Israel says it ‘deeply regrets' strike on Gaza's only Catholic church, pledges investigation
Israel said Thursday that it 'deeply regrets' a deadly strike on Gaza's only Catholic church, which killed three people.
The Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem, which has jurisdiction for Roman Catholics in Gaza, said the Holy Family Church was struck by Israel on Thursday morning. The church has become a shelter for the enclave's tiny Christian community amid the 20-month war.
The office of Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that 'Israel deeply regrets that a stray ammunition hit Gaza's Holy Family Church. Every innocent life lost is a tragedy.'
'Israel is investigating the incident and remains committed to protecting civilians and holy sites,' the office added in a statement.
Pope Leo received a phone call from Netanyahu on Friday, following the strike, the Vatican said, in which the patriarch expressed the importance of protecting places of worship.
During the phone call, which Netanyahu's office is yet to comment on, Leo renewed his calls for a ceasefire to be reached by the warring sides in Gaza, a statement said.
Pope Leo 'again expressed his concern for the dramatic humanitarian situation of the population in Gaza, whose heartbreaking price is paid especially by children, the elderly and the sick,' according to the statement.
Leaders from the Catholic and Greek Orthodox Church visited the church on Thursday, in a highly unusual trip given Israel's tight control over access in and out of the territory.
Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, together with Theophilos III, the Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem, visited the enclave to show their support for Gaza's Catholics, according to a statement from the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem.
The two expressed 'the shared pastoral solicitude of the Churches of the Holy Land and their concern for the community of Gaza,' according to a statement from the Jerusalem Patriarchate.
Leaders from the Catholic and Greek Orthodox Church visited the church on Thursday, in a highly unusual trip.
Omar Al-Qatta/AFP via Getty Images
Netanyahu told US President Donald Trump in a phone call that the church incident was a 'mistake,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told a briefing Thursday. Asked about Trump's view on the strike, Leavitt described it as 'not a positive reaction.'
The Israel Defense Forces acknowledged it hit the church 'mistakenly.'
'An initial inquiry into reports regarding injured individuals in the Holy Family Church in Gaza City, suggests that fragments from a shell fired during operational activity in the area hit the church mistakenly,' the IDF said in a statement on Thursday.
'The cause of the incident is under review.'
Church 'directly' hit
Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, told Vatican News that the church was hit 'directly' by a tank Thursday morning.
The parish priest, Father Gabriel Romanelli, was injured in the attack, the patriarchate said, alongside a number of others. Romanelli is an Argentine who has ministered in Gaza for close to 30 years.
It named the three killed as Saad Issa Kostandi Salameh, Foumia Issa Latif Ayyad and Najwa Abu Dawood. Several others were also injured.
Images verified by CNN showed the church was damaged in the attack, but the crucifix on top of the church's roof appeared intact.
The church has come under attack once before amid Israel's war in Gaza. In December 2023, an Israeli military sniper shot and killed two women who were sheltering inside, according to the patriarchate.
The church is known internationally for its close connection with the late Pope Francis, who would call the parish almost daily as the war raged on.
Only around 1,000 Christians are thought to have lived in Gaza before the October 7 attacks, which is overwhelmingly a Muslim territory.
Meanwhile ceasefire talks to end the war in Gaza, which Palestinian officials say has killed over 58,000 people, are continuing.
Israel may show flexibility on a key sticking point in the talks, sources have told CNN, as negotiators attempt to close the gaps preventing the first pause in months of fighting.
Specifically, there could be some flexibility from Israel on the potential withdrawal of its troops from the Morag Corridor – a key Israeli security zone in the southern Gaza strip – a source familiar with the matter told CNN on Thursday.
The corridor was established by Israeli forces in April with the stated intention of dividing up Gaza and exerting greater pressure on Hamas. Its name refers to the Jewish settlement of Morag that once lay between the cities of Khan Younis and Rafah in the south of the territory.
The US had talked up the prospects of a quick agreement in the talks, which had gained momentum after a deal ended the brief Israel-Iran conflict last month. But days of talks yielded no breakthrough.
This story has been updated with additional developments.
CNN's Mohammed Tawfeeq contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Egypt Independent
an hour ago
- Egypt Independent
This week's big questions: Can Trump finally quell the Epstein storm — and is it hurting his presidency?
CNN — Even President Donald Trump doesn't seem to think his angry and chaotic efforts to end the renewed storm over convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein will work. He warned in a weekend social media post that 'nothing will be good enough' to satisfy what he claims are leftists and troublemakers fanning the uproar. In reality, however, the controversy was heightened by Trump's defensive outbursts following his aides' clumsy efforts to quell conspiracies they fueled before the 2024 election over Epstein's death in prison and a supposed celebrity client list. But Trump's Truth Social post raises important questions. Will the intrigue, which differs from most of his political tangles since it set the president against his own base, be accelerated by new revelations, including curiosity over Trump's past ties to Epstein, an accused sex trafficker? Or, after two weeks of internal recriminations, will the MAGA movement unite to protect its patron following a Wall Street Journal report Thursday on Trump and Epstein, which the president used to set up his trademark assault on 'fake news'? Trump did everything he could to ignite new political fires Sunday to distract attention from the Epstein saga. He demanded that the NFL's Washington Commanders play again as the Redskins and blasted Obama administration officials over intelligence findings that Russia meddled in the 2016 election to help him. But the Epstein matter has so far created its own momentum and defied his efforts to quiet it. It's rather curious in this sense, since it seems less pertinent to the lives of millions of Americans than the impact of Trump's radical policy moves and power grabs, which have repeatedly tested the Constitution and risked harming the economy. But scandals that boil away and don't fade are always a dangerous sign for White Houses, even when the president has a Teflon hide as thick as Trump's. One reason this controversy has legs is that its foundations are part of the MAGA philosophy — the idea that hidden elites in the intelligence agencies and government are running an American 'deep state' that hides the truth about issues like child sex trafficking. Declarations by Trump officials who fomented the conspiracy that there is nothing to it seemed only to validate the concerns of committed conspiracists in the movement. A message calling on Trump to release all files related to Jeffrey Epstein is projected onto the US Chamber of Commerce building across from the White House on July 18, 2025. Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images Democrats echo MAGA conspiracists and demand transparency The uproar showed no sign of passing at the weekend, frustrating Trump's efforts to highlight the success of his first six months in power, which he has used to gut parts of the federal government and to send a jolt of social change through American life. Democrats launched a new push to discomfit Trump, parroting demands by some MAGA activists for total transparency over the Epstein case as they try to finally find some traction against a president who has obliterated opposition in Washington. 'The president blaming Democrats for this disaster … is like that CEO that got caught on camera blaming Coldplay,' Sen Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat, told CNN's Jake Tapper on 'State of the Union' on Sunday. 'This is his making: He was president when Epstein got indicted for these charges and went to prison. He was president back then. So all of us would believe they know what's in these documents. They know what's there. They have been claiming forever that they should be released.' The administration's missteps might give Democrats an opening, especially since Trump's approval ratings are now in the low 40s and there is growing public concern over his signature hardline deportation policies. A new CNN/SSRS poll Sunday showed that 55% of Americans think Trump has gone too far with his deportations. But despite fierce internal bickering in the MAGA movement, it's doubtful Epstein is a deal-breaker for most of the president's supporters. A CBS News poll Sunday showed GOP voters evenly split over the Trump administration's handling of the matter. A majority of MAGA Republicans said they were satisfied; only 36% of all voters and 11% of Republicans said the issue matters 'a lot' when evaluating Trump's presidency. But if the public feels this way, why won't the storm abate? GOP officeholders are still having a tough time navigating Epstein questions, a sign perhaps that the political impact might be greater than initially expected. Closing ranks around Trump, they are now trying to create a classic GOP vs. Democrats fight that might further confuse and polarize the public. Tennessee Republican Rep. Tim Burchett recalled that Democrats had blocked GOP attempts to release all information on the case when they held power in the Senate. 'Where the heck was she the last four years?' Burchett asked, also on 'State of the Union,' in a reference to Klobuchar. Trump could help himself by cooling his fury on the Epstein saga Trump's hopes of dampening the furor may depend partly on matters out of his control. But if he simply stopped talking about it, it might help. His frequent outbursts and claims that nobody cares about Epstein could be just Trump being Trump. But they also offered an opening for critics to suggest he's got something to hide. And the weekend brought several media accounts detailing the past relationship between Trump and Epstein — two tabloid fixtures in New York whose association was no secret early in the 21st century. No law enforcement authorities have ever accused Trump of wrongdoing in relation to Epstein. But more revelations of their past contacts could enliven public interest and frustrate the president's attempts to change the subject. That does not mean that Trump necessarily did anything wrong, or that anything occurred that could hurt him politically now. It's still not clear whether this is a controversy that could impose a real cost on a presidency or something that could blow over in a couple of weeks. Still, a Wall Street Journal report last week about a collection of letters gifted to Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003, including a note bearing Trump's name and an outline of a naked woman, is reverberating. CNN has not independently confirmed the report, and the president and his lawyers said the letter supposedly sent by Trump was a fake. Trump has filed a $20 billion libel suit against the paper. But the spectacle of a court battle between the president and The Journal's owner, Rupert Murdoch — a clash between two of the most influential and powerful titans of the conservative movement — is guaranteed to electrify public attention over the Epstein case. But comments by MAGA influencers such as Steve Bannon suggested that a fight between Trump and a paper seen as a pillar of the old right-wing establishment could heal splits in the movement. And Trump is an expert at weaponizing attacks against him to galvanize supporters. Consider how he turned his four criminal indictments into the most famous political comeback in history. There are other aspects of the uproar that make an accurate assessment of its long-term impact impossible. Outsiders can't know for sure whether the Trump Justice Department and FBI leadership are being truthful about the findings of their review of the Epstein case. In a memo that dismayed much of the MAGA media machine, both agencies said there was no incriminating client list, nor evidence that the accused blackmailed prominent individuals. They stood by findings that Epstein died by suicide in jail in 2019. Most Washington scandals explode because of a cover-up or political malpractice. There's no public evidence at this stage of the former. But there's plenty to support the idea that this is a political disaster the administration brought upon itself. Attorney General Pam Bondi, for instance, implied earlier this year that she had details of Epstein's client list on her desk, raising expectations among activist MAGA members of bombshell disclosures. Bondi has proved herself a valuable Trump lieutenant, notably in showing the kind of ultimate loyalty to the president and his political cause that many modern attorneys general have preferred to avoid in the interests of the fair administration of justice. But her handling of the Epstein case has been accident-prone and exposed Trump to political risks. If he comes looking for a culprit, her political foundation could quickly erode. Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks at a news conference at the Drug Enforcement Administration in Arlington, Virginia, on July 15, 2025. Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP As an example of her eagerness to please Trump, Bondi and her team sprang into action quickly last week when the president demanded the release of grand jury testimony from the Epstein prosecution. But even if the judge quickly allows this — which seems unlikely — there's no guarantee it would satisfy the demands for more transparency from Trump's base, and much material would remain under seal. The MAGA meltdown has also presented other members of the administration with tricky political considerations. Vice President JD Vance spent years calling for more transparency on the Epstein files before becoming Trump's running mate. But he was quick to blast the Wall Street Journal report with a profanity on X last week. For now, Vance's political fate rests in Trump's hands. But no Republican who wants to run for president in future can risk being seen as a member of the Beltway 'deep state.' Trump made multiple attempts to change the subject over the weekend. He repeatedly highlighted another conspiracy theory — given life by his director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard — that the Obama administration committed treasonous acts when the spy agencies warned of a Russian attempt to influence the 2016 election. Later Sunday, Trump shared an apparent AI-generated video depicting former President Barack Obama being arrested by FBI agents and jailed in an orange jumpsuit, overlaid to a soundtrack of Trump's campaign anthem 'Y.M.C.A.' And the president warned that he'd thwart a plan for the Commanders to return to the District of Columbia in a new stadium unless they changed their team name. The franchise decided in 2022 after years of pressure from Native American groups to rebrand amid concerns their original name was offensive. Trump also called for baseball's Cleveland Guardians to reclaim their identity as the 'Cleveland Indians' in a characteristic attempt to stoke culture-war controversy to fire up his base and steal oxygen from other issues. This might work for him again. But the fact he's delving into his classic tricks of political distraction is a telling sign he still doesn't know how to end the Epstein morass.
Egypt Independent
2 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
‘Not Trump's dumping ground': Outrage over arrival of foreign US deportees in tiny African nation
CNN — Across Africa, and in the tiny nation of Eswatini, fury has erupted over the arrival of foreign deportees from the United States, after its government confirmed that migrants described by a Department of Homeland security spokesperson as 'depraved monsters' had been sent to its prisons. Roughly the size of New Jersey, Eswatini — formerly known as Swaziland — is governed by a monarch who has absolute power. On Wednesday, officials said that five deportees from the US were being held in isolated units in its jails, acknowledging 'widespread concern' but insisting the deported men 'pose no threat to the country or its citizens.' The five men are being kept in solitary confinement, acting government spokesperson Thabile Mdluli told CNN Friday, but stopped short of disclosing the prisons they were held in, citing security risks. Mdluli did not reveal how long the men would stay in Eswatini, but said: 'Critical engagements between stakeholders are still ongoing.' She had earlier stated that the deportation was the 'result of months of robust high-level engagements' between the US and the southern African nation. Critics of the move say it is unacceptable for Eswatini to be treated as a 'dumping ground' for people considered unfit to live in the US. US 'pressure' on African countries While the Trump administration's mass deportations to the prisons of El Salvador have made headlines around the world, the White House has also been quietly attempting to strike agreements with a number of African countries to accept deportees originally from other nations. President Donald Trump's aggressive clampdown on immigration has run into logistical hurdles, with some countries refusing to take back their nationals, or doing so only on a limited basis. Undocumented immigrants, shackled at the wrists and ankles, were searched before boarding a charter flight at Kansas City International Airport, run by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Department. The detainees were flown to Louisiana, Texas or Arizona, where they are returned to or flown to the detainees countries of origin, on December 2, 2024. Kansas City Star/Tribune News Service/TNS/Getty Images Some of those approached by the US, such as Nigeria, have decried being pressured to take in foreign deportees. 'The US is mounting considerable pressure on African countries to accept Venezuelans to be deported from the US, some straight out of prison,' Nigeria's foreign minister, Yusuf Tuggar, said in a televised interview last week, citing Washington's announcement of increased tariffs and recent reductions in the validity of visas. The US Mission in Nigeria insisted visa changes were 'not the result of any nation's stance on third-country deportees' but rather 'to safeguard US immigration systems.' 'The Trump Administration is committed to removing criminal illegal aliens from the United States,' a White House official told CNN in a statement. 'The Administration frequently engages in conversations with foreign nations on a variety of topics, but we do not share information on private discussions.' President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media upon his arrival from Pennsylvania, at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, U.S., on July 15, 2025. Nathan Howard/Reuters Earlier this month, the US Supreme Court paved the way for the Trump administration to deport certain migrants to countries other than their homeland with little notice. Soon after, eight third-country deportees said by the US to have criminal records landed in South Sudan, a nation on the cusp of civil war. Who were the prisoners deported to Eswatini? DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a post on X Wednesday that the five detainees flown to Eswatini were nationals from Jamaica, Laos, Cuba, Yemen and Vietnam. 'This flight took individuals so uniquely barbaric that their home countries refused to take them back,' she wrote. 'These depraved monsters have been terrorizing American communities but thanks to @POTUS Trump @Sec_Noem they are off of American soil,' McLaughlin added. The prisoners were convicted of various crimes, including child rape, murder and robbery, she said. Eswatini government spokesperson Mdluli said the nation would now collaborate with the US and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) 'to facilitate the transit of these inmates to their countries of origin.' She told CNN Thursday, however, that 'there are no timelines at present' for their repatriation. Why are people outraged? Eswatini's decision to accommodate America's deportees has met with widespread public disapproval, both due to the perceived risk around their presence and the US portrayal of the nation as a 'safe third country.' The landlocked country of just over one million people is already beleaguered by poverty, unemployment, high crime rates and congested prisons. Human rights are also deteriorating, according to Human Rights Watch, following a wave of crackdowns on pro-democracy movements. More than half its population lives on less than $4 a day, according to the World Bank. Opposition party PUDEMO said accepting foreign deportees from the US 'poses a serious risk to our already vulnerable communities' which it said are 'battling a severe scourge' of crime, including rape and murder. 'Our country must not be treated as a dumping ground for those deemed unfit to live elsewhere,' the group said in a statement sent to CNN. Lucky Lukhele, of the Swaziland Solidarity Network, an exiled civil society group based in South Africa, told CNN it was 'clear racism to think Africa is a dumping ground for Donald Trump.' Lukhele said he was informed by unnamed sources that more US deportees would be sent to Eswatini, warning that 'Swazi prisons are (already) overcrowded' with prisoners who 'get one meal a day.' The Multi Stakeholder Forum (MSF), a coalition of Eswatini's civil society groups, said in a statement that the country's 'sovereignty and dignity must not be traded off for unclear deals or political expediency.' It's not clear how Eswatini stands to benefit from housing US deportees. Government spokesperson Mdluli told CNN that 'the terms of the agreement (with the US) remain classified information.' Asked whether more foreign US deportees would arrive in Eswatini, she said there was currently no information to that effect. Eswatini's trade privileges with the US came under threat in April after it was included in Trump's list of tariffs, facing a rate of 10% on its exports. Its neighbor and biggest trading partner, South Africa, was also slapped with a 30% tariff, triggering panic from Eswatini's central bank on the 'implications' for its economy. The tariffs are due to come into effect on August 1. Its intake of US deportees has similarly generated uproar in South Africa, whose relations with the US have deteriorated under Trump. A South African government source told CNN, 'There is a feeling that some inside the Trump administration could be using this (the deportation of prisoners to Eswatini) to destabilize South Africa,' given its porous borders and Eswatini's struggling economy. 'Everyone knows that these fellows (the deported convicts) will want to move to South Africa' another diplomatic source said, adding that the US 'did (ask South Africa to accept migrants) and we refused.' The source said the deportations to Eswatini were a provocation by the US and a direct national security threat. Ken Opalo, an associate professor at Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service in Washington, DC, said African nations are being pushed by the Trump administration 'into doing egregious things such as accepting migrants from random countries or giving them (the US) their mineral wealth in ambiguous deals that don't make much sense.' He cautioned: 'It's foolhardy for African countries to think that they can make deals and expect a credible commitment from the White House, given their transactional nature, which means everything is subject to change.' This story has been updated with additional developments. CNN's Mary Kay Mallonee contributed to this report.
See - Sada Elbalad
18 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
Israel's Expanding Footprint: From Gaza to Suwayda : A Strategy of Sectarian Division and Strategic Dominance
Monica William Recently, the Middle East has witnessed a dangerous escalation in Israeli military actions, most notably in Syria's Suwayda province and the Gaza Strip. These seemingly distinct flashpoints are deeply interconnected, reflecting a broader Israeli strategy aimed at reshaping the regional order along sectarian and ethnic lines to solidify long-term strategic dominance. Post-Assad developments reveal a sensitive phase in which Israeli security calculations overlap with Syrian political transformations. Despite the pretext of security concerns, Israeli military intervention threatens to ignite a wider conflict and complicate the chances for stability, especially with the entry of Turkey and perhaps other countries on the front line. Suwayda, a predominantly Druze province in southern Syria, has become the epicenter of a new internal conflict between local Druze militias and Sunni Bedouin tribes. Following clashes sparked by a personal incident, the Syrian government deployed forces to stabilize the area. This move, however, was swiftly met with Israeli airstrikes, with Prime Minister Netanyahu declaring that Israel would not tolerate the presence of any 'Islamist-oriented' government forces in Suwayda. the Israeli airstrikes targeting Syrian military positions near Suwayda and even in Damascus appear to be in response to immediate security concerns namely, Israel's stated intention to 'protect the Druze community' in Syria from both government forces and militias. But beneath the rhetoric lies a deeper political calculus. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu framed the strikes as a moral necessity to protect the Druze community in Suwayda from the encroachment of a radical Syrian administration, which can be seen as a Humanitarian Cover for Strategic influence. His language was deliberate, evoking memories of October 7th in Gaza and presenting the Druze crisis as a mirror image. But analysts and regional actors saw a different picture: one in which Israel was not merely responding to violence but actively shaping Syria's post-war map. Yet Netanyahu's government appears unmoved. In fact, some Israeli commentators suggest the strikes are designed not just to 'protect' the Druze but to provoke Syria into overreaction, justifying deeper Israeli entrenchment in the south. Meanwhile, the Syrian government's partial withdrawal from Suwayda under the terms of a fragile ceasefire raises questions: was this a retreat in the face of Israeli pressure, or a tactical pause in a broader struggle for sovereignty? This also raises a critical question: Why is Israel becoming entangled in the unrest in Suwayda, a province whose Druze population makes up just 3% of Syria's total? The reasons behind Israel's involvement seems to depend on three main objectives. First, to prevent Syrian government forces from reestablishing a firm presence in Suwayda and across southern Syria areas considered critical due to their proximity to the Israeli border. Second, to strengthen Syria's Druze community as a potential ally or buffer zone against Iranian-backed militias and other hostile factions operating near Israel's northern frontier. Third, to respond to domestic political pressure from Israel's own Druze minority, which has called on the government to act in defense of their Syrian kin. These motivations combine strategic calculations with identity politics, illustrating how Israel's regional interventions often serve multiple overlapping agendas. Then, what's happening in Suwayda cannot be seen in isolation. At the same time, Gaza remains under siege, with its infrastructure devastated, its leadership fragmented, and its people trapped in cycles of war and temporary ceasefires. The connection between these fronts lies not in shared borders but in shared Israeli strategy: weaken unified national identities, empower local actors with specific sectarian loyalties, and maintain a fractured region incapable of coordinated resistance. Hence, political logic is simple: a fragmented enemy cannot pose an existential threat. For instance, in Syria, this strategy translates into supporting or at least tolerating Druze autonomy even as it undermines the central government. In Gaza, it involves ensuring Hamas remains isolated from the Palestinian Authority. What Israel is executing is not merely military doctrine , it is the unfolding of a broader geopolitical project. Echoing the 1980 Bernard Lewis plan, which envisioned the fragmentation of the Middle East along sectarian and ethnic lines, this strategy seeks to redraw the region not through diplomacy, but through targeted airstrikes, calculated proxy alliances, and the deliberate weakening of central states. Its logic thrives on sustained instability creating minority enclaves, autonomous zones, and national capitals too fractured to assert real sovereignty or regional influence. Yet such fragmentation rarely ends in peace. It creates vacuums, invites radicalization, and punishes civilian populations trapped between competing agendas. As in Iraq and Libya, internal conflict brings not stability but collapse. Already, signs of this are visible: tensions between Druze leaders, Sunni backlash in nearby provinces, and international scrutiny of Israeli motives. Briefly , From Suwayda's embattled hills to Gaza's shattered neighborhoods, Israel's expanding influence is reshaping the regional chessboard. But it is a dangerous game. In seeking to divide and dominate, Israel may indeed secure tactical victories. Yet the long-term consequences which include regional chaos, diplomatic isolation, and moral erosion could outweigh the gains. What the region needs is not another airstrike, but a coherent vision one grounded in respect for sovereignty, inclusive dialogue, and a shared framework for collective security. Without this, the cycle of violence will persist, and the map of the Middle East will continue to be not merely redrawn, but burned into fragments by the division and fear. read more Analysis- Turkey Has 0 Regional Allies... Why? Analysis: Russia, Turkey... Libya in Return For Syria? Analysis: Who Will Gain Trump's Peace Plan Fruits? Analysis: Will Turkey's Erdogan Resort to Snap Election? Analysis: What Are Turkey's Aspirations in Iraq? Opinion & Analysis Analysis: Mercenaries In Libya... Who Should Be Blamed? Opinion & Analysis Analysis- How 'Libya Nightmare' Takes Erdogan to Algiers Opinion & Analysis Analysis: What Happens After Brexit? Opinion & Analysis Analysis: Strategic Significance of Libya's Sirte, Jufra! News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Arts & Culture "Jurassic World Rebirth" Gets Streaming Date Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Arts & Culture South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle News "Tensions Escalate: Iran Probes Allegations of Indian Tech Collaboration with Israeli Intelligence" Sports Get to Know 2025 WWE Evolution Results News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks
