British Steel will not revisit Teesside arc furnace plans in Redcar
British Steel said it would not revisit plans to build an electric arc furnace (EAF) at one of its plants, even though it was consulting on the closure of an alternative site for the machinery.It was reported in January the firm had shelved plans to build an EAF in Lackenby, near Redcar, in favour of building two at its Scunthorpe factory, which is at risk of closure.Conservative Tees Valley Mayor Ben Houchen said the Scunthorpe proposals had been unworkable and "economically flawed", as he criticised the government's handling of the situation.The Department of Business and Trade declined to comment on Mr Houchen's claims but said it had committed £2.5bn to rebuilding the sector.
On Thursday, British Steel said its two blast furnaces in Scunthorpe were "no longer financially sustainable" and launched a consultation into closing the factory, a move which has put 2,700 jobs at risk.Houchen said he had warned the government the deal to move the arc furnace plans entirely to Scunthorpe would end in collapse."We had a serious deal on the table to bring an electric arc furnace to Teesside," he said. "It would have secured jobs, attracted investment, and delivered a long-term future for green steelmaking in the UK. For whatever reason, that deal was quietly dropped."A spokesperson for British Steel said while the Scunthorpe facilities were being consulted on it would continue to operate its rolling mill in Skinningrove, Redcar.
'Steel is our identity'
On Wednesday, Industry Minister Sarah Jones told the Business and Trade Select Committee British Steel's owner, Jingye, had rejected a deal from the government, which the BBC understands involved a cash injection of £500m.In a joint statement, local Labour MPs Anna Turley and Luke Myer, along with Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council leader Alec Brown, said they were "deeply concerned" about Jingye's rejection of the offer."This development raises the possibility of impacts on workers at Lackenby and Skinningrove, as well as their families and our communities," they said."Steel is not just an industry, it is part of our identity. For generations, steelworkers have been the backbone of our communities, and we are determined they will remain so in the years ahead."
Unions Community, GMB and Unite have called on the government to do everything it can to secure the Scunthorpe site, including using £2.5bn it had set aside for the steel industry."Jingye's announcement is devastating and sets up a disastrous cliff edge for British Steel and its dedicated workforce," said Community assistant general secretary Alasdair McDiarmid."We urge the company and the government to conclude an agreement to prevent a catastrophic outcome."
Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said he understood it was a "deeply worrying time for staff" and he would work tirelessly to reach an agreement with the company.British Steel chief executive Zengwei An has said consultations on the closure were "a necessary decision given the hugely challenging circumstances the business faces".
Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
3 days ago
- BBC News
Over 200 apply for 30 British Steel apprenticeships in Scunthorpe
More than 200 people have applied for 30 apprenticeship roles at British Steel in Scunthorpe, the firm has company, which is also recruiting for 180 permanent roles, said it was looking to enrol its first apprentices in three comes after plans to make 2,700 workers redundant were scrapped in April after the government took control of the company from its Chinese owner, Bell, the company's interim chief executive, said the number of applications showed "a major vote of confidence in our business". "Our new apprentices will be our next generation of engineers and technical experts and support our journey to becoming a sustainable and profitable business at the heart of the UK economy," he application window for apprenticeships closes on Friday at 23.59 BST. British Steel said it was also recruiting 182 workers in a range of roles, including jobs in engineering, cleaning and workplace government passed an emergency law to take control of British Steel amid accusations that Jingye was planning to switch off two blast furnaces in closure of the furnaces would have left the UK without the capability to produce "virgin" steel, which is used in major construction projects such as new buildings and railways. Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
The Guardian
4 days ago
- The Guardian
Fears Tata Steel could be excluded from Starmer's Trump tariff deal
Ministers are reportedly working to stop the UK's biggest steelmaker, Tata Steel, from being left out of tariff-free access to the US under Keir Starmer's trade deal with Donald Trump. The prime minister said on Wednesday that he hoped his deal with the US – which has been agreed but not signed – would come into effect 'in just a couple of weeks', after the US president decided to pause 50% tariffs on British steel and aluminium products for five weeks. However, the deal could end up excluding Indian-owned Tata Steel, which runs the vast Port Talbot steelworks in south Wales, because of the origin of some of its products, its bosses fear. The company exports more than $100m worth of goods into the US market every year. Tata Steel shut down its blast furnace at Port Talbot last year owing to its transition to a greener electric arc furnace. As part of that change, the company has imported steel from its sister companies in India and Europe to ship on to customers. However, this could breach US import rules that require all steel to be 'melted and poured' in the country from which it is imported. UK negotiators have been trying to secure a carve-out for Tata, according to the Times. A government source reportedly told the paper that they were confident a deal could be struck to protect Tata but said negotiations were 'complex'. The UK government has also come under pressure from the US over British Steel, which is owned by the Chinese Jingye group. In April the government used emergency legislation to take control of the site in Scunthorpe amid fears the Chinese company planned to let its blast furnaces run cold. However, US representatives are concerned that Chinese involvement in British Steel could allow Beijing to use the company as a 'back door' into the US for Chinese products, according to the Times. The US has this week doubled tariffs on foreign steel and aluminium imports to 50%, which applies to all trading partners except Britain. The rate for steel and aluminium imports from the UK will remain at 25% until at least 9 July although the exact size of Britain's steel quota is unclear. As part of Starmer's deal with Trump last month, the US agreed to cut the 25% tariff rate on British steel and aluminium exports to zero, but this has not yet been finalised. Steel manufacturers say delays to implementing the trade deal have lost them business. Speaking to MPs before the announcement, Russell Codling, a director at Tata Steel, said that about £150m of business was affected by tariffs. 'If we can get this deal enacted as quickly as possible … it will get stability for us and for our customers in the US,' he said.
Sky News
5 days ago
- Sky News
The big problem facing UK as deadline to finalise US trade deal looms
When push comes to shove, the question of whether British industry faces crippling tariffs on exports to the US or enjoys a unique opportunity to grow may come back to three seemingly random words: "melted and poured". To see why, let's begin by recapping where we are at present in the soap opera of US trade policy. Donald Trump has just doubled the extra tariffs charged on imports of steel and aluminium into the US from 25% to 50%. In essence, this would turn a painfully high tariff into something closer to an insurmountable economic wall (remember during the Cold War, the Iron Curtain equated to an effective tariff rate of just under 50%). Anyway, the good news for UK steel producers is that they have been spared the 50% rate and will, for the time being, only have to pay the 25% rate. But there is a sting in the tail: that stay of execution will only last until 9 July - on the basis of President Trump's most recent pronouncements. 1:00 For anyone following these events from the corner of their eyes, this might all sound a little odd. After all, didn't Sir Keir Starmer announce only a few weeks ago that British steel and aluminium makers would be able to enjoy not 25% but 0% tariffs with America, thanks to his bold new trade agreement with the US? Well, yes. But the prime minister wasn't being entirely clear about what that meant in practice. Because the reality is that every trade agreement works more or less as follows: politicians negotiate a "heads of terms" agreement - a vague set of principles and red lines. There then follows a period of horse-trading and negotiation to nail down the actual details and turn it into a black and white piece of law. In this case, when the PM and president made their big announcement 28 days ago, they had only agreed on the "heads of terms". The small print was yet to be completed. Right now, we are still in the horse-trading phase. Negotiators from the UK and the US are meeting routinely to try and nail down the small print. And that process is taking longer than many had expected. To see why, it's worth drilling a little bit into the details. The trade deal committed to allowing some cars to pass into the US at a 10% rate and to protecting some pharmaceutical trade, as well as allowing some steel and aluminium into the US at a zero tariff rate. When it comes to cars, there are some nuances about which kind of cars the deal covers. Something similar goes for pharmaceuticals. Things get even knottier when you drill into the detail on steel. 2:13 You see, one of the things the White House is nervous about is the prospect that Britain might become a kind of assembly point for steel from other countries around the world - that you could just ship some steel to Britain, get it pressed or rolled or worked over and then sent across to the US with those 0% tariffs. So the US negotiators are insisting that only steel that is "melted and poured" in the UK (in other words, smelted in a furnace) is covered by the trade deal. That's fine for some producers but not for others. One of Britain's biggest steel exporters is Tata Steel, which makes a lot of steel that gets turned into tin cans you find on American supermarket shelves (not to mention piping used by the oil trade). Up until recently, that steel was indeed "melted and poured" from the blast furnaces at Port Talbot. But Tata shut down those blast furnaces last year, intending to replace them with cleaner electric arc furnaces. And in the intervening period, it's importing raw steel instead from the Netherlands and India and then running it through its mills. Or consider the situation at British Steel. There in Scunthorpe they are melting and pouring the steel from iron made in their blast furnaces - but now ponder this. While the company has been semi-nationalised by the government, it is still technically a Chinese business, owned by Jingye. In other words, its steel might technically count as benefiting China - which is something the White House is even more sensitive about. 👉 Tap here to follow Politics at Jack and Anne's wherever you get your podcasts 👈 You see how this is all suddenly becoming a bit more complicated than it might at first have looked? This helps to explain why the negotiations are taking longer than expected. But this brings us to the big problem. The White House has indicated that Britain will only be spared that 50% tariff rate provided the trade deal is finalised by 9 July. That gives the negotiators another month and a bit. That might sound like a lot, but now consider that that would be one of the fastest announcement-to-completion rates ever achieved in any trade negotiations in modern history. There's no guarantee Britain will actually get this deal done in time for that deadline - though insiders tell me they think they could be able to finalise it in a piecemeal fashion: the cars one week, steel another, pharmaceuticals another. Either way, the heat is on. Just when you thought Britain was in the safe zone, it stands on the edge of jeopardy all over again.
