Exposure to phthalates during pregnancy can affect a newborn's brain development, study finds
Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.
Phthalates — the synthetic chemicals used in everyday products for food packaging, personal care, toys and more — have been linked to abnormal neurological development in infants.
Now, scientists may have discovered a biological pathway for how this phenomenon could occur. Researchers found that in utero exposure to phthalates is linked with altered metabolism of neurotransmitters and amino acids involved in brain maturation, according to a study published Wednesday in the journal Nature Communications.
The report is the first to use untargeted metabolomics — the study of all small molecules or metabolites in a biological system — to connect a mother's phthalate exposure to a newborn's metabolites, and those metabolites to neurological development, said senior study author Dr. Donghai Liang via email.
'This represents an important step forward in understanding how prenatal chemical exposures shape infant development at the molecular level,' added Liang, an associate professor of environmental health at Emory University's Rollins School of Public Health in Atlanta.
First introduced in the 1920s, phthalates are used to make plastics softer and more flexible, primarily in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) products such as vinyl flooring, medical devices, children's toys, food packaging or shower curtains. The chemicals also help lubricate substances and carry fragrances in various personal care products including deodorant; nail polish; perfumes; hair gels, sprays or shampoos; soaps; and body lotions.
Phthalates are also endocrine disruptors that have been linked to preterm birth, infant genital abnormalities, childhood obesity, asthma, cancer, cardiovascular issues, and low sperm count and testosterone in men.
'We conducted this study because phthalates are everywhere in our daily lives,' Liang said, hence their nickname 'everywhere chemicals.'
The findings are based on mother-newborn pairs enrolled in the Atlanta African American Maternal-Child Cohort between 2016 and 2018. In urine samples collected from 216 mothers between eight weeks and 14 weeks of gestation at visit one and 145 participants between 24 and 30 weeks' gestation at visit two, the authors measured eight phthalate metabolites. Participants were around age 24 on average, and their levels of some phthalate metabolites were higher than the average determined by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Within a day or two of birth, the authors collected the babies' blood via a heel stick.
The team found prenatal phthalate levels were associated with lower levels of tyrosine, an amino acid and precursor to the thyroid hormone thyroxine. Thyroxine was also abnormally low in those with in utero phthalate exposure, and low thyroxine has been previously associated with greater vulnerability to illness and neurodevelopmental issues in newborns, the authors said. Tyrosine is also a precursor to the neurotransmitters dopamine, norepinephrine and epinephrine, all of which partly contribute to the body's fight-or-flight response. Low levels of these neurotransmitters can lead to various problems, including anxiety, depression and trouble focusing.
Prenatal phthalate exposure was also linked with lower levels of the essential amino acid tryptophan, which converts into 5-hydroxytryptophan (or 5-HTP), which then turns into serotonin. Both 5-HTP and serotonin were also low. Serotonin has several critical roles in the body, including mood regulation, sleep, learning, memory, digestion and the body's response to stress. Previous research has linked low serotonin with mood disorders such as depression and anxiety, sleep problems, and digestive issues.
These biological changes generally were also linked to lower scores on tests measuring attention and excitability, or the ability to respond to stimuli, in participants' newborns, according to the study.
Polyvinyl chloride plastic, a primary use for phthalates, 'continues to increase in use globally,' said Dr. Leonardo Trasande, director of the New York University Center for the Investigation of Environmental Hazards, who wasn't involved in the study. 'We know already — across not just brain development in babies, but a host of consequences that run from cradle to grave, and womb to tomb — that phthalates, in the form of (a) disease burden due to plastic, cost the US $250 billion annually.'
'This study just adds to a voluminous base of evidence that chemicals used in plastic materials harm human health,' Trasande added. 'It's not really something that we should be debating more actively. The more thoughtful approach would be to actually discuss what we need to do about the use of plastic.'
The American Chemistry Council, which represents chemical companies, said via email that its High Phthalates Panel is 'dedicated to promoting the benefits of high phthalates such as DIDP and DINP.' Phthalates with a high molecular weight have seven or more carbon atoms. The study did not measure DIDP (diisodecyl) and DINP (diisononyl phthalate), but some of phthalates identified in the study were high phthalates.
The study has a few important limitations, including the lack of information on participants' diets or whether their births were vaginal or caesarean, all of which can significantly affect both phthalate exposure and a newborn's metabolites, the authors said. Additionally, around 10% of participants reported using alcohol while pregnant, while 15% reported using tobacco and 40% reported using marijuana. There were no details collected on frequency, quantity or duration of use of those substances.
Adverse pregnancy outcomes related to environmental contaminants can also be influenced by psychological or social stressors, which the study couldn't account for.
'The sample size is small, of course, (but) it's a complicated and expensive study to conduct in the first place,' Trasande said. 'There may be multiple mechanisms by which phthalates disrupt brain development.'
For people to be able to avoid exposure to phthalates and other chemicals, experts are calling on manufacturers and policymakers to change.
'I'm part of the Scientists' Coalition for an Effective Plastics Treaty (and we) are actually suggesting banning phthalates as a group because of their demonstrated toxicity and that they can cause effects at very low doses,' said ecotoxicologist Dr. Susanne Brander, associate professor in the department of fisheries, wildlife and conservation sciences at Oregon State University. Brander wasn't involved in the study.
Some manufacturers are creating new plastic additives they hope are safer, but it's possible they could be as problematic as what we're using now, Trasande said. 'The burden needs to be on the manufacturers to prove that materials … are proven safe before they're used.'
In the meantime, people can reduce their exposure to phthalates by using glass, stainless steel or cast iron and not using nonstick cookware or microwaving or dishwashing plastic materials, Trasande said. 'Microwave safe' means the container will be OK, not your food — since it can absorb microscopic particles, he added.
When buying personal care products, look for those labeled 'phthalate-free' and check ingredient lists, Liang said. Phthalates may be listed as DEP (diethyl phthalate), DBP (dibutyl phthalate) or BBzP (butyl benzyl phthalate). You can use the Environmental Working Group's SkinDeep database to check which chemicals a product may contain.
'Since phthalates can be found in household dust, improving air circulation and regular cleaning with a damp cloth can help,' she added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Virginia Tech Study Finds Aging Life Care Managers® Deliver Critical Support, Trust, and Peace of Mind to Families Navigating Aging and Caregiving
TUCSON, Ariz., June 9, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- A recent national study by researchers at Virginia Tech confirms the significant impact Aging Life Care Managers® have on families and older adults facing the challenges of aging and caregiving. The study highlights the essential role these professionals play in improving care quality, easing emotional burdens, and providing clarity during times of uncertainty. Aging Life Care Managers are trained experts in aging, disability, and care coordination. They offer comprehensive support to families managing complex health conditions, navigating transitions, and coordinating services, while also serving as compassionate advocates and trusted partners in care. Study Highlights Profound Impact on Families and Individuals The two-phase research project, led by Dr. E. C. Shealy, Dr. P. B. Teaster, Dr. L. Sands, and Dr. J. Gray, involved in-depth interviews and a nationwide survey of current and former clients of Aging Life Care Managers. Findings reveal an overwhelmingly positive experience among families: 99% would recommend an Aging Life Care Manager 97% felt gratitude for the support received 93% said the value of the service outweighed the cost Respondents frequently described their Aging Life Care Managers as "lifelines," especially in emergencies or when navigating complex family dynamics. Long-distance caregivers, in particular, expressed relief at having a knowledgeable, local expert they could trust. A Model of Ethical, Compassionate Care The study emphasized the ethical and person-centered foundation of the Aging Life Care™ model. Nearly all respondents affirmed their Aging Life Care Manager's professionalism, confidentiality, and advocacy: 97% said Aging Life Care Managers helped mediate family dynamics 96% noted strong knowledge of local providers 95% confirmed their privacy was protected 94% credited their Aging Life Care Manager with supporting balanced decision-making "Aging Life Care Managers are not just professionals, they are partners, deeply committed to honoring the values and dignity of each client," said Pamela Teaster, Ph.D., professor and director of the Virginia Tech Center for Gerontology. Emotional and Practical Support Through Every Stage In addition to managing logistics, Aging Life Care Managers were praised for their emotional support and compassionate presence: 95% said their Aging Life Care Manager understood emotional challenges 91% found them responsive in crises 87% received help with care transitions Families also reported a significant improvement in quality of life for both clients and themselves: 97% reported feeling peace of mind 92% affirmed their future needs were anticipated 87% said the client was able to "live well" despite their challenges 82% experienced reduced isolation Client Testimonials Underscore Value Comments from survey participants highlighted the personal and lasting impact of their Aging Life Care Managers: "She's an extension of me.""It's worth every cent.""Even after her passing, the Aging Life Care Manager arranged a celebration." A Call to Action for Families Nationwide The findings affirm what many families have long known: Aging Life Care Managers offer critical support during some of life's most difficult times. Their unique blend of clinical knowledge, ethical practice, and emotional insight makes them essential partners in navigating aging, illness, and end-of-life care. For those caring for aging loved ones or planning ahead, the Aging Life Care Association offers a nationwide directory of qualified professionals. Visit to learn more. About the Study The study, commissioned by the Aging Life Care Association® (ALCA), surveyed members of the Aging Life Care Association and their clients. An Examination of the Aging Life Care Association: Part Two – Qualitative Client Interviews and Client Survey was presented at the Aging Life Care Association's 41st Annual Conference in Boston, MA. Findings will be presented at the Gerontological Society of America Scientific Meeting in November 2025. A summary of the study's findings can be found on the Aging Life Care Association's blog. About the Aging Life Care Association® (ALCA) The Aging Life Care Association® (ALCA) was formed in 1985 to advance dignified, coordinated care for older adults in the United States. With nearly 2,000 members nationwide, Aging Life Care Professionals® have cared for about two million older adults over its history. ALCA Members are distinguished from others practicing care management as they must meet stringent education, experience, and certification requirements and adhere to Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice. Members may be trained in several fields including, but not limited to, counseling, gerontology, mental health, nursing, occupational therapy, physical therapy, psychology, or social work; with a specialized focus on issues related to aging and elder care. For more information or to access a directory of Aging Life Care Professionals, please visit View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Aging Life Care Association


Chicago Tribune
9 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Used in COVID shots, mRNA may help rid the body of HIV
The technology that powered COVID vaccines may also lead scientists to a cure for HIV. Using mRNA, Australian researchers said they were able to trick the virus to come out of hiding, a crucial step in ridding the body of it entirely. The research, published last week in Nature Communications, is still preliminary and so far has been shown to be successful only in a lab. But it suggests that mRNA has potential far beyond its use in vaccines as a means to deliver therapies against stubborn adversaries. Short for messenger RNA, mRNA is a set of instructions for a gene. In the case of COVID vaccines, the instructions were for a piece of the coronavirus. In the new study, they are for molecules key to targeting HIV. Dr. Sharon Lewin, director of the Doherty Institute at the University of Melbourne, who led the study, called mRNA a 'miraculous' tool 'to deliver things that you want into places that were not possible before.' Vaccines deploying mRNA instruct the body to produce a fragment of the virus, which then sets off the body's immune response. In the United States, the shots were initially hailed for turning back the pandemic, then viewed by some with suspicion and fear. Some officials, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., have falsely said that they are highly dangerous and even deadly. Last week, the Department of Health and Human Services sought to limit the vaccine's availability to pregnant women, children and healthy younger adults. The administration also canceled a nearly $600 million contract with the drugmaker Moderna to develop an mRNA shot for humans against bird flu. 'The fear right now is not rational,' Lewin said, adding that 'mRNA vaccines have been given to millions of people around the world, so we have a very good understanding of their risks.' The new study describes the use of mRNA as a tool to flush HIV out of its hiding places. Other uses could involve providing proteins missing from those with certain diseases or correcting genetic errors. Frauke Muecksch, a virologist at Heidelberg University in Germany who was not involved in the work, called mRNA a 'promising, absolutely powerful technology.' Although most people may have only heard of mRNA's use in science during the pandemic, scientists have been working with it for more than 20 years, she said. 'I think it's not just therapeutically very powerful, but also for basic science, for research, it opens up a lot of avenues,' she added. Potent antiretroviral drugs can now control HIV, suppressing it to undetectable levels. Still, minute amounts of the virus lie dormant in so-called reservoirs, waiting for an opportunity to resurge. A cure for HIV would involve ferreting out all of this virus and destroying it, a strategy that has been called 'shock and kill.' A significant hurdle is that the virus lies dormant in a particular type of immune cell, called a resting CD4 cell. Because these cells are inactive, they tend to be unresponsive to drugs. The few drugs scientists have previously used to rouse the virus in these cells were not specific to HIV and had unwanted side effects. 'It's fair to say the field's been a little bit stuck,' said Brad Jones, a viral immunologist at Weill Cornell Medicine who was not involved in the latest research. In 2022, Jones and his colleagues found that the immune boost from the mRNA vaccines awakened latent HIV in people living with the virus. (Other research has shown that mRNA vaccines also activated dormant viruses including Epstein Barr.) 'You get just a little bit of a gentle nudge with some of these vaccines, and it's enough to coax some of these latent viruses out so they can be killed,' Jones said. Lewin and her colleagues had for years experimented with other ways to activate HIV but had no luck in resting cells. Seeing the success of the COVID vaccines, which used lipid nanoparticles — tiny spheres of fat — containing mRNA, her team tested similar particles. They used the particles to deliver two different sets of molecules: Tat, which is adept at switching HIV on, and CRISPR, a tool that can 'edit' genes. The researchers showed that in resting immune cells from people living with HIV, the approach coaxed the virus out of dormancy. 'It's very, very hard to deal with these cells, so I think this really targeting the right population of cells is what makes this paper special,' Muecksch said. It's unclear whether the new approach can successfully awaken all of the dormant HIV in the body, and what side effects it might produce. Lewin said that 'mRNA will almost certainly have some adverse effects, as every drug does, but we will investigate that systematically, as we do for any new drug.' In this case, she said, side effects may be more acceptable to people living with HIV than having to take medications for the rest of their lives. The researchers plan to test the method in HIV-infected animals next, before moving into clinical trials. This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Is Elon Musk Tweeting About Me at 3 A.M.?
If elected, I would be the poorest member of Congress—and the world's richest man just attacked me in a 3:00 am tweet for supporting universal healthcare. You might have seen a clip of me on CNN last week, debating with Scott Jennings on whether healthcare is a basic human right. In that clip, Jennings—a long-time Republican strategist and pro-Trump contributor at CNN—asks, 'Even illegals?' To which I respond, 'Every single person in the world deserves healthcare... How is this controversial?' It shouldn't be controversial. And I'm not afraid to say that as a person or as a congressional candidate. The state of our country's healthcare has been front and center for many Americans over the last few weeks, as President Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' threatens healthcare coverage for 11 million people—including thousands of families right here in Illinois' Ninth Congressional District, where I am running. Why? So Republicans can slash taxes for the ultra-rich, decimate oversight for AI, and spend $125 billion on a 'Golden Dome' which will make America less safe – all for the low, low price of workers' health, food, and clean air. Our healthcare system is one of the worst in the developed world. Medical debt is the cause of 66% of bankruptcies in the US. In Canada, the runner up in this bleak competition, that number is 19%. We spend more on healthcare than any other wealthy country and yet have the worst outcomes. We take Ubers instead of ambulances, take fish antibiotics instead of prescriptions, and often skip medical treatment altogether because of the expected cost. These hardships are uniquely American. In 1944, Franklin Delano Roosevelt proposed a Second Bill of Rights to Congress, encouraging legislators to enshrine into law additional rights not already enumerated in the Constitution. His proposals were prescient, reflecting trials many Americans face today: the right to earn a decent living, the right to trade free of monopolies, the right to education. He also said that every American should be guaranteed 'the right to medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health.' Congress did not pass it. It's been more than 80 years since FDR proposed his Second Bill of Rights and healthcare is still not a legal right for any American. While the Affordable Care Act made progress on this front, treatment and prescription costs are still expensive, insurance bureaucracy is still predatory, and most Americans' coverage is still tied to their employment. I lost my own health insurance for over a year when I was laid off last May. Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' would continue the death by a thousand cuts approach to the ACA that Republicans have pushed every time they're in power. Donald Trump and the Republicans want to make this worse. By creating even more hoops for Americans to jump through just to get care that is often lackluster, by demonizing the poor, and by insisting healthcare is something you must earn, this administration is bragging about its own inhumanity. When I said, 'Every person in the world deserves healthcare,' Jennings couldn't fathom that idea. His first instinct was to blurt out, 'Even illegals?' The answer is yes. If you are a person, you deserve healthcare, no matter where you are or who you are. No one deserves to die because they can't afford insulin or because they're too scared of bankruptcy to seek medical attention. If you show up at my doorstep starving or injured, I am not going to ask for papers before I help you. Conservatives struggle with this idea. Elon Musk seems to think this idea and my comments are 'suicidal empathy.' Illinois Republicans were so incensed that my campaign office stocks food, clothes, and other resources for whoever needs them, that they thought I was somehow breaking the law. But in most other wealthy countries, this mindset is barbaric. In much of the rest of the world, if you need care, you get it. In fact, I have needed to see an emergency doctor in three foreign countries since I was a kid and all of those visits cost less than any urgent care clinic visit I've had in the United States. But when you say any of this, the Republican instinct is to ask, 'How will we pay for this?' The answer is pretty simple and we've known it for a long time. Universal, single-payer healthcare—a system where our tax dollars pay for our healthcare without the private insurance middleman—would actually save us money and lead to better health outcomes. We save lives, reduce waste, and guarantee a baseline of human dignity. Of course, predatory insurance companies would lose the ability to profit off of our basic existence, but that's a sacrifice we should all be willing to make. One of the main reasons I'm running for Congress is because our leaders have conditioned us into thinking we don't deserve good things, especially if we aren't rich. But we do. You do. Every American deserves to afford housing, groceries, and healthcare with money left over to save and spend. We deserve to thrive, not just survive. And every single human being in every single country deserves to know that they can find the help they need on the worst day of their lives, when they are at their weakest and most vulnerable. For most Americans this concept isn't hard to grasp, but when it comes to Elon Musk and right-wing pundits, they simply can't fathom having even an ounce of basic humanity.