logo
Staffing shortages, old facilities, and ‘nothing to lose': These are the factors that contribute to prison breaks across the country

Staffing shortages, old facilities, and ‘nothing to lose': These are the factors that contribute to prison breaks across the country

CNN27-05-2025

It sounded like something out of a movie: Ten inmates at a New Orleans jail surreptitiously cut through cell walls using electric hair trimmers before fleeing into the dead of night when an employee tasked with watching security cameras stepped away for food.
But it was real life — and experts say escapes from correctional facilities happen every year across the country.
The New Orleans escapes have attracted media attention in part because of the inmates' 'fantastical escape method,' according to Bryce Peterson, a research scientist who studies law enforcement and corrections facilities at CNA, a security-focused research organization.
But so-called 'flight escapes,' in which inmates have to overcome a physical barrier by 'either through tunneling or cutting or climbing,' are not unheard of in reality, Peterson said.
Neither are 'deception escapes,' like the Sunday escape of an Arkansas former police chief serving decades-long sentences for rape and murder, who reportedly donned a makeshift law enforcement outfit when he escaped from prison.
'Escapes like this happen every year,' Peterson told CNN.
It's difficult to know exactly how many escapes take place annually due to a lack of centralized data collection. Peterson noted that escapes from minimum-security facilities, like halfway houses, are much more common than those at jails and prisons. Federal data shows escape offenses accounted for less than one percent (0.4%) of all federal offenses between 2017 and 2021.
Most escapes from correctional facilities never become news because the escapees are recaptured shortly, Peterson said.
The recent escapes follow several other high-profile breakouts, like that of Danilo Cavalcante, a convicted murderer who escaped from a Pennsylvania prison, sparking a two-week manhunt, and the escape of four inmates from a Georgia jail in 2023.
Here's more on what we know about jail and prison escapes – and the factors that make them possible.
Prison and jail escapes happen when inmates have a combination of two things: 'Motivation and opportunity,' said Peterson.
Motivation is 'inherent,' he said, particularly among inmates facing more serious charges. 'They have nothing to lose,' Peterson added.
These inmates are also more likely to attempt to break out of jails, where security is lower and the environment more 'chaotic,' before they're moved to a more secure prison.
In the New Orleans case, inmates seem to have capitalized on a 'confluence' of factors that provided the opportunity to escape, Peterson said, including understaffing and faulty locks at the facility, as well as help on both the inside and the outside.
Peterson noted that escapees receiving outside assistance — like from friends or family members — is much more common than receiving help from staff inside a prison or jail.
At least 13 people have been arrested for allegedly assisting the New Orleans escapees either before, during or after the jailbreak. The district attorney has pledged to 'identify and hold accountable anyone who facilitated or assisted with this historic jailbreak.'
Staying free may be even harder than escaping. Around 91 percent of escapees are recaptured within a year, according to a 2024 study led by Peterson. And of those recaptured, 81.5 percent were back in custody within 1 week of the escape.
'Most people are recaptured pretty quickly, but the longer you're out, the more likely it is that you're gonna stay out for a long period of time,' he said.
In New Orleans, where the two remaining escapees have spent more than a week on the lam, 'it's looking more and more likely that some of them are gonna be out for a long time before they're recaptured.'
The most consistent factor that contributes to prison or jail escapes is human error linked to staffing shortages, several experts told CNN.
'Somebody took a shortcut, didn't do what they were supposed to do,' Joseph Gunja, a security consultant who previously worked as a warden for several federal prisons, told CNN. 'The inmates figured out how they were gonna use that weakness to their advantage, and escaped.'
'Sometime it's just a small mistake, like, you don't pat search somebody, or you don't search a cell, or you let an inmate go into an area he shouldn't be,' he said. 'And then those things pile up.'
Sometimes inmates may watch and monitor certain mistakes or lapses in security for months before planning an escape, Gunja said.
Similarly, Joe Russo, a program manager at the University of Denver whose research focuses on institutional and community corrections technologies, told CNN that correctional facilities 'live and die by their staff.'
Staff shortages have increased since the Covid-19 pandemic, he said, and some facilities have lowered their educational requirements to try to meet staffing targets. Russo was the lead author of a 2019 report that identified insufficient staffing as the primary threat to security at correctional facilities.
'When staff are stretched too thin, or tired, or fatigued, or overly stressed, or traumatized, whatever the case might be, you have lowered vigilance,' he added.
Orleans Parish Sheriff Susan Hutson has cited understaffing as a key contributor to the disaster. The jail is only about 60% staffed, and 150 more deputies are needed, the sheriff said.
On the morning of May 16, when the escape occurred, there were four supervisors and 36 staff on-site, which Chief of Corrections Jay Mallett called a 'low ratio.'
Aging facilities with faltering equipment can also contribute to escapes.
'A lot of facilities out there have aging infrastructure,' Russo told CNN. 'They're kind of crumbling, a lot of deferred maintenance over the years because they don't have the money to keep these facilities up to par.'
'You may not have the proper camera coverage,' he said. 'There may be blind spots in the facility. Or they're just not taking advantage of the latest technologies out there that could prevent escapes.'
In New Orleans, the sheriff has highlighted locks she said were defective and called for funding to update correctional facilities. 'There are deficiencies in these facilities that cause public safety concerns,' she said.
Police are also heavily reliant on tips from the local community to help recapture escaped inmates, Petersen explained.
So when the community has a fractured relationship with police, that can make it harder to recapture escapees.
'When there's a lack of trust in social structure and the police and law and courts, of course folks are gonna be less willing to turn turn someone in,' Russo said.
'It's kind of a sad, double-edged sword, where these folks are responsible for committing crimes and violence in the community, but yet due to that lack of trust in law enforcement, they're not brought to justice,' he said.
This is particularly true in Louisiana, where police have faced accusations of systemic misconduct. In January, the Department of Justice found a years-long pattern of 'unlawful conduct' at Louisiana State Police that put the public at 'serious risk of harm.'
Fourteen years ago, the department accused the New Orleans Police Department of unconstitutional conduct, triggering the nation's 'most expansive Consent Decree' in a bid for sweeping reforms. Among other changes, the department implemented widespread usage of body-worn cameras among officers.
Despite the reforms, mistrust of law enforcement is widespread: Residents are five times as likely to hold a negative view of city police as a positive view, according to a 2024 survey by the New Orleans Crime Coalition.
'If we feel like the law enforcement was here to help us, we would help them,' one New Orleans resident, 48-year-old Mario Westbrook, told the Associated Press.
'Our community, the police come back here, they have no respect for us as human beings,' Westbrook said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial, Cassie Ventura's friend Bryana Bongolan to testify
Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial, Cassie Ventura's friend Bryana Bongolan to testify

CNN

time9 minutes ago

  • CNN

Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial, Cassie Ventura's friend Bryana Bongolan to testify

Update: Date: Title: Court is back from lunch Content: Judge Arun Subramanian is on the bench. The jury is entering now. Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey said they intend to call Enrique Santos to the stand before Jane. Update: Date: Title: Judge warns Combs could be excluded from courtroom for repeatedly nodding at jury during Bongolan's testimony Content: Judge Arun Subramanian warned the defense that Sean 'Diddy' Combs could be excluded from the courtroom if he continues to attempt to interact with the jury. The judge said he saw Combs on two different occasions during Bryana Bongolan's testimony, looking at the jury and 'nodding vigorously.' Combs was previously seen nodding during the testimony of George Kaplan, his former assistant. Subramanian said he already warned the defense that Combs can't be making any facial expressions or attempts to have any interaction with or influence the jury. 'I could not have been any clearer in terms of what I said,' the judge said. 'Well, there was a line of questioning when your client was nodding vigorously and looking at the jury,' Subramanian said. During a sidebar, the judge said he saw Combs doing it a second time. 'I looked and I saw your client looking at the jury and nodding vigorously.' 'It is absolutely unacceptable,' Subramanian said. He asked defense attorney Marc Agnifilo, 'Is it going to happen again?' Agnifilo assured him it wouldn't. 'It cannot happen again,' the judge said. And if it does, Subramanian said he'll let the government make an application to give the jury an instruction on the issue and will consider more severe measures, such as excluding Combs from the courtroom. Update: Date: Title: This is what it takes to prove racketeering conspiracy Content: Prosecutors have charged Sean 'Diddy' Combs with racketeering conspiracy and are currently laying out their case on how the music mogul's conduct meets the criteria for the charge. Combs has pleaded not guilty to the racketeering charge as well as sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution. If convicted on all counts, he could face up to life in prison. What is racketeering? Racketeering is 'not a specific crime — it's a way of thinking about and prosecuting a variety of crimes,' attorney G. Robert Blakey told CNN. Racketeering means engaging in an illegal scheme. It's used in the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, known as RICO, to describe 35 offenses, including kidnapping, murder, bribery, arson and extortion. Prosecutors must prove a pattern involving at least two instances of racketeering activity to convict someone under the law. RICO criteria: According to the US Justice Department, to convict someone of racketeering, prosecutors must prove five different criteria: The minimum sentence for racketeering varies by jurisdiction and severity of the crime. Convicted racketeers can also face fines. Prosecutors in Combs' case are using witness testimony, like from Cassie Ventura, Bryana Bongolan and 'Mia,' to prove RICO charges against him. Legal analysts have said witness testimony is key to proving the various aspects of the RICO charge against Combs, including establishing the workings of a criminal enterprise and coercion. Other cases: The federal government has used racketeering to go after a dozen college athletic figures and test administrators in the largest college admissions scandal ever prosecuted, former President Donald Trump and musicians like R. Kelly and Young Thug. Update: Date: Title: The jury is taking a short break. Catch up on what has happened in court so far Content: Bryana Bongolan, a friend of Cassie Ventura's who is testifying under an immunity order, completed her testimony this morning. Enrique Santos is expected to be called to the stand when the jury returns from break. Here's what she testified this morning: Update: Date: Title: "I care about justice," Bongolan says, when questioned on her motives for accusing Combs Content: The defense briefly addressed Bryana Bongolan one more time before her testimony concluded, with attorney Nicole Westmoreland asking if her lawsuit against Combs is Bongolan's 'opportunity to become a millionaire.' 'I can't agree with that,' Bongolan said. Westmoreland pointed out that Bongolan is seeking $10 million in her civil lawsuit and asked if Bongolan cared about becoming a millionaire. 'I care about justice,' Bongolan said. She is now off the stand and court is going to a break. The jury was dismissed until 1:30 p.m. ET. Update: Date: Title: Bongolan testifies she's certain Combs held her on balcony Content: Assistant US Attorney Madison Smyser asked Bryana Bongolan if she had testified truthfully to the best of her recollection about the alleged incident with Sean 'Diddy' Combs on Cassie Ventura's balcony. Bongolan said yes and acknowledged she doesn't remember every single detail, but said she'll never forget some parts of that altercation. Bongolan said she was terrified in that moment and said, 'I will never forget him holding me on that balcony.' Smyser also asked Bongolan, 'Do you yourself know the exact date of when the balcony incident occurred?' 'No,' Bongolan said. 'Why do you not know that exact date?' 'Because it was a while ago,' Bongolan said. In closing the redirect examination, Smyser asked Bongolan, 'Regardless of the exact date, do you have any doubt that Mr Combs held you up on that balcony on the 17th floor?' 'I have no doubt,' Bongolan said. Update: Date: Title: Bongolan says Ventura asked to name her in lawsuit before filing Content: Assistant US Attorney Madison Smyser is beginning redirect. Bryana Bongolan testified that she and Cassie Ventura had only one conversation about Ventura's lawsuit before it was filed in November 2023. Ventura asked Bongolan if she could name her in the complaint in connection with the balcony incident, according to Bongolan. Bongolan said she did not know what information would be included in Ventura's suit. Bongolan said that at some point after Ventura's lawsuit was filed, she told Ventura that some details about the balcony incident were incorrect. Bongolan testified that during that conversation, she told Ventura 'exactly what happened to me.' Update: Date: Title: Defense asks Bongolan directly if she's lying to the jury before wrapping up cross-examination Content: Defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland asked Bryana Bongolan to confirm that 'Mr. Combs did not cause you the injuries that you showed us that we saw on your phone with the metadata from September 26, 2016.' 'I can't agree with you,' Bongolan said. In her final question, Westmoreland pressed further, saying: 'You came in here and you lied to the ladies and gentlemen of the jury.' 'I can't agree with you,' Bongolan replied once again. Westmoreland's cross examination is over. Update: Date: Title: Combs' attorney questions Bongolan's timeline of alleged balcony incident Content: Defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland suggested the alleged balcony incident couldn't have happened when Bryana Bongolan says it did because Sean 'Diddy' Combs was traveling on the East Coast to perform in the Bad Boy Family Reunion Tour and Cassie Ventura was with him. Combs performed in Newark, New Jersey, on September 25 2016, Westmoreland said, and Combs and Ventura went to an event in New York City on September 26. In her testimony, Bongolan linked the alleged balcony altercation to a photo of a bruise on her leg that she said was taken hours after the incident. According to metadata from Bongolan's phone, the photo was taken on the morning of September 26. Westmoreland also showed the jury records for 'Frank Black' from the Trump International Hotel in New York City, which included dining receipts for September 25 and 26, 2016. Records from the Trump Hotel stay showed the check-in date was September 24, 2016, and the check-out date was September 29, 2016. 'You agree that one person can't be in two places at the same time,' Westmoreland asked. Bongolan responded, 'In theory, yeah,' and 'I can't answer that one.' Update: Date: Title: Combs messaged Bongolan about friends stopping each other from making mistakes while high Content: Sean 'Diddy' Combs sent Bryana Bongolan a message saying that friends should try to stop each other from making mistakes when they get high together. 'If you're gonna do k with her at least have her back,' Combs wrote, according to the message read aloud in court. Defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland asked Bongolan if she believed Combs wanted her to stop using so many drugs with Cassie Ventura. 'I can't speak for him,' Bongolan said. Update: Date: Title: Defense questions why Bongolan maintained contact with Ventura and Combs after alleged attack Content: The defense is pressing Bryana Bongolan over her continued friendship with Cassie Ventura and proximity to Sean 'Diddy' Combs in the time after he allegedly held her over a 17-story balcony in 2016. Defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland pointed out that in the weeks following the alleged attack, Bongolan texted Ventura offering to get Combs a hoodie. 'We were trying to be cool,' Bongolan said. According to text messages from October 9, 2016, between Ventura and Bongolan, she also agreed to sleep over at Ventura's apartment about two weeks after the balcony incident took place, according to her testimony. 'Isn't it true that you continued to hang out with Mr. Combs and you continued to spend the night at Ms. Ventura's house because Mr. Combs did not cause you those injuries?' Westmoreland asked Bongolan. 'Part of that statement is correct and part of that statement I can't agree with,' Bongolan replied. Update: Date: Title: Bongolan says she kept her distance from Combs after alleged incident Content: Bryana Bongolan testified that she continued to see Sean 'Diddy' Combs occasionally after the balcony incident in late September 2016. Defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland asked if she was afraid to be around Combs. 'I kept my distance,' Bongolan said. Bongolan confirmed that she went to one of Combs' concerts on October 4, 2016. 'I don't think I was around him most of the time,' she said. She also confirmed that she went to a club that Combs rented out the following day, on October 5. Westmoreland asked if she wore her neck brace to the private party. 'I probably should have but didn't,' Bongolan said. Update: Date: Title: Defense presses Bongolan on whether Cassie Ventura saw balcony incident Content: Defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland asked Bryana Bongolan if her longtime friend Cassie Ventura witnessed the moment Sean 'Diddy' Combs allegedly dangled her over a balcony, which has been central to Bongolan's testimony in Combs' federal criminal trial. Bongolan said she heard Ventura's voice during the incident, but said she couldn't speak for her. Westmoreland suggested Bongolan had told prosecutors several times that Ventura saw the incident. 'I spoke to them, but again, I don't recall,' Bongolan said. Update: Date: Title: Bongolan shown texts with drug photos she sent Ventura after alleged threat from Combs Content: Defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland showed Bryana Bongolan texts with photos of drugs that Bongolan sent to Cassie Ventura in the month after she alleges Sean 'Diddy' Combs threatened her at a photoshoot in April 2016. Bongolan testified that the images she sent Ventura appear to be drugs, but said she isn't sure what type. Bongolan confirmed that she and Ventura continued their friendship as usual at the time, despite the alleged threats from Combs. Update: Date: Title: Bongolan is back on the stand Content: Bryana Bongolan, a longtime friend of Cassie Ventura, is on the stand. The jury is entering now. Defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland is continuing cross-examination. Update: Date: Title: Judge questions relevance of Bongolan's alleged balcony incident in Combs case Content: Judge Arun Subramanian asked the prosecution why Bryana Bongolan's alleged balcony incident is relevant to the charges against Sean 'Diddy' Combs in the indictment. Assistant US Attorney Christy Slavik said the incident with Bongolan in Cassie Ventura's apartment shows the jury how Combs' violence extended beyond Ventura to other people close to her, which helps prove Combs' alleged coercion of Ventura. Bongolan's testimony will continue shortly. Update: Date: Title: Combs accuser expected to read text messages aloud in court during her closely watched testimony Content: Jane, one of Sean 'Diddy' Combs' accusers who is testifying under a pseudonym, will read text message conversations aloud in the courtroom when she takes the stand, prosecutors said this morning. The discussion arose as a group of media outlets argued for access to the exhibits admitted into evidence during Jane's testimony. As of now, the judge has said no exhibits will be shown to the public in the courtroom and the prosecution will eventually release the exhibits to the press. While Judge Arun Subramanian denied the media application, Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey said she'll have Jane read text messages aloud, so they'll be heard in open court and captured on the record in the daily transcript. When to expect Jane on the stand: The defense's cross-examination of Bryana Bongolan, a longtime friend of Cassie Ventura, is expected to continue this morning. Prosecutors have said they'll call Enrique Santos next. His time on the stand is expected to be short, and afterward, Jane's closely watched testimony is expected to begin. Update: Date: Title: Balcony incident testimony shows "mob-like behavior" prosecutors need to prove case, legal expert says Content: A woman's testimony that Sean 'Diddy' Combs' dangled her over a 17-story balcony demonstrated the 'mob-like behavior' that prosecutors need to prove racketeering conspiracy, former federal prosecutor Alyse Adamson said today. Bryana Bongolan testified yesterday that Combs held her over a balcony and threw her onto balcony furniture in September 2016. The incident was previously mentioned in a civil suit filed by Bongolan against Combs in November 2024. 'I think it's extremely impactful, if the jury ultimately believes it,' Adamson said on 'CNN This Morning with Audie Cornish.' 'That's mob-like behavior,' Adamson said. 'And that's what prosecutors need' to prove the racketeering conspiracy aspect of the case. 'He needs to be behaving in a pattern of abuse, threats, and violence. That's the theme.' Adamson said it was notable that Bongolan was not an intimate partner of Combs. 'I think the prosecution scored points eliciting this testimony, but now we're going to see how she holds up on cross,' Adamson said. Bongolan is set to return to the stand for more cross-examination at 11 a.m. today. Combs has pleaded not guilty to charges that include racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking. If convicted on all counts, he could face up to life in prison. Adamson noted 'it only takes one juror' for there to be a hung jury. 'The defense seems to be extremely strategic in how they are doing things,' Adamson said. 'Sometimes the strategy isn't always, 'Well, let's just get a straight acquittal.' … Sometimes we need to be more surgical, more strategic' and focus on jurors who are 'feeling our narrative.' Update: Date: Title: This is a recap of what happened in court yesterday Content: A forensic video expert and a woman who said Sean 'Diddy' Combs dangled her over a balcony took the stand yesterday in the hip-hop mogul's federal criminal trial. Here's what we learned in testimony Wednesday: Hotel surveillance video was not manually altered, expert says Woman says Combs held her over a balcony Bongolan talks threats and drug use Update: Date: Title: Here's who has taken the stand so far in the Combs' trial Content: Bryana Bongolan, a longterm friend of Cassie Ventura, and a forensic audio and video editor took the stand yesterday in the criminal trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs. Bongolan is expected to testify again this morning. Here's a look at who else has taken the stand:

Live updates: Trump and Musk escalate public feud over agenda bill
Live updates: Trump and Musk escalate public feud over agenda bill

CNN

time9 minutes ago

  • CNN

Live updates: Trump and Musk escalate public feud over agenda bill

Update: Date: Title: Elon Musk says Trump would have lost the election without him Content: Elon Musk said President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans would have lost the 2024 election without his support. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk said in a post on X. Musk was responding to Trump's statement in the the Oval Office today that he didn't need the tech billionaire to win the election. 'I would have won Pennsylvania regardless of Elon,' Trump said. 'I'm very disappointed with Elon.' Musk spent more than $290 million on the 2024 election, according to filings with the Federal Election Commission. The massive sum was rivaled by only a handful of competing mega donors. Update: Date: Title: Republican senators downplay Musk pressure campaign Content: Republicans senators are so far brushing off Elon Musk's call to his massive social media following to turn up the heat on Republican elected officials. 'I don't know,' GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina told CNN when asked if his office was receiving more pressure. 'Nobody is calling me.' GOP Sen. Bernie Moreno of Ohio also said that he has not received an uptick of constituent calls, telling CNN, 'No. I mean, honestly, as you know, most normal people don't watch the inconsistencies of how the sausage is made.' He said that usually those that do call have only seen 'misinformation' about the bill. 'There's a difference in mandatory spending and discretionary spending. So once we explain to them what we're actually doing, they buy into the whole process.' Asked about Musk's influence and platform, and how that could affect support for Trump's agenda, Moreno shot back: 'President Trump has the biggest platform on earth, and the platform that he's advocating for is to prevent that $4 trillion tax increase, fund our military, secure our border and strengthen Medicaid.' GOP Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama said 'nah' when asked if he felt like he was under more of a spotlight since Musk made a direct ask to his followers to call elected officials. 'The deal is not done. We got three more weeks. And it will change many times between now and three weeks from now,' Tuberville said. GOP Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who has been publicly opposing the legislation, said: 'I'll say in my office, most of the calls, the vast majority, are voting no. But my guess is that's not coming from either my supporters or President Trump's supporters. I take that seriously. I look at it.' Update: Date: Title: Trump is the "key person" to end war in Ukraine, says German chancellor Content: German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that President Donald Trump is the 'key person' to bring about an end to the war in Ukraine 'by putting pressure on Russia.' 'We both agree on this war and how terrible this war is going on, and we are both looking for ways to stop it very soon. And I told the president … he is the key person in the world who can really do that now by putting pressure on Russia,' Merz said. The German leader reiterated his country's steadfast commitment to Ukraine, adding that the horrific images from the battlefield are caused by 'Russian weapons against Ukraine.' 'Ukraine is only targeting military targets, not civilians, not energy infrastructure. So this is the difference, and that's the reason why we are trying to do more on Russia,' Merz added. Update: Date: Title: Elon Musk live-posts responses to Trump during bilateral meeting Content: In a stunning real-time response on X, Elon Musk responded to President Donald Trump's comments about him after the tech billionaire slammed his signature legislation. Musk, until recently a White House special employee who oversaw the administration's cost-cutting efforts, denied Trump's claim that the Tesla CEO knew the inner workings of the president's so-called 'big beautiful bill.' Musk also countered that the elimination of America's electric vehicle tax incentives has nothing to do with his opposition to the massive domestic policy bill. 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Musk wrote. 'Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill,' Musk said in a separate post. 'In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this! Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.' Update: Date: Title: Trump sidesteps on Russia sanctions and compares Ukraine war to children's fight Content: President Donald Trump declined to offer specifics on sanctions on Russia during a meeting with German Chancellor Merz in the Oval Office. 'It's in my brain, the deadline, when I see the moment where it's not going to stop,' Trump said, and then looked on to Merz, saying, 'I'm sure you're going to do the same thing.' Trump then added, 'we'll be very, very, very tough,' when pressed about sanctions on Russia. 'And it could be on both countries to be honest. You know, it takes two to tango,' Trump said. Without directly addressing whether he would impose Russian sanctions, the president described a conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin, in which he said he gave an analogy likening the war to a playground fight. 'Sometimes you see two young children fighting like crazy. They hate each other, and they're fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart. They don't want to be pulled, sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart.' Trump continued: 'And I gave that analogy to Putin yesterday, I said, president, maybe you're going to have to keep fighting and suffering a lot, because both sides are suffering before you pull them apart, before they're able to be pulled apart.' Update: Date: Title: Trump says US will 'hopefully' have a deal with EU Content: President Donald Trump on Thursday struck a positive tone on a potential trade deal with the European Union during a meeting at the White House with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. 'We'll have a good trade deal,' Trump said. 'I guess that will be mostly determined by the European Union, but you're a very big part of that, so you'll be involved,' Trump said to Merz. Trump's major tariffs on the EU, including a threatened 50% tariff, have been delayed until July 9. Germany is still impacted by tariffs including Trump's 25% tariff on autos, which is in effect. The president said that 'hopefully' there will be a trade deal, or the United States will 'do the tariffs.' 'I mean, I'm okay with the tariffs, or we make a deal with the trade, and I guess that's what we're discussing,' he said. Trump's optimistic remarks came hours after the president separately spoke with Chinese President Xi Jinping on a phone call. Investors and economists have been on edge about the impact of the president's trade war. Wall Street in recent weeks has started to bet that Trump will back down on his most aggressive trade war threats. That's spawned the phrase TACO trade, which stands for Trump Always Chickens Out. US stocks were in the green during the meeting between Trump and Merz. The Dow rose 130 points, or 0.3%. The S&P 500 was also up 0.3% and the Nasdaq Composite was up 0.5%. Update: Date: Title: Trump says he's "very disappointed" in Musk, confirming their deteriorating relationship Content: President Donald Trump appeared to confirm the deterioration of his relationship with Elon Musk, saying he was 'very disappointed' in the tech billionaire, who exited his top advisory role at the White House and subsequently railed against the president's sweeping tax and spending package. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office less than one week after the two exchanged effusive praise on Musk's last day. Since then, Musk has strongly criticized what Trump calls his 'Big, Beautiful Bill' that has passed the House and faces an uncertain path forward in the Senate, calling the bill, which is a major Trump priority, a 'disgusting abomination.' Trump and Musk have not spoken since Musk lashed out at the legislation, a source familiar with the dynamic told CNN. 'He knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' Trump said. The president predicted that though Musk had not personally attacked him, he could soon. 'I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot,' Trump said. Kristen Holmes and Hadas Gold contributed to this post. Update: Date: Title: Trump says he and Xi 'straightened out complexity' of trade deal in phone call Content: President Donald Trump said Thursday that trade talks with China remain on track and that he and Chinese President Xi Jinping 'straightened out any complexity' after a long-awaited phone call earlier in the day. 'We had a very good talk, and we've straightened out any complexity. This is very complex stuff, and we straightened it out,' Trump said from the Oval Office after welcoming German Chancellor Friedrich Merz to the White House. 'I think we're in very good shape with China and the trade deal,' Trump said. 'We're going to just make sure that everybody understands what the deal is.' The president added that he expected to be traveling to China at some point. 'By the way, he invited me to China, and I invited him here. We both accepted. So I'll be going there with the first lady at a certain point, and he'll be coming here, hopefully, with the first lady of China.' Update: Date: Title: Trump explains why Egypt not part of travel ban after Egyptian national's antisemitic attack in Boulder Content: President Donald Trump said Thursday that Egypt was not included in the list of countries subject to a new travel ban because he believes the country '(has) things under control.' CNN previously reported that Trump made the final decision to sign the proclamation after the antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado. The suspect in the attack was an Egyptian national. Asked why Egypt was not one of the banned countries unveiled on Wednesday, Trump said, 'Egypt has been a country that we deal with very closely. They have things under control. The countries that we have don't have things under control.' The travel ban, Trump added, 'can't come soon enough. Frankly, we want to keep bad people out of our country. The Biden administration allowed some horrendous people, and we're getting them out one by one, we're not stopping until we get them out.' The countries included, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said Wednesday, 'include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information.' Update: Date: Title: Trump says he thinks Harvard is 'starting to behave' Content: President Donald Trump said Thursday he thinks Harvard is 'starting to behave,' suggesting the university would be handing over a list of international students attending the school. 'Harvard didn't want to give us that list. They're going to be giving us the list now. I think they're starting to behave, actually, if you want to know the truth,' he told reporters in the Oval Office while meeting with German leader Friedrich Merz. On Wednesday, Trump signed a proclamation suspending international visas for new students at Harvard University. The proclamation temporarily blocks the entry of nearly all new international Harvard students under visas most use to study at US universities or participate in academic exchange programs. Trump on Thursday was asked if he would allow Chinese students into US universities after speaking with Chinese leader Xi Jinping earlier in the day. 'Chinese students are coming. No problem. It's an honor to have them, frankly. We want to have foreign students but we want them to be checked, you know. In the case of Harvard and Columbia and others – all we want to do is see their list. There's no problem with that,' the president said. Update: Date: Title: NOW: Trump greets German chancellor at White House Content: President Donald Trump is meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz at the White House. It's the first time the two are meeting in-person and comes amid a series of high-stakes International issues. Update: Date: Title: Lawmakers respond to Trump administration's travel ban Content: Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley and Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin, leaders on the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee, shared contrasting perspectives on the travel ban that the Trump administration imposed on 12 countries last night. Grassley, the GOP chair of the committee, said the president was within his rights to impose the ban, referencing national security priorities and 'some terrorist attacks we've had in the United States.' Grassley said he is 'very comfortable' with Trump's proclamation, 'because the president's number-one responsibility is the national security of the United States. And I don't know what the basis was for him making that decision, but I assume it's come because of some terrorist attacks we've had in the United States.' Trump made the final call on signing the proclamation after the antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado, according to a White House official. He was considering it beforehand, but Sunday's assault put it into motion faster. Grassley continued, saying 'not only that, but it's a foreign policy issue, and you know how the Constitution gives the president of the United States wide sway in foreign policy.' Durbin, meanwhile, criticized the move, saying, 'I don't understand it.' 'The president said this situation, terrible crime in Boulder, was the reason for this. The individual in Boulder was from Egypt,' the Illinois Democrat said. 'The president did not include Egypt on his list of nations of people we don't want in the United States. I can't follow his thinking on this at all.' Update: Date: Title: Trump proclaims Xi call had "very positive conclusion" on trade issues Content: President Donald Trump concluded a long-awaited 90-minute telephone call with President Xi Jinping of China, saying he was encouraged that ongoing trade tensions could soon be resolved. Calling the conversation 'very good,' Trump said follow-up talks would occur 'soon' between the countries' economic teams, and that Xi invited him to visit China. 'During the conversation, President Xi graciously invited the First Lady and me to visit China, and I reciprocated. As Presidents of two Great Nations, this is something that we both look forward to doing,' Trump wrote. Trump said the call focused almost entirely on trade, without touching on other geopolitical issues like an Iran nuclear deal or the Russia-Ukraine war. The call 'resulted in a very positive conclusion for both Countries,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. He singled out the issue of rare earth minerals — which China had placed restrictions on — as an area where he made progress with his counterpart. 'There should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products,' Trump wrote. Update: Date: Title: Democratic lawmakers criticize Trump's travel ban as discriminatory Content: Democratic lawmakers slammed President Donald Trump's proclamation to ban travel from several countries to the US. Here's what they've said: Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar, the first Somali-American in Congress, blasted Trump's policy, comparing it to the president's first term, when he barred travelers from seven majority-Muslim nations from coming to the US. 'This discriminatory policy is beyond shameful. Just like his first Muslim Ban, this latest announcement flies in the face of basic morality and goes directly against our values. This racist policy will not make us safe, it will separate families and endanger lives. We cannot let it stand,' Omar said in a post on X. California Sen. Adam Schiff posted on X: 'This is Trump's reckless first term travel ban all over again. Just like before, Trump's expanded ban on travelers from around the world will not improve our national security and will only further isolate the U.S. from the rest of world. Bigotry is not a national security strategy.' Rep. Pramila Jayapal of Washington pointed to economic harm due to the ban and suggested it would lead to a dangerous precedent. 'Further, banning people fleeing dangerous countries like Afghanistan — a country where many people are in danger due to their work assisting the U.S. military — the Congo, Haiti, and Sudan will only further destabilize global security,' Jayapal said in a statement posted on her social media. Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey said Trump's travel ban won't make America safer, saying in a post on X: 'We cannot continue to allow the Trump administration to write bigotry and hatred into U.S. immigration policy.' Update: Date: Title: Trump and Xi speak in long-awaited trade call, source says Content: President Donald Trump held a phone call with China's Xi Jinping, a person familiar with the matter said, as the two leaders tussle over trade policy. The White House did not immediately confirm the call, which was also reported by Chinese state media. Remember: Tensions have been rising between the two sides in the weeks after they agreed to a 90-day trade truce last month, which hit pause on their tit-for-tat escalation of tariffs. Trump last week accused China of 'violating' the agreement — a charge Beijing has denied, while it accused the US of taking steps to 'seriously undermine' that consensus. US officials had signaled in recent days that a call between the two leaders could help jump-start progress in expected upcoming trade talks, which had appeared to stall following the initial truce reached in Geneva. Update: Date: Title: Trump issues travel ban on 12 countries Content: President Donald Trump signed a proclamation yesterday evening to ban travel from several countries to the US, citing security risks. The ban will fully restrict entry of nationals from the following 12 countries: People from these seven countries will have partial restriction: The proclamation includes exceptions for lawful permanent residents, existing visa holders, certain visa categories and individuals whose entry serves US national interests. The president made the final call on signing the proclamation after the antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado, according to a White House official. He was considering it beforehand, but Sunday's assault put it into motion faster. Trump said in a video posted yesterday that new countries could be added to the travel ban as 'threats emerge around the world.' Update: Date: Title: Republicans downplay impact of Musk blasting Trump's signature legislation Content: Elon Musk lashed out yesterday at President Donald Trump's agenda bill, calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' Both GOP leaders and White House officials are downplaying the actual impact of the tech billionaire's outburst, even as some vent frustration with Musk behind the scenes. White House officials, while annoyed by the matter, said they ultimately did not believe the comments would impact how senators vote on Trump's prized bill. Two administration officials even went as far as suggesting Musk's opposition could actually help Trump's measure, given how toxic the Tesla CEO has become over the course of his time in Trump's orbit. House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune both evinced no worry whatsoever that it would change Republicans' minds or sink the massive border, tax and spending cuts package. While several GOP senators had been expressing doubts about the bill for weeks, none cited new concerns over Musk's comments. Republican leaders remain bullish that they can deliver the legislation to Trump's desk by July 4 — an ambitious timeline. Watch more from CNN's Kaitlan Collins: Elon Musk lashed out at President Donald Trump's agenda bill — which the president is pressuring GOP senators to support — calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' CNN's Kaitlan Collins reports. #cnn #news Update: Date: Title: Speaker Johnson says he will put DOGE spending cuts on House floor next week Content: Speaker Mike Johnson said yesterday that he will put the White House's spending cuts request on the House floor next week. 'Next week, we will put the rescissions bill on the floor of the House and encourage all our Members to support this commonsense measure,' Johnson said in a joint statement with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, House Majority Whip Tom Emmer and House Republican Chair Lisa McClain. The White House earlier this week sent the $9.4 billion spending cuts request — known as 'rescissions' — to Congress as it seeks to formalize the Department of Government Efficiency's slashes to federal funding. If the package comes to a vote, it can clear both the House and the Senate with a simple majority, meaning Republicans can advance it without Democratic support. Johnson said Monday that he expects there may be 'multiple' such packages coming to the hill in the next few months. 'It's a big priority for me,' Johnson said. Update: Date: Title: Senate leader sets ambitious timeline for vote on Trump's domestic policy bill Content: Senate Majority Leader John Thune is setting an ambitious timeline for a vote on President Donald Trump's domestic policy bill, with the goal of sending it to Trump's desk by July 4 after senators make changes to the House bill. 'I think we're on track — I hope, at least — to be able to produce something that we can pass through the Senate, send back to the House, have them pass and put on the President's desk by the Fourth of July,' Thune told CNN. He added his chamber would amend the House bill, but said 'it will have to be tracked fairly closely, obviously, with the House bill,' citing House Republicans' 'fragile majority' and how they had to strike a 'delicate balance' in the House GOP conference to adopt the package last month. However, Thune did acknowledge that 'there are some things that senators want added to the bill, or things that we would do slightly differently,' than the House. Pressed on whether he would consider overruling the parliamentarian if she objects to anything in the package, which must abide by strict budget rules, Thune insisted that 'we're not going there.' Thune also indicated that the Senate could move on sanctions against Russia before July 4, but noted that they are working with the Trump administration on timing so as not to disrupt negotiations. The resolution, led by Sens. Lindsey Graham and Richard Blumenthal, currently has over 80 co-sponsors in the Senate.

Trump lays into Musk, suggesting he has ‘Trump derangement syndrome'
Trump lays into Musk, suggesting he has ‘Trump derangement syndrome'

CNN

time33 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump lays into Musk, suggesting he has ‘Trump derangement syndrome'

President Donald Trump appeared to confirm the deterioration of his relationship with Elon Musk, saying he was 'very disappointed' in the tech billionaire after Musk repeatedly blasted the president's sweeping domestic agenda bill in recent days. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office less than one week after the two exchanged effusive praise on Musk's last day as a special government employee. Since then, Musk has strongly criticized what Trump calls his 'Big, Beautiful Bill' that has passed the House and faces an uncertain path forward in the Senate. On Tuesday, Musk called the bill a 'disgusting abomination.' Trump and Musk have not spoken since Musk lashed out at the legislation, a source familiar with the dynamic told CNN. 'He knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' Trump said, adding that while Musk has not yet personally attacked him, the president expected that could be next. Trump repeatedly claimed that Musk's concerns with the bill were centered on the repeal of electric vehicle subsidies that benefitted Tesla. Musk has admitted his company has struggled in the wake of his political involvement. Musk didn't wait to respond, posting his reactions in real time on his social media platform X. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk said. He added: 'Such ingratitude.' Musk denied Trump's claim that the Tesla CEO knew the inner workings of the bill ahead of time, and countered that the elimination of EV tax incentives has nothing to do with his opposition to the massive domestic policy bill. 'Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill' Musk in a separate post. 'In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this! Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.' One Republican strategist who has worked closely with the tech billionaire downplayed the idea that Musk's opposition is only about the EV subsidies, telling CNN that Musk was genuinely troubled by projections of how much the bill would add to the deficit – the reasoning Musk has publicly cited on multiple occasions. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the legislation passed by the House would increase the deficit by $2.4 trillion. During Thursday's Oval Office appearance alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump reminisced about his campaign bromance with Musk, who contributed at least a quarter-billion dollars to efforts supporting Trump's 2024 presidential bid and once called himself Trump's 'first buddy.' 'Elon endorsed me very strongly. He actually went up and campaigned for me. I think I would have won – Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway,' Trump said, referring to his chief of staff Susie Wiles, appearing to hint at tensions between Wiles and Musk. Trump appeared to moderate his tone at times, saying he 'always liked Elon' – before implicitly accusing him of so-called 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' 'He's not the first – people leave my administration, and they love us, and then at some point they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it, and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is. It's sort of 'Trump derangement syndrome,' I guess they call it, but we have it with others too,' he said. 'They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour is gone,' he continued. 'The whole world is different, and they become hostile. I don't know what it is.' Kristen Holmes contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store