‘Never heard that': Donald Trump says he's unaware ‘shylock' is considered anti-Semitic; faces backlash
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
'I've never heard it that way. To me, Shylock is somebody that's a money lender at high rates,' Trump spoke to reporters after stepping off Air Force One. 'I've never heard it that way, you view it differently than me. I've never heard that.'
T
rump was heading back to Washington after the event in Iowa that marked the start of nationwide celebrations for the country's 250th anniversary, which will take place next year.
In his speech, he used the word while highlighting parts of the major domestic policy bill that Congress had passed just a few hours earlier.
"Think of that: No death tax. No estate tax. No going to the banks and borrowing from, in some cases, a fine banker - and in some cases, Shylocks and bad people,' he said during remarks at an Iowa rally.
The term 'Shylock' comes from the character in William Shakespeare's play The Merchant of Venice.
In the play, Shylock is a Jewish moneylender known for being harsh and demanding, famously insisting on a 'pound of flesh' from a merchant named Antonio if a loan wasn't repaid.
"The term 'Shylock' evokes a centuries-old antisemitic trope about Jews and greed that is extremely offensive and dangerous. President Trump's use of the term is very troubling and irresponsible," the Anti-Defamation League said in a post on X.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
'It underscores how lies and conspiracies about Jews remain deeply entrenched in our country. Words from our leaders matter and we expect more from the President of the United States,' the organisation added.
US Representative Dan Goldman, a Jewish Democrat, said, "This is blatant and vile antisemitism, and Trump knows exactly what he's doing."
Amy Spitalnick, CEO of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, said in a post on social media, 'Shylock is among the most quintessential antisemitic stereotypes. This is not an accident. It follows years in which Trump has normalized antisemitic tropes and conspiracy theories - and it's deeply dangerous.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
34 minutes ago
- Indian Express
HC junks plea challenging ex-CM Channi's election
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed an election petition challenging the victory of former Punjab CM and Congress member of Parliament Charanjit Singh Channi from the Jalandhar (SC) Lok Sabha seat. The petition, filed by Jalandhar-based social activist Gaurav Luthra, had accused Channi of indulging in corrupt practices, underreporting election expenses, and concealing material information in his affidavit submitted to the Election Commission. However, Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma on Thursday dismissed the case after Luthra's counsel repeatedly failed to appear in court. Channi, who won the Jalandhar seat in the June 4 results, was represented in court by advocate Nikhil Ghai. In his plea, Luthra alleged that Channi concealed key details in his Form 26 affidavit, including actual election expenditure. He claimed that a lavish round-the-clock langar at a local guest house, multiple roadshows, the hiring of singers, and a large number of public meetings were not properly accounted for in the expense register. The petitioner also alleged that local media, including news portals and TV channels, gave disproportionate coverage to Channi, amounting to paid news that was not reflected in his poll spending. Luthra had sought that Channi's election be declared void under Section 100 of the Representation of People Act, 1951.
Scroll.in
37 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Karnataka HC stays BJP defamation case against Deputy CM DK Shivakumar, state Congress
The Karnataka High Court on Friday stayed a defamation case filed by the Bharatiya Janata Party against Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar and the Congress' state unit, Bar and Bench reported. Justice SR Krishna Kumar heard preliminary arguments in the matter, and stayed the proceedings till the case is heard next. The judge issued a notice to the BJP, and adjourned the hearing till July 29, the Deccan Herald reported. The case pertains to allegations by the Congress that the previous BJP government in Karnataka took bribes from contractors. The Congress was elected to power in the state in 2023, displacing the BJP government. The BJP filed the defamation case against the Congress, party leader Rahul Gandhi and Shivakumar, objecting to newspaper advertisements with allegedly derogatory allegations about the previous BJP government between 2019 and 2023. The Congress had alleged that the government was charging a 40% commission or bribes from contractors for undertaking public works. The BJP alleged that the Congress was spreading false claims against its members, including the then Chief Minister Basavaraj Bommai. The High Court had stayed proceedings against Gandhi in the case on January 17. The advertisements based on which the BJP filed the defamation case accused the previous government in Karnataka of having looted Rs 1,500 crore through corrupt practices like charging commissions. They also alleged that the government had put in place 'rate cards' for bribes that purportedly had to be paid to secure government posts.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
38 minutes ago
- First Post
Decoding the ‘Big Beautiful Bill' that Donald Trump signed into law
During an outdoor event on the Fourth of July, US President Donald Trump signed the tax and spending cut bill into law at the White House on Friday. The nearly 900-page bill includes a mix of tax cuts, spending reductions, and key Republican priorities such as increased funding for national defence and immigration enforcement. Hundreds of Trump supporters attended the event, including White House staff, members of Congress, and military families read more Trump held the ceremony on the South Lawn of the White House on Independence Day. Reuters US President Donald Trump signed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' into law at the White House on Friday. This happened during an outdoor event on the Fourth of July. Military jets flew overhead as hundreds of supporters gathered to witness the signing. Trump signed the bill just one day after the Republican-led House of Representatives narrowly passed what has become the key legislation of his second term. Democrats stood united in opposition to the bill but were unable to stop it, while Republicans held together. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Senate passed the bill on Tuesday, with Vice President JD Vance casting the deciding vote. The House had earlier passed a version of the bill in May, winning by just one vote. The final version was passed on Thursday with a 218-214 margin. ALSO READ | He spoke for 8 hrs and 44 mins on Trump's 'one big, beautiful bill'. Who is Hakeem Jeffries? The bill, nearly 900 pages long, includes a collection of tax cuts, spending reductions, and other priorities for Republicans. These include new funding for national defence and immigration enforcement. Trump gave a 22-minute speech before signing the bill. Though brief, he appeared energised, especially as the bill's approval meant another recent success for his administration. This came after the campaign in Iran and several US Supreme Court decisions that he has fought for. Trump signed the bill into law during an outdoor event on the Fourth of July. Reuters Trump held the ceremony on the South Lawn of the White House on Independence Day, featuring a flyover by stealth bombers and fighter jets, some of which were involved in the recent strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. Hundreds of Trump supporters attended the event, including White House staff, members of Congress, and military families. Here's a look at what the bill includes and when some of its changes will start to apply: Reductions for businesses and new tax breaks Republicans say the bill is crucial because there would be a massive tax increase after December when tax breaks from Trump's first term expire. The legislation contains about $4.5 trillion in tax cuts. The existing tax rates and brackets would become permanent under the bill, solidifying the tax cuts approved in Trump's first term. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It would temporarily add new tax deductions on tip, overtime and auto loans. There's also a $6,000 deduction for older adults who earn no more than $75,000 a year, a nod to his pledge to end taxes on Social Security benefits. It would boost the $2,000 child tax credit to $2,200. Millions of families at lower income levels would not get the full credit. A cap on state and local deductions, called SALT, would quadruple to $40,000 for five years. It's a provision important to New York and other high-tax states, though the House wanted it to last for 10 years. There are scores of business-related tax cuts, including allowing businesses to immediately write off 100% of the cost of equipment and research. Proponents say this will boost economic growth. The wealthiest households would see a $12,000 increase from the legislation, and the bill would cost the poorest people $1,600 a year, mainly due to reductions in Medicaid and food aid, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office analysis of the House's version. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Funding the border wall, deportations and a missile shield The bill would provide some $350 billion for Trump's border and national security agenda, including for the U.S.-Mexico border wall and for 100,000 migrant detention facility beds, as he aims to fulfil his promise of the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history. Money would go for hiring 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, with $10,000 signing bonuses and a surge of Border Patrol officers, as well. The goal is to deport some 1 million people per year. To help pay for it, immigrants would face various new fees, including when seeking asylum protections. For the Pentagon, the bill would provide billions for shipbuilding, munitions systems, and quality of life measures for servicemen and women, as well as $25 billion for the development of the Golden Dome missile defence system. The Defence Department would have $1 billion for border security. Huge cuts to Medicaid, Snap To help partly offset the lost tax revenue and new spending, Republicans aim to cut back on Medicaid and food assistance for people below the poverty line. Republicans argue they are trying to rightsize the safety net programmes for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and food stamps, including older people up to age 65. Parents of children 14 and older would have to meet the programme's work requirements. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD There's also a proposed new $35 co-payment that can be charged to patients using Medicaid services. More than 71 million people rely on Medicaid, which expanded under Obama's Affordable Care Act, and 40 million use the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programme. Most already work, according to analysts. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law, and 3 million more would not qualify for food stamps, also known as Snap benefits. Republicans are looking to have states pick up some of the cost for Snap benefits. Currently, the federal government funds all benefit costs. Under the bill, states beginning in 2028 will be required to contribute a set percentage of those costs if their payment error rate exceeds 6%. Payment errors include both underpayments and overpayments. But the Senate bill temporarily delays the start date of that cost-sharing for states with the highest Snap error rates. Alaska has the highest error rate in the nation at nearly 25%, according to Department of Agriculture data. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, had fought for the exception. She was a decisive vote in getting the bill through the Senate. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD ALSO READ | Who gains and who loses most from Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill'? 'Big Beautiful' Bill cuts clean energy tax credits Republicans are proposing to dramatically roll back tax breaks designed to boost clean energy projects fuelled by renewable sources such as energy and wind. The tax breaks were a central component of former US President Joe Biden's 2022 landmark bill focused on addressing climate change and lowering health care costs. Democratic Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden went so far as to call the GOP provisions a 'death sentence for America's wind and solar industries and an inevitable hike in utility bills.' A tax break for people who buy new or used electric vehicles would expire on Sept. 30 of this year, instead of at the end of 2032 under current law. Meanwhile, a tax credit for the production of critical materials will be expanded to include metallurgical coal used in steelmaking. Hundreds of Trump supporters attended the event, including White House staff, members of Congress, and military families. Reuters Creation of 'Trump Accounts', funding national hero garden A number of extra provisions reflect other GOP priorities. The bill creates a new children's savings programme, called Trump Accounts, with a potential $1,000 deposit from the Treasury. The Senate provided $40 million to establish Trump's long-sought 'National Garden of American Heroes.' There's a new excise tax on university endowments and a new tax on remittances, or transfers of money that people in the US send abroad. The tax is equal to 1% of the transfer. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A $200 tax on gun silencers and short-barrelled rifles, and shotguns was eliminated. One provision bars for one year Medicaid payments to family planning providers that provide abortions, namely Planned Parenthood. Another section expands the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, a hard-fought provision from GOP Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, for those impacted by nuclear development and testing. Billions would go for the Artemis moon mission and for the exploration of Mars, while $88 million is earmarked for a pandemic response accountability committee. Additionally, a provision would increase the nation's debt limit by $5 trillion to allow continued borrowing to pay already accrued bills. State AI regulations cut from bill The Senate overwhelmingly revolted against a proposal meant to deter states from regulating artificial intelligence. Republican governors across the country asked for the moratorium to be removed, and the Senate voted to do so with a resounding 99-1 vote. A provision was thrown in at the final hours that will provide $10 billion annually to rural hospitals for five years, or $50 billion in total. The Senate bill had originally provided $25 billion for the programme, but that number was upped to win over holdout GOP senators and a coalition of House Republicans warning that reduced Medicaid provider taxes would hurt rural hospitals. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The amended bill also stripped out a new tax on wind and solar projects that use a certain percentage of components from China. Final price tag: Bill could add $3.3 trillion to deficit Altogether, the Congressional Budget Office projects that the bill would increase federal deficits over the next 10 years by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034. Or not, depending on how one does the maths. Senate Republicans are proposing a unique strategy of not counting the existing tax breaks as a new cost because those breaks are already 'current policy.' Republican senators say the Senate Budget Committee chairman has the authority to set the baseline for the preferred approach. Under the alternative Senate GOP view, the bill would reduce deficits by almost half a trillion dollars over the coming decade, the CBO said. Democrats say this is 'magic math' that obscures the true costs of the tax breaks. Some nonpartisan groups worried about the country's fiscal trajectory are siding with Democrats in that regard. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget says Senate Republicans were employing an 'accounting gimmick that would make Enron executives blush.' With inputs from AP
