logo
Britain's energy bills problem - and why firms are paid huge sums to NOT provide power

Britain's energy bills problem - and why firms are paid huge sums to NOT provide power

Yahoo2 days ago

It is 1am on 3 June. A near gale force wind is blasting into Scotland. Great weather for the Moray East and West offshore wind farms, you would have thought.
The two farms are 13 miles off the north-east coast of Scotland and include some of the biggest wind turbines in the UK, at 257m high. With winds like that they should be operating at maximum capacity, generating what the developer, Ocean Winds, claims is enough power to meet the electricity needs of well over a million homes.
Except they are not.
That's because if you thought that once an electricity generator - whether it be a wind farm or a gas-powered plant - was connected to the national grid it could seamlessly send its electricity wherever it was needed in the country, you'd be wrong.
The electricity grid was built to deliver power generated by coal and gas plants near the country's major cities and towns, and doesn't always have sufficient capacity in the wires that carry electricity around the country to get the new renewable electricity generated way out in the wild seas and rural areas.
And this has major consequences.
The way the system currently works means a company like Ocean Winds gets what are effectively compensation payments if the system can't take the power its wind turbines are generating and it has to turn down its output.
It means Ocean winds was paid £72,000 not to generate power from its wind farms in the Moray Firth during a half-hour period on 3 June because the system was overloaded - one of a number of occasions output was restricted that day.
At the same time, 44 miles (70km) east of London, the Grain gas-fired power station on the Thames Estuary was paid £43,000 to provide more electricity.
Payments like that happen virtually every day. Seagreen, Scotland's largest wind farm, was paid £65 million last year to restrict its output 71% of the time, according to analysis by Octopus Energy.
Balancing the grid in this way has already cost the country more than £500 million this year alone, the company's analysis shows. The total could reach almost £8bn a year by 2030, warns the National Electricity System Operator (NESO), the body in charge of the electricity network.
It's pushing up all our energy bills and calling into question the government's promise that net zero would end up delivering cheaper electricity.
Now, the government is considering a radical solution: instead of one big, national electricity market, there'll be a number of smaller regional markets, with the government gambling that this could make the system more efficient and deliver cheaper bills.
But in reality, it's not guaranteed that anyone will get cheaper bills. And even if some people do, many others elsewhere in the country could end up paying more.
The proposals have sparked such bitter debate that one senior energy industry executive called it "the most vicious policy fight" he has ever known. He has, he says, "lost friends" over it.
Meanwhile, political opponents who claim net zero is an expensive dead end are only too ready to pounce.
It is reported that the Prime Minister has asked to review the details of what some newspapers are calling a "postcode pricing" plan. So is the government really ready to risk the most radical shake-up of the UK electricity market since privatisation 35 years ago? And what will it really mean for our bills?
The Energy Secretary, Ed Miliband, is certainly in a fix. His net zero policy is under attack like never before. The Tories have come out against it, green politicians say it isn't delivering for ordinary people, and even Tony Blair has weighed in against it.
Meanwhile Reform UK has identified the policy as a major Achilles heel for the Labour government. "The next election will be fought on two issues, immigration and net stupid zero," says Reform's deputy leader Richard Tice. "And we are going to win."
Poll after poll says cost of living is a much more important for most people, and people often specifically cite concerns about rising energy prices.
Miliband sold his aggressive clean energy policies in part on cutting costs. He said that ensuring 95% of the country's electricity comes from low-carbon sources by 2030 would slash the average electricity bill by £300.
But the potential for renewables to deliver lower costs just isn't coming through to consumers.
Renewables now generate more than half the country's electricity, but because of the limits to how much electricity can be moved around the system, even on windy days some gas generation is almost always needed to top the system up.
And because gas tends to be more expensive, it sets the wholesale price.
Supporters of the government's plan argue that, as long as prices continue to be set at a national level, the hold gas has on the cost of electricity will be hard to break. Less so with regional – or, in the jargon, "zonal" - pricing.
Think of Scotland, blessed with vast wind resources but just 5.5 million people. The argument goes that if prices were set locally, it wouldn't be necessary to pay wind farms to be turned down because there wasn't enough capacity in the cables to carry all the electricity into England.
On a windy day like 3 June, they would have to sell that spare power to local people instead of into a national market. The theory is prices would fall dramatically – on some days Scottish customers might even get their electricity for free.
Other areas with lots of renewable power - such as Yorkshire and the North East, as well as parts of Wales - would stand to benefit too. And, as solar investment increases in Lincolnshire and other parts of the east of England, they could also see prices tumble.
All that cheap power could also transform the economics of industry. Supporters argue that it would attract energy-intensive businesses such as data centres, chemical companies and other manufacturing industries.
In London and much of the south of England, the price of electricity would sometimes be higher than in the windy north. But supporters say some of the hundreds of millions of pounds the system would save could be used to make sure no one pays more than they do now.
And those higher prices could also encourage investors to build new wind farms and solar plants closer to where the demand is. The argument is that would lower prices in the long run and bring another benefit - less electricity would need to be carried around the country, so we would need fewer new pylons, saving everyone money and meaning less clutter in the countryside.
"Zonal pricing would make the energy system as a whole dramatically more efficient, slashing this waste and cutting bills for every family and business in the country," argues Greg Jackson, the CEO of Octopus Energy, one of the biggest energy suppliers in the UK.
Research commissioned by the company estimates the savings could top £55 billion by 2050 - which it claims could knock £50 to £100 a year off the average bill. Octopus points out Sweden made the switch to regional pricing in just 18 months.
The supporters of regional pricing include NESO, Citizens Advice and the head of the energy regulator, Ofgem. Last week a committee of the House of Lords recommended the country should switch to the system.
There are, however, many businesses involved in building and running renewable energy plants that oppose the move.
"We're making billions of pounds of investments in renewable power in the UK every year," says Tom Glover, the UK chair of the giant German power company RWE. "I can't go to my board and say let's take a bet on billions of pounds of investment."
He's worried changing the way energy is priced could undermine contracts and make revenues more uncertain. And he says it risks undermining the government's big push to switch to green energy.
The main cost of wind and solar plants is in the build. It means the price of the energy they produce is very closely tied to the cost of building and, because developers borrow most of the money, that means the interest rates they are charged.
And we are talking a lot of money. The government is expecting power companies to spend £40bn pounds a year over the next five years on renewable projects in the UK.
Glover says even a very small change in interest rates could have dramatic effects on how much renewable infrastructure is built and how much the power from it costs.
"Those additional costs could quickly overwhelm any of the benefits of regional pricing," says Stephen Woodhouse, an economist with the consultancy firm AFRY, which has studied the impact of regional pricing for the power companies.
That would come as already high interest rates have combined with rising prices for steel and other materials to push up the cost of renewables. Plans for a huge wind farm off the coast of Yorkshire were cancelled last month because the developer said it no longer made economic sense.
And there's another consideration, he says. The National Grid, which owns the pylons, substations and cables that move electricity around the country, is already rolling out a huge investment programme – some £60bn over the next five years - to upgrade the system ready for the new world of clean power.
That new infrastructure will mean more capacity to bring electricity from our windy northern coasts down south, and therefore also mean fewer savings from a regional pricing system in the future.
There are other arguments too. Critics warn introducing regional pricing could take years, that energy-intensive businesses like British Steel can't just up sticks and move, and that the system will be unfair because some customers will pay more than others.
But according to Greg Jackson of Octopus, the power companies and their backers just want to protect their profits. "Unsurprisingly, it's the companies that enjoy attractive returns from this absurd system who are lobbying hard to maintain the status quo," he says.
Just Stop Oil was policed to extinction - now the movement has gone deeper underground
Can UK afford to save British Steel – and can it afford not to?
UK taxpayers no longer own NatWest - but 17 years on, are banks safer from collapse?
Yet the power companies say Octopus has a vested interest too. It is the UK's biggest energy supplier with some seven million customers, and owns a sophisticated billing system it licenses to other suppliers, so could gain from changes to the way electricity is priced, they claim.
And the clock is ticking. Whether the government meets its clean power targets will depend on how many new wind farms and solar plants are built.
The companies who will build them say they need certainty around the future of the electricity market, so a decision must be taken soon.
It's expected in the next couple of weeks. Over to you, Mr Miliband.
BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. And we showcase thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. You can send us your feedback on the InDepth section by clicking on the button below.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Innovative company completes offshore project that will bring low-cost energy to 800,000 homes: 'Another meaningful step'
Innovative company completes offshore project that will bring low-cost energy to 800,000 homes: 'Another meaningful step'

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Innovative company completes offshore project that will bring low-cost energy to 800,000 homes: 'Another meaningful step'

A wind farm off the coast of France has brought the country closer than ever to large-scale clean energy use. In May, the sustainable energy company Ocean Winds announced the successful installation of its first wind turbine. It plans to install 61 turbines by September. Upon completion of this wind farm, Ocean Winds is expected to provide almost 800,000 French residents with clean, renewable energy. "We are proud to support the installation of 61 turbines for EMYN," said Peter De Pooter, the manager of Offshore Energy Structures at Jan De Nul. "This project represents another meaningful step toward accelerating the shift to renewable energy, and it strengthens our track record in delivering offshore wind projects in France and across Europe." Wind energy is essentially a no-lose proposition. It emits far less carbon dioxide than its fossil fuel and gas counterparts and has relatively low operation costs as well. The turbines may not look pretty, but they don't take up that much space and are a consistent form of energy generation, especially in rural areas. Additionally, investment in wind energy farms will lower energy costs, provide more stability for local electrical grids, promote energy independence, and create new jobs; the Ocean Winds turbine project is expected to provide over 1,500 jobs in the area. As many nations and cities continue to look for ways to provide a cleaner and safer future for their citizens, harnessing the wind is about as safe a bet as it gets. All involved were celebratory about this major step forward. "The installation of EMYN's first turbine is a powerful demonstration of Ocean Winds' commitment to France's energy transition and our contribution to offshore wind development in the country and in the region." said Marc Hirt, Ocean Winds' country manager for France, in a press release. "The installation of the first offshore turbine at Yeu-Noirmoutier marks an important milestone toward achieving the ambitious targets of offshore wind in France," added Yara Chakhtoura, the managing director for Siemens Energy and Siemens Gamesa France. "We are proud to manufacture and install the turbines for this offshore wind farm and thereby contributing to the energy transition and decarbonization in France." Should we be harnessing the ocean to power our homes? Absolutely Leave it be It depends I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Gen Alpha: How Digital Natives Are Redefining Finance And Retail
Gen Alpha: How Digital Natives Are Redefining Finance And Retail

Forbes

time41 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Gen Alpha: How Digital Natives Are Redefining Finance And Retail

Rupert Lee-Browne is the chairman and chief executive of payments fintech Caxton, which he founded in 2002. The way Gen Alpha children (born from 2010-2024) interact with money is a seismic shift. We're witnessing the rise of "cashless kids," a generation managing finances digitally through apps and prepaid cards rather than piggy banks. This is a fundamental reshaping of consumer behavior with profound implications for brands, retailers and financial institutions. In our business, we've analyzed over 33.5 million transactions by children aged 5 to 18 across six years, totaling £250 million (approximately $337 million) in spending. This research uncovers keys insights into the future of commerce and the evolution of young consumers. These 33.5 million transactions represent real-world spending decisions and reveal valuable insights into the preferences and brand interactions of young digital natives. This data-driven approach allows us to identify concrete trends shaping the future of finance and retail, and provides insight into spending patterns across different age groups. The shift to cashless spending has far-reaching consequences for brands. As the saying goes: "The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second-best time is now." This wisdom applies perfectly to brands seeking to connect with young consumers. Early engagement creates opportunities for building lasting relationships. Our data shows that average annual digital spending per child increased from £164 ($221) in 2017 to £367 ($495) by 2023. Younger children experienced more significant percentage increases in spending power compared to older teenagers, who likely supplement pocket money with part-time employment. As children mature, their spending diversifies remarkably. Six-year-olds spend within approximately 17 categories, but by age 15, this expands to 185 categories, including services from beauticians and barbers to record stores and country clubs. This highlights the importance of early and consistent brand engagement. The brands that will succeed understand how different age groups spend their money and tailor offerings accordingly—focusing not just on products but on the entire digital experience. Gen Alphas are not just consumers; they are active architects in the fintech revolution. Their early adoption of digital finance tools is shaping their understanding of money and financial management. Gaming and online retail dominate their spending. Gaming accounts for 32.6% of spending, while online shopping via platforms such as Amazon Marketplace accounts for 27.2%. This generation is growing up in a world where digital transactions are the norm, influencing the development of financial products and services. For businesses, understanding and engaging with Gen Alpha is imperative. Their influence extends beyond direct spending; they significantly impact household purchasing decisions. A global study indicates that Gen Alpha influences 27% of their household's nonessential monthly spending, with an emphasis on digital products and services. The data reveals several key insights valuable for businesses and policymakers: • Rising digital spending power: From 2017 to 2023, the average spending per child grew by more than 123%, outpacing inflation. • Gaming and online retail dominance: These categories account for a significant portion of children's spending, highlighting the importance of digital platforms for engaging this demographic. • Need for financial literacy: Children spend a high percentage of their pocket money (approximately 88%). Robert Kiyosaki is widely quoted as saying, "It's not about how much money you make, but how much money you keep." This highlights the need for financial education initiatives. • Increased financial sophistication: Young consumers require not only engaging products but also responsible corporate citizenship that ensures online safety and promotes financial literacy. Parents play a crucial role in this ecosystem. Digital payment platforms can be valuable tools for parents to guide their children's financial exploration in a safe, controlled environment. Policymakers must prioritize initiatives that promote financial literacy and protect young consumers from online fraud and exploitation. The rise of Gen Alpha represents a fundamental shift in how we interact with money and commerce. By understanding the insights revealed by our data, businesses, parents and policymakers can work together to empower young consumers, foster healthy financial habits and shape the future of finance. By embracing personalization, ethical practices and seamless digital experiences, companies can effectively navigate the evolving landscape shaped by Gen Alpha's economic influence and prepare the next generation for financial success in an increasingly digital world. Forbes Finance Council is an invitation-only organization for executives in successful accounting, financial planning and wealth management firms. Do I qualify?

Veteran JPMorgan Banker Baygual to Depart Bank After 26 Years
Veteran JPMorgan Banker Baygual to Depart Bank After 26 Years

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Veteran JPMorgan Banker Baygual to Depart Bank After 26 Years

Guillermo Baygual, global co-head of JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's infrastructure and strategic investors group, is departing the bank after 26 years. The London-based dealmaker has informed JPMorgan of his decision to leave, according to an internal memo seen by Bloomberg. Baygual has held a number of senior positions at JPMorgan over the years, previously helping run its mergers and acquisitions franchise for Europe, the Middle East and Africa, as well as industry coverage in the region.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store