Coulport nuclear leaks spark alarm among local nuclear campaigners
The revelations came after an investigation by The Ferret which forced the release of information on the leaks the Government had tried to keep hushed up.
Marian Pallister, chair of Pax Christi Scotland, said the revelations were unsurprising but concerning for people living in the area.
Pallister, a writer and journalist who lives near Lochgilphead, told The National: 'I'm afraid that it wasn't a surprise, we have known about this for a long time.'
She dismissed the MoD's claims that there had been 'no unsafe releases of radioactive material into the environment', adding: 'They would say that, wouldn't they?
'They are obviously going to lessen their involvement but however big or small the leaks might be, they are leaks into waters that are a part of our lives, part of our heritage.
'I live in mid-Argyll, as the seagull flies, I'm about 35 miles from Faslane, it's a much longer journey by road. These are waters that we sail in, that we swim in, that our fish come from et cetera. Even if it's one milli-whatever of contamination, then it affects the whole population.'
Pallister also raised concerns about the impact on tourism to the area, which is a major boost to its economy.
She said: 'This area relies so much on tourism. Do you think that tourists are going to come up here if they think that the waters around the Clyde Estuary are contaminated with radiation?'
The scandal has led to calls from the Scottish Greens for an investigation after a six-year battle to have the files released.
READ MORE: Investigation urged into radioactive leak in Scottish loch and 'cover-up scandal'
An investigation by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) found that the leaks had occurred because of 'shortfalls in maintenance'.
There was one pipe burst in 2010 and a further two in 2019, one of which released 'significant amounts of water' flooding a nuclear weapons processing area where the water became contaminated with tritium, a material in nuclear warheads. This water was released into Loch Long.
After an investigation by Sepa, the MoD promised 23 actions to prevent more bursts and floods in March 2020.
However, there were two more pipe bursts in 2021 including another incident in an area with radioactive substances.
(Image: POphot Barry Wheeler/Ministry of Defence/PA Wire)
The SNP said the incidents were a 'direct consequence of Westminster's decision to impose nuclear weapons on Scotland'.
Bill Kidd, the MSP for Glasgow Anniesland, said: 'Trident is dangerous, immoral, and completely incompatible with the peaceful, forward-looking nation we want to be.
'Scotland has a proud tradition of opposing weapons of mass destruction. With independence, we can scrap Trident, clean up the mess it has left behind, and invest instead in the real priorities of our people – tackling the climate crisis, improving public services, and building a fairer economy.'
The MoD was approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
An emphatic 2026 win for the SNP will mean no excuses for inaction
Given that support for independence is around 50% and support for establishing a Scottish parliament was around 75%, it does not take too much imagination to believe that a significant majority can be persuaded (with the help of some serious campaigning) to vote for that parliament to have the legal authority to conduct a referendum enabling the people of Scotland to determine their own future (within or outwith a now dysfunctional Union). READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Alex Salmond 'did not read' 2014 independence paper From Tommy's words, it appears that my personal interpretation of John Swinney's intentions regarding a constitutional convention – as being consistent with the creation of a widely-inclusive citizen's convention – was wrong. However, if we wish to gain broad public support for the next step on our journey to independence then, in addition to progressing an open citizens' convention, independence parties should have the commitment to establishing the legal authority of the Scottish Parliament to conduct a constitutional referendum clearly stated as a primary clause in their manifestos, backed up by stated actions to ensure that authority is granted to Holyrood. Otherwise, unless independence can be achieved in the meantime by alternative actions, the next Westminster General Election must be declared a de facto referendum. Offering another perspective to the dilemmas confronting 'Old John' and Jim Taylor (Letters, Aug 11), and no doubt many others, the more emphatic an SNP victory, the less excuse the SNP hierarchy will have for not taking substantive actions in support of a public mandate. This approach may be considered hypocritical by some if they do not support the route to independence advocated by the current First Minister, but to vote otherwise in the knowledge that it could bring about a Labour government in Holyrood would seem a betrayal to most who are absolutely committed to independence. Better to give neither the First Minister nor the Prime Minister any excuse for not delivering, or for further delaying, the means of exercising the right of Scotland's people to determine their own future. Stan Grodynski Longniddry, East Lothian TRUMP'S views on a deal with Putin over Ukraine seems like a deal between 18th-century aristocrats settling their gambling debts. Trump acts like an18th-century monarch. No consideration is given to the views of residents of the possible transfer areas, who are merely insignificant chequers in a high-stakes gambling deal. It seems reminiscent of the Act of Union, whereby the ruling elite in Scotland agreed to a union with England against the will of the general populace. READ MORE: David Pratt: Are Trump and Putin about to stitch up Ukraine? Trump will no doubt gain whatever happens, and Ukraine will suffer, being back under a modern Russian Czar. President Trump will parade as a peacemaker, and his sycophants (with usual brown envelopes pocketed) will propose him for a Nobel Peace Prize which he desires, hypocrite that he is. What's changed in politics since the 18th century? Modern democracy seems little more than a sham, with elites still in charge. Current political parties seem little more than a means for the current elites to maintain control under a pretext of democracy. Where is real limitation of elector funding? The exist many ways to get round and buy elections. If you're in the know, it seems funding is unrestricted. The current government in the UK, as well as the previous one, seem uninterested in altering the present set-up, as they both benefit from it. Drew Reid Falkirk YOUR article 'PM claims people feeling 'better off'' by Hamish Morrison (Aug 7) presents the reader with the classic case of 'the ventriloquist has died but the dummy keeps talking'! The 'dummy' tells us that his government is 'bearing down' on costs and 'putting more money into people's pockets'. Yes, the pockets of his sponsors, big businesses and fellow Labour parliamentarians, definitely NOT those of the people of the country! Since Labour came to power, the 'dummy' has increased the weekly shopping costs by as much as 40%. The facts reveal 'disposable income' is falling! It's not falling, it's PLUMMETING in an ever-increasing spiral into those same pockets that enabled Starmer to become PM. The answer is to tax the super-rich and get them to pay their fair share. Everyone knows 'Starmer the dummy' will never do that because HE is one of the super rich along with his cronies who sit beside him on the government benches. As for 'the focus will be on living standards', these are also PLUMMETING under his watch. Everybody and anybody in the 'vulnerable' category will be forced to pay more tax but not the wealthy pals, sponsors and big businesses who back this 'dummy'. I don't ever see 'Rachel from Accounts' do anything to help anyone other than herself and the 'dummy'. It's time the dummy was put back in the box and a real person with a spine and a conscience took over – or better still, let Scotland leave this Westminster pantomime. Jim Todd Cumbernauld
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Strange case of Nicola Sturgeon's recovery from amnesia over Alex Salmond sexual harassment claims
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Having been in the Scottish Parliament from the very start, I watched an introverted Nicola Sturgeon manoeuvre her way within the SNP to become the most powerful woman in the country. And what did she achieve with this untrammelled power – is Scotland a better place after 10 years of Sturgeon as First Minister? The answer is not to be found in her newly published memoirs – indeed there is little about her record of achievement. There is no explanation for why the educational attainment gap, which she pledged to eradicate, still persists. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There is no excuse for the state of the NHS and the health service waiting lists that were growing long before the Covid pandemic. Never mind the stagnant economy and the lack of engagement with business. READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon says she still counts shamed Derek Mackay as a friend Nicola Sturgeon, seen with Val McDermid during Glasgow International Comedy Festival earlier this year, found her powers of recall had deserted her when she gave evidence to a Scottish Parliament committee investigating the government's handling of complaints against Alex Salmond (Picture: Jane Barlow) | PA Spoiler alert Instead we are told a story of a powerful woman approached by her older male mentor, Alex Salmond, who asks her to protect him, but she refuses. It's a dramatic turning point worthy of any author – which is no doubt why Sturgeon picked it to promote her book. The former First Minister may be more comfortable in a Waterstones' armchair these days than the debating chamber at Holyrood. But while I enjoy a good work of fiction as much as the next person, I was on the parliamentary committee investigating this very same episode. Spoiler alert – there's more to the story. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The committee was set up in 2021 after the Scottish Government's internal investigation into those same sexual harassment claims collapsed, costing taxpayers thousands of pounds and forcing the complainants into a spotlight they never sought. Our committee's job was to understand why this had happened and ensure that in future the Scottish Government's complaints procedures would not let women down. You would think that Sturgeon, who was famed for her attention to detail, would be focused on that task. Instead, we discovered the then First Minister's power of recall had deserted her. She could not remember. I am glad that her memory is returning. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Throughout our evidence-gathering sessions, the SNP government blocked us at every turn, at one point taking two years to deliver the documents we requested. And when they came, some were blank sheets of paper. READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon says Alex Salmond could have leaked probe against him and addresses conspiracy claim Swinney's role In this obstruction, Sturgeon had a key ally. Secret Scotland came into its own with our current First Minister, John Swinney. He was Sturgeon's political fixer and refused for many months to share information with the committee to the point that opposition parties forced a no-confidence vote. That culture of obfuscation and spin is Sturgeon's legacy, now carried forward by Swinney. On International Women's Day a few years ago, Sturgeon pledged 'to change for good the culture of misogyny'. With all the power she had, with a majority SNP parliament, she could have changed the country. That really would have been a legacy for Scotland's first female First Minister. In this case, actions speak louder than words.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
MoD has a long history of disregard for Scotland's environment
THE Scottish Greens have demanded an investigation into a series of leaks of water contaminated by radioactive waste from a network of poorly maintained pipes at the Royal Navy's nuclear bases on the Clyde. The leaks have been occurring over a period of at least 20 years but the Ministry of Defence (MoD) has attempted to cover up its negligence by claiming it's a matter of national security. The information was only finally revealed earlier this month following a six year long battle involving Scotland's information commissioner David Hamilton who finally ruled that the relevant documents should be released after finding that notwithstanding the claims of the MoD, their disclosure only threatened "reputations", not national security. The Scottish Greens have said the repeated leaks are a 'stark failure on the part of the UK Government', adding that it could have 'serious consequences'. The release of the documents highlights the repeated cover ups by the MoD as it attempted to avoid public awareness of its reckless negligence. In 2009, it was reported that the two Royal Navy bases on the Clyde, Coulport and nearby Faslane, had seen a series of serious safety breaches involving repeated leaks of radioactive waste from broken pipes and waste tanks. In a confidential report released under the Freedom of Information Act that year, the MoD has admitted that safety failings at the UK's main nuclear submarine base at Faslane, near Glasgow, are a "recurring theme" and ingrained in the base's culture. The worst breaches included three leaks of radioactive coolant from nuclear submarines in 2004, 2007 and again in 2008. However, due to a lack of proper maintenance, and the ongoing culture of an acceptance of safety failures at the facility, the pipes continued to burst repeatedly, allowing the loch to be contaminated with radioactive waste in the form of low levels of tritium, which is used in the nuclear warheads stored at Coulport, one of the UK's most secure and secretive military bases. The MoD has no excuses here. The Royal Navy had been aware of the deterioration in the pipe network since at least 2009, but it was only in March 2020 that the MoD promised to undertake a course of 23 specific actions necessary to remedy a situation which had been causing the leakage of radioactive waste for well over a decade. Despite this, the MoD failed to take action to maintain and repair the pipes with the result that there were further leaks of radioactive material into the loch in 2021 and again in 2022. The MoD accepted in 2020 that its lack of preparedness had caused 'confusion', 'a breakdown in access control' and a 'lack of communication of the hazards.' This, however, did nothing to cause the MoD to ensure that it was any more prepared in future, as the continuing leaks and burst pipes in 2021 and 2022 prove. The Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) insisted that its assessments found the risk to the environment from the effluent discharges was "of no regulatory concern," while the MoD said there had been "no unsafe releases of radioactive material" into the environment. Reacting to the latest disclosures, Scottish Greens West Scotland MSP Ross Greer said: "It is scandalous, but given the long list of previous incidents at Faslane and Coulport, its sadly no surprise. "The Ministry of Defence has long played fast and loose with these weapons of mass slaughter, throwing billions at private contractors whilst failing to even maintain its own facilities. He added: "These revelations will have been particularly chilling for my constituents who live near the site. To reassure them, UK Ministers must now investigate and explain why it happened and the steps they are taking to ensure it never does again. We need full transparency and accountability, not more secrecy. 'Nuclear weapons are a moral obscenity. They have no place in Scotland. These incidents underline the direct risk to the local communities who host them. "It's time to disarm our waters and get these dangerous weapons of mass slaughter out of Scotland." Alba depute leader Neale Hanvey added: 'This is a disgraceful cover-up by the UK Government. Radioactive leaks into Scottish waters were kept secret to protect Westminster's nuclear obsession – not our communities. 'The UK Government and MoD have form when it come to this. When I challenged them on radiation leaks in 2023 their response raised more questions than it answered. 'Scotland is treated as a dumping ground for weapons we don't want and dangers we didn't vote for. Independence is the only way we rid ourselves of nuclear weapons and end this toxic disregard for our nation's safety.' The MoD has a long history of disregard for the Scottish environment and a culture of denial and cover up in which it is enabled by the Crown Immunity which it and its facilities enjoy. When you are literally above the law there is no incentive for the MoD to take environmental and public safety issues seriously, no matter what reassuring words a MoD spokesperson puts out in a press release when the MoD has been unable to maintain secrecy about its negligence and carelessness. Refusing to accept nuclear waste is for woke snowflakes … Also on an unwanted nuclear theme, concerns have been raised by the UK Government's 'utterly reckless' approach to nuclear energy – as a new report recommends ministers tear up 'needless' regulations in order to speed up the development of new civilian nuclear power projects. A taskforce commissioned by the UK Government to look into nuclear regulations has recommended a 'radical reset' to speed up projects. Its final report is expected to focus on tackling what the UK Government described as a 'culture of risk aversion' in nuclear energy regulation, because apparently avoiding risk is a bad thing now. Presumably we need to throw caution to the wind and start making our tea with the Royal Navy's waste water contaminated by Tritium, after all it's only being "risk averse" that stops us doing so. Refusing to accept radioactive waste is for woke snowflakes. Everyone knows that radioactive snowflakes are much prettier as they glow in the dark. Scottish Greens co-leader Lorna Slater said: 'This seems utterly reckless. Nuclear energy is extremely costly and insecure, and it leaves a long and toxic legacy for future generations. 'The last thing we should be doing is cutting corners, especially when it comes to something so dangerous.' She added that nuclear energy was 'totally unnecessary when it comes to our environmental objectives'.
