Australia to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN next month
The confirmation comes hours after the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu – facing growing disapproval over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza – branded Australia and European nations 'shameful' for considering recognising a Palestinian state.
The Australian prime minister said he spoke to Netanyahu last week and told him 'the situation in Gaza has gone beyond the world's worst fears', citing an unacceptable civilian death toll.
More than 60,000 civilians have been killed during Israel's bombing campaign in Gaza, local health authorities report, following the 7 October 2023 terror attack by Hamas where 1,200 Israelis were killed and dozens taken hostage.
'Australia will recognise the right of the Palestinian people to a state of their own, predicated on the commitments Australia has received from the Palestinian Authority. We will work with the international community to make this right a reality,' Albanese announced on Monday.
Appearing alongside Albanese, foreign minister Penny Wong said: 'We can't keep waiting for the end of a peace process that has ground to a halt.'
'We have always said that Palestinian civilians cannot be made to pay the price of defeating Hamas. But a whole population has been shattered. So this September, the international community has the chance to forge hope from despair, as the world seizes the opportunities that are presented by the new commitments of the Palestinian Authority and as the world seeks to support the Arab League's efforts to isolate Hamas.'
The Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) called the government's decision a 'betrayal' and a 'disappointment'. Coalition defence spokesperson Angus Taylor called the decision 'premature,' claiming it would reward Hamas.
Australia's move matches recognition pledges made by countries including France, Canada and the United Kingdom in recent weeks, amid gathering international momentum for a Palestinian state and condemnation of Israel's military campaign in Gaza, including plans to militarily occupy the entire territory.
The Labor government has been facing demands from inside and outside its party ranks to accelerate moves to recognise a Palestinian state, with public pressure growing after hundreds of thousands of people marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge last weekend.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
Calls grew at the weekend after Netanyahu's cabinet announced plans to occupy Gaza – Wong urged Israel not to follow through on, claiming it could constitute a breach of international law.
Labor Friends of Palestine, an internal rank-and-file membership group which has been campaigning intensely for the government to recognise a Palestinian state, said Monday's announcement 'delivers on policy long supported by Labor members who will strongly welcome this move.'
Albanese spoke with Netanyahu last week to inform him of Australia's pending move, while Wong spoke with US counterpart Marco Rubio on Monday.
The prime minister said Israel's government 'continues to defy international law and deny sufficient aid, food and water to desperate people, including children.'
In a written statement, Albanese and Wong claimed Netanyahu's government was 'extinguishing the prospect of a two-state solution' with its actions in threatening to further occupy Gaza and expand West Bank settlements.
'Australia is further compelled by the Netanyahu government's disregard of the international community's calls, and its failure to comply with its legal and ethical obligations in Gaza,' they wrote.
Albanese told the press conference Australia's recognition pledge was predicated on commitments he said he'd received from the Palestinian Authority, the governing body which administers part of the Palestinian territory of the West Bank. Albanese said those commitments include a demilitarised Palestine, recognising Israel's right to exist in peace and security, the PA holding elections and undertaking governance reforms, and no role for terror group Hamas in a future Palestinian state. He also said the government wanted Israeli hostages released.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Wong on Monday said practical steps, such as an Australian embassy presence or conferring full embassy status to the Palestinian delegation to Australia, would be tied to commitments from the Palestinian Authority. She conceded there was 'much more work to do in building a Palestinian state.'
'We will help build the capacity of the Palestinian Authority, and with the international community, Australia will hold the Palestinian Authority to its commitments,' Wong said.
Asked whether the recognition move was purely symbolic, Albanese said an end to conflict between Israel and Palestine could only come following a two-state solution, calling the move 'practical contribution towards building momentum'.
In a statement, ECAJ president Daniel Aghion said the government had not confirmed what it would do if Israeli hostages were not returned, and that Israel 'will feel wronged and abandoned by a longstanding ally.'
'This commitment removes any incentive or diplomatic pressure for the Palestinians to do the things that have always stood in the way of ending the conflict,' he said.
Netanyahu, in a press conference overnight, was strongly critical of growing international moves to recognise a Palestinian state.
'To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole, just like that, fall right into it,' he said. 'This canard is disappointing, and I think it's actually shameful. But it's not going to change our position.'
Netanyahu went on to claim Israel was 'actually applying force judiciously, and they know it'.
'They know what they would do if right next to Melbourne or right next to Sydney you had this horrific attacks. I think you would do it, at least what we're doing, probably maybe not as efficiently and as precisely as we're doing it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
Increasing the danger: Journalist killing in Gaza sends a chilling message
Israel 's targeted killing of an Al Jazeera correspondent in Gaza over the weekend was noteworthy even for a conflict remarkably blood-soaked for journalists, leaving some experts to marvel that any news at all emerges from the territory. An Al Jazeera executive said Monday that it won't back down from covering what is going on there and called for news organizations to step up and recruit more journalists. A total of 184 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed by Israel in the Gaza war since its start in October 2023, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. That compares to the 18 journalists and media workers killed so far in the Russia- Ukraine war, CPJ said. Aside from rare guided tours, Israel has barred international media from covering the 22-month war in Gaza. News organizations instead rely largely on Palestinian Gaza residents and ingenuity to show the world what is happening there. Israel often questions the affiliations and biases of Palestinian journalists but doesn't permit others in. 'You simply are in awe when stories show up,' said Jane Ferguson, a veteran war correspondent and founder of Noosphere, an independent platform for journalists. She can't recall a conflict that has been more difficult for reporters to cover, and she's reported from South Sudan, Syria and Afghanistan. Correspondent Anas al-Sharif knew he was a target, and left behind a message to be delivered upon his death. He and seven other people — six of them journalists — were killed in an air strike outside of Gaza City's largest hospital complex on Sunday. Israel swiftly claimed responsibility, saying without producing evidence that al-Sharif had led a Hamas cell. It was a claim the news organization and al-Sharif had denied. The toll of journalists in Gaza has been high Agence France-Presse, The Associated Press, BBC News and Reuters are among the organizations regularly reporting from Gaza. An Aug. 7 AP dispatch vividly described the hunger faced by many in Gaza: 'A single bowl of eggplant stewed in watery tomato juice must sustain Sally Muzhed's family of six for the day. She calls it moussaka, but it's a pale echo of the fragrant, lawyered, meat-and-vegetable dish that once filled Gaza's kitchens with its aroma.' Other recent AP reports carried images and text reporting from the aftermath of an Israeli strike on Gaza's only Catholic church, and a profile of an 18-year-old aspiring doctor now trying to survive sheltered in a tent. Journalists from The Washington Post and the Guardian recently accompanied a Jordanian relief mission and took images of Gaza from the air, despite some restrictions from Israel. The Guardian's Lorenzo Tondo wrote: 'Seen from the air, Gaza looks like the ruins of an ancient civilization, brought to light after centuries of darkness.' None of the organizations match the power and immediacy of Al Jazeera, however, in part because their correspondents have been in front of cameras. They've also paid the heaviest price: CPJ estimates that 11 journalists and media workers affiliated with AJ have been killed in the Gaza conflict, more than any other single organization. In a social media post written in June to be sent if he was killed, al-Sharif wrote that 'I have lived through pain in all its details, tasted suffering and loss many times, yet I never once hesitated to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification — so that Allah may bear witness against those who stayed silent.' In another posting on X on Aug. 10, the day that he was killed, al-Sharif wrote of the challenges covering the aftermath of one attack. He said he lost his strength and ability to express himself when he arrived at the scene. 'Body parts and blood were all around us, and corpses were scattered on top of each other,' he wrote. 'Tell me what words and phrases could help any journalist describe this horrific image. When I told you on air that it was an 'indescribable scene,' I was truly helpless in the face of this horrific sight.' Al Jazeera calls for other news organizations to come forward Salah Negm, news director at Al Jazeera English, said Monday it is very difficult to get people in to Gaza. But it is full of educated people and those with training in journalism who can help get stories out. He called on other news organizations to step up. 'We get the news from several sources on the ground in Gaza — not only journalists but also doctors, hospitals, civil servants, aid workers,' Negm said. 'A lot of people in Gaza talk to us.' Many of the journalists working in Gaza are facing the same struggles to find food, for themselves and their families, as the people they are covering. Noosphere's Ferguson said she's never before had to ask a reporter whether she had enough food for herself and her child. In an interview in May on 'Democracy Now!,' 22-year-old journalist Abubaker Abed described the difficult decision he made to leave Gaza to pursue his education in Ireland. Not only was he suffering from malnutrition, he said, but his mother was concerned that his work as a journalist would make him and his family targets. 'If I stayed, I would die,' he said. Jodie Ginsberg, CEO of the Committee to Protect Journalists, said she's concerned about the implications for journalists in future conflicts if what is happening in Gaza is allowed to continue without international condemnation that has real teeth. 'They're essentially admitting in public to what amounts to a war crime,' Ginsberg said, 'and they can do that because none of the other attacks on journalists have had any consequences. not in this war and not prior. It's not surprising that it can act with this level of impunity because no international government has really taken it to task.' Given all that they face, 'to me, the most remarkable thing is that journalists are continuing to cover (Gaza) at all,' she said. ___ Laurie Kellman and Danica Kirk in London, Samy Magdy in Cairo and Sam Metz in Jerusalem contributed to this report. David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at and
Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Nat Barr's tough message to Anthony Albanese after Australia's landmark decision to recognise the state of Palestine
Nat Barr has suggested Hamas may have 'partly got what they want' after Australia's landmark decision to recognise the state of Palestine. In an interview with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, the Sunrise host challenged him over the decision, citing the October 7 Hamas terror attacks on Israel, which killed more than 1,200 people, and asked whether recognising Palestine could be seen as rewarding militant violence. 'Two years later, they have got partly what they want - they've got their own state?' Albanese rejected the suggestion, insisting Hamas would be 'totally opposed' to the decision and could have 'no role whatsoever' in a future Palestinian state. 'Hamas do not want this. Hamas don't want two states. Hamas wants to destroy Israel, which is why Hamas can have no role whatsoever in a future Palestinian state. 'This is about isolating Hamas… and finding a way forward for peace and security for both Palestinians and Israel.' The Prime Minister said the recognition, which will be formalised at the United Nations in September alongside countries such as the UK, France and Canada, sent a clear message to the international community that 'enough is enough' after 77 years of conflict. Albanese said the plan was for a demilitarised Palestinian state living 'side by side' with Israel in peace, adding that military action alone was not a long-term solution. Earlier in the interview, Barr had pressed Albanese on whether the recognition would make any tangible difference to people in Gaza. 'The international community is saying, enough is enough. This is a conflict that has gone on now for 77 years,' he said. 'We need to find a solution that promotes security for the state of Israel but also recognises the political aspirations of the Palestinian people for their own state. 'You can't just keep doing the same thing over and over again and expect a different outcome. 'One in which the states around Israel recognise its right to exist, and one which sees a demilitarised state of Palestine - allowing Palestinians to live. To continue to do the same thing is not enough.' Albanese also revealed he had spoken directly with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last week, warning that military operations without a political pathway could not deliver lasting peace. 'You can't just continue to do what he is saying, which is to continue the military operation without any political solution,' he said. 'There's been too much innocent loss of life.' The crisis in Gaza began after Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1200 people and taking about 250 more hostage. Israel's response has since killed more than 61,000 people, according to Gaza's health authorities, and UN sources project more than two million people are facing high levels of acute food insecurity.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australia news live: Macron welcomes Albanese's move to recognise Palestine as Israeli president calls it a ‘grave and dangerous mistake'
Update: Date: 2025-08-11T21:11:47.000Z Title: Good morning Content: and welcome to the live blog. It's Nick Visser here to take you through the day's news. Here's what's on deck: The French president, Emmanuel Macron, welcomed Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state. Macron wrote on social media Anthony Albanese's announcement joined 'the momentum we created in New York, which has already been supported by the United Kingdom, Canada, Portugal, and others'. Israel's president, Isaac Herzog, maintained Australia's decision would only reward Hamas and in no way help the Palestinian people. Herzog said 'these declarations, by Australia and other countries, are a reward for terror, a prize for the enemies of freedom, liberty, and democracy. This is a grave and dangerous mistake'. It's RBA day for mortgage holders and savers. The Reserve Bank is set to hand down its decision on interest rates around 2.30pm Sydney time. Let's get to it.
