Government directs 6 tweaks to Udaipur Files: Nutan Sharma name, AI turban scene
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 minutes ago
- Time of India
Set to Release on August 8 After SC Clearance
The Supreme Court has officially cleared the release of 'Udaipur Files', giving it the go-ahead to hit theatres on August 8, 2025. The film, which had earlier faced delays due to a stay by the Delhi High Court, was under scrutiny for allegedly prejudicing an ongoing trial and inciting communal tension. But now, the path has been cleared. The top court refused to extend the stay, stating clearly: 'Let the film be released'.With the Supreme Court's backing, the film is all set for its long-awaited theatrical debut. Read More
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
CBFC panel verbally refused to certify KIFF film: Director
1 2 Kolkata: The Dallas-based director of 'Kalponik' told TOI that the revising committee of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) that watched his Bengali film in Mumbai last Friday (July 18) verbally refused to recommend it for certification. Director Arka Mukhopadhyay said the 15-member committee fears that releasing his film will disrupt communal harmony since it feels that, although the movie is a work of fiction, the storyline hints at a probable politician-media nexus when controversies erupt over unearthing Hindu idols on the premises of mosques. CBFC's regional officer in Kolkata, Sushrut Sharma, is waiting for the written communication on this from the CBFC Mumbai office. "An examining committee watched the film in Kolkata. The revising committee meeting was held in Mumbai last Friday," said Sharma. "The protocol now is that the CBFC Mumbai office will send the CBFC Kolkata office written documentation on the observations. We will then share it with the director," he added. Mukhopadhyay's Bengali film, screened in the competitive segment of the Bengali Panorama of the 30th Kolkata International Film Festival (KIFF) last year, is based on what happens when relics of an ancient temple are unearthed underneath a mosque before an upcoming election. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Up to 70% off | Libas Purple Days Sale Libas Undo It stars Rajatava Dutta, Shahidur Rehman, and Satakshi Nandy. "At Friday's meeting, I was asked if my film is pointing to the Babri Masjid and Ram Temple controversy. I was quizzed about whether or not my storyline hints at a probable politician-media nexus when controversies erupt over unearthing Hindu idols on the premises of mosques. But I told the committee that mine is a fictional story and is a work of art. The title of the film itself is 'Kalponik', which means imaginary," the engineer-turned-director told TOI. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata According to him, the committee was not convinced. "It felt that my story, told from a foreign lens, may disrupt communal harmony. I was even told that my film shows one particular community in a bad light. I have asked CBFC to give me everything in writing. When I wanted to know if there is anything that could be done to bring the film to the audiences, the answer was 'not the way it is told now'. The committee agreed to consider if I changed the approach or my script. But doing so will turn it into another film. It will then become 'Kalponik 2'," Mukhopadhyay said.
Scroll.in
3 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Supreme Court declines to extend stay on release of ‘Udaipur Files'
The Supreme Court on Friday declined to extend the stay on the release of the Hindi film Udaipur Files, which is reportedly based on the 2022 killing of Udaipur tailor Kanhaiya Lal, reported The Indian Express. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi told the petitioners to approach the Delhi High Court to challenge the Union government's order, which allowed the film to be released with six cuts, according to Live Law. The film was scheduled to be released on July 11. The Delhi High Court had stayed the release on June 10 and directed the Union government to examine the film's content. The Centre recommended that the film should be released with a disclaimer, The Indian Express reported. 'You first go to the High Court, the other side is satisfied with the central government order,' PTI quoted the bench as saying on Friday. 'So, please go to the High Court, why waste our time.' The Supreme Court also clarified that it was not commenting on the merits of the case and said that it was the High Court's domain. It requested the High Court to take up the matter on Monday. In June 2022, Lal, a tailor, was killed in Rajasthan's Udaipur for purportedly sharing a social media post in support of suspended Bharatiya Janata Party Spokesperson Nupur Sharma. She had made disparaging remarks about Prophet Muhammad during a television debate in May 2022. The assailants and several other persons accused in the matter were arrested by the Rajasthan Police. A video showed two men claiming responsibility for the killing of Lal as they brandished the cleavers used in the murder. The murder case was investigated by the National Investigation Agency and the persons accused in the matter were charged under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. The trial is underway in a Special NIA Court in Jaipur. The High Court had stayed the release of Udaipur Files while hearing a batch of petitions, including one filed by Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind chief Maulana Arshad Madani, seeking a ban on the film. The petitioners had alleged that the film is communally provocative and vilifies the Muslim community. A day before the order, the Supreme Court had heard a writ petition filed by Mohammed Javed, one of the eight persons accused in the murder case. Javed argued that the release of the film would violate his right to a fair trial. He had sought that the release of the film be postponed until the trial in the matter concluded. The petitioner also argued that the film, based on its trailer, appeared to be communally provocative. In response, the Supreme Court said that the petition could be mentioned before the appropriate bench when the Supreme Court reopened on July 14 after the summer break. It added that the movie could be released in the meantime.
