Scottish schools must provide single-sex toilets after parents win landmark legal battle
A Scottish judge has ruled that all state schools must provide separate male and female toilets, following a landmark case brought by parents against Scottish Borders Council. The decision, handed down at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, came after Sean Stratford and Leigh Hurley challenged the council's policy at Earlston Primary School, where their eight-year-old son had been a pupil. The £16.6 million replacement school opened with only gender-neutral lavatories—something the parents argued breached legal requirements and put children at risk. The council conceded in court that it had failed to comply with its legal obligation under the School Premises (General Requirements and Standards) (Scotland) Regulations 1967, which require the provision of single-sex lavatories in schools. Lady Ross KC, who presided over the case, confirmed she would issue a formal court order, or declarator, clarifying the legal position for all Scottish schools. Rosie Walker, solicitor for the parents and partner at Gilson Gray LLP, welcomed the judgment, stating: "This case, on top of the Supreme Court decision last week, gives focus to the importance of protecting sex-based rights a nd single-sex spaces." She added that the ruling would have 'far-reaching implications' for schools across Scotland. Ms Hurley, 39, who works at the school as a pupil support worker, first raised concerns in late 2023 about the school's broader transgender inclusion policies, which included allowing a pupil to socially transition and participate in sports in line with their gender identity. She later discovered the school planned to have no sex-segregated toilet facilities, and that children could face punishment for "misgendering" peers. 'We just want all children to be safeguarded,' Hurley said. 'We have great empathy for any child, but we just wanted our rights respected at the same time, and that wasn't happening.' The couple ultimately withdrew their son from the school, citing emotional distress and concerns about their younger daughter, who would have also been expected to use gender-neutral toilets once she enrolled. Stratford, 42, said: 'We've won, but common sense says we should never have been in this position in the first place. We brought this to their attention when it was still a building site.' The legal action was supported by campaign group For Women Scotland, which recently won a major case at the UK Supreme Court affirming that, under equalities law, "woman" refers to biological sex. Although the Supreme Court ruling did not directly address school toilet regulations, Walker said it helped underline the legal requirement to protect single-sex spaces. She also criticised public bodies for relying on advice from activist groups rather than adhering to the law. 'It's a huge problem that schools and councils have deferred to campaign groups rather than sticking to their legal obligations,' she said. 'This is undoubtedly the first of many cases in which we will see the rights of women and girls upheld by the courts.' Scottish Borders Council has now been ordered to revisit the wider complaints made by the parents, including policies on transgender inclusion and discipline, and must respond within 20 days. A council spokesperson confirmed the matter related to Earlston Primary School but declined to comment further. They added that the council had accepted the legal position before the court hearing and would now review the complaint. The Scottish government said it was considering the implications of both the Court of Session and the Supreme Court rulings. A spokesperson added: "Local authorities have statutory responsibility for the school estate, including provision of toilets. "The Scottish government is committed to ensuring that our Transgender Guidance for Schools remains up to date and fit for purpose. "As with any significant legal or policy developments, we will consider whether the guidance requires to be updated to reflect upon these." Ministers are expected to meet with the Equality and Human Rights Commission later this week to discuss the issue, with new national guidance anticipated in the near future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
16 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Thousands of UK drivers face huge speed limit change under new road rules – is your route affected?
THOUSANDS of UK drivers will face a huge speed limit change under new road rules - is your route affected? The Welsh Government announced plans to lower the default speed limit from 30mph to 20mph, in 2023. 1 Welsh councils can revert to a 30mph speed limit Credit: Getty The decision sparked major public backlash, with hundreds of thousands of locals signing petitions calling for the rule to be scrapped. It appears residents were heard, as the Government later confirmed that councils could opt out by restoring some roads to the original 30mph limit the following year. This prompted fresh discussions, as local authorities began working with drivers to decide which roads should return to the higher speed limit. Some areas have since reverted to the 30mph limit, while others are still in the process of making the change. At the time, plans to slash the threshold for drivers being fined on 20mph roads have been branded "utter madness" as the Welsh Labour Government continues to develop the controversial policy. Motorists across Wales were still getting used to the 20mph speed limits on restricted roads as the Government worked with local authorities to make necessary changes. Following the heavily criticised rollout, Labour announced it would look to amend the policy so it was more focused on roads that actually need it - instead of it being a blanket measure. To that end, the standard threshold for drivers to be slapped with a speeding fine is 10 per cent plus two miles per hour. This was changed to four miles per hour for the new 20mph roads, as requested by GoSafe, who called on chief police officers to be more lenient on drivers as they adjust to the nationwide proposal. This means that if a driver is caught speeding at 24mph in the 20mph zone, they will not be fined. Major Speed Limit Changes on Scottish Roads However, a penalty charge notice could be issued if they're caught at 26mph. But reports now suggest changes could be introduced to amend this threshold and could see drivers fined if they're travelling at 24mph. According to Wales Online, chief police officers were set to review the policy in March. The former leader of the Welsh Conservatives, Andrew RT Davies MS, Senedd Member for South Wales Central, said: "Dropping this threshold would be utter madness. "The 20mph policy is crackers enough without implementing a low threshold which is hard to match at low speeds. "Labour's failed 20mph experiment should be dropped." In 2024, 48,203 offences were recorded in Mid and South Wales, while 36,710 were given out in North Wales. In total, 84,913 offences were recorded across the country. Average offence speeds peaked in April for Mid and South Wales at 30.4mph, while North Wales saw the average offence speed peak at 32.7mph in May. Throughout 2024, the GoSafe road safety partnership revealed that 13,443 engagement sessions had taken place in which the Welsh Fire and Rescue Services delivered a 10-minute presentation about the speed limit changes. A spokesperson for GoSafe said: "While the public get used to the change in default limit, chief police officers have allowed us to increase this to 10 per cent plus 4mph in 20mph only, meaning we start to prosecute at 26mph in a 20mph limit. "This allows us to concentrate on offences more significantly over the speed limit. "The increased enforcement threshold is scheduled to be reviewed by Chief Officers in March 2025, however, they will continue to monitor it and may review it before this date. Any change will be communicated in advance through official sources."
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Defections to Reform smack of political opportunism
The party has also bled support in the Scottish Parliament when MSP Jamie Green joined the Liberal Democrats in April. Of course, this phenomenon is not limited to the Tories. In March 2021, SNP MPs Kenny MacAskill and Neale Hanvey followed former FM Alex Salmond to the newly-formed Alba Party. Ash Regan followed suit in 2023 after coming a distant third in the race to become Nicola Sturgeon's successor. Ash Regan is a high-profile defectee. (Image: PA) In some cases, the mental gymnastics required to swap one party for another are quite impressive. Former MP Lisa Cameron famously deserted the SNP for the Tories in October 2023, as the East Kilbride parliamentarian faced a staunch selection contest. Reform councillor Jamie McGuire serves as a recent example of this drastic ideological seesaw. Read more: The former Labour apparatchik worked as a Parliamentary Researcher for Paisley & Renfrewshire North MP Alison Taylor and was a past chair of Glasgow University's Labour club. He dramatically swapped sides in early June, announcing his defection as Nigel Farage visited Scotland ahead of the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. McGuire's former colleagues have shared their shock at the defection. A fellow Glasgow University graduate who was on the committee of the Labour society alongside Jamie told The Herald that the defection came as a 'slap in the face'. 'I am quite shocked,' the source said. 'He was so deep within the Labour circles and organised some decent events too for the society. 'He got elected as a councillor and trained by the party to be a candidate so it does feel like a slap in the face. It is shocking.' Jamie McGuire is a former Labour councillor. (Image: Newsquest) The decision came as a surprise to another Glasgow University politics alumnus, who took classes alongside McGuire. The source said they thought the announcement was a joke at first. They told The Herald: 'I was bored scrolling on Reddit, then saw his picture in a Glasgow-related page with Reform background logos. I assumed some SNP cybernat made it up as a joke but when I found out it was real I was beyond floored. 'The guy was the biggest Labour party advocate I knew at university, I even spoke to him last year and he was talking to me about his excitement about what the Labour party was going to do in government and his excitement for the Scottish elections. It feels like a fever dream. 'He's one of the most lovely guys I've met and I'm really curious to hear more about his decision and hopes for the party's future.' Another person who knew McGuire at university said: 'I'll tell you this, it was coming. He was setting himself up to be a Labour MP. 'Clearly he sensed the way of the wind and jumped ship.' In a tweet that now appears to be deleted, McGuire shared a photo of himself alongside Jeremy Corbyn at an event he organised during COP26. The post reads: 'It was a surreal experience tonight to share a stage with Jeremy Corbyn for my GU Labour Club COP26 event. Thank you to the Corbyn Project for showing us that another future is possible.' Jeremy Corbyn was hosted at an event set up by McGuire. (Image: Other) McGuire also served as Secretary of Scottish Young Labour and Scottish Labour Students in recent years. The Renfrewshire councillor cancelled a scheduled interview with The Herald last week, and did not respond to subsequent requests for comment. However, speaking to the Local Democracy Service last week, McGuire pushed back against claims made by his former group leader on the council. Councillor Ian McMillian of Labour said: 'His politics have, shall we say, always been a bit fluid and, since being elected three years ago as a Labour councillor, he has at times struggled to be a team player.' McGuire retorted: 'I've always been a team player, I've always been in politics to try and make a difference. 'I wish everyone well. I've always thought it was about the community, that was the reason I got involved in politics. 'I've always tried my best and I don't think anyone could disagree with the fact I put 100 per cent in all the time.' He said he joined Reform because it was a 'genuine opportunity' to tackle 'deep structural issues' affecting the UK. Read more: McGuire's story is far from unique. Indeed, it feels as if defections are occurring with increasing regularity. Some of that is to be expected as new political parties come to the forefront. Yet, far too often, ideological consistency is abandoned for political opportunity. Where does the average voter stand amidst all of this? Is it fair that the people of Renfrew North, who elected a Labour councillor four years ago, are now represented by a member of Reform UK? Or what about the constituents of West Scotland, who elected Jamie Greene as a Tory, and now have a Lib Dem MSP? After each high-profile defection calls for by-elections abound; in our nation's newspapers, radio stations, and social media sites. And while the noble thing would be to defend one's seat, or at least to stand down, politics is ultimately about power. Fairness is not top of mind for most politicians. Yet, sooner or later; in 2026, 2027, or 2029, our happy band of defectors will face the voting public. And like Julius Caesar, now they have crossed the Rubicon, there is no going back.
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
UCU academics oppose Glasgow Uni trans rights consultation
The review of the institution's gender policies is being carried out in the wake of a Supreme Court ruling on the legal definition of a woman in late April. In the wake of the judicial decision, which ruled that the term 'woman' derives its legal definition from biological sex, not gender identity; transgender women have been banned from a range of female-only toilets and sports teams, including at the Scottish Parliament. The UCU is a prominent supporter of trans rights. (Image: Andrew Milligan/PA)The email, sent last Thursday, reads: 'Communication with our membership is already evidencing that this consultation is causing distress and fear for trans, nonbinary and other gender diverse staff and students, by exposing them to scrutiny and debate about their rights, and requiring them to feel obliged to respond in defence of those rights – rights that the University is already on record as stating it supports as 'an inclusive community'. 'We recommend that UCU members do not respond to this consultation until we can issue further guidance. We are also preparing to ask UofG EDU to cancel this consultation and to discuss with us better ways of supporting staff and students around the Supreme Court decision. Read more: The communique goes on to state that the UCU 'unequivocally' promotes the rights of trans and nonbinary staff and students, adding: 'We believe that this type of consultation on the rights of marginalised groups increases their marginalisation, severely impacts their wellbeing and safety, and does not provide a sound basis for determining policy or practice. 'Human rights are not up for debate. It also increases the atmosphere of fear and uncertainty that has already been engendered by the Supreme Court ruling.' For Women Scotland took the Scottish Government to court in April. (Image: PA) A spokesperson for campaign group For Women Scotland has hit out at the union, telling The Herald: 'UCU appears to inhabit an alternate reality where universities can pick and choose which laws they obey. It benefits none of their members if the union or the university stick their fingers in their ears like a petulant toddler. It also reflects poorly on their capacity to understand pretty basic concepts. 'This is not a consultation on rights, it is about the application of the law. Women who understand the reality of sex-based violence and discrimination and work at the university also have human rights, and it may astonish the UCU to learn that they also have a responsibility to represent those members as well as the select elite they prefer to pander to.' Meanwhile, Helen Joyce, director of advocacy at human rights charity Sex Matters, said the 'era of no debate' was over. She told The Herald: 'Gender ideologues' attempts to thought-police and silence gender-critical academics in recent years have been shameful. It's hard to understand how this can continue even after the Supreme Court judgment. 'This letter raises an obvious question: what is UCU Glasgow afraid of? Could it be that it cannot counter gender-critical arguments on their merits, and must resort to shunning and ostracism instead?' Protestors blocked a screening of Adult Human Female in Edinburgh in the spring of 2023. (Image: Levi Pay) The academic union is no stranger to facing criticism over its position on trans rights. Two university lecturers behind the gender-critical film Adult Human Female recently sued the UCU over claims they had been discriminated against because of their views. Dr Deirdre O'Neill of Hertfordshire University, and Michael Wayne of Brunel University, told the Employment Tribunal that the union's public opposition to the film amounted to unlawful discrimination. Members of the UCU Edinburgh branch objected to the film being shown on campus in 2022 and 2023 over 'misinformation' relating to trans and nonbinary people. However, in a ruling handed down this week, a judge dismissed the claim, ruling that the pair had not been treated detrimentally under the Equality Act 2010. Read more: Mary Senior, Scotland official UCU, said: "This is a sensible and common sense decision, and we thank Judge Laidler and the tribunal for their careful deliberations. 'It cannot be right that a trade union is not able to protest peacefully within the law and to employers when material is presented on campus which it believes attacks the human rights of others.' Asked for comment on the UCU declining to participate in the consultation, a University of Glasgow spokesperson refused to be drawn. Instead, they repeated a statement previously issued to The Herald, noting: 'The University is committed to being an inclusive community and ensuring that everyone on our campuses is treated with care and respect. We are actively considering the Supreme Court ruling and are consulting with colleagues and students.' UCU Glasgow has been contacted for comment.
