Iran says no 'agreement' on ceasefire, signals halt to strikes if Israel stops
[Editor's Note: Follow the KT live blog for live updates on the Israel-Iran conflict.]
Iran's foreign minister said Tuesday Tehran did not intend to continue its strikes if Israel stopped its attacks, hours after US President Donald Trump announced a staggered ceasefire to bring about an "official end" to their conflict.
Abbas Araghchi suggested that Iran had already halted its operation at 4am Tehran time (0030 GMT) -- and wanted a simultaneous end in attacks from Israel as well.
Trump had said the ceasefire would be a phased 24-hour process beginning at around 0400 GMT Tuesday, with Iran unilaterally halting all operations. Israel would follow suit 12 hours later.
"It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a Complete and Total CEASEFIRE," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.
"Upon the 24th hour, an official end to the 12-day war will be saluted by the world," he said, adding that both sides had agreed to remain "peaceful and respectful" during each phase of the process.
Any cessation in hostilities would come as a huge relief to world leaders frantic about an escalation in violence igniting a wider conflagration.
There was no immediate confirmation from Israel on ending the conflict that has killed hundreds in Iran and two dozen in Israel.
Explosions continued to rock Tehran overnight, with blasts in the north and centre of the Iranian capital described by AFP journalists as some of the strongest since the conflict broke out.
Writing on social media, Araghchi said: "The military operations of our powerful Armed Forces to punish Israel for its aggression continued until the very last minute, at 4am."
"As of now, there is NO 'agreement' on ceasefire or cessation of military operations. However, provided that the Israeli regime stops its illegal aggression against the Iranian people no later than 4am Tehran time, we have no intention to continue our response afterwards," he added.
As Iran has repeatedly made clear: Israel launched war on Iran, not the other way around.
As of now, there is NO "agreement" on any ceasefire or cessation of military operations. However, provided that the Israeli regime stops its illegal aggression against the Iranian people no�
— Seyed Abbas Araghchi (@araghchi) June 24, 2025
The adversaries had been swapping missile fire since Israel carried out surprise "preemptive" strikes against Iran on June 13, targeting nuclear and military sites, and prompting Trump to warn of a possible "massive" regional conflict.
Strikes on US base
The US leader's truce announcement came hours after Iran launched missiles at the largest US military facility in the Middle East -- Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar -- in a move Trump shrugged off as "very weak."
Calling for a de-escalation, Trump said Tehran had given advance notice of the barrage.
Iran's National Security Council confirmed having targeted the base "in response to the US aggressive and insolent action against Iran's nuclear sites and facilities".
But it added that the number of missiles launched "was the same as the number of bombs that the US had used" -- a signal that it had calibrated its response to be directly proportional rather than escalatory.
"This was calibrated and telegraphed in a way that would not result in any American casualties, so that there is an off ramp for both sides," Ali Vaez, a senior advisor at the International Crisis Group, told AFP.
The offensive came after the United States joined its ally Israel's military campaign against Iran, attacking an underground uranium enrichment centre with massive bunker-busting bombs and hitting two other nuclear facilities overnight Saturday into Sunday.
As international concern mounted that Israel's campaign and the US strikes could ignite a wider conflict, French President Emmanuel Macron insisted that "the spiral of chaos must end" while China warned of the potential economic fallout.
'Blatant aggression'
Iran said its assault in Qatar wasn't targeting the Middle Eastern neighbour, but the government in Doha accused Tehran of "blatant aggression" and claimed its right to a "proportional" response.
Iran's state media quoted the Revolutionary Guard Corps announcing that six missiles had hit Al Udeid, which had been evacuated beforehand, according to the Qataris.
The broadside was made up of "short-range and medium-range ballistic missiles," a US defence official said.
AFP reporters heard blasts in central Doha and in Lusail, north of the capital, on Monday evening, and saw projectiles moving across the night sky.
Iranians gathered in central Tehran to celebrate, images on state TV showed, with some waving the flag of the Islamic republic and chanting "Death to America".
Qatar earlier announced the temporary closure of its airspace in light of "developments in the region", while the US embassy and other foreign missions warned their citizens to shelter in place.
Israeli strikes on Iran have killed more than 400 people, Iran's health ministry has said. Twenty-four people have died in Iran's attacks on Israel, according to official figures.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
30 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
Some UAE employers offer work from home option after Iran strikes US base in Qatar
[Editor's Note: Follow the KT live blog for live updates on the Israel-Iran conflict.] Some companies in the UAE offered their employees the option to work from home on Tuesday, a day after Iran launched a missile attack on a US air base in Qatar. In an email to their employees, some explained that it was a measure taken for "caution" in the aftermath of the regional conflict. Sana K, an employee at a homegrown company, said that she got an email late on Monday evening. "It gave everyone the option to work from home, and I was very thankful," she said. "My family and I were up all night following the news. So, the work from home (WFH) option was a welcome move. I also decided not to send my children to school today." Stay up to date with the latest news. Follow KT on WhatsApp Channels. She said Monday's situation made her family introspect: "We were up almost all night following the live news updates on TV. Even though there was no threat in the UAE, the attack in Qatar was scary. We are due to fly home next week, so everything seemed unsettling. That's when my son pointed out that people in many parts of the world live in a state of war daily. We were filled with gratitude for the safety and security we experience in the UAE." On Monday, Iran attacked an American airbase in Qatar, causing panic among Qatari residents. The incident was followed by a ceasefire between Israel and Iran after a 12-day conflict which saw both countries attack each other with missiles. Cautious step Another Dubai resident, F.K., said that his company also offered employees the option to work from home on Tuesday. 'Ours is an international MNC with headquarters in the US,' he said. 'They wanted to be extra cautious in light of the recent regional events. However, I decided to go in because I had some meetings that I wanted to attend in person. The drive to work was very smooth with very little traffic." Meanwhile, several companies have cancelled all work-related travel plans of their employees. Ali, who works as a sales manager, said that he was due to fly to Doha and later to Riyadh on Monday night but was advised to cancel all meetings. "My supervisor called me and asked me to cancel the meeting and the trip," he said. "He said the situation was too fluid and it was better to reschedule later. I am glad I did because I know there were brief suspensions of flights, which caused significant delays." Several flights were cancelled and rerouted as the conflict caused brief closures of airspaces of several countries in the region. Many travellers in the UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait faced delays due to the issue. Some airlines have advised people to expect delays in the coming weeks due to the incident.
Zawya
43 minutes ago
- Zawya
Tel Aviv stocks and shekel jump on Israel-Iran ceasefire
JERUSALEM: Tel Aviv stocks opened higher and the shekel hit more than a two-year high against the dollar on Tuesday, after Israel and Iran agreed to a ceasefire following nearly two weeks of fighting. The broad Tel Aviv 125 index was up 1.7%, while the blue chip TA-35 was up 1.5%, for the market's sixth day of gains in the past seven sessions on optimism that Israel had removed a threat of Iran developing nuclear weapons anytime soon. The shekel appreciated 1.5% against the dollar to 3.39, its strongest level since February 2023. (Reporting by Steven Scheer; Editing by Alison Williams)
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Even the climate agenda has been affected by US strikes on Iran
The topic of the moment at the ongoing Climate Action Week in London is to get ready for the next global climate summit at Belem in Brazil. But it is happening at a time when the climate change agenda has slipped markedly under the radar. One speaker said it was like living in a 'good news, bad news' world. The radical optimists are still to be found, but the naysayers who foresee a future of a lemming-like collapse from the cliff are in stronger voice. The US strikes on Iran over the weekend represent a radical moment not just for the global political balance, but also the environmental movement, which has an uneasy relationship with nuclear power. Its emotional heart is not in favour of atomic energy, but administrators who need to deliver on net-zero goals by the mid-century see no alternative. The B2 bombers that carried out the raids on Iran's Fordow were clearly running the risk of contamination from the nuclear facility. So far, the reporting from the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN's nuclear body, is that there have been no leaks that would pose a danger to the region. The area may be mountainous and arid, but it is close to multiple countries and thus the ultimate threats exist far wider afield than just in the host nation. It is clear how badly Iran fell short in its nuclear adventure Iran has invested much of its resources in mastering atomic technology. Decades of underground research and the building of refining facilities have come about despite the international community expressing doubts over the programme. The IAEA has been the principal forum in which this contested activity was carried out, with reference regularly to the UN Security Council, and now finally culminating in a bombing intervention by the US. I say 'finally', but there is no certainty that the raid will cap Iran's nuclear programme. This is even as Israeli officials claimed over the weekend that the war they have waged, combined with Washington's intervention, has set Tehran several years back from weaponisation of this programme. What is the link between climate change and Iran's nuclear programme, you may ask. The short answer is that the climate change agenda could have taken Iran down a different path. Because around the world, there is more and more investment in nuclear capability. As mentioned above, it is crucial to net-zero goals. There is no denying that Iran meets several metrics for how a nation can benefit from nuclear energy. It is a vast country with a rapidly expanding population that has great manufacturing potential. As it asserts, it has the right under international law to develop an indigenous nuclear programme. And yet, in failing to recognise the wider political context of its claims, it has lost sight of its own national needs for clean and sustainable energy output. Tim Gould, the chief economist of the International Energy Agency (which is not affiliated with the IAEA), told the City of London's Net Zero Delivery Summit on Monday that nuclear energy was at the heart of a new age of electricity. Power generation is needed to meet an increasing share of the world's rising demand. One of the components of this push for more electricity directly stems from climate change and rising global temperatures. Mr Gould says there is more demand for electricity for cooling systems so that humans can live normally in the changed climate. Iran is one of the countries bearing the brunt of this trend. For a country like Iran, electricity offers the 'most readily available' set of advantages, ranging from falling costs to more efficient clean technologies. Worldwide, despite the headlines around countries like India returning to coal generation, more than 80 per cent of new electricity capacity is coming from low-emission sources. Mr Gould makes the point that countries also like to have homegrown energy security, which can be derived from renewables. Energy transition is vital to the future of the Earth. It is essential for us to survive and make our habitats more liveable. And contamination in any part of the planet from a nuclear facility that is in the middle of a confrontation amounts to the greatest failure to meet the challenge of climate change. But even at this moment, with the brink of disaster in front of us, there is progress being reported. According to Mr Gould, the Cop28 goal that was announced by the UAE presidency of tripling renewable energy is being met. With innovation like carbon capture and storage, there is an opportunity to increase energy efficiency and to line up enough capital to back big-ticket sustainable energy systems, including nuclear. That is where the global agenda is really at, with just months to go before Brazil hosts the next UN climate summit. It is, therefore, important that progress not be blown off course by cataclysm in the Middle East. Seen through the lens of climate change, it is clear how badly Iran fell short in its nuclear adventure. It is just as hard to know when it will start back on the international path.
