logo
Investigation into South Korea's Jeju Air crash hints at pilot error, angering families

Investigation into South Korea's Jeju Air crash hints at pilot error, angering families

The Hindu23-07-2025
The initial results of an investigation into December's devastating Jeju Air crash in South Korea showed that, while the plane's both engines sustained bird strikes, its pilots turned off the less-damaged one just before its crash-landing.
The finding, which implied human errors, drew quick, vehement protests from bereaved families and fellow pilots who accused authorities of trying to shift responsibility for the disaster to the dead pilots.
South Korea's Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board initially planned to publicise the results of an investigation of the plane's engines on Saturday. But it was forced to cancel its press briefing in the face of strong protests by relatives of crash victims who were informed of the findings earlier in the day, according to government officials and bereaved families.
Also Read | Ahmedabad Air India flight crash: Fuel control switches 'transitioned' to cutoff position after take off, says interim probe
'If they want to say their investigation was done in a reliable, independent manner, they should have come up with evidence that backs up their explanation,' said Kim Yu-jin, head of an association of bereaved families. 'None of us resent the pilots.'
The Boeing 737-800 operated by Jeju Air landed on its belly without its landing gear deployed at South Korea's southern Muan International Airport on Dec 29. It overshot a runaway, slammed into a concrete structure and burst into flames. It was the deadliest disaster in South Korea's aviation history in decades, killing all but two of the 181 people on board.
Investigation signals pilots turned off the wrong engine
According to a copy of an unpublished briefing report obtained by The Associated Press, a South Korean-led multilateral investigation team said it found no defects in the plane's engines built by France's Safran and GE.
The report said thorough examinations of the engines found the plane's right engine suffered more serious internal damage following bird strikes as it was engulfed with big fires and black smoke. But the pilots switched off the plane's left engine, the report said citing probes on the cockpit voice recorder, the flight data recorder and the engines examinations.
Officials earlier said the black boxes of the Boeing jetliner stopped recording about four minutes before the accident, complicating investigations into the cause of the disaster. The cockpit voice recorder and the flight data recorder cited in the briefing report refers to data stored before the recording stopped.
The report didn't say why the pilots shut off the less-damaged engine and stopped short of saying whether it was an error by the pilots.
Bereaved families, fellow pilots slam the probe
Bereaved families and pilots at Jeju Air and other airlines lambasted the investigation findings, saying authorities must disclose the cockpit voice recorder and the flight data recorder.
'We, the 6,500 pilots at civilian airlines, can't contain our seething anger against the preposterous argument by the Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board that lost neutrality,' the Korean Pilot Unions Alliance said in a statement Tuesday.
Unionized pilots at Jeju Air also issued a statement urging authorities to present scientific evidence to show the plane should have landed normally if it flew with the less-damaged engine.
The latest report focused only on engine issues and didn't mention other factors that could also be blamed for the crash. Among them is the concrete structure the plane crashed into. It housed a set of antennas called localizers designed to guide aircraft safely during landings, and many analysts say it should have been made with more easily breakable materials. Some pilots say they suspect the government wouldn't want to mainly and prominently blame the localizers or bird strikes for mass deaths as the Muan airport is under direct management of the Transport Ministry.
The Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board and the Transport Ministry have offered no public response to the criticism. They said they also won't publicly discuss the engine investigation to respect demands by bereaved families.
A person familiar with the investigation told the AP that authorities are looking at the localizers and other issues, like whether air traffic controllers relayed the danger of bird strikes to the pilots swiftly enough and what emergency training Jeju Air offered to pilots. The person, who requested anonymity citing the sensitive nature of the investigation, said authorities earlier planned to publicise the results of probes after reviewing various issues, but changed the plan and tried to release the outcome of the engine investigation at the request of bereaved families. He said authorities don't intend to place the responsibility for the disaster to the pilots.
Authorities aim to publish the investigation's final results by next June, the person said.
Kwon Bo Hun, dean of Aeronautics College at the Far East University in South Korea, called the engine investigation report 'clumsy' because it didn't disclose evidence that supported its finding on the pilots. He said it only irritated 'emotional parts of us" as the investigation raised suspicions that it puts the whole blame on the dead pilots.
A former Transport Ministry-turned-university professor reached by the AP said the engine investigation report must be 'reliable' as it's based on an analysis of cockpit voice and flight data recorders that 'don't lie.' He spoke on condition of anonymity citing the delicate nature of the issue.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Size of a small cat': Giant 22-inch rat caught from house in northern England sparks concerns about pest control
‘Size of a small cat': Giant 22-inch rat caught from house in northern England sparks concerns about pest control

Indian Express

time2 days ago

  • Indian Express

‘Size of a small cat': Giant 22-inch rat caught from house in northern England sparks concerns about pest control

Pest controllers recently caught a massive rat, believed to be the biggest ever seen in the United Kingdom (UK), from a house in northern England, sparking a wave of concern and disbelief online. Measuring an astonishing 22 inches from nose to tail, the giant rodent was discovered in the Normanby area of Redcar and Cleveland after a worried resident contacted exterminators. Local councillors were shown a photo of the animal and were stunned by its size, describing it as 'almost the size of a small cat'. For context, the previous record-holder for Britain's biggest rat was a 21-inch rodent found in a Bournemouth home back in 2018. The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA), a charity in England and Wales that works to promote animal welfare, says most rats in the UK typically grow to around 11 inches — making this latest find nearly double the average. Eston ward councillor David Taylor told The Telegraph that the rat problem has been steadily escalating, especially since the Labour-led council scrapped free pest control services for residents. 'The longer this is ignored, the worse it will get,' Taylor warned. 'It is a growing problem.' While the council claims it has a dedicated pest control officer for public land and offers guidance to residents, locals say it's not enough. Taylor and fellow councillor Stephen Martin took to Facebook, urging action: 'Rats are being spotted more and more around our area. As your local councillors, we're calling on the Council administration to take this seriously.' Their post quickly went viral, with social media users chiming in from across the UK, and even abroad. One user joked, 'You must have never been to the Nation's Capitol or New York. Because most big cities have Rats that you could put on the police force. Put 'em in uniform, give a taser, and the city would be crimeless.' Others shared their own rat encounters, with one person saying, 'I saw the biggest rat I've ever seen in my home. My cat sat there looking at it, two inches away. Craziest thing I've ever seen.' Another added, 'This is nothing new. We get rats every year as soon as the weather gets cold. I've been told to get traps and poison or humane traps.'

Why red light is essential for flowering plants and indoor gardening: Benefits and how to use
Why red light is essential for flowering plants and indoor gardening: Benefits and how to use

Time of India

time2 days ago

  • Time of India

Why red light is essential for flowering plants and indoor gardening: Benefits and how to use

Indoor gardening has surged in popularity, with plant enthusiasts increasingly using grow lights to support healthy growth. Among the various light colours available, red light is gaining attention for its unique role in plant development. Red light plays a crucial part in photosynthesis and is especially effective during the flowering and fruiting stages. It helps regulate plant hormones and encourages stem elongation, bud formation, and energy production. Many growers use red LED lights as part of a full-spectrum setup to enhance both indoor gardening success and plant health. This targeted lighting approach supports vibrant, thriving plants year-round, especially in low-light environments. What is red light and why does it matter for plants Red light is part of the visible light spectrum and plays a crucial role in photosynthesis, the process by which plants convert light energy into food. It is distinct from infrared light, which is invisible and can cause heat stress if overused. Red light influences key growth phases like flowering and fruiting. According to gardening experts red and blue light are the primary wavelengths plants need. Blue light supports leaf and stem growth, while red light triggers flowering and fruit production, making it essential in later stages of plant development. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Rates Undo Why gardeners prefer red LED grow lights Modern growers favour LED grow lights, including red LEDs, for several reasons. LED lights provide strong, energy-efficient illumination without generating excessive heat, unlike incandescent or fluorescent bulbs. This makes LEDs safer and more cost-effective for indoor use. Garden designers prefer full-spectrum LED lights, which include red light, for starting seedlings indoors, especially in early spring. The ability to customise light wavelengths and intensity allows growers to optimise plant growth for specific species and growth stages. Types of red light: Visible, infrared, and far-red Red light comes in three forms: visible red light, infrared light, and far-red light. Visible red light is the classic red glow seen in grow lights, directly influencing plant photosynthesis. Infrared light is invisible and mainly involved in plant signaling; however, excessive infrared can cause overheating and damage. Far-red light , situated between visible red and infrared wavelengths, is believed by some growers to be the most effective at promoting growth, though scientific evidence is still emerging. Anecdotal reports from gardeners highlight its benefits, but more research is needed. How to use red lights effectively for your plants The effectiveness of red light depends heavily on timing and duration. Seedlings typically require 16-18 hours of light per day, while flowering plants need around 12-16 hours. Overexposure to red light can stress plants, so balancing with blue and full-spectrum light is ideal. For best results: Use full-spectrum LEDs with a strong red light component to mimic natural sunlight. Adjust light duration based on plant species and growth stage. Position lights to provide even coverage without overheating plants. Research specific plant needs, as some may benefit more from combined blue and red light. Also read | 10 best small plants for your office desk

Ancient relics believed to be Lord Buddha's bones traced to US family, returned to India after 127 years
Ancient relics believed to be Lord Buddha's bones traced to US family, returned to India after 127 years

New Indian Express

time4 days ago

  • New Indian Express

Ancient relics believed to be Lord Buddha's bones traced to US family, returned to India after 127 years

JAIPUR: A family based in the United States was allegedly preparing to sell ancient remains believed to be the bones of Lord Buddha through a major international auction house, Union Culture and Tourism Minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat revealed on Saturday. The announcement was made during a public hearing at his residence in Jodhpur. The relics, once taken out of the country during British rule, were recently traced to a family in the United States that was allegedly preparing to sell them through an international auction house. Speaking at a public hearing at his residence in Jodhpur, Shekhawat said that the relics had appeared in a Sotheby's catalogue earlier this year, triggering swift intervention by the Indian government. 'We stopped the auction and informed them that the Government of India wanted to claim and officially receive the relics,' he said. The sacred remains were originally discovered in 1898 during British-led excavations at Piprahwa in the Kapilvastu region, present-day Uttar Pradesh. They were found inside a stone casket believed to belong to the Shakya clan—Lord Buddha's own family. The casket contained a crystal container with ashes said to be of Buddha, along with belongings of his nephew and other kin. British officer William Peppe, who led the excavation, took possession of a large portion of the relics, some of which later made their way overseas.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store