‘Real sense of panic': Kate Middleton sparks Palace ‘chaos'
This was the scene, or at least something like it I'm assuming, inside the palace this week after 'chaos' and 'panic broke out' when Kate, The Princess of Wales pulled out of a major event less than an hour before she was meant to arrive.
It has now emerged that her last minute call to skip Ascot left royal aides 'bewildered and worried' and that 'rumours had briefly swirled around the palace that the future queen had been taken unwell and either needed to see a doctor or had been rushed to the hospital,' according to a new report.
Oh I say!
The full extent of the hullabaloo caused by the princess' about-face has been revealed by The Daily Beas t 's Tom Sykes whose unbeatable contacts paint a picture of the palace having been briefly pushed to the edge of a meltdown.
On Wednesday, UK time Kate and her husband Prince William were slated to attend day two of Royal Ascot to enjoy their God-given right to drink champers in the sun and put 10 quid each way on a sure thing. Accordingly, the couple was listed in the official 'carriage list' put out by the palace of members of their royal family who would be arriving in clippety-clop regency style to the racecourse.
But, less than an hour after the carriage list was published, and just over an hour before Kate was due to appear along with King Charles and Queen Camilla, the palace announced she had withdrawn.
Cue the drammahhhh.
Inside the palace, it was 'chaos', according to Sykes.
'Rumours … briefly swirled around the palace' that Kate 'either needed to see a doctor or had been rushed to the hospital,' he has reported.
'Everyone was wandering around going, 'What is going on?'' a former courtier told Sykes.
'One minute she was going, and the next she wasn't. This is one of the biggest days of the year in the royal calendar; you don't just miss Ascot on a whim, so there was a real sense of panic.'
The good news is that none of these fears were borne out by the facts. The truth about what had gone one was reassuringly benign.
As every single UK news story pointed out, Kate herself said exactly this time last year that she was 'taking each day as it comes'. Despite having announced in January this year she is remission, clearly this still holds. She was said to be 'disappointed' to not be up to attending Ascot.
The Telegraph's royal editor Hannah Furness reported that 'there [was] no cause for alarm' and only that 'the Princess was mindful of treading a careful line as she returns to work.'
A friend of Kate's has backed up this explanation too.
They told Sykes: 'My understanding is that Kate was basically exhausted after Trooping the Colour on Saturday and Garter Day on Monday and couldn't face it. There are good days and bad days, as she herself has very candidly said.'
That's the good news.
The bad news is that the palace's handling of this situation suggests they have not exactly learnt that much since last year when we witnessed the months-long extraordinarily clumsy and inept royal mismanagement around Kate.
Who can forget how the internet collectively lost its mind in early 2024 about Kate supposedly going 'missing' after having abdominal surgery? In the absence of any real information and in what felt like a squirrely royal climate, social media quickly filled the void with noxious conspiracy theories about Kate and William.
The princess ditching Ascot immediately brought to mind the PR disaster that came at the peak of Kate-madness in February 2024 after William pulled out of his godfather King Constantine of Greece's memorial service only 45 minutes before it started, and despite it being held only minutes away from their Windsor home. The prince's abrupt cancellation only stoked the fires and led to more feverish speculation online.
(As we all now know, several weeks later in March 2024, Kate would tell the world she had cancer.)
While this week the princess was just 'exhausted', as the former coutrier told Sykes of the Ascot mess, 'The chaotic nature of the announcement was eerily reminiscent of the dark days of last year. People were bewildered and worried.'
Kate wrote in June last year, 'I am learning how to be patient, especially with uncertainty.'
A year on and the palace still does not seem to have much more of a clue how to manage communications around Kate's fluid health needs. You have to wonder if any lessons might have been learned since those 'dark days' of 2025.
The best bit of news that came out of Wednesday's Ascot situation came courtesy of William. The princess might not have gone but the prince trotted along where he was photographed drinking beer with friends and having what looked like a cracking good time. The proof is in the pilsner. Panic over.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
4 days ago
- ABC News
British lawyer says families received wrong remains of Air India crash victims
Relatives of a British victim killed in last month's Air India crash received a casket that contained mixed remains, a lawyer representing several families says. The family of a separate victim received the remains of another person, according to James Healy-Pratt, who is representing 20 British families who lost loved ones in the disaster. A total of 241 people on board the London-bound Boeing 787 Dreamliner died when the plane crashed shortly after take-off from Ahmedabad in western India on June 12. The toll included 169 Indian passengers and 52 British nationals. Several people on the ground also died while only one passenger, British citizen Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, survived the crash. Mr Healy-Pratt told the Press Association news agency that the return of victims' remains had been marred by serious errors, which had been identified following a probe by a British coroner. "In the first two caskets that were repatriated, in one of the caskets, there was co-mingling of DNA which did not relate to the deceased in that casket or the casket that accompanied it," he said. The lawyer added the coroner was then "able to determine that one particular loved one was not at all who the family thought they were". Miten Patel, whose mother, Shobhana Patel, died along with her husband in the disaster, told the BBC that "other remains" were found in her casket after her body was returned to Britain. "People were tired and there was a lot of pressure. But there has to be a level of responsibility that you're sending the right bodies to the UK," he told the BBC. The Daily Mail newspaper first reported two cases in which the wrong remains were apparently returned to families in Britain. India's foreign ministry said all remains "were handled with utmost professionalism and with due regard for the dignity of the deceased". "We are continuing to work with the UK authorities on addressing any concerns related to this issue," the statement added. AFP
News.com.au
5 days ago
- News.com.au
‘I would cry': Dating clip sparks etiquette debate
Gen Z is a different breed from their elders, but they're also still pretty big on one type of etiquette. A London local, who goes by the username MissingDevon, posted a video of a group of people recently dining out at a restaurant. The dining layout was a classic booth arrangement, where one person sat on a comfortable, lounge-like chair and the other sat on an ordinary dining chair. If you're the person who gets the regular dining chair, you're also the one who has their back to the comings and goings of a restaurant. So waiters and people are constantly strolling past you. The clip showed a group of couples sitting down to eat, and while two of the men sat in the normal dining chairs, giving the women the more comfortable booths, one woman was sitting in a dining chair with her back to the ongoing bustle of a busy restaurant. MissingDevon posted the video with the caption, 'only a girl could tell you what is wrong in this video', and she seems to have been right. The clip amassed 5 million views and the comment section was filled with young women arguing that the woman should be sitting in a comfortable booth. 'Why is she sitting on the chair?' One asked. 'The princess should be on the couch,' someone else argued. 'I would cry if he made me sit on the chair and he took the booth,' another confessed. 'He has taken the comfy cushion seat, making her sit on the wooden chair, and all the other guys are on chairs,' someone else observed. 'Wrong seat, fella,' another criticised. Interestingly, though, it wasn't unanimous, with others arguing men should sit themselves facing the exits. 'It's common etiquette for the man to always be facing the door,' one argued. 'I think that's correct, so the man can see any danger entering the building first,' one argued. While someone else argued the man in the booth was in the right position because he could observe the entire restaurant and 'protect' his date. 'A man wants to see the entry. It's to see potential danger,' another man argued, but a woman replied and said 'there's no danger' in a cocktail bar. 'Why can't a man be comfy?' Another asked. Others argued it isn't 'that deep' and that no one knows their situation and perhaps the woman prefers the wooden chair. Relationship expert Elizabeth Jane told said that there's actually no wrong or right move in terms of who gets what seat in dating etiquette. 'I think that Gen Z men tend to be more emotionally expressive and are more comfortable with fluidity in gender roles, so taking the booth may not be viewed as ill-mannered, as both may view themselves as equals, and who takes the booth becomes quite irrelevant to them,' she said. 'It may come down to more practical considerations as to who takes the booth. The larger person may feel more comfortable in the booth, which may be larger or more sturdy.' Ms Jane argued that Millennial men may still be 'emotionally evolving,' so they are more keen to stick to traditional gender roles. The relationship expert argued that etiquette norms are still a big part of dating for Gen Z but the standards are shifting. 'I wouldn't say that etiquette norms are dying but rather they are transforming or at least adjusting to more relaxed rules on how a man and a woman should behave, gender roles are beginning to merge,' she said. 'They tend not to get lost in gender roles where they are seeking approval from older generations as to how they should act and what they should say'.
Sky News AU
6 days ago
- Sky News AU
'Very intelligent': Former royal butler Grant Harrold reveals the most intelligent royals... and where he thinks King Charles III ranks in the family
Former palace aide Grant Harrold has weighed in on who he believes are the Royal Family's brightest minds - and King Charles III has made the cut. Harrold, 47, who served in the Royal Household between 2004 and 2011, has named the three royals he considers to be the most intelligent, based on his years of experience working at Highgrove House. Harrold was a trusted member of staff for King Charles III and Queen Camilla and also regularly assisted the Prince and Princess of Wales and the Duke of Sussex. On occasion, he even had the honour of serving the late Queen Elizabeth II and the late Prince Philip. In a recent interview with online learning platform Study Platform, Harrold revealed: "The smartest in my mind would have been Queen Elizabeth II." "The reason I say that is not just intelligence; she was witty, ruled a country for over 70 years, and knew about sports," he told the outlet, per Express UK. Coming in just behind the late monarch, Harrold placed the Queen's eldest son, King Charles III. "Right behind her, I would say the King because he speaks several languages, but he is also very intelligent with numbers, and his command of the English language is extraordinary," Harrold explained. "He's super intelligent, so if you're talking about the royals now, he'd be top of that pile without any question." Rounding out his top three was Princess Anne, whom Harrold described as "a knowledgeable lady". Asked whether it would be seen as a negative if younger royals chose not to pursue university, Harrold said attitudes had shifted. "I don't think it would (be frowned upon) these days," he said. "We may find that George, Charlotte, and Louis might not all go to university. They may go straight to somewhere like Sandhurst." For Prince George, who turns 12 on Tuesday, Harrold said some form of military training is almost certain. "You can guarantee that George, whether he likes it or not, will have to go through that military training," he said. "Both William and Charles had military training. You're the commanding chief of the Armed Forces, so you've got to know the profession. "However, there might not be so much pressure when it comes to George; only time will tell." In the same interview, Harrold also weighed in on the future schooling of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's children, Archie and Lilibet, who are being raised in Montecito, California. He said it was "very likely and completely possible" that Harry might want his children to experience British schooling. "If they have their younger education in America, I'm sure their father will be quite keen to have a bit of a British education," he said. "But then it depends on how the relationship is with the rest of the family when the time comes." When it comes to royal education, the standards have always been high. King Charles began his schooling at Hill House at age eight, before moving on to Cheam School and later Gordonstoun, where he passed six O-levels. He went on to study archaeology, anthropology and history at Cambridge University, graduating in 1970 with a 2:2, the first British royal heir to earn a university degree. Princess Anne, meanwhile, was educated at Benenden School, leaving with six O-levels and three A-levels. Famously, she insisted on being treated like any other student, making her own bed, doing chores and waiting on tables. Princes William and Harry both attended London nurseries before going on to Eton College. William later studied at St Andrews University, where he famously met his future wife, Princess Catherine. His cousin, Lady Louise Windsor, daughter of Prince Edward and Duchess Sophie, enrolled at the same university in 2022. Interestingly, the royal Harrold deemed the smartest, the late Queen Elizabeth II, was educated entirely at home and even during World War II. She and her younger sister, the late Princess Margaret, were taught by their governess Marion 'Crawfie' Crawford. According to the official Royal Family website, when Elizabeth became heir presumptive in 1936, her education shifted to include constitutional law and history, with guidance from her father and Eton's Vice-Provost, Henry Marten. She also received religious instruction from the Archbishop of Canterbury and studied French with native-speaking governesses. The late Queen also excelled in sport and the arts, becoming a strong swimmer, horse rider, and musician. At just 13, she won the Children's Challenge Shield at London's Bath Club, and during the war years, she took home first prize at the Royal Windsor Horse Show in 1944. Of course, beyond her academic grounding and sporting achievements, the late Queen was renowned for her quick wit and dry sense of humour. In a previous interview on 6 September 2022- just two days before Queen Elizabeth died at age 96- Harrold reflected on "the wonderful kind of way" Her Majesty carried herself, as well as her "wicked sense of humour" in an interview with Slingo. "She wasn't very regal or royal... I felt really relaxed around her," he said.
