US representatives, union workers warn ‘critical' Boston Ship Repair vanishing without investment, work
U.S. representatives and Boston Ship Repair workers gathered at one of the country's few remaining large dry docks in the Seaport on Monday, calling for investment and support for U.S. ship building and repair as the facilities struggle to survive overseas competition.
'Let me be clear, if immediate action is not taken by our federal, state and city agencies, this year, this facility will face the same fate,' said Boston Ship Repair CEO Edward Snyder, citing the closure of the company's shipyard in Philadelphia. 'We will become a once-talked-about graveyard with a history but no future.'
Rep. Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts, along with Rep. Joe Courtney from Connecticut and Rep. Jared Golden from Maine, all Democrats, called for 'urgent investments' in facilities like the Boston dock supporting U.S.-based ship building and repair industries.
Flanked by a hulking gray-and-black vessel docked in the facility's basin over 1,000 feet long, the politicians, union and company leadership called the movement of work critical to military and commercial vessels a threat to the local economies and jobs, as well as the country's national security.
As layoffs hit the industry, Boston Ship Repair has shrunk from about 300 workers to now just 60, IAM Union Eastern Territory General Vice President David Sullivan said.
About 80 U.S.-flagged ships are currently engaged in international commerce while China has more than 5,500, Sullivan said, calling on Americans to 'pay attention to these numbers.'
'It was facilities like this that allowed us to build and repair a Navy that preserved democracy when democracy hung in the balance,' said Lynch. 'That is our role, and we are losing that capacity here in this country.'
The group expressed support for U.S. Trade Representative penalties on Chinese ships, pushed by the Trump administration, and incentives related to U.S.-built vessels. They also heralded the SHIPS for America Act introduced in Congress, aiming to rebuild U.S. shipyard infrastructure.
There is need for oversight in the work distribution, Golden said, noting that the Boston facility only sees 60% to 70% utilization while others face a backlog of repair work.
'When the shipyard is empty, our members get laid off,' said IAM Union Local S25 President Andre Lavertue. 'Too often we see younger workers get let go and never return to work. These jobs need to be secured, and we need consistent, efficient use of our shipyard here at home.'
Rep. Courtney noted the 'hypercompetitive environment in Washington' in terms of funding priorities but the bipartisan support for the issue.
'We're in the process now of writing the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act, the 2026 budget, which Jared and I can tell you needs a lot of work in terms of what's been given to us by the administration,' said Courtney. 'But again, I'm an optimist that, with the right partnership and the right coalition of forces, this is an issue that rises above partisanship in terms of what the nation needs.'
___
© 2025 MediaNews Group, Inc.
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"What's Happening In This Country Is Horrific": 29 Of The Best Political Tweets From This Chaotic, Messy Week
Editor's Note: While we can't endorse what X has become, we can bring you the worthwhile moments that still exist there, curated and free of the surrounding chaos. American politics — well, frankly, global politics — is chaos right now, but I find it comforting to know I'm not alone in thinking the world has gone bananas. So, here are 29 of the best, most relatable, and sometimes funny political tweets from the last week: 1. 2. 3. I've watched this like 20 times. Carlson sets traps and Cruz walks into them like a Cancun vacation — Van 'Not Going Anywhere' Lathan Jr (@VanLathan) June 18, 2025 The Tucker Carlson Show / Twitter: @VanLathan 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Using the phrase "humanizing children" reveals so much about you — evan loves worf (@esjesjesj) June 17, 2025 RSBN / Twitter: @esjesjesj Related: "Honestly Speechless At How Evil This Is": 26 Brutal, Brutal, Brutal Political Tweets Of The Week 9. 10. You have to remember, a lot of these older folks from the 60s and 70s have been fighting for equal rights for decades. What's happening in this country is horrific, they've watched as rights were gained (like Roe) and then lost again. It's devastating. — Simone (@girlpowertbh) June 15, 2025 Fox News / Twitter: @girlpowertbh 11. 12. 13. 14. Nah. You're doing just fine on your own. — Mike Lupica (@MikeLupica) June 17, 2025 RSBN / Twitter: @MikeLupica Related: MAGA Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really Doesn't Like This Army Vet's Now-Viral Speech 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. this is how our government is being run — Dj (@DjsokeSpeaking) June 18, 2025 Paramount / Twitter: @DjsokeSpeaking 25. 26. 27. 28. finally: See you next week! For more political tweets, check out our most recent roundup: "Americans Should Be Alarmed": 24 Of The Most Brutal, Brutal, Brutal Political Tweets Of The Week Also in In the News: "The Most Honest Accidental Summary Of This Administration's Foreign Policy": A Clip From Karoline Leavitt's Latest Press Briefing Is Going Viral For Being So, So Cringey Also in In the News: Trump Had A Middle-Of-The-Night Meltdown About... Well... So Many Things Also in In the News: "Let Them Eat Teslas": People At The "No Kings" Protests This Weekend Brought Signs That Were So Clever I'm Still Laughing About Them
USA Today
37 minutes ago
- USA Today
From tax on tips to SALT deductions: Senate tweaks bring change to Trump's big tax bill
The Senate released its revisions to the legislation dubbed the "One Big Beautiful Bill" by President Donald Trump this week, but whether it's better for average Americans than the House bill might be questionable, some experts say. The Senate's version of the mega tax bill keeps popular benefits like no taxes on overtime and tips, an additional tax deduction for those 65 years and older, and a deduction for state and local taxes (SALT). However, the Senate's tweaks, if passed, may make those tax benefits less beneficial for individual taxpayers, some accountants said. No tax on tips and overtime pay Eliminating taxes on tips and overtime pay is one of President Donald Trump's most popular campaign promises, and the Senate kept it – but with a cap. For tips, the Senate offers a maximum $25,000 deduction for both overtime pay and tips, but it would begin to phase out for single filers earning, with a modified adjusted gross income (MAGI), $150,000, and couples over $300,000. It would reduce the deduction by $100 for every $1,000 of income over those thresholds. MAGI begins with the adjusted gross income, whch is basically the sum of all income, which commonly can include items like dividends, interest, capital gains, rental income, self-employment income, taxable alimony, Social Security, pensions, annuity income, and a few more things. The AGI is then adjusted or 'modified' further to get to the MAGI. For a single filer, the deduction is completely phased out if income is $250,000 over the MAGI threshold. The House version didn't have a cap or a phase out. Instead, it excluded highly compensated employees who make at least $160,000 in 2025. 'For both no tax on tips and no tax on overtime, the House version is more beneficial to the average taxpayer as there are no caps on the deduction,' said Richard Pon, a certified public accountant in San Francisco. Senior deduction The Senate proposed a $6,000 'bonus deduction' for those aged 65 and older, but eligibility is capped at $75,000 in income for single filers and $150,000 for couples. The deduction would be available from 2025 through 2028, and would supplement, but not replace, the existing extra standard deduction already available to older adults. For 2025, a single filer age 65 or older can claim an extra $2,000, while married couples filing jointly can add $1,600 for each spouse over 65 in addition to the standard deduction available to all taxpayers. The Senate's bonus deduction would be on top of those. The House agreed on a $4,000 bonus deduction with similar eligibility parameters and duration. Bonus deductions are meant as a substitute for Trump's promise of no tax on Social Security because the budget reconciliation process doesn't allow provisions related to Social Security, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center Since tax deductions only reduce taxable income, not tax owed directly, those who pay little to no federal income tax may benefit very little if at all from the bonus deduction, analysts said. SALT deduction Individual taxpayers could lose big under the Senate's version of the controversial SALT, or state and local tax, deduction. In 2017, Trump's first major tax bill capped SALT at $10,000. Before that, it was uncapped, meaning individuals could deduct all their state and local taxes on their federal tax returns. The cap was seen as mostly hurting many big Democratic states like New York with high state and local taxes. As a workaround, many states adopted Pass-Through Entity (PTE) taxes, which allow the entity to pay state income tax at the entity level and take the tax deduction. Only individuals, not entities, are subject to the SALT cap. The House plan raises the cap to $40,000 for individuals earning $500,000 or less. The Senate kept the current $10,000 cap and said passthrough entity taxes (PTE) would now be subject to the $10,000 limit, Pon said. 'I think the cap may be raised slightly -- most likely by doubling the cap to $20,000 for married taxpayers,' Pon said. But 'the proposal to stop the PTE workaround, I think, will pass as it raises revenue which is needed to get the deficit under control.' Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@ and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday.
New York Post
38 minutes ago
- New York Post
‘Grifter' David Hogg pledged to unleash $20M on safe blue Dems — but only has paltry $1.5M — and most funds did not go toward candidates
David Hogg has yet to bring home the bacon. Two months ago, the recently defenestrated Democratic National Committee vice chair ignited a firestorm among Democrats by vowing to deploy $20 million from his 'grassroots' Leaders We Deserve PAC against incumbents in safe blue districts. But there's just one small problem. Advertisement Leaders We Deserve only has a measly $1.5 million cash on hand, far short of the promised $20 million it has committed to spend, according to Federal Election Commission records for the month of May. Worse yet, the PAC has never actually raised that kind of money in the two years since its inception, only raking in $848,000 last month, while spending about $798,000. Close to three-quarters of those expenses appear to have largely been gobbled up on operational costs such as travel, payroll, consulting fees, meals, etc. 4 David Hogg endorsed New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, a socialist who wants city-run grocery stores and massive tax increases on corporations and the rich. X / @ZohranKMamdani Advertisement This includes $10,502 that went directly into Hogg's personal pockets. 'David Hogg spent his spring on a kamikaze mission right towards the heart of the Party to raise money for his PAC and, as it turns out, he spent more money on consultants pitching negative stories on the Party than on candidates actually trying to run and win campaigns,' a Democratic strategist vented to The Post. 'That's the definition of a grift right there, and should be a red flag for every donor, candidate, and activist that he's already fooled.' Hogg made waves again Friday by rolling out his PAC's endorsement of socialist New York City mayoral wannabe Zohran Mamdani, whom the 25-year-old hailed as 'authentic' and 'real,' ahead of Tuesday's Big Apple primary contest. Advertisement Given the current fundraising trends from his PAC, critics are skeptical of Hogg's ability to make good on the $20 million goal, which had sparked fierce divisions within the party. Only $6,000 of the $798,000 outlays Hogg's PAC reported in May appear to have actually gone to backing candidates — Illinois's 2nd District congressional hopeful Robert Peters and Ohio state Rep. Christine Cockley (D). 'At this rate, he would only have to raise a little over $3 billion in order to get his promised $20 million to primary candidates. THIS should be the story, folks,' New York state Sen. James Skoufis, who vied unsuccessfully earlier this year to chair the DNC, chided. Advertisement 4 David Hogg has ruffled feathers within the DNC due to his push to meddle in primaries. Breakfast Club Power 105.1 FM The $20 million target is ambitious. Since Leaders We Deserve was launched in 2023, it has only raised $15.3 million in total (all but $1.5 million of that has been spent). During that timeframe, Hogg pocketed some $225,000 from the PAC, FEC records show. Notably, the announcement from Hogg's PAC did not give a specific timeline for the spending; however, in media appearances, the 25-year-old political neophyte has expressed a keen interest in the 2026 House midterms, which are only in the pre-season right now and about a year away from most voters casting primary ballots. Nevertheless, it's clear that he doesn't have anywhere near that kind of cash sitting in his PAC right now. 'The grift that keeps on grifting,' a high-ranking Democrat outside of the DNC griped to The Post. 'He needs an internship. Not a PAC. 'The only thing David Hogg can actually raise is eyebrows, because he's never held a job, won a race, or lifted a finger to help anyone — unless it helps him make money first and foremost,' that Democrat, who has dealt with Hogg in the past, added. The less-than-desired war chest comes despite the fact that Hogg was caught snatching Democratic National Committee contact lists to solicit donations, a move that has infuriated party insiders, as The Post previously reported. Typically, DNC leaders are expected to raise funds for the party, rather than tapping Democratic resources for their personal operations. Advertisement 'Many non-profits that do serious, impactful grassroots organizing have lost important donors to Leaders We Deserve due to David's highly impressive ability to center himself in the narrative as a bold fighter,' Cameron Kasky, a former classmate of Hogg's at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, said. 4 David Hogg has been a prominent voice in progressive circles since the tragic Parkland high school shooting in 2018 . Getty Images Hogg, who was catapulted into the national spotlight due to his activism in the wake of the tragic Parkland school shooting in which a sicko gunned down 17 people, was elected as one of three DNC vice chairs in February. During his tenure, he quickly rubbed many insiders the wrong way with his focus on his outside operations. But in April, that drama came to a head when he unveiled his plans to target 'asleep at the wheel, out-of-touch, and ineffective' incumbent Democrats in their primaries. Advertisement Hogg caveated that he was only focused on effectiveness, not necessarily age or ideology and that he would stay out of competitive races to avoid jeopardizing Democrats' chances of beating Republicans in the general election. But the backlash was immediate, and the drama consumed the DNC at a time in which the party was licking its wounds from the 2024 election drubbing and trying to regain its mojo to take on the Trump machine. DNC chairman Ken Martin was forced to publicly split with Hogg, telling the party apparatus in a call that 'Our job is to be neutral arbiters,' and adding that, 'We can't be both the referee and also the player at the same time.' Martin also pushed DNC leaders to sign a neutrality pledge, something Hogg refused to do. Advertisement 4 DNC Chairman Ken Martin has been adamant that party bosses should not meddle in primaries and defer to the voters. AP Earlier this month, leaked audio showcased a frustrated Martin, who appeared to be on the verge of tears at times, bluntly complaining about the headaches and distraction Hogg caused for the party. 'I don't think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to,' Martin told Hogg in a leaked May call revealed by Politico. 'So it's really frustrating.' That same month, the DNC Credentials Committee concluded that Hogg and DNC Vice Chair Malcolm Kenyatta were improperly elected to their roles in violation of the party's gender parity rules. Advertisement To rectify that, the panel later urged the DNC to hold new elections. Hogg opted to step aside on June 11 instead, pointing to his 'fundamental disagreement' with top brass over his role. Kenyatta won back his perch. The Post reached out to Hogg's reps and Leaders We Deserve for comment.
