Specialty ‘Iron Horse' motorcycle license plate bill passes first hurdle
Asking Rep. Art De La Cruz (D-Albuquerque) to talk about his 1982 Harley Davidson Shovelhead is like asking him to talk about his children – he's proud and has pictures at the ready.
De La Cruz told Source NM that he is particularly proud of his bike because it was made during the first full production year after Harley Davidson bought back the company from American Machine and Foundry.
'I always tell everybody I own a full-blooded Harley,' he said.
De La Cruz is sponsoring a bill this session for motorcycle enthusiasts such as himself that would create a new speciality license plate specifically for classic and vintage motorcycles. The 'Iron Horse' license plate would apply to bikes 35 years old or more that are used for vintage vehicle meets, parades or other exhibitions.
'Not your daily driver,' De La Cruz told Source NM, referring to the newer bikes people are more likely to ride day-to-day.
House Bill 23 advanced through the House Transportation, Public Works and Capital Improvements Committee Tuesday with a do-pass and will continue on to the House Judiciary Committee.
De La Cruz, chair of the House transportation committee, presented the bill to committee members, explaining that the 'Iron Horse' license plate is a way to preserve classic motorcycles in a similar way that the current 'Horseless Carriage' specialty plate does for cars, trucks and other vehicles in the state.
He said the new plate will look almost identical to the 'Horseless Carriage' license plates, but with different wording at the bottom. 'It's a little cheaper,' De La Cruz told Source NM, and the registration is good for five years.
The bill notes that the plate would cost owners an initial fee of $7 and a $25 registration fee. If a person violates the rules surrounding the special plate, they can be charged $25.
According to the fiscal impact report, the Taxation and Revenue Department predicts the 'Iron Horse' plate will cost the department $31,100 and 14 weeks to develop, test and implement it into their system.
If passed, the bill will go into effect July 1, 2025.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iron Horse Acquisition Receives Clearance Pursuant to the Competition Act
Calgary, Alberta--(Newsfile Corp. - August 20, 2025) - Trican Well Service Ltd. (TSX: TCW) ("Trican") is pleased to announce that it has received clearance from the Competition Bureau, in the form of a No-Action Letter, with respect to the previously announced acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Iron Horse Energy Services ("Iron Horse") (the "Acquisition"). Iron Horse is a premium provider of fracturing and coiled tubing services in the Cardium, Charlie Lake, Mannville Stack, Viking, Montney and Shaunavon plays in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. Under the terms of the Acquisition, Iron Horse shareholders will receive approximately $77.35 million in cash and approximately 33.76 million common shares of Trican. Following closing of the Acquisition, Tom Coolen, Chairman and CEO of Iron Horse, will be appointed to the board of directors of Trican. "We are delighted to have received a no-action letter from the Competition Bureau, completing a critical stage of our acquisition process. This acquisition augments our strategy and aligns with our long-term vision for growth and innovation in Canada. We look forward to better serving customers in all areas of the basin and creating meaningful value for our shareholders," said Brad Fedora, Trican's President and Chief Executive Officer. The Acquisition is expected to close on or about August 27, 2025, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of customary closing conditions and TSX listing approval of the common shares of Trican to be issued pursuant to the Acquisition. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This document contains certain forward-looking information based on Trican's current expectations, estimates, projections and assumptions that were made by Trican in light of information available at the time the statement was made. Forward-looking information that addresses expectations or projections about the future, and other statements and information about Trican's strategy for growth, expected and future expenditures, costs, operating and financial results, future financing and capital activities are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking information in this press release is identified by the use of terms and phrases such as "anticipate", "achieve", "estimate", "expect", "intend", "plan", "planned", and other similar terms and phrases. This forward-looking information speaks only as of the date of this document, and we do not undertake to publicly update this forward-looking information except in accordance with applicable securities laws. This forward-looking information includes, among others: statements as to the proposed Acquisition; the anticipated benefits of the Acquisition; and the anticipated completion of the Acquisition and timing thereof. Forward-looking information is based on current expectations, estimates, projections and assumptions, which we believe are reasonable but which may prove to be incorrect. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information as Trican's actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied. Developing forward-looking information involves reliance on a number of assumptions and consideration of certain risks and uncertainties, some of which are specific to Trican and others that apply to the industry generally. Material factors or assumptions on which the forward-looking information in this press release is based include, among others, the successful closing of the Acquisition, including obtaining necessary stock exchange approvals and satisfying all other conditions to closing, within expected timelines. Additional information about assumptions, risk factors, uncertainties on which the forward-looking information is based and that could cause Trican's actual results to differ materially from any estimates or projects of future performance or results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements are set forth under the section entitled "Risks Factors" in Trican's Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2024, and under the section entitled "Business Risks" in Trican's management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2024, which are each available on Trican's SEDAR+ profile at Readers are also referred to the risk factors and assumptions described in other documents filed by Trican from time to time with securities regulatory authorities. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking information. ABOUT TRICAN Headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, Trican supplies oil and natural gas well servicing equipment and solutions to our customers through the drilling, completion and production cycles. Our team of technical experts provide state-of-the-art equipment, engineering support, reservoir expertise and laboratory services through the delivery of hydraulic fracturing, cementing, coiled tubing, nitrogen services and chemical sales for the oil and gas industry in Western Canada. Requests for further information should be directed to: Bradley P.D. FedoraPresident and Chief Executive Officer Scott E. MatsonChief Financial Officer Phone: (403) 266-02022900, 645 - 7th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 4G8 Please visit our website at To view the source version of this press release, please visit Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
NBC News
26 minutes ago
- NBC News
What's next in the battle over redistricting as the Texas House passes new GOP maps
The Republican-controlled state House in Texas has passed new congressional maps that aim to pad the party's majority in Washington by as much as five seats in the midterm elections, a move that comes as battles over redistricting spread across the country. With Texas set to fully enact its new plan as soon as this week, urged on by President Donald Trump, California Democrats are moving quickly to implement a plan carving up their state's maps in retaliation. Meanwhile, top Republicans in states like Indiana, Missouri and Florida continue to talk about tweaking their maps to create more Republican-controlled congressional seats in the 2026 elections. Ohio's redraw, which it must do under state law, could benefit the GOP, too. Governors in Democratic-controlled states are weighing a response too, but in many cases, they're restrained by procedural hurdles or by other practical limitations — some have already stretched their own gerrymandered maps as far as they could go — that could make a tit-for-tat more difficult. It's all expected to come to a head in a matter of weeks, against the backdrop of a race for the congressional majority in Washington that sits on a knife's edge. The final outcome in Texas Lawmakers in the GOP-controlled Texas House passed their map Wednesday, days after Democrats returned from a two-week "quorum break" in which they fled the state to hold up the bill. But they could only delay, not derail, the new Republican maps, which convert three deep-blue districts into deep-red ones and tilt two Democratic-held South Texas districts slightly further toward the GOP, too. State Rep. Todd Hunter, a Republican who represents Corpus Christi and co-sponsored the new map, kicked off the day with some straight talk. 'The underlying goal is this plan is straightforward: Improve Republican political performance,' he told his colleagues, adding that the crux of the changes to the maps center on five districts that 'now trend Republican in political performance.' 'While there's no guarantee of an electorate success, Republicans will now have an opportunity to potentially win those districts,' he added. After a handful of lawmakers remained in the chamber overnight to protest House leadership for requiring Democrats agree to police escorts to ensure they don't attempt to skip town again, Democrats took to the floor to criticize their Republican colleagues over the maps. They questioned whether their Republican colleagues were truly not factoring in the racial compositions of districts, as they claimed, warning Democrats will have "their day in federal court." They also hit out at their scheduling in the special legislative session, which put redistricting on the calendar ahead of voting on relief for the victims of the July floods in the Hill Country. 'This is Donald Trump's map. It clearly and deliberately manufactures five more Republican seats in Congress because Trump himself knows the voters are rejecting his agenda and instead of respecting that rejection, he's changing the rules," said state Rep. John Bucy III of Austin, a Democrat. "Instead of listening to the people he's trying to silence them, and Texas Republicans have been more than willing to help.' California Democrats move to retaliate California's legislature saw an hours-long hearing Tuesday as Democrats there speed toward passing legislation that will call for a fall special election putting redistricting on the ballot. Voters will decide whether to override the state's independent redistricting commission and approve temporary, Democratic-drawn maps for the rest of the decade. Those maps are the political inverse of the ones in Texas — endangering a handful of incumbent Republicans and putting Democrats in position to net up to five seats from California's new map, according to estimates from the University of Virginia's Center for Politics. The hearing turned contentious amid interruptions and partisan clashes between lawmakers. Republicans repeatedly accused Democrats of wasting state resources — a statewide special election would cost significant funds — and for bucking the agreement that empowered the state's independent redistricting panel in the first place. 'California should lead the way — when other states decide to do something else, we shouldn't react to them, we should prove by example that we can do this better. That we create the foundations for the rest of the nation,' said state Assemblyman David Tangipa, a Republican from the Fresno area, said. Steve Bennett, a Democratic state legislator from Ventura, lashed out at Texas Republicans' mid-decade redistricting by comparing it to power grabs by 'autocrats' like Russian President Vladimir Putin. "We prefer the agreement we all had to play by the old rules," he said. "But when autocrats change the rules and the norms that we are using to decide who has power, we can either fight back or we can potentially permanently lose the ability ever to fight back again." Democrats need to get the maps passed through the legislature soon in order to bring the question to the voters this fall, if they want to enact the maps in time for the 2026 midterms. Republicans are seeking to delay that, with a group of lawmakers suing this week, arguing that Democrats haven't given the public the required time to review legislation before voting. Other states weigh jumping into the fray While the spotlight remains on California and Texas, redistricting remains a live ball in other states. Ohio must redraw its lines by law, since the state legislature approved its 2021 map without Democratic support. The timing could work out well for Republicans, who control the legislature there and could stand to gain depending on how the maps are drawn. Two of Ohio's three Democratic House members won re-election last cycle by less than 3 percentage points. In Indiana, the state's Republican members of Congress have in recent days announced their support for a redraw there, where the party already controls seven of the nine congressional seats. Indiana Gov. Mike Braun, a Republican, hasn't said whether he plans to call for a special session of the legislature. But Vice President JD Vance traveled to Indiana earlier this month to meet with the governor as the redistricting debate swirled. In Missouri, Republicans have been cajoling Gov. Mike Kehoe to call a special legislative session for redistricting there, where the GOP controls six of the eight congressional seats. In Florida, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis said this week that people can 'anticipate' a mid-decade redraw because there has been a 'sea change in demography' since the 2020 census. Outside of California, where their efforts are subject to approval from voters, Democrats face a smattering of other challenges if they want to redraw maps in other states. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who has been vocally supportive of the Texas House Democrats' attempts to delay the redistricting process in their home state, hasn't ruled out a redistricting push in his backyard. But Democrats already hold 14 of the state's 17 congressional districts there. New York Democrats are also interested in redrawing the lines there, but they face logistical hurdles to change the state constitution, which would likely mean no changes until 2028 at the earliest.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Texas House approves redistricting map favoring Republicans
The Texas House gave initial approval to a new congressional map Wednesday that will likely give Republicans five more seats in a closely divided U.S. House. Why it matters: The redistricting would go a long way to ensuring the U.S. House remains in Republican control — even as it sets in motion a wave of gerrymandering in other states. Catch up quick: Heavily outnumbered Texas House Democrats briefly held up the redistricting plan as they left for other states, depriving the chamber of the quorum necessary for a vote. But they returned Monday for a new special session, saying they would now challenge the redistricting in the courts. By the numbers: The 38-member Texas congressional delegation is currently composed of 12 Democrats and 25 Republicans. One seat is vacant, following the death earlier this year of Democratic Rep. Sylvester Turner of Houston. Under the new map, prompted by a demand from President Trump, Texas would likely send 30 Republicans and eight Democrats to Washington. What they're saying: "You want transparency? ... The underlying goal of this redistricting is to improve Republican political performance," bill author state Rep. Todd Hunter (R-Corpus Christi) said on Wednesday. The other side: The proposal amounts to "an illegal and racially discriminatory map" that "surgically ... strips away minority representation in the U.S. Congress," state Rep. Chris Turner (D-Grand Prairie) said. "This is Texas, not Washington, D.C. The impulses of outside politicians and their billionaire backers shouldn't dictate what we do in this House," he said.
