logo
A risky bet? Texas Republicans poised to redraw congressional map on Trump's orders

A risky bet? Texas Republicans poised to redraw congressional map on Trump's orders

The Guardian18-07-2025
At the behest of Donald Trump, Texas Republicans are poised to redraw their state's congressional map to try and gain as many as five congressional seats, a move that is likely to further weaken the influence of the state's fast-growing non-white population and could wind up backfiring on the party.
The effort to redraw the map represents a blunt and undemocratic effort by Republican lawmakers to pick the voters who elect them, and comes at a time when many of the party's positions are unpopular. The US president and national Republicans are making the push because the GOP holds a 220-212 advantage in the US House (there are three Democratic vacancies) and Trump's party typically loses seats in the midterm elections, which will happen next year.
But it's a risky bet. Twenty-five of Texas's 38 congressional districts are currently represented by Republicans, a result that was carefully engineered when lawmakers redrew the state's congressional map in 2021. During that process, mapmakers focused on shoring up Republican seats instead of trying to pick up Democratic ones.
In order to pick up new seats, Republicans will have to spread their voters from safe Republican ones into Democratic districts. It could allow them to pick up more seats, but also makes the Republican districts more competitive and potentially winnable by Democrats in a strong year.
The number of seats Republicans are able to pick up 'depends on how much risk Republicans want to take,' said David Wasserman, an analyst at the Cook Political Report who closely follows US House races. 'Republicans could probably target three Democratic seats very easily, but once it gets to four or five, that could put additional Republican seats at risk.'
When Republicans drew the existing map, they blunted the political influence of non-white voters in the state, who accounted for 95% of the state's population growth over the last decade. The new maps could further weaken their ability to elect their preferred candidates.
'The current maps are already blatantly racist and discriminate against voters of color, communities of color, all over the state,' said Anthony Gutierrez, the executive director of the Texas chapter of Common Cause, a watchdog group. 'There would be absolutely no way you get to five more Republican districts without just completely trampling on minority voting rights.'
Two Democratic seats likely to be targeted are the ones in south Texas currently held by representatives Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez, Wasserman said. Trump won both districts in 2024 and Republicans could easily tweak their boundaries to make them winnable. Democrats also represent four districts in the Houston area, and Republicans could shift the boundaries to try and pick up one or two districts depending on how aggressive they want to be.
The Republican push to redraw the map comes as the state is still reeling from deadly floods that left at least 134 people dead with more than 100 people still missing. Democrats in the Texas legislature are reportedly considering walking out of the special session in order to deny Republicans a quorum needed to pass the maps. Ken Paxton, the Texas attorney general, has said he will assist in 'hunting down' members who walk out and compel them back to the capitol.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
To justify redrawing the maps, Texas governor Greg Abbott pointed to a 7 July letter from the justice department claiming lawmakers had impermissibly sorted voters based on their race. Both the letter's argument, and Abbott's quick acceptance of it, raised eyebrows because Texas officials have said for years they did not consider race at all when they drew the maps.
'My jaw dropped when I saw that letter,' said Mark Gaber, an attorney at the Campaign Legal Center, who is representing some of the plaintiffs suing Texas over the maps already in place. 'Either the witnesses were not telling the truth or the entire premise of this special session and the mid-decade redistricting is false.'
In its letter, the justice department pointed to four districts where it claimed voters had been unconstitutionally sorted by race. In two of those districts, two different groups of minority voters constitute a majority that can elect their preferred candidates. Another district is majority Hispanic. The final district it raised issue with was drawn after judges found intentional discrimination in a previous district.
Several legal experts said those claims were highly questionable.
'The DoJ letter is completely concocted and it reflects a complete misunderstanding of the law, but that's not what they're interested in,' said Thomas Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which is representing some of the plaintiffs challenging the current congressional map.
'If I were them, I would be consulting legal counsel about the possibility of being found guilty of perjury in what they testified to under oath,' he added.
Mapmakers may want to keep communities who share common interests together for reasons that have nothing to do with their race, said Michael Li, a redistricting expert at the Brennan Center for Justice.
Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola Law School who worked on voting rights issues at both the justice department and White House said the letter was 'nonsense'.
'What they appear to articulate in the letters is the notion that any time there happens to be multiple minorities in a district, that's a constitutional violation. And that's like seven different versions of wrong,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

France is turning against the EU
France is turning against the EU

Spectator

time11 minutes ago

  • Spectator

France is turning against the EU

When Donald Trump won a second term in the White House last November the response in Europe was one of barely disguised horror. 'The European Union must stand close together and act in a united manner,' declared Germany's Chancellor Olaf Scholz. Emmanuel Macron posted a message on X: 'The question we, as Europeans, must ask ourselves is, are we ready to defend the interests of Europeans?' The president of France got his answer on Sunday evening. No. The trade deal agreed between Ursula von der Leyen, the EU Commission president, and Donald Trump has not gone down well in much of Europe. Scholz's successor, Friedrich Merz forecast that Germany's economy would suffer 'significant' damage because of the deal. EU exports will have a tariff of 15 per cent, which is superior to the customs duties before Trump's re-election, but much lower than his threatened 30 per cent tariff. Additionally, von der Leyen has promised the bloc will purchase energy worth $750 billion from the United States and make $600 billion in additional investments. According to Hungary's Viktor Orban: This is not an agreement… Donald Trump ate von der Leyen for breakfast.' The most strident criticism of the deal came from France, where in a rare display of unity the terms of the agreement were savaged across the political spectrum. Prime Minister Francois Bayrou said that 'it is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, united to assert their values and defend their interests, resigns itself to submission.' Trade minister Laurent Saint-Martin described the deal as unbalanced and said the government should not accept 'what happened yesterday because that would be accepting that Europe is not an economic power.' It was telling that Saint-Martin said 'Europe' and not 'France'. For centrists like Saint-Martin – he was one of the first to join Macron's fledging En Marcheparty in 2016 – France and the EU are indistinguishable. Macron's predecessor (and mentor), Francois Hollande once accused him of 'believing in nothing and having no conviction'. That is not true. Macron has one unshakeable conviction and that is the EU. It is why he won't let Brexit go, taking every opportunity to savage Britain's decision to leave the bloc. Twice during his recent state visit he went on the attack. Britons were 'sold a lie' over Brexit he said at one point, adding on another occasion that the country 'was stronger when part of the EU.' As yet there has been no response the Elysee to von der Leyen's trade deal. Perhaps Macron is still working out how best to spin the fact that Britain's tariff rate with the USA is 10 per cent. Marine Le Pen lost little time in pointing this out, posting on X that the EU 'has obtained worse conditions than the United Kingdom.' The leader of the National Rally described the deal as 'a political, economic and moral fiasco' and said that that 'this form of globalisation, which denies and destroys sovereignty, has been outdated for many years.' The majority of the French agree with her. In an interview with the BBC in 2018, Macron admitted that if given the choice his people would probably follow Britain out of the EU. This is one reason why he has been so determined to make life difficult for post-Brexit Britain: pour encourager les autres. Macron's strategy has been partially successful. A poll last year revealed that 62 per cent of the French are opposed to Frexit. The bad news for the president is that 69 per cent of them have a bad opinion of the EU. The poll was conducted a month before the European elections, which resulted in a resounding victory for Le Pen's Eurosceptic party and a humiliating defeat for Macron's Europhile movement. When Le Pen reached the second round of the 2017 presidential election it was with a promise to quit the EU. Two years later she abandoned that position and vowed to reform the bloc from within. Her party won't return to Frexit but it will increase its Euroscepticism between now and the 2027 election. The same goes for the hard-left's Jean-Luc Melenchon, who loathes Brussels as much as Le Pen. Bruno Retailleau, the leader of the centre-right Republicans, is also a long-standing critic of the EU's ambition and voted against the EU Constitution in France's 2005 referendum. That result, he said in a 2020 interview, along with Brexit, 'have shown one and the same thing: Europeans do not want a federal Europe.' Across France enmity towards the EU has strengthened in the last year. The Mercosur trade deal agreed with South America in December is widely unpopular and France's failure to control its borders is blamed on Brussels. The French are demoralised and angrier than ever with their ruling elite. A citizens' collective called 'Bloquons tout!' (Block everything) is using social media to mobilise people for a day of protest on September 10. 'Boycott, disobedience, and solidarity' is their rallying cry and they are urging people to take to the streets across France. Will it achieve anything? Probably not. After all, what's the point of protesting in Paris when all the big decisions about France's future are made in Brussels.

US and China hold trade talks after Donald Trump eyes ‘world tariff'
US and China hold trade talks after Donald Trump eyes ‘world tariff'

The Guardian

time12 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

US and China hold trade talks after Donald Trump eyes ‘world tariff'

Update: Date: 2025-07-29T06:58:13.000Z Title: US-China talks extension 'likely' as Trump targets 'world tariff' Content: Good morning, and welcome to our live coverage of business, economics and financial markets. After the US and EU announced the outline of a trade deal that would limit tariffs to 15%, it looks like talks with China could be the next on the agenda, with an extension of a truce in the trade war 'likely', according to a top official in the Trump administration. US Treasury chief Scott Bessent arrived yesterday in Sweden, alongside China's vice premier He Lifeng, according to Reuters. Back in the US, Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary told Fox News that a delay to a higher tariff deadline was probable: Is that a likely outcome? Sure, it seems that way, but let's leave it to President Trump to decide. Donald Trump triggered financial market chaos after slapping tariffs at 145% on China. However, in May he announced a 90-day pause, lowering tariffs to (a still significant) 30%. That left a deadline of 12 August for the talks, but it is US trade representative Jamieson Greer told the CNBC news channel he did not expect 'some kind of enormous breakthrough today' at the talks in Stockholm, although he flagged that a deal last month to speed up rare earth metal imports from China to the US would be on the agenda. He said: What I expect is continued monitoring and checking in on the implementation of our agreement thus far, making sure that key critical minerals are flowing between the parties and setting the groundwork for enhanced trade and balanced trade going forward. It came after the US and EU announced a deal to limit tariffs to 15%. The end of market uncertainty appeared to be welcomed at first by markets on Monday – only for the mood to sour somewhat later in the day. The French prime minister, François Bayrou, said the EU had capitulated to Donald Trump, and said it was a 'dark day' for the EU. Trump on Monday suggested that he could impose a 'world tariff' on all of the countries that have not agreed a trade deal. That tariff could be 15% or 20% – meaning that, after all the negotiating effort, the EU could be left with similar terms to the rest of the world. At his golf course in Scotland yesterday, while visiting UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Trump said: I would say it'll be somewhere in the 15 to 20% range. Probably one of those two numbers. On the prospects of Chinese talks, Trump said: I'd love to see China open up their country. Back in May, Trump had said that China had already 'agreed to open up' – but it appears there may be more work to be done. 9:30am BST: Bank of England mortgage approvals (June; previous: 63,032; consensus: 63,000) 9:30am BST: Bank of England consumer credit (June; previous: £859m; consensus: £1.2bn)

Security breach on Trump's Scotland visit sparks probe
Security breach on Trump's Scotland visit sparks probe

The Herald Scotland

time26 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Security breach on Trump's Scotland visit sparks probe

President Trump departed Joint Base Andrews for Scotland on board Air Force One on Friday of last week. The Secret Service confirmed that it is investigating the incident. Secret Service spokesperson Anthony Guglielmi said: 'The U.S. Secret Service is conducting a personnel investigation after an employee attempted to invite his spouse – a member of the United States Air Force – aboard a mission support flight. READ MORE Bagpipes, ballrooms and bluster: the day Trump came to Turnberry Donald Trump says he has 'alternative' plans for Gaza during visit to Scotland 'Scotland is a part of the world I want to thrive', says Donald Trump "The aircraft, operated by the U.S. Air Force, was being used by the Secret Service to transport personnel and equipment. 'Prior to the overseas departure, the employee was advised by supervisors that such action was prohibited, and the spouse was subsequently prevented from taking the flight. No Secret Service protectees were aboard and there was no impact to our overseas protective operation.' On the final day of his visit to Scotland on Tuesday, Trump will officially open his new golf course in Aberdeenshire. The US president's fifth day in Scotland follows a meeting and press conference with Sir Keir Starmer on Monday. Mr Trump will cut the ribbon on a second 18-hole course at his resort in Menie, Aberdeenshire before he flies back to the US on Air Force One. As they met at Turnberry for bilateral talks on trade and the situation in Gaza, Mr Trump and Sir Keir took part in what proved to be a lengthy press conference, with the president discussing a number of topics. The Republican Party leader spoke of his 'great love' for Scotland and said he wanted to see the nation 'thrive'. He returned to his long-running objections to wind turbines, branding them 'ugly monsters' and speaking of his admiration for North Sea oil and gas.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store