logo
Britain's energy bills problem - and why firms are paid huge sums to NOT provide power

Britain's energy bills problem - and why firms are paid huge sums to NOT provide power

Yahoo2 days ago

It is 1am on 3 June. A near gale force wind is blasting into Scotland. Great weather for the Moray East and West offshore wind farms, you would have thought.
The two farms are 13 miles off the north-east coast of Scotland and include some of the biggest wind turbines in the UK, at 257m high. With winds like that they should be operating at maximum capacity, generating what the developer, Ocean Winds, claims is enough power to meet the electricity needs of well over a million homes.
Except they are not.
That's because if you thought that once an electricity generator - whether it be a wind farm or a gas-powered plant - was connected to the national grid it could seamlessly send its electricity wherever it was needed in the country, you'd be wrong.
The electricity grid was built to deliver power generated by coal and gas plants near the country's major cities and towns, and doesn't always have sufficient capacity in the wires that carry electricity around the country to get the new renewable electricity generated way out in the wild seas and rural areas.
And this has major consequences.
The way the system currently works means a company like Ocean Winds gets what are effectively compensation payments if the system can't take the power its wind turbines are generating and it has to turn down its output.
It means Ocean winds was paid £72,000 not to generate power from its wind farms in the Moray Firth during a half-hour period on 3 June because the system was overloaded - one of a number of occasions output was restricted that day.
At the same time, 44 miles (70km) east of London, the Grain gas-fired power station on the Thames Estuary was paid £43,000 to provide more electricity.
Payments like that happen virtually every day. Seagreen, Scotland's largest wind farm, was paid £65 million last year to restrict its output 71% of the time, according to analysis by Octopus Energy.
Balancing the grid in this way has already cost the country more than £500 million this year alone, the company's analysis shows. The total could reach almost £8bn a year by 2030, warns the National Electricity System Operator (NESO), the body in charge of the electricity network.
It's pushing up all our energy bills and calling into question the government's promise that net zero would end up delivering cheaper electricity.
Now, the government is considering a radical solution: instead of one big, national electricity market, there'll be a number of smaller regional markets, with the government gambling that this could make the system more efficient and deliver cheaper bills.
But in reality, it's not guaranteed that anyone will get cheaper bills. And even if some people do, many others elsewhere in the country could end up paying more.
The proposals have sparked such bitter debate that one senior energy industry executive called it "the most vicious policy fight" he has ever known. He has, he says, "lost friends" over it.
Meanwhile, political opponents who claim net zero is an expensive dead end are only too ready to pounce.
It is reported that the Prime Minister has asked to review the details of what some newspapers are calling a "postcode pricing" plan. So is the government really ready to risk the most radical shake-up of the UK electricity market since privatisation 35 years ago? And what will it really mean for our bills?
The Energy Secretary, Ed Miliband, is certainly in a fix. His net zero policy is under attack like never before. The Tories have come out against it, green politicians say it isn't delivering for ordinary people, and even Tony Blair has weighed in against it.
Meanwhile Reform UK has identified the policy as a major Achilles heel for the Labour government. "The next election will be fought on two issues, immigration and net stupid zero," says Reform's deputy leader Richard Tice. "And we are going to win."
Poll after poll says cost of living is a much more important for most people, and people often specifically cite concerns about rising energy prices.
Miliband sold his aggressive clean energy policies in part on cutting costs. He said that ensuring 95% of the country's electricity comes from low-carbon sources by 2030 would slash the average electricity bill by £300.
But the potential for renewables to deliver lower costs just isn't coming through to consumers.
Renewables now generate more than half the country's electricity, but because of the limits to how much electricity can be moved around the system, even on windy days some gas generation is almost always needed to top the system up.
And because gas tends to be more expensive, it sets the wholesale price.
Supporters of the government's plan argue that, as long as prices continue to be set at a national level, the hold gas has on the cost of electricity will be hard to break. Less so with regional – or, in the jargon, "zonal" - pricing.
Think of Scotland, blessed with vast wind resources but just 5.5 million people. The argument goes that if prices were set locally, it wouldn't be necessary to pay wind farms to be turned down because there wasn't enough capacity in the cables to carry all the electricity into England.
On a windy day like 3 June, they would have to sell that spare power to local people instead of into a national market. The theory is prices would fall dramatically – on some days Scottish customers might even get their electricity for free.
Other areas with lots of renewable power - such as Yorkshire and the North East, as well as parts of Wales - would stand to benefit too. And, as solar investment increases in Lincolnshire and other parts of the east of England, they could also see prices tumble.
All that cheap power could also transform the economics of industry. Supporters argue that it would attract energy-intensive businesses such as data centres, chemical companies and other manufacturing industries.
In London and much of the south of England, the price of electricity would sometimes be higher than in the windy north. But supporters say some of the hundreds of millions of pounds the system would save could be used to make sure no one pays more than they do now.
And those higher prices could also encourage investors to build new wind farms and solar plants closer to where the demand is. The argument is that would lower prices in the long run and bring another benefit - less electricity would need to be carried around the country, so we would need fewer new pylons, saving everyone money and meaning less clutter in the countryside.
"Zonal pricing would make the energy system as a whole dramatically more efficient, slashing this waste and cutting bills for every family and business in the country," argues Greg Jackson, the CEO of Octopus Energy, one of the biggest energy suppliers in the UK.
Research commissioned by the company estimates the savings could top £55 billion by 2050 - which it claims could knock £50 to £100 a year off the average bill. Octopus points out Sweden made the switch to regional pricing in just 18 months.
The supporters of regional pricing include NESO, Citizens Advice and the head of the energy regulator, Ofgem. Last week a committee of the House of Lords recommended the country should switch to the system.
There are, however, many businesses involved in building and running renewable energy plants that oppose the move.
"We're making billions of pounds of investments in renewable power in the UK every year," says Tom Glover, the UK chair of the giant German power company RWE. "I can't go to my board and say let's take a bet on billions of pounds of investment."
He's worried changing the way energy is priced could undermine contracts and make revenues more uncertain. And he says it risks undermining the government's big push to switch to green energy.
The main cost of wind and solar plants is in the build. It means the price of the energy they produce is very closely tied to the cost of building and, because developers borrow most of the money, that means the interest rates they are charged.
And we are talking a lot of money. The government is expecting power companies to spend £40bn pounds a year over the next five years on renewable projects in the UK.
Glover says even a very small change in interest rates could have dramatic effects on how much renewable infrastructure is built and how much the power from it costs.
"Those additional costs could quickly overwhelm any of the benefits of regional pricing," says Stephen Woodhouse, an economist with the consultancy firm AFRY, which has studied the impact of regional pricing for the power companies.
That would come as already high interest rates have combined with rising prices for steel and other materials to push up the cost of renewables. Plans for a huge wind farm off the coast of Yorkshire were cancelled last month because the developer said it no longer made economic sense.
And there's another consideration, he says. The National Grid, which owns the pylons, substations and cables that move electricity around the country, is already rolling out a huge investment programme – some £60bn over the next five years - to upgrade the system ready for the new world of clean power.
That new infrastructure will mean more capacity to bring electricity from our windy northern coasts down south, and therefore also mean fewer savings from a regional pricing system in the future.
There are other arguments too. Critics warn introducing regional pricing could take years, that energy-intensive businesses like British Steel can't just up sticks and move, and that the system will be unfair because some customers will pay more than others.
But according to Greg Jackson of Octopus, the power companies and their backers just want to protect their profits. "Unsurprisingly, it's the companies that enjoy attractive returns from this absurd system who are lobbying hard to maintain the status quo," he says.
Just Stop Oil was policed to extinction - now the movement has gone deeper underground
Can UK afford to save British Steel – and can it afford not to?
UK taxpayers no longer own NatWest - but 17 years on, are banks safer from collapse?
Yet the power companies say Octopus has a vested interest too. It is the UK's biggest energy supplier with some seven million customers, and owns a sophisticated billing system it licenses to other suppliers, so could gain from changes to the way electricity is priced, they claim.
And the clock is ticking. Whether the government meets its clean power targets will depend on how many new wind farms and solar plants are built.
The companies who will build them say they need certainty around the future of the electricity market, so a decision must be taken soon.
It's expected in the next couple of weeks. Over to you, Mr Miliband.
BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. And we showcase thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. You can send us your feedback on the InDepth section by clicking on the button below.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former Top Starmer Aide Sue Gray to Join Advisory Firm Consello
Former Top Starmer Aide Sue Gray to Join Advisory Firm Consello

Bloomberg

time13 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Former Top Starmer Aide Sue Gray to Join Advisory Firm Consello

Keir Starmer's former chief of staff, Sue Gray, will join global advisory firm Consello Group as its UK chair, moving into business 8 months after her departure from the prime minister's top team. The former political aide and senior civil servant, who departed Starmer's Downing Street in October, will lead Consello's expansion in the UK and will start immediately, people familiar with the appointment said, requesting anonymity discussing an appointment that hasn't been publicly announced yet. Other recent hires include former Manchester United soccer club captain Gary Neville, US National Football League legend Tom Brady, and 23-time tennis Grand Slam singles champion Serena Williams.

Xeinadin enhances London presence with KBSP acquisition
Xeinadin enhances London presence with KBSP acquisition

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Xeinadin enhances London presence with KBSP acquisition

UK-based professional services company Xeinadin has announced its acquisition of KBSP, an accountancy firm situated in Swiss Cottage, North London. The deal is set to strengthen Xeinadin's footprint in the capital and offer clients a wider range of expertise. Xeinadin CEO Derry Crowley said: 'KBSP's longstanding reputation, strong client relationships and local insight make them an ideal fit for Xeinadin. 'Their focus on SMEs, commitment to client education, and adaptable service model reflect exactly the kind of firm we want to support and grow with. We're delighted to welcome them aboard.' Established in the 1960s, KBSP has been offering a variety of services, such as auditing, accounting, tax compliance, and consultancy. The firm has assisted numerous clients, ranging from local startups to well-known national companies, throughout their business development. The acquisition ensures the preservation of KBSP's identity, workforce, and location while merging its operations into Xeinadin's national framework, reported. This integration will allow clients to access specialists in fields like R&D tax credits, audit assurance, and sector-specific advisory services. As a result of this acquisition, KBSP's clients can now have access to more extensive, digital-first offering. The partnership aims to empower businesses at all stages of development, meeting the demand for customised and personal business support in an evolving market environment, the report added. KBSP partner David Myerson said: 'We're a partner led local firm. Our clients aren't looking for a revolving door of advisors. 'They want to speak to someone who knows their name, their business, and their challenges. That's what we've always offered, and it's what we'll keep offering – now with the extra tools and expertise that Xeinadin brings.' "Xeinadin enhances London presence with KBSP acquisition" was originally created and published by International Accounting Bulletin, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Mistral Launches Magistral to Compete in the Reasoning AI Race
Mistral Launches Magistral to Compete in the Reasoning AI Race

Entrepreneur

time34 minutes ago

  • Entrepreneur

Mistral Launches Magistral to Compete in the Reasoning AI Race

While Magistral puts Mistral in closer competition with well-known reasoning AI models, there are still doubts across the industry about how well current LLMs can actually "reason" Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. French artificial intelligence firm Mistral has announced the release of its latest large language model (LLM), Magistral, marking its entry into the growing space of "reasoning" AI models. The new model aims to improve the transparency and traceability of AI-generated outputs, particularly in tasks that require step-by-step logical processing. Unveiled on Tuesday during London Tech Week, Magistral is available through Mistral's platforms and the open-source AI repository Hugging Face. The company has released two versions of the model: Magistral Small, a 24-billion-parameter model licensed as open-source, and a more powerful, proprietary version, Magistral Medium, currently available in limited preview. Mistral describes Magistral as suitable for general-purpose use cases that involve more complex reasoning and demand greater accuracy. The model is designed to provide a visible "chain of thought," which the company says helps users understand how conclusions are reached. This feature may appeal to professionals in law, healthcare, finance, and public services where regulatory compliance and interpretability are key concerns. According to CEO Arthur Mensch, a key distinction of Magistral is its multilingual reasoning capability, especially in European languages. "Historically, we've seen U.S. models reason in English and Chinese models reason in Chinese," he said during a session at London Tech Week. Mensch noted that Magistral is initially focused on European languages, with plans to expand support to other languages over time. The launch comes as more AI companies shift their focus from building larger models to improving how existing models process and present information. Reasoning models are designed to handle more sophisticated tasks by simulating logical steps, rather than generating answers based solely on pattern recognition. This shift also responds to ongoing concerns about the interpretability of AI systems, which often function as black boxes even to their creators. Mistral claims that Magistral Medium can process up to 1,000 tokens per second, potentially offering faster performance than several competing models. It joins a growing list of reasoning-focused models released over the past year, including OpenAI's o1 and o3, Google's Gemini variants, Anthropic's Claude, and DeepSeek's R1. The release also highlights Mistral's continuing emphasis on open-source AI development. The company, founded in Paris in 2023, has received significant backing from investors including Microsoft, DST Global, and General Catalyst. It raised approximately USD 685.7 million million in a Series B round in June 2024, bringing total funding to over USD 1.37 billion and reaching a reported valuation of USD 6.63 billion. Despite its relatively short history, Mistral has seen considerable commercial traction. As per the media reports, the company has secured over USD 114.3 million in contracted sales within 15 months of launching its first commercial offerings. While Magistral puts Mistral in closer competition with well-known reasoning AI models, there are still doubts across the industry about how well current large language models (LLMs) can actually "reason." A recent research paper from Apple, titled The Illusion of Thinking, questions the belief that today's models truly have general reasoning abilities. The researchers found that these models tend to struggle or fail when tasks become too complex, revealing key limitations in their capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store