logo
Immigration raids on California cannabis nurseries spark protests

Immigration raids on California cannabis nurseries spark protests

The Sun11-07-2025
LOS ANGELES: Federal agents conducted immigration enforcement raids on Thursday on state-licensed marijuana nurseries in an agricultural region of coastal Southern California, where they were confronted by throngs of angry protesters.
As word and video images of the raids spread on social media, dozens of migrant-rights activists converged on the area in vehicles leading to face-offs with federal agents in the middle of rural roadways, according to the Santa Barbara Independent, Los Angeles Times and other news media.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents accompanied by National Guard troops in military-style vehicles turned up at two locations operated by Glass House Farms - one in the Santa Barbara County town of Carpinteria, about 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles, and one in the Ventura County community of Camarillo, about 50 miles from L.A.
Glass House Farms, which bills itself as one of the 'fastest-growing vertically integrated cannabis companies in the U.S.,' said on X that its greenhouse sites 'were visited today by ICE officials,' adding, 'The company fully complied with agent search warrants and will provide further updates if necessary.'
An attorney representing clients who work at Glass House said both of the company's nurseries had been previously visited by ICE in June. National Guard troops were with ICE when they arrived at the property Thursday morning.
Tear gas
One local television station reported that about 100 farmworkers were detained in the immigration sweep prior to the protests, and that tear gas was fired at crowds during an encounter with federal agents.
Local TV footage from the scene of one standoff showed protesters yelling and gesturing angrily at armed, uniformed federal agents wearing helmets and face masks blocking traffic with yellow crime-scene tape strung across the road.
Asked for information or comment on the situation, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, parent agency of ICE, replied by email: 'DHS law enforcement is executing a warrant at a marijuana facility. Our brave officers will continue to enforce the law.'
In Carpinteria, U.S. Representative Salud Carbajal, a California Democrat, said he was denied access to the scene of the raid while seeking to exercise his oversight authority as a member of Congress, and that company officials later told him 10 workers were taken into custody at that location.
More than 50 ICE agents took part in the operation there, with crowd-control munitions deployed against members of the crowd in a 'militarized raid targeting farm workers,' Carbajal said on X.
One of two city council members who were also present fell and injured her arm in a fracas between protesters and law enforcement, the Independent reported.
At a separate clash in Camarillo, a man running from federal agents appeared to open fire with a handgun in the direction of authorities as they lobbed smoke canisters at protesters, video footage from Los Angeles TV station KABC-TV showed.
Shifting position
The Trump administration has shifted its position several times in recent weeks on whether farmworkers will be subject to its campaign to deport all immigrants who are in the country illegally.
Trump on June 14 ordered ICE to halt enforcement activities on farms, but the agency reversed that position days later. On July 3, Trump said he was willing to let migrant workers stay in the country if farmers can 'vouch' for them. Days later Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said there would be 'no amnesty' for farmworkers from deportation.
About half of U.S. farmworkers are in the country illegally, according to government estimates. The farm sector has warned that mass deportation of agricultural workers would cripple the nation's food supply chain.
Raids on some California farms in June left crops unharvested and farmworkers and operators fearful of further enforcement activity - REUTERS
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Explainer-Can Trump take control of Washington to fight the city's crime?
Explainer-Can Trump take control of Washington to fight the city's crime?

The Star

time8 hours ago

  • The Star

Explainer-Can Trump take control of Washington to fight the city's crime?

Protesters hold a banner near the White House, as U.S. President Donald Trump announced he is placing the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control and deploying National Guard troops to Washington, D.C, in Washington D.C., U.S., August 11, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly threatened to put Washington, D.C., under full federal control to reduce crime, even as city officials stressed crime is already falling. While Trump does have some authority over the capital city's police force and National Guard soldiers, a full federal takeover would likely be blocked in court. Here is why. WHAT DOES THE CONSTITUTION SAY ABOUT CONTROL OF DC? The U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1787, provided for the creation of a federal capital district to serve as the permanent seat of the government. The Constitution made clear that Congress has complete legislative authority over the district. But Congress has historically delegated at least some of the day-to-day work of municipal government to other entities. HOW IS DC GOVERNED? A federal law passed by Congress in 1973, known as the Home Rule Act, allowed city residents to elect a mayor and council, who have some autonomy to pass their own laws. Congress still has budgetary oversight over D.C., however, and can overturn local legislation. Congress did that most recently in 2023, voting to overturn changes to Washington's laws that lowered penalties for some crimes. WHO CONTROLS DC LAW ENFORCEMENT? The Democratic mayor of Washington, Muriel Bowser, has authority over the city's Metropolitan Police Department. But the Home Rule Act allows the president to take control of the MPD for federal purposes during emergencies if 'special conditions of an emergency nature exist.' A presidential takeover is limited to 30 days, unless Congress votes to extend it through a joint resolution. Trump invoked this part of the Home Rule Act on Monday, saying in an executive order that there is a "crime emergency" in the city that necessitates federal management of the police department. Bowser has pushed back on Trump's claims of unchecked violence, saying the city is "not experiencing a crime spike" and highlighting that violent crime hit its lowest level in more than three decades last year. Violent crime, including murders, spiked in 2023, turning Washington into one of the nation's deadliest cities, according to city police data. However, violent crime dropped 35% in 2024, according to federal data, and it has fallen an additional 26% in the first seven months of 2025. Trump also has broad control over the D.C. National Guard's 2,700 soldiers and airmen. They report directly to the president, unlike counterparts in other states and territories. Trump said on Monday he was deploying 800 National Guard troops to Washington. SO CAN TRUMP 'FEDERALIZE' DC? It is highly unlikely. To exert full federal control of D.C., Trump would need Congress to repeal the Home Rule Act. Such a repeal would require 60 votes in the U.S. Senate, where Trump's Republican Party has a 53-47 advantage. Democrats have been supportive of home rule for DC and are not expected to cross party lines to endorse Trump's vision. But there are ways Trump can exert more influence over the district without fully taking it over. Trump in recent months has directed federal law enforcement agencies such as the FBI to increase the police presence in Washington. Trump has broad authority to reallocate FBI personnel, and in recent months, FBI agents around the country have been given temporary assignments to help with immigration enforcement. Trump also signed an executive order in March to make D.C. "safe and beautiful," establishing a task force to increase police presence in public areas, maximize immigration enforcement, and expedite concealed carry licenses. CAN TRUMP EVICT DC'S HOMELESS POPULATION? Trump has said homeless people must move out of Washington, without offering specifics of a plan to accomplish this. "I'm going to make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before," Trump said on Truth Social. "The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital." The federal government owns much of Washington's parkland, so the Trump administration has legal authority to clear homeless encampments in those areas, like President Joe Biden did while in office. But the federal government cannot force people to move out of the city because they lack shelter, legal experts said. (Reporting by Jan Wolfe; Editing by Noeleen Walder and Rod Nickel)

Bukit Kayu Hitam immigration denies entry to 21 travellers
Bukit Kayu Hitam immigration denies entry to 21 travellers

New Straits Times

time10 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Bukit Kayu Hitam immigration denies entry to 21 travellers

BUKIT KAYU HITAM: Twenty-one foreigners were denied entry into the country today at the Bukit Kayu Hitam border crossing in Kedah after immigration checks found irregularities with their travel documents. Bukit Kayu Hitam Malaysian Border Control and Protection Agency (MCBA) commander Senior Assistant Commissioner Mohd Nasaruddin M. Nasir said all of them were stopped at the Immigration, Customs, Quarantine and Security (ICQS) Complex at about 8am. He said inspections found the travellers did not meet the requirements set under the Immigration Director-General's Standing Orders for entry refusal. "Yesterday, we stopped seven foreign nationals for similar offences, and today we recorded another 21," he said at a press conference at the complex. "In the past, such refusals involved only a small number, but in the last two days alone, the figures have been significantly higher. Reasons for refusal included damaged passports, suspicious entry passes, invalid flight or hotel bookings, and other irregularities." The 21 people comprised 4 Chinese, 15 Thai, one Indian, and 1 Pakistani. They were eight men and 13 women aged between their 20s and 40s. "Action was taken under Section 8(3) of the Immigration Act 1959/63 as they did not fulfil the entry requirements as visitors to Malaysia," Mohd Nasaruddin said. "All were ordered to return to their countries of origin via the same entry point. The refusal process was carried out in full compliance with the Standard Operating Procedures and department circulars in force. "No seizures were made and no criminal elements or enforcement investigations were identified in this case," he added.

Diesel smuggling thrives despite subsidy removal
Diesel smuggling thrives despite subsidy removal

New Straits Times

time10 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Diesel smuggling thrives despite subsidy removal

BUKIT KAYU HITAM: Despite the removal of the diesel subsidy in Malaysia, the fuel remains highly sought after by smugglers transporting it into neighbouring Southeast Asian countries, where prices are significantly higher. Malaysian Border Control and Protection Agency (MCBA) commander Senior Assistant Commissioner Mohd Nasaruddin M. Nasir said that Thailand was believed to be a "transit hub" for smuggled diesel before it was moved to other countries. He said the fuel was likely destined for markets with higher prices, such as Myanmar, where it can be sold for up to RM15 per litre. He added that the diesel was probably stockpiled in neighbouring countries, rather than in Malaysia. It was sourced from petrol stations near the border or local industrial warehouses before being smuggled out. Nasaruddin was speaking at a press conference at the Bukit Kayu Hitam Immigration, Customs, Quarantine and Security (ICQS) complex, where an attempt to smuggle 10,200 litres of diesel worth RM30,600 was foiled. The smuggling attempt involved three trailer lorries and three pickup trucks fitted with hidden tanks. Nasaruddin said the Thai-registered vehicles were stopped during a joint operation with other enforcement agencies. The total value of the vehicles was estimated at RM350,000, while the overall seizure, including the diesel, was worth RM380,600. The vehicles were seized under Section 64(1) of the Road Transport Act 1987 for further investigation. All the vehicles had concealed additional tanks mounted beneath the chassis of the lorries and on the decks of the pickups, making them difficult to detect at first glance. Nasaruddin said checks assisted by Road Transport Department (RTD) officers were vital, as they were familiar with such modifications. The vehicles typically entered Malaysia in the early morning before leaving at strategic hours, including weekends, early mornings, or late nights. The 6 drivers, all foreign men aged between 40 and 60, were released on MCBA bail. In June last year, the government implemented diesel subsidy rationalisation to curb cross-border smuggling and ensure that subsidies benefited targeted groups. The move raised diesel prices in Peninsular Malaysia to the current market rate of RM2.94 per litre, up from the previous fixed subsidised rate of RM2.15 per litre.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store