Government ‘passive' in recovering £1.9bn of Covid loan losses, MPs warn
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) – comprised of cross-party MPs – criticised the lack of incentive for lenders to recover the money.
The bounce back loan scheme was set up in the early days of the Covid-19 lockdowns when businesses across the country were forced to close or faced a drop-off in demand.
It provided loans of up to £50,000 per business, and were available to most UK firms without the usual credit and affordability checks in order to be issued more quickly.
However, the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) estimated that total losses due to fraud on the bounce back loan scheme will be at least £1.9 billion – with the figure likely to be higher as not all fraudulent cases had been identified.
The DBT also said that some £130 million worth of losses had so far been recovered from the bounce back scheme – but said it was not possible to identify how much related to borrowers contracting them fraudulently.
The Government guaranteed to cover any losses incurred by lenders on loans which could not be repaid when the scheme began.
It has nonetheless withdrawn its backing on £367 million worth of loans where it felt lenders have not done all it should have done – meaning banks foot the bill, rather than taxpayers.
Earlier this month, Starling Bank said it had agreed to remove the Government guarantee on a group of loans that had potential issues – leading it to put aside some £28 million.
But the PAC said the broader guarantee meant there was a lack of incentive for banks to recover taxpayers' money.
Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chairman of the committee, criticised 'passivity' in the Government's approach.
'DBT were unable to tell us if even the tiny fraction of that sum recovered was in fact even related to fraud,' he said.
'Indeed, relying on government-backed lenders to recover losses, who thus lack any incentive to pursue lost funds, has been a dangerously flat-footed approach.
'Now that the Insolvency Service has taken over responsibility for viable cases, we look forward to hearing how it fares where others have failed.'
The DBT has been approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Learning from Ukraine and Israel, Taiwan to issue new air-raid guidance
TAIPEI, June 25 (Reuters) - Taiwan will issue new air-raid guidance for its citizens next week, according to security officials and internal planning documents reviewed by Reuters, learning lessons from Ukraine and Israel in case it needs to counter a Chinese military attack. "Taiwan is looking very closely into the cases from Ukraine and Israel," a senior Taiwan security official briefed on the matter told Reuters. "Our people must know how to protect themselves, either at home or in office," said the official, who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter. Authorities will update instructions on what people should do when air-raid alerts are issued, including for citizens who are not able to get into shelters in time or for those who are driving a car, according to the government planning documents. That includes instructions on hiding behind "at least two layers of walls" and "staying in the down position while opening your mouth slightly" in the scenario when people could not immediately get to an air-raid shelter. "In metropolitan Taiwan, the reality is that many residents of high-rise buildings may not be able to get to the designated air-raid shelters quickly within three minutes," a second security official said, adding the government is working to get citizens to learn "alternative" ways to protect themselves. Civil defence drills including rehearsals on setting up emergency supply stations will be held across the island alongside Taiwan's main annual "Han Kuang" military exercises in July, which will last for an unprecedented 10 days, the two officials said. Taiwan has been preparing air-raid shelters across the island, including in subway stations and shopping malls, after Russia's invasion of Ukraine raised new fears about a Chinese invasion. The capital of Taipei alone has more than 4,600 such shelters that can accommodate some 12 million people, more than four times its population. China views separately governed Taiwan as its own territory and has ramped up its military pressure over the past five years, including staging half a dozen rounds of war games. Taiwan's government rejects Beijing's sovereignty claims.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Top civil servant told to ‘get on it' after ruling on gender
Mr Griffin insisted the Scottish Government was 'taking action where we think that is appropriate and possible', pending a further update from regulators at the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC). But with two women's rights groups – For Women Scotland and Sex Matters – now threatening further legal action against the Scottish Government, Ms Thomson told the top civil servant he should 'get on it'. She challenged the Permanent Secretary on the issue in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling back in April that the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. That judgment came about after a challenge to the Scottish Government by For Women Scotland – with ministers, including First Minister John Swinney, making clear that while they accept that, they are waiting for further guidance from the EHRC before acting. The Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body made changes to its policy on the use of toilet facilities in the Holyrood building in May (Image: Jane Barlow/PA) Ms Thomson however pointed out that at Holyrood the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body has ruled that the use of toilet facilities designated as either male or female will be based on biological sex – preventing trans people from using the toilet of their preferred gender. Mr Griffin insisted there is a 'range of action we have been taking already', adding that Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville had tasked him with leading a short life working group 'to take stock of the actions we need to take'. Speaking as he gave evidence to MSPs on the Finance and Public Administration Committee, Mr Griffin said: 'These are the actions we are taking while we wait for the end of the EHRC process to review their statutory guidance. 'Once that is finalised we will then be able to take a further series of actions.' He added: 'We are taking action where we think that is appropriate and possible, pending the finalisation of the EHRC guidance.' READ MORE: When Ms Thomson then demanded to know what action had been taken 'beyond talking about taking action', Mr Griffin told her: 'Specific actions, I can't give you that right now.' But he insisted the work being done was looking to 'prepare the ground' so that the government is ready to implement changes once the EHRC guidance is finalised. The Permanent Secretary said: 'We in the Scottish Government are in a very similar position to the UK Government and the Welsh Government in our understanding of our responsibility being we need to wait for the guidance for the implementation of some actions.' Michelle Thomson insisted Scotland's most senior civil servant needs to 'get on it' and act after a landmark Supreme Court ruling (Image: Andrew Milligan/PA) But with two potential further legal challenges that Ms Thomson said could potentially result in a 'significant loss of public money', the SNP MSP told him she was 'staggered why you are not acting now'. Mr Griffin said the advice he was given 'remains nevertheless that we should wait for the statutory regulator to finalise their guidance'. He added: 'I am assured that the advice that I've got is the correct advice. 'We find ourselves in a very similar position to our colleagues at Westminster and in Cardiff.' But Ms Thomson told him: 'I think my firm advice to you would be to look afresh at that. It is no justification under law, frankly, to say: 'Ah well, that's what everybody else was doing.' 'The Supreme Court judgment was compellingly clear, there is a threat of two further legal actions. My firm advice to you, Permanent Secretary, would be to get on it, because I think you are ultimately the accountable officer responsible for ensuring the Scottish Government upholds the law. 'And regardless of your view in this matter, I personally think it is a very poor look that we're 10 weeks later and we haven't done anything about it.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Tory peer Liam Booth-Smith takes job at AI firm he encountered at No 10
A former chief of staff to Rishi Sunak who was made a Conservative peer has taken a job as 'external affairs' chief at an artificial intelligence company that he encountered while working at No 10. Liam Booth-Smith, who entered the House of Lords last year, has joined Anthropic, which recently signed a memorandum of understanding about working with the government on AI. His former boss Sunak was a supporter of the UK leading on AI during his time as prime minister, and hosted a meeting where Anthropic was present in May 2023 – which was attended by Booth-Smith as an observer. The Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba) said Booth-Smith should not engage in any lobbying on behalf of Anthropic for at least two years after leaving the government. Anthropic confirmed to Acoba his role would not involve lobbying and that it would abide by its terms. The committee said that Booth-Smith had not had any role in commercial or contractual decisions relating to Anthropic but noted that No 10 had overall oversight of AI policy. But it added: 'The committee's view is that there remains a risk associated with Lord Booth Smith's influence in government, particularly as he seeks to take up a role in external affairs. Anthropic is currently developing a UK presence to promote its services with a wide range of applications, including with and across the UK government. 'Lord Booth-Smith must avoid engaging in activity that could reasonably be seen as seeking to influence government decisions, including approaching the government, whether special advisers, other officials or ministers about its approach or policy on Anthropic's behalf. If he was to initiate contact with the UK government it would be difficult to manage the risk that this is seen as lobbying.' In addition to a two-year lobbying ban, it advised that Booth-Smith should not draw on any privileged information available to him from his time in government, make use of any contacts made in government to influence policy, or provide advice to Anthropic on any policy he had specific involvement in or responsibility for as chief of staff at No 10 for two years. As a peer, Lord Booth-Smith is already banned from lobbying the government on any subject. Gabe Winn, the chief executive of Blakeney, a lobbying firm, who is campaigning against peers being paid to offer political advice to companies, questioned whether Booth-Smith should be doing the external affairs role for an AI company as well as being a legislator. An Anthropic spokesperson said: 'Liam Booth-Smith is following all applicable Acoba guidance and the House of Lords Code of Conduct in his role.' Booth-Smith has been approached for comment.
