Morocco's Taxi Unions Urge HACA to Ban inDrive Ad on Public TV
According to converging media reports, the unions submitted a joint statement claiming that 2M's decision to air promotional content for inDrive, which they assert operates without proper licensing in Morocco, prompted them to seek immediate intervention from HACA.
'A flagrant violation'
The unions characterized the advertisement as 'a flagrant violation of national laws' and 'a serious threat to the taxi sector's interests.'
In their appeal, the unions pointed out that inDrive operates without the necessary permits required under Royal Decree No. 1.63.260.
Their petition cited multiple legal frameworks, including Interior Ministry Circular No. 19959 from November 1, 2022, which mandates monitoring illegal transport activities.
They also referenced Consumer Protection Circular No. 455, and Law 104.12 concerning price freedom and competition.
This latest confrontation marks another chapter in the prolonged struggle between Morocco's traditional taxi services and digital ride-hailing platforms.
In a notable incident on November 29, 2024, a confrontation erupted in Casablanca involving taxi drivers and a Russian businessman utilizing inDrive's services.
The altercation reportedly resulted in injuries to the businessman and his wife when they attempted to intervene in the dispute.
Law enforcement authorities promptly arrested the taxi drivers involved, and the case was referred to court.
In response, inDrive issued a statement condemning the attack as a 'serious violation of the law' and called for a thorough investigation, asserting its position as a 'responsible taxpayer and employer' operating in compliance with local regulations.
In yet another incident in December 2024, authorities apprehended three taxi drivers in Rabat following a dangerous pursuit of a ride-sharing vehicle near the Prince Moulay Abdellah Complex.
The chase, which was captured on video and widely circulated online, resulted in material damage to multiple vehicles and culminated in a roadside confrontation.
These incidents lay bare the escalating clash between traditional taxi operators and digital platforms like inDrive, Yango, and Careem, whose operations teeter on the edge of legality within Morocco's transportation sector.
On the edge of legality
While these companies maintain official business status in Morocco, their transportation services lack formal recognition under current regulations.
Addressing the situation, Interior Minister Abdelouafi Laftit announced in January that the government is conducting comprehensive research to explore potential regulations for the sector.
During a House of Councillors meeting, Laftit acknowledged the necessity for dialogue, stating, 'We must sit down and find a solution. We cannot continue like this.'
He further noted that while ride-hailing services cannot be formally integrated yet, 'we also cannot pretend they do not exist.'
The taxi unions have also forwarded their concerns to the Minister of Interior, requesting intervention regarding the advertisement's broadcast on public television.
Meanwhile, former Transportation Minister Mohamed Abdeljalil had emphasized in March 2024 the importance of achieving consensus among public transportation stakeholders before implementing regulations for ride-sharing applications.
He then noted that 'small and grand taxis are fulfilling an important role and providing services for Moroccan citizens as they handle the primary public transport needs in Morocco.'
The debate has taken on renewed urgency as Morocco gears up to host major international events, including the 2025 Africa Cup of Nations and the 2030 FIFA World Cup.
With millions of visitors expected, the demand for streamlined, reliable transportation is set to surge, heightening pressure on policymakers to address the sector's deep-rooted inefficiencies.
On another front, traditional taxi services remain under fire for their rigid pricing structures and selective service practices, which many argue stifle competition.
Beyond these issues, the sector is plagued by a deep-seated monopoly system that allows taxi permits to be inherited, fueling economic rent-seeking rather than promoting a fair, merit-based industry.
Union representatives continue to push for sweeping reforms, demanding a more equitable permit system that prioritizes professional drivers' rights and ensures proper social security coverage. Tags: indriveride-share apptaxis in Morocco
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ya Biladi
12-08-2025
- Ya Biladi
Revolut seeks regulatory approval from Morocco's Central Bank
Revolut is making its move in Morocco. After appointing a head of operations to lead its entry into the Moroccan banking sector, the British neobank has reportedly submitted a request for regulatory approval to Bank Al-Maghrib, Morocco's central bank. According to L'Economiste on Tuesday, Revolut «has undertaken all necessary steps, including submitting a request for regulatory approval to Bank Al-Maghrib», to secure its entry into the country and launch its activities. While awaiting a response from the Moroccan central bank, the fintech giant, which claims a global user base of 60 million, will continue its recruitment drive to support operations in Morocco. In July, Revolut appointed its first executive to lead its Moroccan operations: Amine Berrada, former operations director for Uber in Southern and Eastern Europe. He is tasked with steering Revolut's strategic direction and growth in Morocco. «I'm thrilled to contribute to launching and scaling its presence in Morocco (…) helping bring cutting-edge financial services to millions of Moroccans», he wrote on LinkedIn. This development confirms information reported by Yabiladi last April, which revealed Revolut's plans for a phased entry into Morocco, beginning as a payment operator with ambitions to obtain a full banking license within two years. Indeed, this latest move is not directly related to obtaining a full-fledged banking license in the country. If granted, this approval will give Revolut the green light to start operations in a limited financial services capacity under Moroccan law. Revolut, with a valuation exceeding €40 billion, offers a fully digital, smartphone-based experience, featuring quick account opening, fee-free international payments, multi-currency cards, trading, cryptocurrency services, and budgeting tools, appealing to a young, mobile, and connected clientele. Founded in July 2015 by British-Russian entrepreneur Nikolay Storonsky and British-Ukrainian software engineer Vlad Yatsenko, Revolut has grown into one of the most prominent players in global fintech.
Morocco World
12-08-2025
- Morocco World
What if the Real Winner of a Strait of Hormuz Blockade… Is Washington?
At first glance, it sounds utterly reckless, almost suicidal for global stability: blocking the Strait of Hormuz, through which about 20% of the world's oil supply flows, would deal a devastating blow to the global economy. Iran, under continuous pressure, even after a shaky ceasefire, seems to favor shutting down this vital passage. The Iranian parliament, a vocal mouthpiece of the regime, just voted a few weeks ago in favor of its closure while small but repetitive irruptions of violence occur each week around this bottleneck. In that particular scenario, oil prices would skyrocket, market chaos would ensue and a recession would be all but guaranteed. And yet… if we dig deeper into the geopolitical calculus, we find that in this catastrophic scenario, one side might actually emerge stronger: the United States. This is not a crude oversimplification of global power plays, but rather a cold-eyed reading of 21st-century energy realities and economic interdependencies. Should Iran ever decide, finally, to close the Strait of Hormuz as its ultimate act of defiance, it would not be the Americans who pay the highest price. Far from it. Europe: The Energy Noose Tightens Even More Let's start with Europe. Already weakened by the war in Ukraine and severed from Russian gas supplies, the EuropeanUnion has been in a frantic scramble to diversify its energy sources since 2022. The Middle East, especially Gulf exports, has become a critical safety valve. Close the Strait of Hormuz tomorrow, and all of that unravels. The result? Setbacks on climate ambitions, soaring energy costs, slower growth, and above all, a deeper dependence on, guess who… the United States. Washington would inevitably become Europe's main supplier of liquefied fossil fuels. The Old Continent's structural energy independence would weaken further. China: Energy Vulnerability Under the Spotlight The real geopolitical shockwave would hit Beijing. China depends on the Middle East for more than 40% of its oil imports, a large portion of which transits the Strait of Hormuz. Any disruption there could be catastrophic for China's energy security and internal stability. To date, China has no comparable alternatives. Its efforts to reduce dependence, through the China-Pakistan EnergyCorridor or Russian supplies, remain structurally insufficient. A crisis at Hormuz would painfully expose the limits of its rise, reminding Beijing that its growth still heavily depends on global flows it cannot fully control. And while the Strait of Malacca represents an even more critical vulnerability, a true Achilles' heel for the Chinese economy, that topic deserves its own analysis in due time. Washington watches all this with a blend of suspicion and opportunism. A temporary slowdown in the Chinese economy would, after all, bolster America's position, especially in value chains, financial markets, and advanced technologies. The United States: Energy Resilience and Strategic Windfall So, what about the U.S. in this tumultuous context? Since the shale oil and gas revolution, America has taken a giant leaptoward energy autonomy. Where once Washington heavilyrelied on imports, it now stands as a net exporter of hydrocarbons, especially liquefied natural gas (LNG). This structural shift has sharply reduced its vulnerability to Middle Eastern disruptions, a historically volatile yet crucial region for the global energy market. The U.S. also holds vast strategic petroleum reserves, able to temporarily absorb supply shocks. Its energy infrastructure, from pipelines to liquefaction terminals, is modern and expanding, enabling flexible, secure supply. This resilience gives Washington a unique leverage: in a crisis, it can not only meet domestic needs but also strengthen its role as a key global supplier. Better yet, a global energy crisis would send oil prices soaring, fattening the profits of major American oil companies, and by extension, the federal treasury. This financial windfall would grant Washington considerable political and economic maneuverability. Through what could be called 'energy aid' disguised as strategic support, the U.S. could sell its oil and gas at premium prices, imposing its standards of quality, security, and environmental norms. This dynamic would also reinforce the Atlantic Alliance, as European nations facing supply disruptions would be forced to depend more on American LNG. Washington would thus reclaim ground on the global energy agenda, imposing its standards and cementing alliances in exchange for vital resources. A Risky Bet… But Tempting Of course, it's not without risks for Washington. Uncontrolled price spikes could also cripple the American economy, fuel inflation, and send shockwaves through the stock market. But in the arsenal of geostrategic consequences, gains often outweigh losses. Such is the paradox of today's international system: what appears as an absolute threat to world order can, from another perspective, be transformed into a power lever for those able to anticipate, absorb, and even capitalize on crises. So yes, it sounds crazy. But in real geopolitics, the illusion of madness often masks cold power logic, and Trump has mastered the cynical game of 'Dynamic Disruption'. Tags: Strait of HormuzUS and IranWashington
Morocco World
12-08-2025
- Morocco World
US and China Prolong Tariff Truce for 90 Days, Avoid Major Trade Shock
Rabat – The US and China have granted themselves another 90 days of tariff peace, sidestepping a steep escalation in duties that threatened to choke off trade between the world's two largest economies. President Donald Trump announced on Monday that he has signed an executive order to delay higher tariffs until November 10. The move keeps US duties on Chinese imports at 30%, rather than the 145% rate that has been on the table. Hours later, China's Commerce Ministry confirmed it would match the pause, leaving its tariffs on American goods at 10% instead of 125%. The original truce, reached in May after talks in Geneva, had been due to expire at the start of Tuesday. The new window spares American retailers from sudden cost spikes just as they prepare shelves for the crucial holiday shopping rush, when imports of electronics, clothing, and toys typically surge. In Beijing, the decision drew relief but also cautious wariness. The truce comes after renewed contact between negotiators, who also met in Stockholm in late July. Trump has suggested a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping before the end of the year if a deal takes shape. Trade data shows the toll of the standoff. China's exports to the US fell 21.7% last month from a year earlier, while shipments to Southeast Asia climbed 16.6% as manufacturers sought new outlets. US figures show the bilateral trade deficit narrowed to its smallest in more than two decades in June. The pause also unfolds against a tense geopolitical backdrop. Washington has urged Beijing to end purchases of Russian oil, with Trump warning of secondary tariffs if such imports continue. For now, the tariffs stay capped. The question is whether 90 days will prove enough to turn a fragile pause into a lasting agreement. Tags: Chinaeconomytariffstrade warus tariffs
