AI killed the Easter Bunny
On the grounds of advancing age, I had decided to ignore all the chatter about artificial intelligence and devote my remaining time to things I could properly understand. Then I discovered that one of my own copyrighted properties, the fruit of a year's work, had been scraped into the AI maw without so much as a by-your-leave, and it became personal.
I wrote to my MP who responded with template blandishments. This government… committed to blah blah… exciting prospects… safeguarding… potential opt-out system… a close watch, yadda yadda…
Feeling impotent and no further forward, I returned to my knitting. It took the murder of the Easter Bunny to rouse me from the torpor of denial. My six-year-old grandson, hanging out with friends who knew how to question Google AI, had been informed there is no rabbit who brings chocolate eggs. It's just your parents, dumbo. They buy the eggs from the supermarket and hide them in the garden. In that moment of brutal AI revelation, I fear Father Christmas also received his P45. Likewise the Tooth Fairy. Whether this myth-busting applies to bogeymen and things that go bump in the night, I'm not sure.
I do know, without consulting Google, that the ethics of terrifying today's delicate children are no longer clear. Screen monsters are probably OK but the kind of flesh-and-blood horrors I was threatened with as a child – Flannel Foot the silent burglar, the Man with the Big Stick and, most sinister of all, the Ten O'Clock Horses, who came for you if you were still playing on the street after dark – are now likely considered too horrific for tender ears.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
6 hours ago
- Wales Online
Android users urged to update their phones 'immediately' for this reason
Android users urged to update their phones 'immediately' for this reason A new security update has been released and anyone with an Android phone is being encouraged to install the new software as soon as possible Those with Google Pixel phones will receive the latest security updates first (Image:) Android phone users are being urged to update their devices with the latest software following the release of Google's monthly security bulletin. This typically reaches Android users with Google Pixel phones first. In May, Google rolled out security enhancements that rectified a significant vulnerability that could have been exploited by hackers, potentially exposing phone owners to malicious attacks. Fortunately, this is not the case this month, but the advice remains to keep your phone updated with the most recent software. "Although the latest Android security bulletin does not list any vulnerabilities currently known to be under exploitation, we still strongly recommend that Android users update their devices immediately," stated Adam Boynton, EMEIA senior security strategy manager at security firm Jamf. "The majority of the fixes are within the Android framework, which provides the foundation for building Android applications and is therefore an attractive target for cybercriminals. Exploiting the most severe vulnerability could allow an attacker to gain elevated access and administrative rights." The terminology used to describe security updates can often be quite technical, just as the likelihood of you being targeted by cybercrime is relatively minimal. However, Android is updated monthly for a reason and anyone running older software versions is technically vulnerable to attack, reports the Express. Google releases these updates free to all Android manufacturers, enabling them to deliver these upgrades to their customers' smartphones. This includes giants such as Samsung, OnePlus, Sony, Xiaomi and Honor, allowing them to keep your device up-to-date, albeit with a delay for the recent models. Article continues below The update also affects Samsung Galaxy phone users (Image: Getty Images ) Android producers are improving at sustaining support for their devices over more extended periods too. Samsung, Google and Honor have committed to seven years of updates for several of their newest phones, although other brands still have some catching up to do. Those in possession of an ageing Android phone will have noticed they no longer receive regular security updates – a sign that it's time to switch to a more modern model. Adam said: "There are four vulnerabilities located within the Android system component, caused by improper input validation. CVE-2025-26453, CVE-2025-26445 and CVE-2025-26441 could allow a local application to gain access to sensitive information, while exploitation of CVE-2025-26443 could allow a local application to execute arbitrary code. "The release provides a window of opportunity to get ahead of cybercriminals; it appears that none of the vulnerabilities addressed in the June security bulletin have yet to be exploited in the wild, making this the perfect time to patch all supported devices." This month, Google says it is one step ahead of the cybercriminals, so updating your device will ensure you're protected. However, if you fail to do so, you could leave yourself vulnerable to future hacks. Article continues below Regularly updating your phone software is simply good tech hygiene. You should be able to configure your Android phone to download these updates automatically, but you can also manually check for system updates in your device's Settings app. If there isn't an update available yet, keep checking throughout the month. If none appears, it may indicate that your phone is no longer receiving these crucial free upgrades.
Reuters
11 hours ago
- Reuters
UK secures action from Amazon to tackle fake reviews
LONDON, June 6 (Reuters) - Amazon (AMZN.O), opens new tab has committed to do more to tackle fake reviews, including sanctioning British businesses that boost their ratings through bogus posts, the country's competition watchdog said on Friday. Following a four-year probe, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said Amazon's undertakings also addressed its concerns about 'catalogue abuse' where sellers use the reviews of well-performing unrelated products to boost ratings and mislead customers. Companies that break the rules could be banned from selling on the e-commerce giant's platform altogether, while users who post fake reviews could be banned from posting reviews. Amazon also committed to robust processes to quickly detect and remove fake reviews and catalogue abuse, the CMA said. The regulator, which estimates that 90% of consumers use online reviews to inform purchases, began investigating Amazon and Google in 2021 over possible breaches of consumer protection law. It secured similar commitments from Google in January. "These new commitments matter and help set the standard," CMA boss Sarah Cardell said in a statement. The watchdog is conducting an initial sweep of review platforms following the release of new reviews guidance in April, seeking to identify platforms that may need to do more to comply with consumer law. Under its newly-granted powers, the CMA can independently decide whether consumer law has been infringed and take action in case of breaches, including issuing fines and ordering businesses to improve their practices.
Reuters
15 hours ago
- Reuters
Google fends off part of textbook publisher lawsuit over ads
June 5 (Reuters) - Google (GOOGL.O), opens new tab has convinced a Manhattan federal court to dismiss part of a lawsuit from a group of top educational publishers that accused the tech giant of unlawfully promoting pirated electronic versions of their textbooks. U.S. District Judge Jennifer Rochon said on Wednesday, opens new tab that Cengage Learning ( opens new tab, McGraw Hill, Macmillan Learning and Elsevier failed to support their allegations that Google committed vicarious copyright infringement or violated New York state law. The judge also found, however, that Google could not escape the publishers' trademark infringement claim at an early part of the case. Rochon also allowed a separate publisher claim for contributory copyright infringement to continue, which Google had not yet asked the court to dismiss. The publishers said in a statement on Thursday that they were pleased with the decision to allow some of their claims to move forward, and that dismissing their other claims "will not save Google from having to explain why a company with its resources decided to side with blatant piracy, rather than with creators and copyright holders." A Google spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday. The publishers sued Google last year, arguing that Google searches for their textbooks feature heavily discounted, pirated e-book versions at the top of the results and "drown out" results for the legitimate versions. They said Google ignored thousands of copyright infringement notices and profited from sales of pirated books. Google denied the allegations and said the e-books "are not sold through Google's platform and Google does not share in revenues from such sales." Rochon said in her ruling on Wednesday that the publishers' vicarious copyright infringement claim failed because Google could not control the pirate sellers' alleged misconduct. The judge also rejected Google's request to dismiss the publishers' trademark infringement claim, finding that the tech giant could be responsible for the pirate sellers' misuse of the publishers' trademarks. The case is Cengage Learning Inc v. Google LLC, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:24-cv-04274. For the publishers: Matt Oppenheim and Michele Murphy of Oppenheim + Zebrak For Google: Sy Damle, Alli Stillman, Joe Wetzel and Sarah Tomkowiak of Latham & Watkins Read more: Google sued by top textbook publishers over ads for pirated e-books
