Tel Aviv targeting nuclear facilities and killing top Iranian generals and scientists. At the heart of the standoff remains the issue of uranium enrichment. While Tehran insists it has the sovereign right to enrich uranium, Washington sees that as a 'red line.' According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran is the only country without nuclear weapons enriching uranium to 60 per cent, just below the 90 per cent needed for weapons-grade material. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Iran has repeatedly denied pursuing nuclear weapons and has shown willingness to negotiate enrichment levels, but not to relinquish its right to enrichment entirely. 'No one in their right mind would abandon the fruits of tremendous investment in homegrown and peaceful technology just because of foreign bullying,' Araghchi said in his post. Israel's Op Rising Lion Meanwhile, Israeli forces launched a large-scale military operation, codenamed 'Operation Rising Lion,' targeting Iran's key nuclear sites including Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan. Nearly 200 warplanes dropped more than 330 bombs and missiles on over 100 locations—including enrichment facilities, centrifuge workshops, missile systems, and command centres. US strikes on Iranian facilities Following that, on June 22, the United States carried out its own high-impact strike under 'Operation Midnight Hammer.' B-2 stealth bombers and Tomahawk missiles delivered 14 powerful bunker-buster bombs, severely damaging all three of the targeted nuclear sites.
Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- Indian Express
How do Chinese analysts view speculations of Trump visiting Beijing in September?
Long-time China watchers and foreign affairs experts know that reports of Chinese leaders travelling abroad or a foreign leader visiting Beijing are only confirmed when they come from China's state-run Xinhua news agency. Since rumours of US President Donald Trump being invited to attend a September 3 military parade in Beijing first appeared in the media nearly a month ago, Xinhua has neither denied nor confirmed them. According to reports published in China, Japan's Kyodo News Agency first reported on a possible visit. The Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson denied having 'any information on the matter' on June 30. However, the speculations resurfaced after Moscow confirmed that Russian President Vladimir Putin will attend the event on July 21. A Reuters story ('Trump may travel to China to meet Xi in 'not-too-distant' future') on July 22 said Trump was likely to attend the ceremony commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War 2. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov had said that Russia was also open to discussing the possibility of holding talks between Putin and Trump, should the latter visit Beijing. Amid speculations of a potential high-level meeting involving Putin, Trump, and Chinese President Xi Jinping, London's The Times newspaper also reported that Beijing may be positioning itself to host a trilateral summit. What has also fuelled the rumours are comments from Trump in January, when he was sworn in as President for the second time, and after he spoke with Xi in June amid the tariff war, about his interest in visiting China shortly. China's media landscape differs from most countries, as the Chinese Communist government exerts significant control over news outlets. While the internet also has restrictions, discussions on online forums and websites still help get an idea of Chinese perspectives. Recently, some scholars and strategic affairs analysts in China weighed in on Trump's potential visit in September: *First, it is seen as necessary for the leaders of China and the United States to sit down and exchange their views on the bilateral relationship and their ideas on the evolving world order. This comes amid turmoil in the Middle East, the Russia-Ukraine war, as well as important recent issues in the bilateral ties, such as tariffs. *Second, the military parade is also a means for China to display and project its military strength to the outside world. It may make Trump re-evaluate the relative capabilities gap between the countries and could be more conducive to the future development of the two countries, some Chinese scholars have said. *Third, China has formally called the event the 80th anniversary of the 'War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression' in recent years. It could help enhance the status and role of China's wartime endeavours in World War 2 (called the 'World Anti-fascist War'). An article penned under a popular Chinese social media blog account, Fox Condolence, and re-circulated by the digital news platform recently wrote: 'If Trump can also come, there will be a historic scene of China, the United States and Russia celebrating the victory of the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression together. This is the first time in 80 years since the war, and it will be held in Beijing. This will undoubtedly greatly enhance China's influence in the world.' *Fourth is the view that calling Trump may be necessary, since he has not held in-person meetings with Putin and Xi since July 2018 and November 2019, respectively. Two weeks ago, in an interview with a Chinese news daily, Professor Gao Zhikai, Deputy Director at the Centre for China and Globalization (CCG) in Beijing, claimed to be the first in China to propose that Trump be invited in September. His main reason was, 'Trump is a short-term phenomenon in US politics, China must try and keep him [Trump] in good humour.' As soon as the Japanese media broke the news of Trump's possible visit, the political elite and media in the United States began to warn the President against it. Chinese scholars have also made a note of these views: *First, there is a view in the US that China's invitation to Trump is a calculated effort to present the country as America's equal on the global stage. Vincent C. Chen, a senior executive in Taiwan's information and communications technology industry, wrote in The Hill that the visit may attempt to convey a vision of 'co-governance of the world.' *Second, he argued that the parade was not a symbol of peace, nor was it aimed at merely commemorating a historic victory. 'It is a deliberate display of military strength, to project the narrative of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) superiority and signaling strategic rivalry with the U.S.', Chen wrote. *Third is the view that the visit would actually help enhance China's role in the war. Writing in Mandarin for the German news agency, Deutsche Welle, a well-known Chinese political affairs commentator, Deng Yuwen, wrote: 'In the Western narrative, China's eight-year war of resistance and huge sacrifices were not crucial to defeating fascism… China has always wanted to reverse the Western-dominated narrative framework of World War II history, but the effect is not obvious.' *Fourth, while analysing reactions in both China and in the US to Beijing's possible invitation to Trump, Singapore-based digital political weekly, ThinkChina, observed: 'Trump sharing the stage with the leaders of two authoritarian states – in the eyes of the West – would trigger strong domestic backlash. Criticism would not come just from the Democrats, but also from the China hawks within the Republican Party. Going against the bipartisan consensus on containing China could come at a political cost for Trump.' Chinese analysts also struck a note of caution, noting that the Communist Party must consider the leaders of the Global South countries, who would likely be invited to the parade as well. As Deng Yuwen has pointed out, if Beijing treats Trump with higher courtesy, will they question China's narrative as an advocate of such countries? This may weaken its influence and appeal in the Global South, where it has made vast investments over the years. Hemant Adlakha teaches Chinese at the Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi. He is also Vice Chairperson and an Honorary Fellow, Institute of Chinese Studies (ICS), Delhi.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
We'll wipe it out faster: Trump again warns Iran over nuclear enrichment
US President Donald Trump has again warned Iran against its nuclear enrichment activities, weeks after launching strikes on three major Iranian nuclear sites. Speaking at a press conference in Scotland alongside UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Trump said Iran was "sending very bad signals, very nasty signals.""They shouldn't be doing that," Trump said. "We wiped out their nuclear possibilities. They can start again. If they do, we'll wipe it out faster than you can wave your finger at it. We will do that gladly, openly and gladly."advertisementTrump's warning comes after Iran's announcement to continue enriching uranium for civilian purposes. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi confirmed the development last week during talks with the UK, France, and Germany. Araghchi said that uranium enrichment is Iran's right, and it is necessary for medical and energy use. After Trump's remarks, Araghchi responded, saying, "Iran will never respond to the language of threat and intimidation," he said, adding that the country "will not hesitate to react in a more decisive manner" if attacked again. Araghchi repeated that Iran's nuclear program is peaceful in nature and meant for civilian and medical use CALLS IRAN 'STUPID'Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz also issued warning on Sunday. "If you continue to threaten Israel, our long arm will reach Tehran again with even greater power – and this time personally to you, too," he said, addressing Iran's Supreme Leader Ali had earlier claimed that the US strikes on Iran's Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear facilities in June had "obliterated" the country's nuclear program. However, intelligence reports suggest that the damage might not have been as extensive as initially claimed. The reports say the program has only been set back by a few the weekend, Trump criticised Iran's ongoing efforts to enrich uranium, calling it "stupid." He also accused Iran of interfering in the ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas in Qatar. "I think they got involved in this negotiation, telling Hamas and giving Hamas signals and orders," he his first term, Trump pulled the US out of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), a nuclear deal involving Iran and world powers. The deal had limited Iran's nuclear activities in return for lifting international sanctions. After Trump's withdrawal from the agreement, Iran resumed enriching uranium beyond the limits set in the JCPOA.- EndsWith inputs from AgenciesMust Watch
