
The UK just gave 16-year-olds the vote. What would the same change do in Australia?
"I believe enfranchisement should be extended to as many Australians as reasonable, including young people, to ensure that those impacted by government decision-making have a say in those decisions," Ryan told SBS News.
"Early participation in the electoral process has been shown to improve political engagement. Young people can leave school, get a job, and pay taxes. They should have a say in who represents them and their interests in government."
In Australia, lowering the voting age would require federal legislation to amend the Commonwealth Electoral Act of 1917. That means it would need support from the federal government — something the Albanese government has said it is "not open" to at this stage.
What would happen if Australia lowered its voting age? The move has prompted many to question whether lowering the voting age would influence electoral outcomes or increase the political representation of young people. But a lack of comparative data makes it difficult to fully understand the potential impact of the change. Critics of the UK's recent move have said the change could benefit left-wing parties due to younger voters' political tendencies.
Across the democratic world, there is a trend that young voters tend to prefer left and centre-left parties and candidates more than older voters.
The Australian Election Study, undertaken after each federal election, has found the same trend from 1987 — the younger voters are, the more likely they are to be left-leaning. As age increases, so too does Coalition support. In the 2022 election, around one in four voters under the age of 40 voted for the Coalition, while 38 per cent of voters in the same age bracket supported Labor. Among gen Z voters — born between 1997 and 2012 — 26 per cent voted for the Coalition, while 67 per cent voted for either the Greens or Labor.
The study found that no other generation included in the research had such a strong political preference at the same stage of life.
However, the political impact of giving 16 and 17-year-olds the vote may not be significant enough to decide elections. According to 2021 Census data, 16 and 17-year-olds in Australia make up a small proportion of the population — around 2.31 per cent of the total population — with experts saying their impact on results is likely to be negligible. Christine Huebner, a lecturer in quantitative social sciences at the University of Sheffield, said her research indicated that including 16 and 17-year-olds in UK elections would not change election outcomes or make elections less representative.
"They will have a very small impact on vote shares [in the UK] — and only in the most extreme (and improbable) scenario that all 16 and 17-year-olds turned out to vote and decided to vote in the same way," she wrote in The Guardian.
Are there problems with lowering the voting age? Dr Sarah Cameron, a political scientist at Griffith University, said most Australians don't support lowering the voting age. "The Australian Election Study has been asking whether the public supports lowering the voting age to 16 in various surveys over the last ten years," she told the ABC. "What this shows is that it's about 15 per cent who believe that the voting age should be lowered to 16." "Whereas the vast majority of about 85 per cent think it should stay as it is now at 18 [years old]," said Cameron, who is also a researcher for the Australian Election Study.
She said support is slightly higher among young people, but still a minority, at 20 to 30 per cent in favour.
Cameron's statements contrast with a 2024 study from the Western Australian Commissioner for Children and Young People, which surveyed almost 2,000 young people across Australia about lowering the voting age. It found more than half of the participants aged 15 and under would like to vote, including 49 per cent who said they'd like it to be optional and another 12 per cent who said they supported it fully. However, 39 per cent said they did not want to vote at 16.
Young people aged 16 and older were more evenly split — 52 per cent said they thought they should have been able to vote at 16, while 48 per cent said they should not have been able to.
A 2024 study from the Western Australian Commissioner for Children and Young People found overall support for lowering the voting age in Australia among those aged 15 and under. Source: SBS News A key point of contention is how the policy would be implemented, with debate around whether 16 and 17-year-olds would be subject to Australia's compulsory voting laws. Cameron said making it voluntary for that age group could undermine long-term youth participation "by setting a habit of being able to not vote as opposed to setting a habit of voting and having it be compulsory". Making it compulsory would mean that eligible younger people could be fined for not voting.
Ryan said she is in favour of compulsory voting for those aged 16 and above, but would support waiving fines for those under 18.
Independent MP Monique Ryan has been advocating for the voting age to be lowered since before she was elected and says young people should "have a say in who represents them". Source: AAP / Diego Fedele Where do the pollies stand on it? It's not the first time the subject has been brought up. Ryan pushed for a similar move in 2022. The Greens have long called for lowering the voting age. In 2018, Western Australian senator Jordon Steele-John introduced a bill to lower the voting age, resulting in a Senate inquiry . The major parties did not support the change and it failed to progress. Again in 2023, Greens MP Stephen Bates introduced another bill to lower the voting age, but it did not progress to Senate consideration.
Just this week, Greens MLC Robert Simms called for the South Australian state government to lower the voting age for state and local elections.
Labor has also previously been in support of the move. In 2015, then Opposition leader Bill Shorten vowed to lower the voting age to 16 or 17, saying it was important to "tackle the apathy and cynicism of young people towards politics". But on Friday, Labor frontbencher Matt Thistlethwaite rejected the idea of the Albanese government pushing for the change, telling the ABC: "We are not open to it at the moment, it is not our policy." He said that, while it was "good to see young voices heard", many nations would be looking to see how the UK's change played out. Ryan said she had some support from crossbenchers and noted previous support from senior Labor politicians, including Shorten. "With the decision by the UK government to lower the voting age, there should be a strong impetus for us review the issue in Australia," Ryan said. "We're similar countries with similar values and should look to other countries for how they keep their democratic process fair and inclusive."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Daily Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Daily Telegraph
Press Council Adjudication
Don't miss out on the headlines from NSW. Followed categories will be added to My News. The Press Council considered whether its Standards of Practice were breached by an article published in print on 4 December 2024 in The Daily Telegraph headed 'To keep peace at home, Labor backs Hamas'. The article reported that Penny Wong, the Minister for Foreign Affairs 'is set to strengthen Australia's support for a two-state-solution in the Middle East by backing a United Nations vote calling for an 'irreversible pathway' to the measure after abstaining in recent years, in a move the Coalition claims will further open a rift with Israel'. The article attributed comments that the 'Albanese government voting for the measure in the UN after abstaining previously was a play for domestic votes', to the former ambassador to Israel Senator Dave Sharma. The article went on to quote Senator Sharma as saying: 'These potential changes in Australia's UN voting pattern are against our national interests. They will do nothing to advance the cause of peace in the Middle East' and 'All they do is reward Hamas for its terrorist acts. And they further damage Australia's relations with an important partner in the Middle East, Israel. Labor is seeking to placate domestic constituencies, rather than putting Australia's national interests first.' In response to a complaint received, the Council asked the publication to comment on whether the article complied with the Council's Standards of Practice, which require publications to take reasonable steps to ensure that factual material is accurate and not misleading (General Principle 1); to ensure that factual material is presented with reasonable fairness and balance and to ensure that writers' expressions of opinion are not based on significantly inaccurate factual material or omission of key facts (General Principle 3). The Council noted that the complaint raised concerns that the headline does not support the tenor of the article and that it is editorial opinion to state that 'Labor backs Hamas'. In response, the publication said that in the article, Senator Sharma criticised the Albanese government for backing a UN resolution that he claims rewards the terrorist organisation Hamas for its acts of terrorism. The publication said that in this context, the headline reflects the opinion of Senator Sharma and readers would view the headline as accurately reflecting the senator's view. The publication also said that readers can discern the difference between an opposition senators criticism of government decision-making, as opposed to the editorial direction of the publisher. Conclusion The Council recognises the limitations of headlines to reasonably reflect the tenor of an article. The Council also recognises that what constitutes reasonable steps to ensure factual material is accurate and not misleading may vary in the circumstances. In relation to this, the Council considers that publications need to take great care in order to satisfy the reasonable steps standard in the context of heightened community sensitivities around the Israel/Palestine conflict and on matters of significant public interest. In the absence of inverted commas to signify a paraphrase or a quote, the Council considers the headline is presented as statement of fact with the clear implication being that the Labor government is 'backing' Hamas. The Council considers that the headline goes beyond what was said by Senator Sharma in his criticisms of the government support for a two-state-solution in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Council concludes the publication failed to take reasonable steps to ensure factual material is accurate and not misleading in breach of General Principle 1. In noting the complaint is limited to the headline, the Council finds no breach of General Principle 3. For the full Adjudication, see:

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Laws that strip childcare funding from centres breaching standards to be introduced
Childcare centres repeatedly failing to meet safety standards could have their funding withdrawn under new legislation being put forward by the federal government today. But questions remain about what it would take for a centre to lose their funding. Under the government's proposal to be introduced to the House of Representatives, funding delivered via the Childcare Subsidy (CCS) could be cut off if centres repeatedly fall short on safety. In March, the federal government said it would move to stop providers who "persistently fail to meet minimum standards" from getting CCS. Education Minister Jason Clare has said he does not want to see funding removed from centres, and instead the legislation will act as an encouragement for centres to improve standards. Alongside child safety issues, the sector is also facing significant problems when it comes to availability and accessibility according to two recent reviews by the consumer watchdog and productivity commission. Approval for CCS can already be cut off if the secretary of the Department of Education believes there is an imminent risk to child safety and wellbeing, but the ABC understands under the new rules this would need to be a top consideration when deciding whether a provider should get CCS at all. Currently, the Australian Children's Education & Care Quality Authority (ACECQA) gives centres quality ratings ranging from "Exceeding National Quality Standards (NQS)" through to "Working Towards NQS" but does not have a "fail" rating. State and territory regulators can also move to shut down centres where child safety is a concern. The government will need the support of either the opposition, the Greens or nine minor party and independent senators to get their legislation through the upper house of parliament. The Coalition has indicated it wants to see the laws passed, but wants to ensure whatever is legislated will actually improve child safety. The Greens say the changes are a good start, but are urging the federal government to go further, with the party's early childhood education and care spokesperson Steph Hodgkins-May calling for a national watchdog. "At the moment we've got this patchwork regulation across states and there's no national body that can actually enforce the national quality standards that have been set," she said. While the Greens will support the government's legislation, Ms Hodgkins-May is frustrated that while the opposition has been given the legislation to look at, the Greens have not. "We are so ready and willing to really look to some of these structural issues that'll not only trigger a response once the poor quality and these hideous cases occur but will pre-emptively work to fix the system that's allowing it to occur in the first place," she said. A spokesperson for Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the Coalition was "working constructively with the government on this in the interests of keeping our children safe". State, territory and federal ministers will meet next month to look at expanding CCTV in childcare centres, a national worker registry and mandatory training for staff on how to detect and prevent child abuse. This follows governments agreeing to a new set of National Quality Standards, which from September includes requiring centres to notify authorities of allegations or incidents of sexual abuse within 24 hours rather than the current seven days. In 2024, a voluntary code was introduced to ban phones and other devices, with state governments now looking at how to implement a compulsory ban. Minister for Early Childhood Education Jess Walsh said the legislation would cut funding to providers who put profit over safety. "Every child deserves to be safe in early learning, every parent deserves to know their children are safe," she said in a statement. "We'll also hold an urgent education ministers meeting next month to take strong, united action with the states and territories, including on a nationwide educator register."

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Breakfast Wrap: The impact of SA's toxic algal bloom
A toxic algal bloom is wreaking havoc and killing marine life throughout South Australia. Today on the Breakfast Wrap we'll hear from the state's fishing industry, as some go months without income. We'll also speak with the state government, after their federal counterparts pledged $14 million to tackle the crisis. Then, more than 20 nations — including Australia — have issued a joint statement calling for an end to the war in Gaza and condemning the humanitarian crisis in the strip. The former UN Special Rapporteur for Palestine shares his perspective, and we'll get the federal political response too. Recap the morning's news, politics and global affairs with the Breakfast Wrap