First Putin-Zelensky meeting ‘would be better without me'
Trump met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday and hosted Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky in Washington three days later. He insisted that the sides begin working toward a lasting peace without a ceasefire first, as some European leaders have suggested.
'I had a very successful meeting with President Putin. I had a very successful meeting with President Zelensky. And now I thought it would be better if they met without me, just to see, I want to see what goes on,' Trump said on Mark Levin's radio show on Tuesday.
'You know, they had a hard relationship, very bad, very bad relationship. And now we'll see how they do and if necessary, and it probably would be, but if necessary, I'll go and I'll probably be able to get [the deal] closed,' he added.
Zelensky told reporters on Monday that he is ready for a potential meeting with Putin.
While the Kremlin has not commented on the latest proposal, Putin said earlier this year that he is ready to meet Zelensky during the 'final stage' of negotiations. Putin's key aide, Yury Ushakov, added on Tuesday that Russia supports continuing 'direct negotiations between the delegations from Russia and Ukraine.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
4 minutes ago
- Russia Today
What is the ‘coalition of the willing' – and why it's falling apart
Western governments are debating how to guarantee Ukraine's security should a peace agreement be reached in the future. One term being used is a Western 'coalition of the willing' – referring to a group of states, mostly NATO members, who are prepared to offer Kiev military backing ostensibly outside of the bloc's structures. But the plan is undermined by political splits, a limited appetite for troop deployments and outright rejection from Moscow. Here are the key points: What is the coalition? The so-called coalition has been floated by Western European leaders as a mechanism to provide Ukraine with security guarantees without relying on NATO as a whole. Reports suggest it could involve some 30 states – mostly NATO members, along with countries such as Ireland and Austria – that would commit to defending Ukraine or maintaining a military presence on its territory. The details remain unclear, including how any commitments would be enforced. The US wants no part of it US President Donald Trump has made clear Washington will not send troops to Ukraine, calling the conflict 'Biden's war.' He has suggested the United States could provide air support under certain circumstances but ruled out any ground presence. Without US backing, the credibility of the initiative is limited. Brussels is sidelined EU leaders have talked up Ukraine's prospects, with officials such as European Commission chief Kaja Kallas adopting a tough line against Moscow. But while the EU can coordinate sanctions targeting Russia, it has no standing military of its own, leaving it reliant on individual member states to make commitments. Europe's major powers are split Italy and Spain have both said they will not send troops. France, Germany and Britain remain among Ukraine's strongest supporters, having provided weapons, training and financial aid, but their willingness to commit forces to a post-conflict deployment is uncertain. Both London and Berlin have backtracked on initial proposals to put troops on the ground in a post-conflict Ukraine. Moscow's red line Russia has repeatedly said it will not accept NATO troops on Ukrainian soil under any circumstances, calling it a red line. Moscow regards the US-led military bloc's support for Kiev as part of a proxy war waged against it with Ukrainian manpower and Western weapons. Political uncertainty in Kiev Ukraine's internal situation could complicate any security arrangement. President Vladimir Zelensky has extended martial law beyond his mandate, raising questions about his political legitimacy. New elections may be required before Kiev can sign binding agreements. Any deal that recognises territorial losses risks further polarising an already heavily armed society. A potentially unstable political landscape in a heavily armed post-war country could present significant risks to any guarantor of Ukraine's security. Moscow's role in guarantees Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Wednesday that security guarantees for Ukraine must be discussed with Moscow as well. He cited the draft Istanbul agreements of 2022 as a model, in which Russia was a party to talks. If Moscow is included as a guarantor, the rationale for a NATO-backed coalition would be undermined.
Russia Today
4 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Russia ready to upgrade level of direct talks with Kiev
Russia is ready to raise the status of its delegation-level peace negotiations with Ukraine, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has announced. His remarks followed a summit between President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump in Alaska last week. DETAILS TO FOLLOW
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
European military stocks fall on Ukraine peace talks progress
European military stocks have tumbled, defying broader positive market sentiment, as traders assessed the White House meeting that brought fresh hope for a Ukraine peace deal. On Monday, US President Donald Trump met with Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky and key Western European backers. The talks came two days after Trump's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, which both sides described as a step toward peace between Russia and Ukraine. The STOXX Europe Total Market Aerospace & Defense Index fell 2.6% on Tuesday, as traders viewed the ongoing negotiations as a chance to take profits following a strong rally in the sector. Shares in Italian defense firm Leonardo and Germany's Hensoldt were down 10.1% and 9.5%, respectively. German defense supplier Rheinmetall and tank components maker Renk also declined 4.9% and 8.2%, respectively. 'Any de-escalation of tensions between Russia and Europe, and talk of spending more on US equipment, is negative for these companies,' Craig Cameron, head of European equities at Franklin Templeton, told the FT. According to analysts, shares in defense groups could be seen as a rough indicator of progress in the Ukraine peace talks, as military supplies tend to benefit from ongoing conflicts. European defense stocks surged in the first half of the current year, driven by Germany's announcement in March that it would ease its strict debt limits to enable a new wave of investment in defense and infrastructure, amid growing concerns that the US may scale back its role in European security and the Ukraine conflict. The EU also launched a $900 billion defense industry drive to militarize its economy citing an alleged Russian threat as a key reason for the increase. The latest US-brokered talks reportedly ended with an agreement in principle to arrange a face-to-face meeting between Putin and Zelensky, although the Kremlin has yet to confirm the plan. AFP reported on Tuesday that Putin has offered to host the talks in Moscow, but Zelensky rejected the proposal, insisting on a neutral location.
