logo
Armizan: CCUS Act shows why Sabah needs strong local party leadership

Armizan: CCUS Act shows why Sabah needs strong local party leadership

Borneo Post05-07-2025
Armizan with delegates of the PGRS Melalap division during the annual conference.
TENOM (July 5): The enactment of the Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) Act 2025, which applies only to Peninsular Malaysia, underscores the importance of having a strong local party as the backbone of the Sabah State Government, said Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) deputy secretary Datuk Armizan Mohd Ali.
Speaking at the official opening of the PGRS Melalap division's annual conference here on Saturday, Armizan reminded delegates that safeguarding Sabah's rights requires a careful balance between national and local political forces.
'It is crucial to ensure that local parties form the core of the State Government. This guarantees that Federal-State relations are inter-governmental in nature — not merely intra-party,' he said.
Citing the recent passage of the CCUS Act 2025, Armizan said the law initially sought nationwide implementation.
'But the Federal Cabinet later agreed to limit its application to only Peninsular Malaysia and Labuan after hearing the views of the Sabah Government led by GRS, and the Sarawak Government led by GPS,' he explained.
He attributed the decision to a Federal leadership that respects Sabah and Sarawak's special positions under the Federal Constitution and the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63), and that is open to constructive engagement with the two State Governments.
'This is the benefit of having a different core at each level of government. The Federal Government is led by a national coalition, while the State Government is anchored by local parties. This setup ensures state interests are debated government-to-government—not lost in internal party politics,' he said.
Armizan contrasted this with the Territorial Sea Act (TSA) 2012, which restricts Sabah's territorial waters to just three nautical miles.
'Today, some leaders are vocal in opposing the TSA 2012. But where were they then? Some were Members of Parliament and even Federal ministers when the Bill was passed in 2012,' he said in a Facebook post.
He pointed out that the Sabah Government under GRS has consistently maintained that the TSA 2012 does not apply to Sabah, as it was never tabled or passed in the State Legislative Assembly.
'This is the historical record of certain parties and leaders. They cannot erase it. They must explain why they only now choose to speak up,' he added.
Armizan said two key factors explain the difference in outcomes between the TSA 2012 and the CCUS Act 2025:
1. In 2012, both the Federal and State Governments were dominated by the same national party.
2. In 2025, Sabah's State Government is led by a local party, while the Federal Government remains nationally focused.
He also noted that nearly every Sabah MP in 2012 was part of a national coalition and bound by its decisions, including how to vote in Parliament.
Armizan clarified that Sabah does not reject national parties entirely, pointing out that the current State Government still includes representatives from Pakatan Harapan (PH).
'But what matters is that the core must remain local to keep Sabah's interests at the forefront. Only then can issues affecting the State be resolved through true government-to-government engagement, not just internal party discussions,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GRS supreme council yet to endorse electoral pact with Pakatan, says SAPP chief
GRS supreme council yet to endorse electoral pact with Pakatan, says SAPP chief

The Star

time8 hours ago

  • The Star

GRS supreme council yet to endorse electoral pact with Pakatan, says SAPP chief

KOTA KINABALU: The Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) supreme council has yet to discuss and collectively agree to endorse the electoral pact with Pakatan Harapan, says Datuk Seri Yong Teck Lee. The Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) president said so far, the GRS supreme council had not held a meeting to endorse the electoral pact with Pakatan announced by Datuk Seri Hajiji Noor on Sunday on the sidelines of the Parti Gagasan Rakyat Sabah annual general meeting. "There has not been a meeting of the Supreme Council in the last few months. If and when there is a meeting, of course, we will attend. "As for what might happen, it depends. For example, what has been agreed between the GRS chairman and Pakatan? Was anything agreed at all?" Yong asked. Hajiji's announcement of the pact took several of the eight party GRS leaders by surprise. The leaders declined to make any immediate comments, saying they wanted clarification on the matter first. Yong said that Hajiji had discussed the matter with GRS component party presidents but nothing was finalised until approved by the GRS supreme council. He also said it was confusing as Pakatan and Barisan have said that they have finalised seat allocation for the Sabah polls. GRS had shown signs it was keen to go solo but Hajiji had constantly voiced preference to continue working with Pakatan for political stability. GRS and Barisan, who worked together to topple the state government under Warisan-Pakatan government in the September 2020 state polls, have been at loggerheads since Barisan pulled its support for Hajiji in January 2023. Sabah Pakatan gave their backing to GRS for the Hajiji-led government to remain in power.

Ex-CJ denies interfering in apex court judges' decisions
Ex-CJ denies interfering in apex court judges' decisions

Free Malaysia Today

time9 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Ex-CJ denies interfering in apex court judges' decisions

Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat stepped down as chief justice on July 1, and Abdul Rahman Sebli retired as the chief judge of Sabah and Sarawak on July 24. PUTRAJAYA : Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat has denied allegations that she had attempted to sway the opinions of Federal Court judges during her tenure as chief justice, particularly in matters of constitutional interpretation. Tengku Maimun, who served as the top judge from May 2019 to July 1 this year, said the Federal Court had decided 19 constitution-related cases during that time and she was in the minority on five occasions. 'Statistically, five out of 19 represent about 25% of the dissenting judgments. 'That fact alone would manifest that judges decided independently without fear of favour, without external and internal pressure,' she told reporters after attending the elevation ceremony for 20 Court of Appeal and High Court judges here today. She said if she had truly wielded influence over the apex court's decisions, she would not have found herself in the minority or issued dissenting opinions on so many occasions. She was responding to claims by Abdul Rahman Sebli, who retired as chief judge of Sabah and Sarawak on Thursday, that he once came under pressure from a 'very senior member of the judiciary' to rule in favour of a litigant who had sued the federal government in a controversial constitutional case. Rahman dropped the bombshell during a farewell speech to judges, lawyers, judicial officers and legal officials in Kuching on Wednesday. He said that as a Federal Court judge at the time, he had prepared a draft judgment which he circulated to six other members of the bench for their review. 'Not long after that, I received an email from a very senior member of the judiciary telling me how wrong my opinion was on the constitutional issue. 'I was a relatively junior (judge) compared to the judges who pressured me,' Rahman said, adding that he was essentially asked to toe the line. Rahman said he stood by his draft judgment in the case, which held that the constitutional issue should be decided in favour of the federal government and not the litigant. His opinion was supported by three other panel members, making it a narrow 4-3 majority decision. He said among those in the majority was the then-president of the Court of Appeal. Tengku Maimun was in the minority. However, the majority decision was later set aside in what he described as an unusual move by a three-member Federal Court panel less than a year later. Rahman was referring to the final appeal by Maria Chin Abdullah, who was barred from travelling overseas in May 2016 without any reasons provided by the immigration department. In her minority ruling, Tengku Maimun declared that the ban was unlawful. It had been imposed on Maria, who was the Bersih 2.0 chairman, on grounds that she had allegedly disparaged the government. The majority of four judges, with Rahman writing the main judgment, had upheld the validity of an ouster clause in the Immigration Act, barring decisions from being challenged in court. Rahman held that judicial power was determined by Parliament. In her minority ruling, Tengku Maimun declared the clause unconstitutional and said the right to travel fell within the scope of the constitutional guarantee on personal liberty. She also stated that the Federal Constitution's clause on the powers of the judiciary should be read in the context of its original meaning, as it represented a basic feature of the constitution, regardless of later amendments. Article 121(1) originally vested the judicial power of the federation in the courts. An amendment in 1988 removed the words 'the judicial power of the federation' and merely stated that the courts would derive their powers from federal law. Rahman, who also attended today's event, said he stood by what he had said in his speech last week. 'There is nothing to worry about as what I spoke was the truth,' he said.

[UPDATED] Community service option extended to more offenders
[UPDATED] Community service option extended to more offenders

New Straits Times

time10 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

[UPDATED] Community service option extended to more offenders

KUALA LUMPUR: The Offenders Compulsory Attendance (Amendment) Act 2025, aimed at broadening the category of offenders eligible for mandatory community service in place of imprisonment, has been passed by the Dewan Rakyat today. The proposed amendments will allow offenders convicted of crimes punishable by up to 10 years' imprisonment, and who reside near a compulsory attendance centre, to be eligible for alternative sentencing. Individuals facing imprisonment for failing to pay fines will also qualify under the revised law. Offenders will be required to undertake compulsory work for a period not exceeding 12 months and no more than four hours a day. However, before granting such an order, the court must assess whether the offender would be adequately punished by a prison sentence not exceeding three years, and take into account the individual's character, as stipulated in the amended Section 5(1A) of the Offenders Compulsory Attendance Act 1954. "Up to July 25, 2025, 8,225 people have received such an order. This shows that this is not new," Deputy Home Minister Datuk Seri Dr Shamsul Anuar Nasarah said in his winding-up speech. Responding to government backbencher Lim Lip Eng's (PH–Kepong) suggestion to utilise electronic monitoring, the deputy minister said an amendment is in the works. "I would like to inform you that the Prisons Department has taken note of this proposal. "The Prisons Act 1995 is being amended, which includes a suggestion on using electronic monitoring as a method," he said. Shamsul also clarified that remand detainees and prisoners were already separated in prison. "This separation is important to ensure that people facing trial are not exposed to negative influences or security risks from convicted inmates. "We have already been doing this for a long time," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store