Peenya Industrial Area notified as special investment region; industry bodies laud move
The Karnataka government has issued a notification declaring 1,461.46 acres of the Peenya Industrial Area as the Peenya Special Investment Region. Phases 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the industrial area have been brought under the region.
Under the new scheme of things, 70% of the property tax collected from the region will be utilised for infrastructure development and maintenance in the region. The remaining 30% will be shared with the local body.
The Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) will be the regional development authority for the industrial township.
'The Peenya Special Investment Region shall be deemed to be an industrial township and the Government of Karnataka hereby declares that the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (regional development authority) be the industrial township authority,' read the notification.
Special benefits
One of the most important features of a special investment region is that the local authorities will have no jurisdiction over it. As per the Karnataka Special Investment Region Act, 2022, the township will be managed by the regional development authority, which will be responsible for its development, operation, regulation, management, and infrastructure development.
The Act was introduced to enhance the State's position as a global manufacturing hub with improved management of large industrial clusters in the State.
According to industry bodies, the establishment of the special investment regions will create a more favourable environment for businesses by avoiding bureaucratic clutter, attracting more investments, facilitating better infrastructure amenities, and creating more jobs.
Praise for the move
The notification makes Peenya Industrial Area the 18th special investment region in Karnataka. Industry bodies such as Karnataka Small Scale Industries Association (KASSIA) and Peenya Industries Association (PIA) have welcomed the notification and hoped that the industrial area would see a facelift in the coming days.
M.G. Rajagopal, president, KASSIA, said that declaring the industrial estate as a special investment region is an upgrade from its present plight and would help boost businesses in the region.
'We welcome the declaration and hope to see that the Peenya Industrial Estate is remodelled,' he said.
Shiva Kumar R., president of the PIA, thanked the Government of Karnataka, while noting that the expectation, however, had been for a Peenya Industrial Township Authority similar to the Electronics City Industrial Township Authority (ELCITA) — a demand raised as far back as 2002.
'Earlier, 80% of the industrial area would come under the Dasarahalli constituency and 20% under the R.R. Nagar constituency. For any grievances, we had to shuttle between both administrative offices. Now it has come under a single body,' he said.
'Inadequate representation'
Some concerns, however, seem to remain unaddressed. One of them is the constitution of the regional development authority. The industry bodies criticised that the representation of the industrial fraternity in the 15-member committee is a miniscule two.
'More representation from the industrial fraternity will ensure better development of the industrial layout, as we know the region better. At least 50% of the committee members should be from the industrial fraternity,' said Mr. Rajagopal, noting that the industry bodies have requested the same to the Chief Minister.
Seconding it, Mr. Kumar remarked that a township authority would have given the industry fraternity more representation. He hoped that the government would consider modifying the committee to increase the number of industry representatives.
Neglected region
Peenya Industrial Area, established in the early 1970s, houses around 13,000 micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) along with several large- and medium-scale industries. Special status for the region has been a longstanding demand of industry bodies.
According to them, the hub has been a victim of neglect from officials and has been writ with problems, including pothole-ridden roads, ineffective garbage collection, water and drainage issues, dysfunctional street lights, and law and order issues.
Even as the KIADB notified 17 industrial areas across the State as special investment regions in April this year, Peenya did not make it to the list.
'We had been raising this demand even before the ELCITA came into being. It was kept pending for decades for various reasons. As a result, industries in the Peenya area faced severe infrastructure problems,' said M.G. Rajagopal, president, KASSIA.
According to him, the corporation showed no interest in the maintenance of the region due to the minimal presence of the public in the region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
3 hours ago
- New Indian Express
ED returns properties worth Rs 611 crore to agri gold victims
HYDERABAD: The Enforcement Directorate Hyderabad Zonal Unit has accomplished the process of restitution of attached properties worth `611 crore (value of the properties at the time of attachment) to the victims of Ponzi schemes launched by Agri Gold group of companies. The present market value of the properties is expected to be more than Rs 1,000 crore. In May 2025, the ED filed restitution application under Section 8(8) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 before the Special PMLA Court of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad for release of movable and immovable properties attached by it to the Crime Investigation Department, Andhra Pradesh. The ED filed the petition so that attached properties could be restored to the victims of the Agri Gold Ponzi schemes under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Protection of Depositors of Financial Establishments (APPDFE) Act, 1999. The Court vide, in its order dated 10.06.2025, allowed the restitution petition filed by ED. The attached assets for which restitution has been allowed by the court include 397 parcels of agricultural land, residential/commercial plots and apartments. Of the total 397 attached immovable properties, 380 are in the state of Andhra Pradesh, 13 in Telangana and 4 in Karnataka. The agency initiated investigation against M/s Agri Gold group of companies in 2018 on the basis of several FIRs registered in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Karnataka, Odisha and Andaman & Nicobar. Agri Gold group of companies had collected deposits from around 19 lakh customers and 32 lakh account holders in the name of real estate investment with a promise of high returns or a residential plot. The ED investigation revealed that Agri Gold group ran fraudulent Collective Investment Scheme in the guise of real estate business, for which more than 130 companies were floated. These companies used to collect deposits as 'advances for plots' from depositors, without commensurate land being available with the company. By adhering to this business module, the accused lured lakhs of gullible persons and got deposits from them. These funds were thereafter diverted to various industries like power/energy, dairy, entertainment, health (ayurvedic), farm land ventures etc., without the knowledge of the depositors and the companies defaulted on returning the deposits either in cash or in kind as agreed upon. The agency stated that thousands of commission agents were engaged by the firm to lure people and they managed to collect around Rs 6,380 crore from more than 32 lakh investor accounts. During the course of PMLA investigation, movable and immovable properties spread across various states worth around Rs 4,141.2 crore were attached by ED. ED had also arrested Avva Venkata Rama Rao, Avva Venkata Seshu Narayana Rao and Avva Hema Sundara Vara Prasad in December 2020 and filed prosecution complaint before the Special PMLA Court, Nampally, Hyderabad against 14 accused persons and entities in February 2021. Cognizance of the offence of money laundering against all the accused was taken by the court on August 29, 2023. Subsequently, a supplementary prosecution complaint was filed on March 28, 2024 against 22 accused and cognizance of the same was taken by the court on November 4, 2024. In the instant case, ED had earlier restituted properties worth Rs 3,339 crore (present market value of more than Rs 6,000 crore) in February 2025. The total value of properties restituted in this case now stands at Rs 3,950 crore (present market value of more than 7,000 crore). This restitution exercise marks a significant step in ED's efforts to restore properties to their rightful claimants and to ensure that proceeds of crime are returned to those affected.
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
GCDA may become first local body to serve as appropriate authority for land pooling for a major project
Greater Cochin Development Authority (GCDA) will be the first local body to act as an appropriate authority to make available land for a major project in the State under the land pooling rules, if and when it goes ahead with land pooling for the third phase expansion of the Infopark Kochi. The State Government order dated October 18, 2024, designated the GCDA as the appropriate authority for the proposed land pooling under Section 56 of the Kerala Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Act, into which land pooling rules were incorporated through an extraordinary government gazette dated March 16, 2024. 'Though we have undertaken projects like Kaloor-Kadavanthra Road, which can be construed as executed through land pooling, this is the first time a local body is being designated as the appropriate authority under the land pooling rules,' said GCDA sources. Out of the 300 acres which the GCDA proposes to make available, 100 acres would be made available to Infopark Kochi, while the remaining 200 acres would be enhanced in value through infrastructure, and a portion of it would be returned to landowners, which is at the heart of the concept of land pooling. According to the Kerala Land Pooling Rules, 30% of the land would be used for commercial, industrial, and housing purposes, and the remaining land would be returned to landowners. The municipal corporation, municipal council, town panchayat, or village panchayat may, through a resolution, decide to prepare a land pooling scheme in respect of any part of the area within its jurisdiction. Once not less than 75% of landowners of the proposed land pooling scheme area give their consent, the appropriate authority may issue the final notification for the drafting of the scheme. However, it is mandatory that the landowners who decline to give their consent should also be included in the scheme. Even if the consent is not forthcoming, the appropriate authority may, with the approval of the government, take an appropriate decision with regard to the scheme. Landowners with plots not less than five hectares in municipal corporations, seven hectares in municipalities, and 10 hectares in panchayats can apply to the appropriate authority for inclusion of their plots in a land pooling scheme in their areas.
Hindustan Times
10 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Register lifts or face penalties, Noida warns housing societies
The Gautam Budh Nagar administration has warned societies and building owners of penalty after discovering that less than 10% lifts operating in the district have been registered under the newly enforced Uttar Pradesh Lift and Escalator Act 2024, said officials. As of June 11, only 7,702 of an estimated total 80,000 lifts have been brought under the regulatory framework — a mere 9.6% compliance rate, said officials. District magistrate (DM) Manish Kumar Verma recently held a review meeting with RWAs and housing society representatives and warned that non-compliance would lead to sealing of lifts and heavy fines. 'Registration of all lifts and escalators under the Uttar Pradesh Lift and Escalator Act 2024 is mandatory in the public interest. Societies and building owners must comply without delay to avoid penalties. Safety and timely maintenance are non-negotiable,' Kumar said. 'The Act is designed for smooth lift operations and lift owners and societies should comply. It is no longer optional. RWAs and building owners must ensure registration and routine maintenance checks without delay,' said Kumar. The UP Lift and Escalator Act 2024, along with its supporting rules, mandates that all residential, commercial, and institutional buildings with lifts or escalators register them with the electrical safety department and undergo regular technical inspections. 'These aren't just formalities. Compliance ensures lives are not at stake during a lift malfunction. Only 7,702 lifts have been registered so far, and over 72,000 remain outside the safety net,' assistant director of electrical safety (Noida) Ramesh Kumar told HT on Friday. If the delay extends up to seven days, a fine of ₹100 per day will be levied. For delays between eight to 15 days, the penalty rises to ₹200 per day, while delays ranging from 16 to 30 days will have a fine of ₹500 per day, said officials aware of the matter. In cases where the delay exceeds 30 days, the lift or escalator will be sealed immediately. It can only be reopened after the owner pays a lump sum penalty of ₹10,000 and completes all pending compliance requirements under the Act, said officials.. The registration process involves multiple formalities and is quite time-consuming, said Federation of Noida RWAs (FONRWA) general secretary KK Jain. 'Many RWAs and individual households are still not fully aware of the exact steps required or the documents needed. There is a clear gap in communication and awareness, especially among independent home owners who are not part of large societies. We urge the administration to simplify the process and launch a bigger awareness campaign,' said Jain. ADM (finance & revenue), Atul Kumar briefed RWAs during a meeting on Wednesday, about the registration and documentation process and warned that the administration will initiate legal and administrative action against those ignoring the guidelines.
